From Sustainability to Superiority: Exploring the Impact of Green Metrics on Global University Rankings

From Sustainability to Superiority: Exploring the Impact of Green Metrics on Global University Rankings

Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum* Syahrul A. Haumahu Annisa Sila Puspita Mochamad Arief Budihardjo Natasya Ghinna Humaira

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50237, Indonesia

Environmental Sustainability Research Group (ENSI-RG), Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia

Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia

Corresponding Author Email: 
i.fajarini@mail.unnes.ac.id
Page: 
133-142
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200114
Received: 
17 January 2024
|
Revised: 
6 September 2024
|
Accepted: 
21 December 2024
|
Available online: 
24 January 2025
| Citation

© 2025 The authors. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Universities in worldwide dealing with changing landscape of expectations and duties in an era marked by serious environmental issues and a raised awareness of the need for sustainable practises. The paper digs into how green measurements have altered international rankings of universities and how sustainable practices have paved the way for academic excellence. This study reveals the complex interplay between sustainability initiatives and university rankings on a global scale by employing a combination of quantitative analysis of green metric data and qualitative insights obtained from extensive stakeholder consultation for to reveal the role of UI Green Metrics for global university rankings. Universities all across the world are beginning to include sustainability into their institutional culture thanks to green metrics like the University of Indonesia Green Metric World Ranking. Sustainable practices, academic innovation, student and staff involvement, and the enhancement of the university's reputation are all part of this sea change. Concurrently, this establishes universities as influential catalysts for transformation, advocates for sustainability-oriented education and research, and well-positioned to deliver significant contributions to the overarching international sustainability agenda. Central to this paradigm shift resides the Green Metric, an efficacious instrument designed to assess and quantify the dedication of universities to sustainability.

Keywords: 

green metric, sustainable, university, transformation

1. Introduction

University ranking systems were created in many nations around the world due to the demand for information about universities and the need to compare each university (e.g., Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US), but Global University Rankings (GURs) quickly replaced and are an essential tool for understanding a university's performance, productivity, and quality in relation to its position in these rankings [1]. In order to gauge university performance, GURs were introduced after 2003. Universities apply a variety of approaches to measure universities' Intellectual Capital (IC) and evaluate university administration using metrics related to intangible assets, such as organizational reputation or institutional prestige [2]. The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), also known as Shanghai Ranking's Academic Ranking (est. 2003), the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings (est. 2004), and the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings (est. 2010) are the most prevalent performance-based ranking systems for universities at the moment [3]. These GURs take into account a number of factors, such as productivity, citations, awards, reputation, etc., whereas others, such as Ranking Web of Universities or Webometrics (since 2004), Leiden and Scimago, exclusively take into account bibliometric indicators [4].

Higher education institutions' involvement in promoting environmental sustainability extends beyond research activities to include updating their curricula to include environmental and sustainability-related courses and making campus infrastructure more environmentally friendly. As a result of this shift, "green metrics," or assessments that gauge an institution's commitment to sustainability, have been incorporated into the standards used to determine worldwide university rankings. The relationship between sustainability and academic success is no longer just a theoretical idea; it now plays a crucial role in determining how well-known a university is on the global arena. Universities' involvement in addressing these issues has never been more crucial as societies battle the effects of climate change, resource depletion, and socioeconomic inequality. The relationship between sustainability and academic success is no longer just a theoretical idea; it plays a significant role in determining where a university stands internationally [5]. The role of universities in addressing society's problems with socioeconomic inequity, resource depletion, and the effects of climate change has never been more crucial. The question that follows is: to what extent do sustainability initiatives translate into academic excellence and international recognition, which becomes the purpose of this study.

Universities must help society overcome the major problems of the twenty-first century, including the escalating environmental and socioeconomic crises, global wage disparities, and political instability [5]. To do this, universities must incorporate the notion of sustainable development into present and future organizations, research, and education through educating professionals in the knowledge, competencies, and skills necessary to address ecological, social, and economic issues affecting entire societies. The administration of higher education institutions' environmental sustainability, however, exhibits a significant deficit when organized in accordance with the environmental management performance idea [6]. Due to all of these factors, universities are crucial in the adoption of policies for education that are focused on sustainable development. These policies must be set up in several dimensions and apply a holistic and integrative approach to all of the sectors that sustainability encompasses. The university's capacity to manage internal university processes (by learning from its peers) and its capacity to create the correct graduates and knowledge should both benefit from systematic engagement initiatives, it has been argued [7]. According to one study, the majority of the institutions that were looked at do not yet appear to be fully utilizing the relationship between economic effectiveness and socio-environmental efficiency [7]. This circumstance might hinder the spread of sustainability ideas in university governance.

Green policy implementation on campuses is frequently the first move higher education institutions take in the direction of the environment [8]. University primarily focused on indicators of energy efficiency, but in order to achieve overall long-term sustainability, priority must also be given to other factors including waste management, protecting and conserving water, transportation, and research [9]. Despite the fact that people have not received enough attention, campus green spaces can offer significant advantages to their users [10]. Because this heavily contributes to campus transportation, use energy and water, produce garbage, then universities have a substantial impact on greenhouse gas emissions. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) also demand that universities reach their SDG objectives by 2030.

