Relative Position of the Size of Sediments in The Cross-Shore Profile

Relative Position of the Size of Sediments in The Cross-Shore Profile

I. López L. Aragonés M. López A. Palazón Gómez-Martín 

Department of Civil Engineering, Alicante University, Spain

Department of Civil Engineering, Catholic University of Murcia, Spain

Department of Transportation, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain

Page: 
1215-1222
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N7-1215-1222
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Most of the beaches in the world have serious erosion problems. To solve this problem, there are different methods of beach nourishment, which consist mainly of a feedback from the beach by pouring sand and with some protection element as dikes or breakwaters. The problem arises when selecting the optimal size of sediment for nourishment. The literature suggests that sediments with similar or higher sizes than those on the dry beach should be employed for nourishment. However, this does not ensure the stability of the future profile since, it is not known how the new material will be distributed on the seabed. In this work, the evolution of the sediment size of the seabed and its position relative to the coastline is studied, using sedimentological data of 1987 and 2006 in the southern part of the province of Valencia (Spain) using a GIS system. Thus, it was observed that: i) the sediment sizes smaller than 0.063 mm are placed beyond the depth of closure (DoC), ii) sizes 0.180–0.125 sediment are located between the shoreline and the DoC, iii) while the sizes of 0.250 are located mainly near the coastline. Therefore, when performing beach nourishment on this area, a material between 0.250 and 0.180 mm should be used, which will ensure the stability of the profile and the sand will not cross the DoC, which would mean the loss permanently.

Keywords: 

beach nourishment, median sediment size, sediment distribution

  References

[1] Ng, K., Phillips, M.R, Borges, P., Thomas, T., August, P., Calado, H. & Veloso-Gomes, H., Maintaining a way of life for São Miguel Island (the Azores archipelago, Portugal): An assessment of coastal processes and protection. Science of the Total Environment, 481, pp. 142–156, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.067

[2] Hamm, L., Capobianco, M., Dette, H., Lechuga, A., Spanhoff, R. & Stive, M., A summary of European experience with shore nourishment. Coastal Engineering, 47(2), pp. 237–264, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(02)00127-8

[3] BEACHMED, INTERREG III – MEDOCC – BEACHMED. European Project. Strategic management of beach protection for sustainable development of Mediterranean coastal zones.: Eurpean Union. Universidad Pilitécnica de Valencia, p. 553, 2003.

[4] Bascom, W.N., The relationship between sand size and beach-face slope. American Geophysical Union Transactions, 32(6), pp. 886–874, 1959.

[5] Single, M. & Hemmingsen, M., Mixed sand and gravel barrier beaches of South Canterbury, New Zealand. In Ecology and Geomorphology of Coastal Shingle, eds J.R. Packman, R.E. Randall, R.S.K. Barnes & A. Neal, Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing: Otley, England, pp. 261–276, 2001.

[6] Hobson, R.D., Review of Design Elements for Beach-Fill Evaluation, DTIC Document, 1977.

[7] Stauble, D., Hansen, M. & Blake, W., An assessment of beach nourishment sediment characteristics. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(19), 1984.

[8] Horn, D.P. & Walton S.M., Spatial and temporal variations of sediment size on a mixed sand and gravel beach. Sedimentary Geology, 202(3), pp. 509–528, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.023

[9] McLaren, P., An interpretation of trends in grain size measures. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 51(2), 1981.

[10] McLaren, P. & Bowles D., The effects of sediment transport on grain-size distributions. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 55(4), 1985.

[11] Stauble, D.K. & Cialone, M.A., Ebb shoal evolution and sediment management techniques Ocean City Inlet, Maryland. Proceedings 9th National Conference on Beach Nourishment. pp. 209–224, 1996.

[12] Ecolevante, Estudio ecocartográfico de las provincias de Valencia y Alicante, D.G.d. Costas, (ed) Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 2006.

[13] MOPU, Estudio Geofísico Marino entre el Puerto de Denia y el Puerto de Valencia, Programa de Planeamiento de Actuaciones en la costa. Dirección General de Costas (España), 1987.

[14] Aragonés, L., Pagán, J.I, López, M.P. & García-Barba, J., The impacts of Segura River (Spain) channelization on the coastal seabed. Science of the Total Environment, 543 (Part A), pp. 493–504, 2016.

[15] Guillén, J. & Hoekstra, P., Sediment distribution in the nearshore zone: grain size evolution in response to shoreface nourishment (Island of Terschelling, The Netherlands). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 45(5), pp. 639–652, 1997.

https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1996.0218