Evaluation on the Sustainability of Urbanization Process Based on Biological Footprint Model

Evaluation on the Sustainability of Urbanization Process Based on Biological Footprint Model

Bingqing Yang Yue Liu 

School of Computer and Information Engineering, Fuyang Teachers College, Fuyang, China

Page: 
367-378
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V14-N4-367-378
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
1 October 2019
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

With the rapid development of science and technology and economy, the living standard of people has tended to be higher year by year, and the degree of urbanization in China has also became increasingly higher. But the extensive economic development mode has led to the problems such as environmental pollution, waste of resources and the expansion of population. Currently one of the problems faced by China is how to find a balance between human and nature and between ecology and economy to achieve sustainable development. In this study, the sustainability of urbanization in Anhui province was evaluated using the ecological footprint model. The ecological footprint model of 2011 was analyzed in details, and the ecological footprint models of 2004 ~ 2011 were compared. The ecological footprint per capita and ecological carrying capacity were on the rise from 2004 to 2011, but there was a deficit, which increased every year. It is concluded that the use of local ecological resources in Anhui province from 2004 to 2011 has exceeded the capacity of the local environment, causing damages to the ecosystem, and the local urbanization has been in an unsustainable state and the development structure of urbanization in Anhui province is unreasonable, resulting in an increased pressure on the ecological environment and a long-term unsustainable state.

Keywords: 

dynamic analysis, ecological footprint, sustainable development, urbanization

  References

[1] Teixidó-Figueras, J. & Duro, J.A., International ecological footprint inequality: A  methodological review and some results. Environmental & Resource Economics, 60(4), pp. 607–631, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9784-x

[2] Galli, A., Giampietro, M., Goldfinger, S., Lazarus, E., Lin, D., Saltelli, A.,  Wackernagel, M. & Müller, F., Questioning the ecological footprint. Ecological  Indicators, 69, pp. 224–232, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014

[3] Salvo, G., Simas, M.S., Pacca, S.A., Guilhoto, J.J.M., Tomas, A.R.G. & Abramovay, R., Estimating the human appropriation of land in Brazil by means of an input–output economic model and ecological footprint analysis. Ecological Indicators, 53, pp. 78–94, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.027

[4] York, R., Rosa, E.A. & Dietz, T., A tale of contrasting trends: Three measures of the ecological footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961–2003.  Journal of World-Systems Research, 15(2), pp. 134–146, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5195/ jwsr.2009.319

[5] Gu, Q., Wang, H., Zheng, Y., Zhu, J. & Li, X., Ecological footprint analysis for urban agglomeration sustainability in the middle stream of the Yangtze River. Ecological Modelling, 318, pp. 86–99, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.022

[6] Liu, X., Jiang, D., Wang, Q., Liu, H., Li, J. & Fu, Z., Evaluating the sustainability of nature reserves using an ecological footprint method: a case study in China.  Sustainability, 8(12), p. 1272, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121272

[7] Chen, H.S., Evaluation and analysis of eco-security in environmentally sensitive areas using an emergy ecological footprint. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 14(2), p. 136, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020136

[8] Liu, H., Wang, X., Yang, J., Zhou, X. & Liu, Y., The ecological footprint evaluation of low carbon campuses based on life cycle assessment: A case study of Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 144, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.017

[9] Fu, W., Turner, J.C., Zhao, J. & Du, G., Ecological footprint (EF): An expanded role in calculating resource productivity (RP) using China and the G20 member countries as examples. Ecological Indicators, 48, pp. 464–471, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2014.09.023

[10] Mancini, M.S., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., Lin, D., Bastianoni, S., Wackernagel, M. &  Marchettini, N., Ecological footprint: Refining the carbon footprint calculation.  Ecological Indicators, 61, pp. 390–403, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2015.09.040

[11] Galli, A., On the rationale and policy usefulness of ecological footprint accounting: The case of Morocco. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, pp. 210–224, 2015. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.008

[12] Legg, R., Moore, J., kissinger, M. & Rees, W., A Greenhouse gas emissions inventory and ecological footprint, analysis of metro vancouver residents’ air travel. Environment and Pollution, 2(4), 2013. https://doi.org/10.5539/ep.v2n4p123

[13] Ciers, J., Mandic, A., Toth, L.D. & Veld G.O., Carbon footprint of academic air travel: a case study in Switzerland. Sustainability, 11(1), p. 80, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11010080

[14] Collins, A. & Cooper, C., Measuring and managing the environmental impact of festivals: the contribution of the ecological footprint. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(1), pp. 148–162, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1189922

[15] Qian, Y., Tang, L., Qiu, Q., Xu, T. & Liao, J., A comparative analysis on assessment of land carrying capacity with ecological footprint analysis and index system method. Plos One, 10(6), p. e0130315, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130315

[16] Anhui Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, 2012.

[17] China Energy Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, 2012.