On the basis of the University of Indonesia Green Metric indicators, this journal examines several facets of sustainability and examines the effects these indicators have on the university's standing, competitiveness, and ability to attract students and researchers [11]. Prior to this study, there was a scarcity of research examining the correlation between sustainability and rankings of global universities. Despite the fact that numerous universities have implemented sustainability initiatives, the global impact of green metrics on their rankings remains poorly understood. Combining qualitative and quantitative analysis, this study will address this deficiency by demonstrating how sustainability, as measured by green metrics, affects the global rankings of universities. Through the integration of quantitative data obtained from various ranking sources and qualitative insights provided by university stakeholders, this study aims to enhance comprehension regarding the correlation between sustainability initiatives and the international accomplishments of universities.

2. Methodology and Approach

In addition to reputable global university ranking systems, quantitative data will be gathered from the Green Metric World Ranking of Indonesian Universities. The significance of the relationship between the university's global classification and its performance on green metrics will be determined through the application of statistical analyses, including correlation and regression. A proportionate representation of various regions, institutional sizes, and transfer initiatives will be ensured through the purposive selection of the university sample. Ensuring adherence to ethical guidelines pertaining to safeguarding sensitive data and obtaining informed consent from participants throughout the entirety of the research process. Nevertheless, this study also recognizes possible constraints, including the accessibility of data and the influence of subjectivity in the compilation of quantitative data. This research method is depicted in Figure 1.

The primary objective of this study is to furnish a thorough comprehension of the influence that green metrics have on international university rankings and to persuade stakeholders in the higher education sector to adopt such metrics themselves. The findings are anticipated to offer policymakers, universities, and desirability advocates practical advice on how to effectively employ green metrics to bolster global recognition and desirability initiatives.

Figure 1. Methodological research

3. Result and Discussion

3.1 Sustainability and higher education

Higher education institutions' responsibilities now go beyond the bounds of traditional academic disciplines. Miller et al. [12] explain universities are forced to adapt and adopt a more expansive mission due to growing environmental concerns and a societal emphasis on sustainable practices, this transition involves an institution's courses, campus infrastructure, and general commitment to promoting environmental sustainability, this goes far beyond research activities. Through their research activities, universities make a substantial contribution to sustainability, researchers at each university are actively involved in researching and tackling a wide range of environmental issues, including biodiversity preservation, climate change mitigation, and sustainable urban development [13]. Universities also play a crucial role in preparing the next generation of professionals to address ecological, social, and economic problems on a global scale by providing them with the knowledge, skills, and competences.

Universities are taking concrete actions outside of the classroom to implement sustainable practices on their campuses, these efforts are visible in the green programs and policies that colleges have been putting in place. Universities frequently begin with energy efficiency indicators, such as retrofitting buildings with energy-efficient technologies, putting renewable energy options in place, and enhancing heating and cooling. These actions not only lessen their negative effects on the environment but also significantly lower costs for institutions. But campus sustainability goes much beyond energy conservation, also includes other crucial elements like waste management, water resource conservation, sustainable transportation, and encouraging green spaces on campuses.

3.2 Higher education challenge

While academic programs and campus initiatives at universities have helped to advance sustainability, there is still a serious lack in the efficient administration and management of environmental sustainability efforts. Sustainability initiatives frequently lack coordination between different departments and universities and are scattered, due to this fragmentation, efforts may be duplicated, resources may be allocated inefficiently, and opportunities for synergistic collaboration may be lost. Purcell et al. [14] explain universities also commonly struggle to integrate their sustainability goals with more general institutional goals, depending on how sustainability is prioritized within a university's governance systems, sustainability efforts may be implemented inconsistently and in fragments.

Universities must create comprehensive sustainability policies that include all aspects of their operations in order to effectively solve the organizational challenge, such regulations ought to cover administrative procedures, purchasing tactics, and financial judgments in addition to academic institutions and campus infrastructure. A comprehensive framework for sustainability policy ties sustainability into the university's mission and vision and aligns it with long-term strategic objectives, including students, teachers, staff, and administrators in group initiatives to lessen the institution's environmental impact and advance responsible resource management, it develops a culture of sustainability.

3.3 Higher education initiatives

Due to their infrastructure, energy use, transportation needs, and trash production, universities as physical entities have a significant ecological footprint, many higher education institutions have started extensive campus green projects with the goal of decreasing their environmental effect and promoting a sustainability culture within their populations as aware of their responsibility as environmental stewards and pioneers in sustainability [15]. Improving energy efficiency and lowering energy use are essential components of campus sustainability projects, to do this universities are using a variety of initiatives, such as renovating buildings with energy-efficient technologies, putting in place smart lighting and HVAC systems, and enhancing energy management through data-driven methods [16].

