The Role of Utility Companies in Municipal Planning of Smart Energy Communities

The Role of Utility Companies in Municipal Planning of Smart Energy Communities

Brita Fladvad Nielsen Eirik Resch Inger Andresen 

Department of Architecture and Planning, NTNU, Norway

| |
| | Citation



Bergen and Oslo municipalities focus on integrating energy concerns into city planning and regard this as an opportunity to further lower greenhouse gas emissions. Due to a lack of tools and clear definitions of what Smart Energy Communities (SECs) are and how planning should be done in order to affect the overarching emission reduction goals, utility companies end up taking a leading role as advisors and influence definitions and strategies in the final design. Based on two case studies of SEC projects in Norway, the authors highlight the need for increased work to create feasible and understandable definitions and strategies for the planning of SECs. In our case studies, city planners struggle to include energy aspects in the early planning phase and to align their objectives of citizen well-being and reduced private car dependency with energy concerns. At the same time, utility companies respond to the perceived threat of more self-sufficient communities by depicting a role closer to the end-user and by offering a pragmatic cost/benefit view on the planning of energy supply options.


Energy planning, Integrated energy planning, Smart Energy Communities, Sustainable urban planning, Zero Emission Neighbourhoods


[1] Pan, W., System boundaries of zero carbon buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, pp. 424–434, 2017.

[2] Kristjansdottir, T.F., Heeren, N., Andresen, I. & Brattebø, H., Comparative emission analysis of low-energy and zero-emission buildings. Building Research & Information, 1–16, 2017.

[3] Lindberg, K.B., Doorman, G., Fischer, D., Korpås, M., Ånestad, A. & Sartori, I., Methodology for optimal energy system design of Zero Energy Buildings using mixedinteger linear programming. Energy and Buildings, 127, pp. 194–205, 2016.


[5] Climate CoOAf. Climate and Energy Strategy for Oslo; Adopted by the City Council in Oslo 22.06.2016 (Proposition 195/16). 2016.

[6] Graabak, I., Bakken, B.H. & Feilberg, N., Zero emission building and conversion factors between electricity consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases in a long term perspective. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 13(1), pp. 12–19, 2014.

[7] Sartori, I., Dokka, T. & Andresen, I., Proposal of a Norwegian ZEB definition: assessing the implications for design. Journal of Green Building, 6(3), pp. 133–150, 2011.

[8] Bulkeley, H. & Betsill, M., Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the’urban’politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), pp. 42–63, 2005.

[9] Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L.J., Quinlan, A.E., Peterson, G.D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., Porter, L. & Davoudi, S., Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end?“Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note: edited by Simin Davoudi and Libby Porter. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), pp. 299–333, 2012.

[10] Henry, C., Matheu, M. & Jeunemaitre, A., Regulation of network utilities: the European experience, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2001.

[11] Newberry, D.M., Privatization, restructuring, and regulation of network utilities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.

[12] Monstadt, J., Urban governance and the transition of energy systems: Institutional change and shifting energy and climate policies in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), pp. 326–343, 2007.

[13] Serrallés, R.J., Electric energy restructuring in the European Union: integration, subsidiarity and the challenge of harmonization. Energy Policy, 34(16), pp. 2542–2551, 2006.

[14] Eising, R., Policy learning in embedded negotiations: explaining EU electricity liberalization. International Organization, 56(1), pp. 85–120, 2002.

[15] Marius Lorentzen LS, Ertesvåg F. Rett til slaktebenken: Oslo kommune vil kjøpe tilbake og dele opp Hafslund. e24no. 2017 26.04.2017.

[16] Mirakyan, A. & De Guio, R., Integrated energy planning in cities and territories: a review of methods and tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, pp. 289–297, 2013.

[17] Bagnoli, A., Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), pp. 547–570, 2009.

[18] Crilly, N., Blackwell, A.F. & Clarkson, P.J., Graphic elicitation: using research diagrams as interview stimuli. Qualitative Research, 6(3), pp. 341–366, 2006.

[19] Biernacki, P. & Waldorf, D., Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), pp. 141–163, 1981.

[20] Gabillet, P., Energy supply and urban planning projects: Analysing tensions around district heating provision in a French eco-district. Energy Policy, 78, pp. 189–197, 2015.

[21] Guy, S. & Marvin, S., Understanding sustainable cities: competing urban futures. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(3), pp. 268–275, 1999.