Characteristics of Tourism Development in Mountainous Regions Using Categorical Regression: the Case of Metsovo (Greece)

Characteristics of Tourism Development in Mountainous Regions Using Categorical Regression: the Case of Metsovo (Greece)

K. Soutsas G. Tsantopoulos  G. Arabatzis  O. Christopoulou 

Department of Forestry, Technological Educational Institute of Larissa, Greece

Department of Forestry & Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Greece

3 March 2006
| Citation



Leisure and tourism activities conceived as part of the developmental process of particular areas or regions can contribute to their economic growth to varying degrees of intensity so that they can be attainable and/or desirable. The exploitation of national resources is of great economic value in promoting tourism development in the provincial and underdeveloped areas of Greece. An evaluation of the factors that contribute to the growth of tourism in these regions would be useful in decision making and planning as far as their development is concerned. Such an interesting region from a tourism perspective, with many individual characteristics is the region of Metsovo, which belongs to Epirus, one of the poorest EU regions. However, Metsovo has recently presented a dynamic image since the region’s natural resources and rich cultural heritage (many Greek benefactors originated from here), along with its farming products with designation of origin, have created major prospects for the promotion of tourism. The present research was carried out using a structured questionnaire and cluster sampling involving visitors staying in local hotels. The collected data were elaborated using the SPSS v. 11.0 statistical program. Descriptive statistics and categorical regression were used to analyse the relevant data. The main conclusions have shown that the profile of visitors to Metsovo can be summarized using the following characteristics: relatively young, minimum secondary school graduates and belonging to the upper social classes ( judged by their profession). In addition, for more than half of the visitors the region of Metsovo is their permanent holiday location, primarily for relaxation purposes. The main problems that visitors face in the region of Metsovo relate to the lack of parking areas and cleanliness.Visitors with a higher level of education and/or income choose to visit Metsovo during public holidays or weekends; they also show a tendency to spend more money in comparison to the rest of the visitors. Finally, visitors who describe the surrounding countryside as nice or very nice are characterized by a higher professional and educational standing.


activities, categorical regression, development, Greece, Metsovo, mountainous areas, questionnaires, survey, socioeconomic characteristics, tourism.


[1] Christopoulou, O.G. & Papadopoulos I.I., Winter tourism, development of mountainous areas and the visitors’ attitudes on the landscape protection; the case of Pertouli ski-center. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 12(2), pp. 153–164, 2001.

[2] Martinos, N. & Karanikolas, P., Spatial differentiation in Greek agriculture. Greek Agriculture in View of 2010, ed. N. Maravegias, Papazisi: Athens, pp. 33–77, 1999.

[3] Kokkosis, C. & Tsartas, P., Sustainable Tourism Development and the Environment, Kritiki: Athens, pp. 21–35, 2001.

[4] Lagos, D., Growth of tourism in Greece and environmental protection. European Environmental Research (East-West Series in Economics, Business and the Environment), 1(1), pp. 105–111, 1998.

[5] Tsartas, P., Socioeconomic impacts of tourism on two Greek isles. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(3), pp. 516–533, 1992.

[6] Cater, E., Ecotourism in the third world: problems for sustainable tourism development. Tourism Management, 14, pp. 85–89, 1993.

[7] Wight, P., Ecotourism: ethics or eco-sell? Journal of Travel Research, 31, pp. 3–9, 1993.

[8] Driml, S. & Common, M., Ecological criteria for sustainable tourism: application to the Great Barrier Reef and Wet Tropics World Heritage Areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 4, pp. 3–16, 1996.

[9] Wallace, G.N. & Pierce, S.N., An evaluation of ecotourism in the Amazons, Brazil. Annals of Tourism Research, 23, pp. 843–873, 1996.

[10] Brown, K., Turner, R.K., Hameed, H. & Bateman, I., Environmental carrying capacity and tourism development in the Maldives and Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 24, pp. 316–325, 1997.

[11] Shackley, M., Tourism development and environmental protection in southern Sinai. Tourism Management, 20, pp. 543–548, 1999.

[12] Teye, V., Soenez, S. & Sira Kaya, E., Residents’ attitudes toward tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 29, pp. 668–688, 2002.

[13] Steele, P., Ecotourism: an economic analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 3(1), pp. 29–44, 1995.

[14] Hong, S., Kim, J. & Kim, S., Implications of potential green tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 30, pp. 323–341, 2003.

[15] Andriotis, K.,Alternative tourism and its differential characteristics. Topos, 20–21, pp. 139–154, 2003.

[16] NSSG, http://www., 26 June 2005.

[17] Siardos, K.G., Methodology of Agricultural Sociological Research, Ziti: Thessaloniki, pp. 92–94, 1997.

[18] Daoutopoulos, G., Social Research Methodology, 3rd edn, Zygos: Thessaloniki, pp. 111–135, 2002.

[19] Kalamatianou, A., Social Statistics, Methods of Unidimensional Analysis, Oikonomiko: Athens, pp. 672–682, 1997.

[20] Matis, K., Forest Sampling, 2nd edn, Democritus University of Thrace: Xanthi, pp. 190–196, 2001.

[21] Siardos, K.G., Multivariable Statistical Analysis with Exams Through the use of SPSS—Vol. 2: Study of Variables Dependence, Ziti: Thessaloniki, pp. 365–390, 2000.

[22] Goupos, C., Soutsas, K., Matsiori, S. & Tsantopoulos, G., Illegal land reclamation and the factors which influences them.Proc. of the 10th Hellenic Forest Association, Tripoli, pp. 359–366, 2002.

[23] Tsantopoulos, G., The application of categorical regression for the identification of factors that contribute to the growth of planned public relations. Special Themes. Institute of Technological Education. Ministry of Education and Religion, 4, pp. 59–73, 2003.

[24] Michailidis, A., Socioeconomic Evaluation of Large Infrastructure Projects: The Case of Petrenia Irrigation Dam, PhD thesis, Department of Agriculture, AUTh, Thessaloniki, pp. 149–192, 2004.

[25] Karameris, A., Mountain tourism in the framework of a networked socio-ecosystem. Geotechnical Scientifics Issues, 4, pp. 29–43, 1993.