Sustainable campus operations also include effective waste management techniques, to reduce the amount of waste transported to landfills, universities are adopting comprehensive waste reduction and recycling programs. This includes the creation of recycling facilities, initiatives to separate waste, and educational campaigns to promote ethical waste disposal among faculty and employees. Organic waste is being diverted more frequently for composting, which benefits soil improvement and sustainability objectives. Moreover, conserving water is essential, especially in areas where drought and water scarcity are common, universities are deploying low-flow plumbing fixtures, real-time data-driven irrigation systems, and water-efficient landscaping techniques. To lessen the pressure on potable water sources, greywater recycling and rainwater harvesting techniques are also being investigated. Promoting environmentally friendly mobility is essential for minimizing the negative environmental effects of university campuses, there are initiatives to increase access to public transit, extend bike-sharing systems, and encourage carpooling and ridesharing. To save pollution, several colleges are even switching entire fleets of cars over to hybrid or electric models.

Beyond aesthetics, campus green spaces have several advantages. For example, support biodiversity, offer recreational spaces for faculty and employees, and contribute to better air quality. The establishment and upkeep of green spaces, frequently combining native and drought-resistant plant species, is becoming more and more of a priority for universities. Many colleges are adopting sustainability reporting systems and rules to monitor progress and improve transparency, these reports give a thorough analysis of the institution's environmental, social, and economic performance while outlining its sustainability accomplishments, ambitions, and difficulties [16]. Universities are also creating departments or offices dedicated to sustainability that are in charge of directing and organizing campus sustainability initiatives.

Lastly, students benefit greatly from the educational possibilities that campus green projects offer, universities may build real-world learning environments where students can experience and interact with sustainable methods. This is done by integrating sustainability into the built environment, with the help of this experiential learning method, which supplements regular classroom instruction, students are given the knowledge and abilities to deal with sustainability concerns in the real world. For instance, campus green spaces are frequently employed as learning environments in sustainability-focused courses so that students can study plant biodiversity, ecosystems, and ecological restoration. Students studying engineering and architecture use energy-efficient building designs and renewable energy installations as case studies, programs for recycling and waste reduction provide information on sustainable waste management techniques. With the help of these experiences, students may advocate for sustainability and find solutions to problems in their future employment, initiatives to promote sustainability on campuses also inspire interdisciplinary research opportunities.

3.4 Sustainable development goals and higher developments goals

Higher education institutions are essential to accomplishing these challenging objectives by 2030, universities are incorporating these global goals into their strategic plans and mission statements in order to contribute to the SDGs in an effective manner [17, 18], this integration entails matching academic curricula to SDG-related subjects and promoting research that specifically addresses the objectives. Universities are also promoting responsible consumerism, resource conservation, and equitable behaviours by integrating sustainability ideas into their campus operations, SDGs are being advanced through research, which is spearheaded by universities [17, 18]. In topics including renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, public health, and social justice, researchers are looking at novel solutions, policy and practice, assisting governments and organizations in making decisions based on the best available data in order to accomplish the SDGs. Interdisciplinary cooperation is a defining characteristic of SDG-focused research, researchers from several fields collaborate to handle complicated problems that call for interdisciplinary approaches [19]. These partnerships encourage innovation and creativity, hastening the realization of the SDGs.

Universities are dedicated to coordinating their operating procedures with the SDGs in order to set an example, this includes establishing sustainability goals for cutting back on energy use, waste, water use, and carbon emissions [20]. Universities are also making moral considerations about their purchasing practices, making sure that their supplier chains follow ethical, sustainable, and socially responsible guidelines [21]. Additionally, campus sustainability activities frequently go beyond the limits of the university, universities collaborate with the community to advance sustainable development and the SDGs' local implementation [22]. In order to jointly address global challenges, this outreach enhances collaborations between academics, government, civic society, and the commercial sector, universities actively contribute to a more sustainable and just society by incorporating the SDGs into their objectives, academic programs, research endeavors, and campus operations [23, 24]. This is in addition to training the next generation of leaders.

3.5 University of Indonesia green metric world ranking

Initiated by Universitas Indonesia, the UI Green Metric World Ranking is a trailblazing project that has greatly influenced the global conversation on sustainability in higher education. In response to the rising significance of sustainability in higher education, the UI Green Metric World Ranking was first created in 2010. In order to evaluate universities' efforts to be sustainable on a worldwide level, UI set out to develop a comprehensive and standardized assessment method. This was done in recognition of the importance that universities play in tackling global environmental concerns, the ranking's main objective is to motivate colleges to give sustainability top priority and to highlight their achievements to the whole community [25]. The rating gives colleges useful information about their strengths and areas for development by quantifying and evaluating sustainable actions [26]. Additionally, it acts as a forum for institutions dedicated to sustainability to collaborate and exchange best practices, University of Indonesia's dedication to sustainability goes beyond operational procedures to incorporate elements related to education and research. The inclusion of sustainability in its educational activities, research endeavours, and community involvement programs is in line with the organization's overarching objective of promoting knowledge and addressing societal issues in Indonesia and elsewhere.

