Smart Growth Through Joint Highway Air Rights and Transit- Oriented Development

Smart Growth Through Joint Highway Air Rights and Transit- Oriented Development

Andreas L. Savvides 

Department of Architecture, University of Cyprus

Page: 
1142-1154
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N7-1142-1154
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
1 October 2017
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

As part of a broader smart growth strategy transportation nodes, from their initial inception, have been organizing forces in a city’s master-planning process. This role has become more important with time and with the addition of modes of transportation, such as buses and trams, which are being co-housed in these structures. At the same time, driving and the use of highways have been a fact of life for many people who live in circumstances that demand car travel. Major highways and mass transit links generally do a good job of connecting primary destinations. It is the connections from primary destinations to networks of local streets and bus routes that can be problematic. At the community level, local governments concerned with the smart growth and fiscal potential of their communities are beginning to establish development policies to promote connectivity. At the project level, urban designers and developers are increasingly asked to establish good connectivity to adjacent properties as well as within their developments. In these efforts, local governments provide further incentives for new development to locate near transit lines and stations, with design guidelines for projects aimed at improving access to transit and all the integrated or adjacent amenities. This paper attempts to discern the qualitative aspects with regards to the urban design strategies employed and also to present socioeconomic indicators that support financial viability of this kind of development model through the utilization of case studies in Boston, MA and Seattle, WA, citing projects that were completed in the mid to the late 1980s (completed before the recessions of 1989–1992 and 1999–2001) as well as examining and comparing the effect of these developments on socioeconomic indicators in the decades before, during and after project completion.

Keywords: 

highway air rights, right-of-way bridging, smart growth, transit-oriented development, urban fabric re-stitching

  References

[1] Cervero, R. & Day, J., Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China. Transport Policy, 15(5), pp. 315–323, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.011

[2] Newman, P. & Kenworthy, J., Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis, 2(1), pp. 35–52, 2006.

[3] Jacobson, J. & Forsyth, A., Seven American TODs: good practices for urban design in transit oriented development projects. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1(2), pp. 51–88, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v1i2.67

[4] Ratnera, K. & Goetzb, A., The reshaping of land use and urban form in Denver through transit-oriented development. Cities, 30, pp. 31–46, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.007

[5] Urban Land Institute and PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Emerging Trends in Real Estate, ULI & PWC: Washington, DC, 2005.

[6] Surface Transportation Policy Project – Centre for Neighbourhood Technology. Driven to Spend, STPP: Washington, DC, 2000.

[7] Cervero, R., Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experience, Challenges and Prospects. TCRP Report 102, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, 2004.

[8] Smith, J.J. & Gihring, T.A. Financing Transit Systems Through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography, Geonomy Society: Portland, OR, 2003.

[9] Voith, R., The downtown parking syndrome: does curing the illness kill the patient? Business Review, 1, pp. 3–14, 1998.

[10] Newman, P. & Kenworthy, J., Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence, Island Press: Washington, DC, 1999.

[11] Holtzclaw, J., Does A Mile In A Car Equal A Mile On A Train? Exploring Public Transit’s Effectiveness in Reducing Driving? The Sierra Club: San Francisco, CA, 2000.

[12] Renne, J.L., Wells, J.S. & Voorhees, A.M., Transit-oriented development: developing a strategy to measure success. Research Results Digest, no. 294, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2005.

[13] Reconnecting America, Center for Transport Oriented Development, available at www.reconnectingamerica.org/html/TOD.

[14] Schlossberg, M., Brown, N., Bossard, E.G. & Roemer, D., Using Spatial Indicators for Pre- and Post-Development Analysis of TOD Areas: A Case Study of Portland and the Silicon Valley, Mineta Transportation Institute: San Jose, CA, 2004.

[15] Olaru, D., Smith, B. & Taplin, J., Residential location and transit-oriented development in a new rail corridor. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(3), pp. 219–237, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.12.007

[16] Button, K., Transport terminals, interchanges and economic development. In Transport and Urban Development, ed. D. Banister, E & FN Spon: London & New York, 1995. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451328_chapter_17

[17] Bernick, M. & Cervero, R., Transit Villages in the 21st Century, McGraw-Hill Companies: Columbus, OH, 1996.

[18] Bishop, Z., Transit-Oriented Development: Benefits and Studies, Virginia Ball Center for Creative Inquiry, 2015.

[19] Conservation Law Foundation, available at: www.clf.org/programs.

[20] Thorne, R, Filmer-Sankey, W. & Alexander, A., Transportation. In Sustainable Urban Design: An Environmental Approach, eds A. Ritchie & R. Thomas, Spon Press: London, 2003. 

[21] Ewing, R., Pedestrian- and Transit-Friendly Design: A Primer for Smart Growth, Smart Growth Network: Washington, DC, 1999.

[22] Fishman, R., The American City in the 21st Century. The Urban Land Institute, Washington DC, 2000.

[23] Savvides, A.L., Multi-modal transit hubs: enhancing sustainability through joint highway development, Proceedings from the 17th International Conference on Urban Transport and the Environment, 6-8 June 2011, Pisa, Italy. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 128, pp. 709–718, 2011.

[24] Thompson, N., Vaulting ambition: air rights buildings. Architect’s Journal, 193(26), pp. 47–48, 1991.

[25] Broadhurst, J.V., From highways to skyways and seaways – the intermodal challenge. Public Roads, 68(1), pp. 28–33, 2004.

[26] Jolliffe, M., Highway Air Rights Structures, Zaldastani Associates, Inc: Boston, MA, 1990.

[27] Jolliffe, M., Highway air rights construction adds New Land to Boston. Urban Land, 43(8), pp. 7–9, 1984.

[28] Dunphy, R., Developing Around Transit, The Urban Land Institute: Washington, DC, 2004.

[29] Strategic Development Study Committee. A Civic Vision for Turnpike Air Rights in Boston, BRA: Boston, MA, 2000.

[30] Parkhi, M., Transit Oriented Development: Environmental Planning and Design. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Environmental Design, University of Georgia, December 2014.

[31] Dunphy, R., Myerson, D. & Pawlukiewicz, M., Ten Principles for Successful Development Around Transit, The Urban Land Institute: Washington, DC, 2003.

[32] Dittmar, H. & Ohland, G. (eds), The New Transit town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development, Island Press, 2012.

[33] Leach, D.M., Context-Sensitive Solutions in Multi-modal Urban Corridor Planning: Arlington, Virginia’s Experience, Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, DC, 2005.