OPEN ACCESS
Streets represent the most common, extensive and thereby important element of public open space in cities. However, during the last four decades children have had decreasing presence in the streets; also, fewer streets are serving as unspecialised playgrounds for children. This paper attempts to describe and interpret this phenomenon from the point of view of spatial structure and morphology; it investigates the syntactic and morphological properties of streets that may have an impact on children’s choices. For surveying children’s preferences, empirical fieldwork has been carried out in Igoumenitsa, a small town in northwest Greece. The fieldwork is now expanding to Thessaloniki, the second largest city in Greece. For the analysis of the syntactic properties of street space, the research has applied ‘syntactic analysis of spatial configuration’ as introduced by Bill Hillier (UCL). For the analysis of the morphological properties of street space, the research introduces a methodology based on the form and meaning of the boundaries shaping the street space. The research outcome points that the syntactic and morphological properties of streets are critical factors controlling children’s choices.
children, city, patterns of use, public open spaces
[1] Matthews, H., Limb, M. & Taylor, M., The street as third space. Children’s Geographies: Playing, Living, Learning, eds. S.L. Holloway & G. Valentine, Routledge: London, 2000.
[2] Valentine, G. & Mckendrick, J., Children’s outdoor play: exploring parental concerns about children’s safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum, 28(2), pp. 219–235, 1997.
[3] Matthews, H., Limb, M. & Taylor, M., Reclaiming the streets: the discourse of curfew. Environment and Planning A, 31(10), pp. 1713–1730, 1999.
[4] Morrow, V., Regenerating children’s neighborhoods: what do children want? Children in the City: Home, Neighborhood and Community, eds. P. Christensen & M. O’Brien, Routledge/ Falmer: London, 2003.
[5] O’brien,M.,Neighborhoodqualityinchildren’seyes.ChildrenintheCity:Home,Neighborhood and Community, eds. P. Christensen & M. O’Brien, Routledge/Falmer: London, 2003.
[6] Hillman, M., Adams, J. & Whitelegg, J., One False Move: A Study of Children’s Independent Mobility, Policy Studies Institute: London, 1990.
[7] Hillman, M., Children. Transport and the Quality of Life, Policy Studies Institute: London, 1993.
[8] Tranter,P.,Children’sindependentmobilityandurbanforminAustralasian,EnglishandGerman cities. World Transport Research: Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Transport Research, eds. D. Hensher, J. King & T. Oum, Vol. 3, Transport Policy, pp. 31–44, 1996.
[9] Jacobs, J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Pelican Books: London, 1961 (1992 publication used).
[10] Matthews,H.,Thestreetasaliminalspace:thebarbedspacesofchildhood. ChildrenintheCity: Home, Neighborhood and Community, eds. P. Christensen & M. O’Brien, Routledge/Falmer: London, 2003.
[11] Moore, R., Childhood’s Domain. Play and Place in Child Development, Croom Helm: London, 1986.
[12] Moore, R., Streets as playgrounds. Public Streets for Public Use, ed. A.V. Moudon, Columbia University Press: New York, 1991.
[13] Christensen, P., Place, space and knowledge: children in the village and the city. Children in the City: Home, Neighborhood and Community, eds. P. Christensen & M. O’Brien, Routledge/ Falmer: London, 2003.
[14] Tranter, P. & Doyle, J., Reclaiming the residential street as play space. International Play Journal, 4, pp. 91–97, 1996, http://www.ecoplan.org/children/general/tranter.htm.
[15] Thomson, J. & Philo, C., Playful spaces? a social geography of children’s play in Livingston, Scotland. Children’s Geographies, 2(1), pp. 111–130, 2004.
[16] Krier, R., Urban Space, London Academy Editions, 1979.
[17] Schumacher, T., Buildings and streets: notes on configuration and use. On Streets, ed. S. Anderson, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1978 (1991 publication used).
[18] Anderson, S., Studies toward an ecological model of the urban environment. On Streets, ed. S. Anderson, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1978 (1991 publication used).
[19] Caliandro, V., Street form and use. On Streets, ed. S. Anderson, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1978 (1991 publication used).
[20] Hillier, B., The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986.
[21] Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis J. & Penn, A., Creating life: or, does architecture determine anything? Architectural Behaviour, 3(3), pp. 233–250, 1987.
[22] Hillier, B., Space is the Machine, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1996.
[23] Whyte, W.H., The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, The conservation Foundation: NewYork, 1980.
[24] Hillier,B.,Penn,A.,Hanson,J.,Grajewski,T.&XuJ.,NaturalMovement:or,configurationand attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, pp. 29–66, 1993.
[25] Gospodini, A., Type and function in the urban square: a case study of London, PhD Thesis, University College of London, UK, 1988.
[26] Gospodini, A., Urban waterfront redevelopment in Greek cities; a framework for redesigning space, Cities, 18(5), pp. 285–296, 2001.
[27] Rapoport, A., Pedestrian street use: culture and perception. Public Streets for Public Use, ed. A.V. Moudon, Columbia University Press: New York, 1991.