The university's reputation and competitiveness have significantly improved as a result of the inclusion of sustainability in UI's fundamental values and strategic initiatives. High ranks in sustainability evaluations, particularly the UI Green Metric, have established UI as a pioneer in sustainability research and education, not only in Indonesia but also internationally. Table 1 outlines the categorization of the ranking system and its indicators, to reveal university sustainability. This designation also makes it easier to work with foreign partners, which promotes research initiatives, student exchanges, and knowledge exchange that further strengthen the competitiveness of UI on the world stage. The UI Green Metric assessment framework takes into account a number of sustainability-related factors, such as:

  1. Setting and Infrastructure (SI): Examining the university's dedication to environmentally friendly construction, transportation, and infrastructure.
  2. Energy and Climate Change (EC): Assessing efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, and the utilization of renewable energy sources.
  3. Waste Management: Examining initiatives to reduce waste, recycle, and employ ethical disposal methods.
  4. Evaluation of sustainable waste: management and water conservation strategies.
  5. Transportation: Assessing accessible and environmentally friendly transportation options.
  6. Education and Research: Recognizing initiatives to incorporate sustainability into educational initiatives and research endeavors. These standards offer a comprehensive assessment of a university's sustainability performance, going beyond operational procedures to take into account community involvement, research, and education.

Table 1 shows that there are 51 criteria and indicators in six key categories of the Green Metric. Each category has a total amount of impact and a number of points, which are assigned to each indicator in the category based on their importance. Six indications totaling 1500 points are found in the first category, titled "regulation and infrastructure," with a total score influence level of 15%. Ten indicators make up the energy and climate change category, which is the most significant of all assessments with a total score of 2100 and a level of influence of 21%. With a combined total of 1800 points, the categories of trash, transportation, education, and research are each assigned an 18 percent weighting. Each of these indicators is given the following numbers: 6, 8, and 11. In addition to 1000 points, the water category also had a total influence level of 10%, making it the least effective of the six categories. The water category consisted of five indicators.

Table 1. University of Indonesia Green Metric World University rankings system categorization and indicators

Categories

No.

Criteria and Indicator

Points

Setting and Infrastructure (15%)

SI 1

Ration open space to the total area

200

SI 2

Total area on campus covered in forest vegetation

100

SI 3

Total area on campus covered in planted vegetation

200

SI 4

Total Area for water absorption besides the forest and planted

100

SI 5

Total open space area divided by total campus population

200

SI 6

Percentage of university budget for sustainability within a year

200

SI 7

Percentage of operation and maintenance activities of building in one year period

100

SI 8

Campus facilities for disabled, special needs, and/or maternity care

100

SI 9

Security and safety facilities

100

SI 10

Health infrastructure facilities for students, academics, and administrative staff’s wellbeing

100

SI 11

Conservation: plant (flora), animal (fauna), and wildlife, genetic resources for food and agriculture secured in either medium or long-term conservation facilities

100

TOTAL

1500

Energy and Climate Change (21%)

EC 1

Energy efficient appliances usage

200

EC 2

Smart building implementation

300

EC 3

Renewable energy sources

300

EC 4

Total electricity usage divided by total campus’ population (kWh/person)

300

EC 5

Ration of renewable energy production divided by total energy use/year

200

EC 6

Elements of green building implementation as reflected in all construction and renovation policies

200

EC 7

Greenhouse gas emission reduction program

200

EC 8

Total carbon footprint divided by total campus population

200

EC 9

Number of the innovative program(s) in energy and climate change

100

EC 10

Impactful university program(s) on climate change

100

TOTAL

2100

Waste (18%)

WS 1

Recycling Program

300

WS 2

Program to reduce paper, plastic

300

WS 3

Organic waste treatment

300

WS 4

Inorganic waste treatment

300

WS 5

Toxic waste treatment

300

WS 6

Sewage Disposal

300

TOTAL

1800

Water (10%)

WR 1

Water conservation programs & implementation

200

WR 2

Water recycling program implementation

200

WR 3

Water efficient appliance usage

200

WR 4

Treated water consumption

200

WR 5

Water pollution control in the campus area

200

TOTAL

1000

Transportation (18%)

TR 1

The total number of vehicles (cars and motorcycles) divided by the total campus' population

200

TR 2

Shuttle services

300

TR 3

Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEV) policy on campus

200

TR 4

The total number of Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEV) divided by the total campus population

200

TR 5

The ratio of the ground parking area to the total campus' area

200

TR 6

Program to limit or decrease the parking area on campus for the last 3 years (from 2020 to 2023)

200

TR 7

Number of initiatives to decrease private vehicles on campus

200

TR 8

The pedestrian path on campus

300

TOTAL

1800

Education and Research (18%)

