Urban Facilities Management: A Systemic Process for Achieving Urban Sustainability

Urban Facilities Management: A Systemic Process for Achieving Urban Sustainability

Luke Boyle Kathy Michell 

UCT-Nedbank Urban Real Estate Research Unit, Department of Construction Economics and Management, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Page: 
446-456
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-446-456
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

With cities at the forefront of the challenge of achieving global sustainability, a key concern for urban management bodies is to identify ways to promote sustainable development at the urban and suburban level. Assessment mechanisms have dominated this field for the past two decades, and sustainable community assessment tools (SCATs) are fast becoming the principal framework adopted by urban planners and developers to drive sustainability. This paper investigates the efficacy and applicability of this approach to urban sustainability. The study aims to establish that the deployment of a management platform, founded in the principles of facilities management (FM), can provide better mechanisms to facilitate the process of achieving urban sustainability. The data were collected by means of survey interviews with key stakeholders who consisted of two main categories: participants from private and public sector engaged in the management and development of sustainable cities. Secondly, developers of the tools were interviewed. The tools evaluated include: LEED for Neighbourhood Development (LEED-ND), BREEAM Communities (BREEAM-C), CASBEE for Urban Development (CASBEE- UD), and Green Star Communities (GSC). It was found that the prescriptive and outcomes-based nature of assessment tools do not adequately accommodate institutional and social imperatives of urban sustainability. Additionally, a need for more a robust procedural framework to manage relationships between the various relevant professionals and interest groups was highlighted. This would provide a unified method to facilitate the achievement of urban sustainability. The paper concludes that urban sustainability needs to draw upon the management principles of FM to facilitate more comprehensive development and assessment relevant to the needs of a specific locale. Without a process-oriented method such as this, cities will continue to fall short of their sustainable imperatives.

Keywords: 

process-oriented sustainability, sustainability assessment, sustainable community assessment tools, sustainable community development, urban facilities management, urban management, urban sustainability.

  References

[1] World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press: Oxford and New York, 1987.

[2] Metzger, J. & Olsson, A. (eds), Sustainable Stockholm: Exploring Urban Sustainability in Europe’s Greenest City, Routledge: New York, 2013.

[3] Bridger, J. & Luloff, A., Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development. Journal of Rural Studies, 15, pp. 377–387, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00076-X

[4] British Institute of Facilities Management Web site, available at http://www.bifm.org. uk/bifm/home

[5] Michell, K., Urban facilities management: a means to the attainment of sustainable cities? Journal of Facilities Management, 11(3), 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jfm.2013.30811caa.001

[6] Alberti, M. & Susskind, L., Managing urban sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Environmental Impact Assessment, 16, pp. 213–221, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00070-4

[7] Yanarealla, E. & Levine, R., Does sustainable development lead to sustainability? Futures, 24, pp. 759–774, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(92)90105-O

[8] McCool, S. & Stankey, G., Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management, 33(3), pp. 294–305, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0084-4

[9] UN, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision- Highlights, United Nations: New York, 2014.

[10] Alusi, A., Eccles, R., Edmondson, A. & Zuzul, T., Sustainable cities: Oxymoron or the shape of the future? Harvard Business School, Working Paper. 2011.

[11] Rees, W. & Wackernagel, M., Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable- and why they are key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment, 16, pp. 223–248, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4

[12] Xia, B., Chen, Q., Skitmore, M., Zuo, J. & Li, M., Comparison of sustainable community rating tools in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, pp. 1–8, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.016

[13] Berardi, U., Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems. Environmental Development and Sustainability, 15(6), pp. 1573–1591, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9462-0

[14] Sharifi, A. & Murayama, A., Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: crossevaluation of assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan. Building and Environment, 72, pp. 243–258, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.006

[15] Mehta, P., Local Agenda 21: practical experiences and emerging issues from the South. Environmental Impact Assessment, 16, pp. 309–320, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00029-7

[16] Brugmann, J., Planning for sustainability at the local government level. Environmental Impact Assessment, 16, pp. 363–379, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(97)81658-7

[17] von Bertalanffy, L., The history and status of general systems theory. The Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), pp. 407–426, 1972. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/255139

[18] Swilling, M. & Annecke, E., Just Transitions: Explorations of Sustainability in an Unfair World, UCT Press: Cape Town, 2012.

[19] Boulding, K., The World as a Total System. Beverly Hills, Sage: California, 1985.

[20] Hjorth, P. & Bagheri, A., Navigating towards sustainable development: a system dynamics approach. Futures, 38, pp. 74–92, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.04.005

[21] Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J. & Krause, T., Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), pp. 874–907, 1995.

[22] Kiel, D., Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity, Vol. 1, EOLSS: Texas, 2009.

[23] Buckley, W., Sociology and Modern Systems Theory, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

[24] Cilliers, P., Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems, Routledge: London, 1998.

[25] Wells, J., Complexity and Sustainability, New York: Routledge, 2013.

[26] Shriberg, M., Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), pp. 254–270, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14676370210434714

[27] Ameen, R.F., Mourshed, M. & Li, H., A critical review of environmental assessment tools for urban design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, pp. 110–125, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.07.006

[28] Dahl, A., Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, pp. 14–19, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032

[29] Innes, J. & Booher, D., Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(2), pp. 173–186, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649350020008378

[30] Moffatt, I. & Hanley, N., Modelling sustainable development: systems dynamic and input-output approaches. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16, pp. 545–557, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00024-X

[31] Sharifi, A. & Murayama, A., A critical review of seven selected neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, pp. 73–87, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006

[32] Komeily, A. & Srinivasam, R., A need for balanced approach to neighbourhood sustainability assessment: a critical review and analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 18, pp. 32–43, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.004

[33] Bagheri, A. & Hjorth, P., Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustainable Development, 15, pp. 83–96, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.310

[34] Sachs-Jeantet, C., Managing social transformation in cities: a challenge to social sciences, 1996. 

[35] Robinson, J. & Cole, R., Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Building Research & Information, 43(2), pp. 133–143, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.979082

[36] Drion, B., Melissen, F. & Wood, R., Facilities management: lost, or regained? Facilities, 30(5/6), pp. 254–261, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632771211208512