ED 1

Ratio of sustainability courses to total courses/subject

300

ED 2

Ratio of sustainability research funding to total research funding

200

ED 3

Number of scholarly publications on sustainability

200

ED 4

Number of events related to sustainability

200

ED 5

Number of student organizations related to sustainability

200

ED 6

University-run sustainability website

200

ED 7

Sustainability report

100

ED 8

Number of cultural activities on campus

100

ED 9

Number of university program(s) to improve teaching and learning

100

ED 10

Number of sustainability community services projects organized and/or involving students

100

ED 11

Number of sustainability-related startups

100

TOTAL

1800

The SDGs and the larger global agenda are aligned by the University of Indonesia's Green Metric World Ranking, an innovative assessment tool. These SDGs, which were endorsed by the UN in 2015, offer a thorough framework for solving the most urgent environmental, economic, and social concerns facing the globe. Through its categories and indicators, which emphasize the three key components of sustainable development—environmental, economic, and social factors—the Green Metric rating system demonstrates congruence with the SDGs. The synergies between Green Metric and SDGs categories are highlighted in a thorough analysis presented in Table 2, demonstrating how the ranking system helps advance the global sustainability agenda.

In order to improve sustainability knowledge, strategic planning, and operations, as well as to foster cross-sector dialogue about sustainability on campus and stimulate collaboration between HEIs, the Green Metric offers a tool for examining all aspects of university campuses, including education, research, campus operations, outreach, assessment, and reporting. Figure 2 demonstrates the flexibility of the Green Metric criterion and diversity indicator dimensions.

Table 2. Suitable indicator UI Green Metric with SDGs

UI Green Metric World University Rankings Categories

Suitable SDGs Goals to UI Green Metric

Setting and Infrastructure

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Goal 4: Quality education

Goal 13: Climate action

Goal 15: Life on land

Energy and Climate Change

Goal 7: Affordable and clean energy

Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Goal 13: Climate change

Waste

Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation

Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities

Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production

Water

Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation

Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production

Goal 14: Life below water

Goal 15: Life on land

Transportation

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Goal 10: Reduces inequalities

Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities

Goal 13: Climate action

Goal 15: Life on land

Education and Research

Goal 4: Quality education

Figure 2. Conformity UI Green Metric and indicator with dimension for university

Through placing a strong emphasis on sustainability across all of its evaluation areas, the Green Metric rating system demonstrates its compatibility with the SDGs, this connection emphasizes the ranking's dedication to tackling global issues and promoting a sustainable culture throughout higher education institutions [27]. The Green Metric rating actively supports the larger global effort to accomplish the SDGs by 2030 by pushing universities to prioritize sustainability in their infrastructure, operations, and instructional activities [28]. Green Metric categories are crucial for furthering the global sustainability agenda through higher education in addition to being in line with the SDGs. International acclaim for the UI Green Metric World Ranking as a preeminent assessment instrument for gauging sustainability in higher education. This is shown in Figure 3, where the number of universities and countries participating in Green Metric during 2010-2021. Participation in the ranking by universities from all around the world demonstrates their dedication to sustainability and their efforts to address environmental problems. High rankings in the UI Green Metric improve universities' standing and competitiveness internationally. By establishing universities as pioneers in sustainability teaching and research, universities draw top talent, philanthropic support, and collaborative relationships.

Figure 3. Number of universities and nations participating in the Green Metric during 2010-2022

Table 3 displays the findings from a study of the sustainability reports submitted by the participating universities. Sustainable actions taken by universities include cutting carbon emissions, installing charging stations for electric vehicles and bicycles, recycling, maintaining sustainable buildings, mowing grass for biodiversity, producing energy from renewable sources, creating natural parks, and promoting a healthy and environmentally friendly campus environment.

Unsurprisingly, the Green Metric UI has had an effect on rankings of universities worldwide. This ground-breaking metric has emerged as a significant catalyst for transformation within the realm of higher education. Its impact is not confined to the University of Indonesia campus; rather, it transcends national boundaries and motivates universities across the globe to adopt sustainability as a fundamental principle. With its comprehensive assessment framework, the Green Metric UI has incentivized academic institutions to systematically evaluate their environmental, economic, and social impact. Its assessment of academic initiatives, energy consumption, campus infrastructure, and refuse management, among other sustainability indicators, has compelled institutions to reconsider their sustainability strategies. Universities have been incentivized by the metric to harmonize their mission statements with sustainability objectives, resulting in a significant cultural transformation towards ecological accountability and ethical consciousness. Universities that achieve exceptional performance in these sustainability assessments are bestowed with global acclaim and bolstered standing. Consequently, such acknowledgment garners the interest of exceptional personnel, financial support for research, and beneficial collaborations. In addition to scholastic accomplishments, universities are presently assessed on the basis of their contributions towards the promotion of sustainability. In addition, universities have been encouraged to collaborate and share knowledge as a result of the Green Metric UI.

Table 3. Sustainability action in Green Metric UI

University

Action for Sustainability

References

Wageningen University and Research

Reducing carbon emissions; installing charging stations for electric vehicles and e-bikes; sorting garbage (more than 15 waste flows); constructing and operating sustainably; providing sustainably; catering sustainably; mowing for biodiversity; producing renewable energy; launching environmentally conscious businesses; creating a green and healthy campus; and so on.

[29]

Nottingham University

A total of roughly 40% of the university's carbon emissions are expected to be cut between 2010 and 2020. The institution lays forth a plan to reach zero net carbon emissions as soon as possible, hopefully by the year 2040.

[30]

Groningen University

The institution plans to reduce its carbon footprint by 30% by 2026 (compared to 2019) and become carbon neutral by 2035, according to its sustainability strategy. Applying a sustainable human resources policy, aim to create a dynamic and energetic organization that actively promotes sustainable behavior among its employees and students.

[31]

Nottingham Trent University

Energy consumption (14% of NTU's emissions outputs) is being addressed, but the institution is also looking at other sources of emissions, such as the supply chain, travel, and remote work. Between now and 2025, Nottingham Trent University wants to cut its carbon output by 24 percent, and between then and 2030, university cut it by 50 percent.

[32]

University of California, Davis

Over 60% of UC Davis's academic departments offer sustainability-related courses, making it one of the most comprehensive sustainability curricula in the country. The university has decreased its greenhouse gas emissions below their levels in 2000 and is striving toward carbon neutrality by the year 2025 according to its Climate Action Plan.

[33]

3.5.1 Recognition of sustainable practices

An important factor in determining how faculty, staff, and the general public view and recognise an institution's commitment to sustainability is how sustainable activities are recognized inside the university. Faculty and staff at a university's opinion of sustainable practices depends on their knowledge of and familiarity with sustainability programs, policies, and practices. The dedication of the institution to sustainability may be better understood by faculty and employees who are actively participating in sustainability-related activities, such as research, teaching, or administrative tasks. Additionally, might be essential in promoting sustainable practices both inside their departments and in the larger university community. Moreover public perception describes how members of the general public, including students, alumni, locals, and outside stakeholders, feel about a university's sustainability initiatives [34]. The reputation of the organization and its appeal to potential contributors, students, and business partners can both be improved by a favourable perception. Public perception can be influenced by effective outreach, events, and media coverage of sustainability projects.

Recognition is greatly aided through sustainability networks, which include alliances, consortia, and collaborations with other institutions, organizations, and government agencies. University members may showcase their sustainability successes, cooperate together on initiatives, and gain knowledge from their peers through these networks. Universities can raise awareness about their sustainable initiatives on a local, national, and worldwide scale by taking part in such networks. Universities are able to share best practices, learn from one another, and enhance their sustainability efforts through participation in such networks. Collective projects and activities undertaken through sustainability networks tend to have a greater impact than those undertaken separately. Universities may tackle difficult sustainability issues and be recognized for their contributions to larger sustainability goals if work with other institutions. Sustainability issues can be addressed by amplifying the voices of universities and their endeavors in lunette.

3.5.2 Higher education through UI Green Metric

Integrating green metrics into the fabric of higher education is causing a seismic shift in the field. Strategic planning in higher education now routinely incorporates green measures. Sustainability is becoming a central tenet of university philosophies, curricula, and operating procedures. This shift is a paradigm change toward solving environmental, economic, and societal problems via learning, investigation, and policymaking. For example, according to research from Meikle and Morris [35], colleges throughout the world have undergone significant changes in response to the pressing concerns of our day. The institution's commitment to sustainability as a central tenet of its mission is emblematic of this shift, sustainability has risen to prominence in university mission statements, where it serves as an overarching theme for all activities, from curriculum development to day-to-day operations. This shift in thinking represents a firm will to take on difficult ecological, economic, and social problems, via means of instruction, investigation, and policymaking. These institutions have been in the forefront of fostering a campus culture of sustainability by providing students with sustainability-focused academic programs that equip them to take on global challenges and by implementing green campus activities that lessen their ecological impact. At the same time, there has been a shift in the way professors teach, do research, and work together to apply their knowledge to problems of sustainability [36].

In the areas of environmental science, renewable energy, climate change mitigation, and sustainability studies, universities with a strong commitment to sustainability tend to perform exceptionally well in academic research. This dedication encourages creative thinking, draws in the best minds in the field, and ultimately produces game-changing findings. Studies that aim to improve understanding of how to achieve sustainability also provide solutions to some of the world's most pressing problems. When professors work together across departments, can be better able to attract research funding and build the university's reputation as a centre of innovative study. Next, incorporation of sustainability into curriculum design introduces novel ideas and methods.

The educational experience of students is improved when student participate in sustainability efforts to learn useful skills, gain leadership experience, and feel empowered. Institutional Prestige and Global Recognition, Institutional prestige can be boosted as well as student enrolment at universities that make sustainability a top priority. The UI Green Metric World Ranking, among others, helps to solidify the university's position as a pioneer in the field of sustainability studies. The academic excellence of the university benefits from this distinction by attracting top-tier staff, students, and research funds. One thing that can be proven is from journals published by various universities related to "sustainability". Figure 4, shows various universities in Indonesia that have published journals related to "sustainability". Institutions of higher education committed to sustainability recognize their role in addressing urgent global issues such as climate change, depletion of natural resources, and social inequality. Universities acknowledge their obligation to produce graduates who can contribute to the development of sustainable solutions.

Figure 4. Sustainability topic publication from university in Indonesia

Within the realm of international higher education, sustainability has emerged as a formidable force, impacting not only the values and principles of universities but also their reputation on a global scale. Central to this paradigm shift resides the Green Metric UI, an efficacious instrument designed to assess and quantify the dedication of universities to sustainability. University rankings are profoundly and extensively influenced by the Green Metric UI. In the pursuit of achieving global recognition and sustainable practices, universities across the globe have turned to this metric as a compass through the intricate landscape of societal engagement and environmental responsibility. With excellence being of the utmost importance and competition being intense in the realm of global rankings, the Green Metric UI functions as a distinctive feature. Academia that achieves excellence in this particular metric not only acquires a sense of honor but also improves standing. By securing partnerships, research funding, and exceptional personnel, universities strengthen their standing as frontrunners in sustainability education and research. As one progresses towards a more sustainable global environment, the Green Metric UI serves as evidence of the significant influence that sustainability-based metrics can exert on the realm of higher education.

4. Conclusion

The emergence of green metrics as a catalyst for change has compelled colleges to make sustainability a central focus of their institutional mission, pedagogy, and administration. The widespread acceptance of green metrics shows a cultural shift in which environmental, economic, and social sustainability are prioritized. In response, many educational institutions have taken on the role of change agents by tackling pressing international issues and encouraging a sustainable mindset in their student bodies, professors, and staff. The dynamic correlation between sustainability initiatives and global university rankings has been elucidated through the novel methodology of this study, which combines qualitative insights from a wide range of stakeholders with quantitative analysis of green metric data. An upward trend in global rankings is more probable for institutions that demonstrate a complete dedication to sustainability, as evidenced by their performance in green metrics. This cultural transformation stimulates increased participation from both students and faculty, drives advancements in the creation of innovative curricula, and accelerates endeavors to tackle urgent global issues. Concurrently, this establishes universities as pioneers in sustainability research and education, thereby making a substantial contribution to the worldwide sustainability agenda. The voyage from sustainability to superiority is not merely an academic endeavor, but rather a profound commitment to addressing the complex challenges facing humanity in the twenty-first century. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of environmental and social issues and the crucial role of higher education institutions in shaping a more sustainable future. As we navigate an era characterized by environmental crises, economic uncertainty, and social inequalities, the incorporation of sustainability into global university rankings demonstrates the importance of education in cultivating a sense of responsibility, ethical values, and innovative solutions. It reaffirms that sustainability is not a choice but a necessity, and it urges universities around the globe to continue their journey toward a more sustainable, equitable, and prosperous future for all. Within the realm of international higher education, sustainability has emerged as a formidable force, impacting not only the values and principles of universities but also their reputation on a global scale.

  References

[1] Wang, R.J., Shih, Y.H. (2023). What are universities pursuing? A review of the Quacquarelli Symonds World University rankings of Taiwanese universities (2021–2023). Frontiers in Education, 8: 1185817. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1185817

[2] Quintero-Quintero, W., Blanco-Ariza, A.B., Garzón-Castrillón, M.A. (2021). Intellectual capital: A review and bibliometric analysis. Publications, 9(4): 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9040046

[3] Szluka, P., Csajbók, E., Győrffy, B. (2023). Relationship between bibliometric indicators and university ranking positions. Scientific Reports, 13(1): 14193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35306-1

[4] Grácio, M.C.C., Delbianco, N.R., Rosas, F.S., Perianes-Rodríguez, A. (2023). Co-follower metric on academic-social media ResearchGate: Similarities between Derek de Solla Price Memorial Medal winners. Scientometrics, 128(10): 5545-5569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04793-4

[5] Nor-Aishah, H., Ahmad, N.H., Thurasamy, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia: The contingent role of entrepreneurial bricolage. Sustainability, 12(8): 3100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083100

[6] Anwar, N., Mahmood, N.H.N., Yusliza, M.Y., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J.N., Khalid, W. (2020). Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401

[7] Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161: 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284

[8] Wahyuningrum, I.F.S., Humaira, N.G., Budihardjo, M.A., Arumdani, I.S., Puspita, A.S., Annisa, A.N., Djajadikerta, H.G. (2023). Environmental sustainability disclosure in Asian countries: Bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 411: 137195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137195

[9] Hou, Y., Iqbal, W., Muhammad Shaikh, G., Iqbal, N., Ahmad Solangi, Y., Fatima, A. (2019). Measuring energy efficiency and environmental performance: A case of South Asia. Processes, 7(6): 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7060325

[10] Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M.J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41: 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005

[11] Galleli, B., Teles, N.E.B., dos Santos, J.A.R., Freitas-Martins, M.S., Junior, F.H. (2021). Sustainability university rankings: A comparative analysis of UI green metric and the times higher education world university rankings. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(2): 404-425. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2020-0475

[12] Miller, K., Cunningham, J., Lehmann, E. (2021). Extending the university mission and business model: Influences and implications. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5): 915-925. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896799

[13] Wahyuningrum, I.F.S., Chegenizadeh, A., Hajawiyah, A., Sriningsih, S., Utami, S., Budihardjo, M.A., Nikraz, H. (2023). Determinants of corporate water disclosure in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(14): 11107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411107

[14] Purcell, W.M., Henriksen, H., Spengler, J.D. (2019). Universities as the engine of transformational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals: “Living labs” for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8): 1343-1357. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0103

[15] Abubakar, I.R., Alshammari, M.S. (2023). Urban planning schemes for developing low-carbon cities in the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Habitat International, 138: 102881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102881

[16] Pamuła, A., Gontar, Z., Gontar, B., Fesenko, T. (2023). Latent dirichlet allocation in public procurement documents analysis for determining energy efficiency issues in construction works at polish universities. Energies, 16(12): 4596. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124596

[17] Guarini, E., Mori, E., Zuffada, E. (2022). Localizing the sustainable development goals: A managerial perspective. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(5): 583-601. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2021-0031

[18] Guthrie, J., Domingues, A.R., Manes-Rossi, F., Orelli, R.L. (2020). Integrated reporting and sustainable development goals in universities. In The Routledge Handbook of Integrated Reporting. London, UK, pp. 419-439. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279621-28

[19] Gudonienė, D., Paulauskaitė-Tarasevičienė, A., Daunorienė, A., Sukackė, V. (2021). A case study on emerging learning pathways in SDG-focused engineering studies through applying CBL. Sustainability, 13(15): 8495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158495

[20] Stukalo, N., Lytvyn, M. (2021). Towards sustainable development through higher education quality assurance. Education Sciences, 11(11): 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110664

[21] Wigmore-Álvarez, A., Ruiz-Lozano, M., Fernández-Fernández, J.L. (2020). Management of university social responsibility in business schools. An exploratory study. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(2): 100382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100382

[22] Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A.L., Eustachio, J.H.P.P. (2023). An overview of the engagement of higher education institutions in the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 386: 135694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135694

[23] Păunescu, C., Nikina-Ruohonen, A., Stukalina, Y. (2022). Fostering research with societal impact in higher education institutions: A review and conceptualization. Social Innovation in Higher Education, 8: 153-178.

[24] Van Le, H., Nguyen, C.H. (2023). Integration of sustainable development goals (SDGs) into institutional development strategy: Recommendations for Vietnamese universities. Vietnam Journal of Education, 7(3): 178-186. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2023.283

[25] Kayyali, M. (2023). The relationship between rankings and academic quality. International Journal of Management, Sciences, Innovation, and Technology IJMSIT, 4(3): 1-11. 

[26] Manso, M., Teotónio, I., Silva, C.M., Cruz, C.O. (2021). Green roof and green wall benefits and costs: A review of the quantitative evidence. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135: 110111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110111

[27] Caeiro, S., Sandoval Hamón, L.A., Martins, R., Bayas Aldaz, C.E. (2020). Sustainability assessment and benchmarking in higher education institutions—A critical reflection. Sustainability, 12(2): 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020543

[28] Aguirre, P., Villota, F.H., Mera, S. (2023). Sustainability in higher education in Ecuador-Universidad Técnica del Norte case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(5): 1136-1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0268

[29] WUR, W.U.a.R. (2025). Sustainability Report. https://www.wur.nl/en.htm.

[30] Nottingham, U.o. (2025). Sustainability Report. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk.

[31] Groningen, U. (2025). Sustainability Report https://www.rug.nl/masters/economics/?lang=en&gclid=Cj0KCQjwpompBhDZARIsAFD_Fp_TlGKBi4iy3vPgfPhwUXku6ZHywWT_3fRhki4SFDLI99zxFtdjbjYaAgv0EALw_wcB.

[32] NTU, N.T.U. (2025). Sustainability Report. https://www.ntu.ac.uk/study-and-courses/undergraduate/why-ntu?utm_campaign=IM-UGAwareness-Sept23&utm_medium=CPC&utm_source=Google&utm_content=Brand&utm_term=IM.

[33] University of California, D.U. (2025). Sustainability Report. https://www.ucdavis.edu.

[34] Rey-Garcia, M., Mato-Santiso, V. (2020). Enhancing the effects of university education for sustainable development on social sustainability: The role of social capital and real-world learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(7): 1451-1476. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2020-0063

[35] Meikle, P.A., Morris, L.R. (2022). University social responsibility: Challenging systemic racism in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder. Administrative Sciences, 12(1): 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010036

[36] Bratianu, C., Hadad, S., Bejinaru, R. (2020). Paradigm shift in business education: A competence-based approach. Sustainability, 12(4): 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041348