Nidaa Nuaman Mageed
| Riyadh Alsultani* | Abdul Wahhab N. Abbas
© 2024 The authors. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
The trend towards sustainable buildings and environmental development has become increasingly pivotal in contemporary architectural discourse, urban planning strategies, and city design frameworks. This research aims to clarify the concept and significance of sustainability in architectural practice by employing a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative case studies and quantitative analyses. Key objectives include identifying essential tools and methodologies for achieving sustainable built environments, analyzing aesthetic values in sustainable construction, and evaluating the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainable practices. The study highlights advanced technologies' transformative potential, such as energy-efficient materials and smart building systems, in enhancing sustainable architectural designs while maintaining aesthetic appeal. Through global and Arab case studies, the research illustrates successful integrations of sustainability principles with innovative technologies. Key findings indicate that using sustainable materials, advanced thermal insulation, natural ventilation strategies, and renewable energy sources significantly reduces the environmental impact of construction. Based on these findings, it is recommended to further integrate advanced technologies and sustainability principles into architectural education and practice to promote more sustainable and aesthetically pleasing built environments globally.
green building, eco-friendly construction, building energy efficiency, renewable materials, smart buildings, sustainable urban development
Sustainable architecture represents a contemporary trend aimed at establishing foundations rooted in aesthetic, architectural, and environmental values [1]. Its objective is to integrate architectural designs more closely with nature and the environment, thereby introducing a novel architectural and planning paradigm [2]. Adopting new technology and creative approaches in architecture and construction corresponds with environmental, economic, social, and technical goals, resulting in sustainable building designs [3]. This method aligns with natural resource availability, minimizes environmental effect, promotes occupant health and comfort, and reduces resource depletion and construction pollution [4].
When sustainability is incorporated into architectural designs, the process goes beyond mere invention and creativity; it becomes an expression of environmental stewardship via efficient resource usage and adherence to environmental standards [5]. This underscores the evolving role of architecture, emphasizing its responsibility not only to fulfill functional requirements but also to preserve planetary resources and achieve harmony between art and function, as well as between environment and technology. Architects must harness advanced technologies to meet environmental standards and ensure a sustainable quality of life for humanity [3].
The literature on sustainable architecture gives a comprehensive review of its key themes, highlighting the importance of integrating ecological building systems and sophisticated technology to reduce environmental effect [6]. According to studies, sustainable design must go beyond technical criteria such as site conditions, materials, and orientation and require a methodology that balances architecture with environmental, cultural, and technological considerations [7]. This holistic vision is consistent with the goal of meeting current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same [8]. However, a critical examination of the literature reveals that many discussions remain theoretical, with limited exploration of how these principles can be practically implemented in real-world architectural projects. Furthermore, while advances in materials science and architectural trends are noted [9], there is a lack of comprehensive analysis of how effectively these innovations can be applied to create environmentally conscious designs that provide optimal comfort for occupants. Despite the growing discourse on sustainable design, the literature reflects a continuing gap between the theoretical promotion of sustainability and its practical adoption. Many architects and designers, influenced by client preferences or personal convictions, still marginalize sustainability principles, prioritizing aesthetic or cost considerations [10]. While some studies address barriers to implementing sustainable practices, such as financial constraints or limited technological access, there is insufficient focus on strategies to overcome these obstacles. In addition, little attention is paid to the social and cultural dimensions of sustainability, particularly how public perceptions and client demands influence the integration of sustainable features into architecture. This gap underscores the need for more research that explores not only the technical and material aspects of sustainable architecture, but also the broader challenges that prevent its widespread adoption. The current study aims to address these gaps by proposing practical frameworks and solutions that encourage the seamless integration of sustainability into architectural practice.
The concept of sustainability in architecture introduces new design methods and techniques in response to economic challenges, facilitating the construction of new buildings using advanced methods to minimize environmental impact and promote safe urban environments [11]. Consequently, the adoption of sustainability concepts has given rise to the concept of Sustainable Development, encompassing interconnected social, environmental, and economic dimensions [11].
It is the duty of architects to create a future where sustainable and aesthetic values coexist, and sustainable architectural design principles raise awareness of aesthetic value as a component influencing user well-being [12]. Through energy efficiency, environmental protection, thorough construction planning, material selection, and continuous maintenance, it incorporates a holistic design strategy that encourages the development of architectural designs and cultivates sustainable communities [13].
Sustainability in building design emphasizes the importance of evaluating building performance post-occupancy and promoting the use of local construction materials to integrate design elements such as site orientation and building envelope effectively [14]. Key sustainability principles include material efficiency, resource reuse, recycling in construction processes, and fostering harmonious interaction between residents and natural resources [15]. These principles aim to strike a balance between human needs and environmental preservation within the construction industry [16].
The holistic concept of sustainable architecture encompasses social and economic dimensions, underlining its link to all aspects of life and rejecting cookie-cutter approaches and imported designs that disregard environmental context and unique architectural requirements [17]. In light of these considerations, this research aims to explore the architectural design process using advanced technologies and innovative techniques to achieve energy self-sufficiency and apply environmentally, economically, and socially beneficial values and concepts effectively and in balance with society [18]. This objective is pursued through the utilization of advanced technology and cutting-edge techniques.
Therefore, the research objectives are to underscore the significance of clarifying the role of advanced technologies and innovative techniques in sustainable design, enhancing sustainability and aesthetic values by balancing environmental, social, and economic imperatives within the architectural design process to achieve optimal architectural outcomes.
Sustainable design in architecture includes economic, environmental, social, and technical aspects. Its fundamental goal is to protect natural resources and the beauty of nature, in line with worldwide trends that address different elements of life [19]. Beyond just reducing consumption, sustainable architecture entails creative design and construction techniques that preserve environmental resources while solving economic and environmental concerns [20-22]. Sustainable design plays a crucial role in promoting innovation, technological advancement, and progress in building construction. By employing advanced techniques, sustainable design enhances building efficiency and contributes to the resilience of local communities. Moreover, it generates employment opportunities by leveraging local natural resources [23, 24].
By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, sustainable buildings enhance energy efficiency and mitigate energy consumption, thereby helping to combat climate change. Sustainable design conserves natural resources by optimizing their use, including raw materials, energy, and water [25]. Additionally, sustainable architectural design enhances the quality of life by creating healthy and comfortable indoor environments for occupants. This is achieved through considerations such as ventilation, lighting, and air quality management. Sustainable design also minimizes long-term building maintenance and operational costs through the adoption of energy-efficient technologies, water-saving measures, and sustainable materials [26].
Sustainable designs contribute to constructing buildings capable of adapting to climate change impacts, such as rising temperatures and altered precipitation patterns. These efforts encompass sustainable material choices, integration of green spaces, and effective waste management, ultimately reducing the environmental footprint of buildings [27].
3.1 Smart sustainable design with advanced technology
Smart technology enhances sustainable architectural design by improving functionality, aesthetics, and structural integrity. Sustainable architecture prioritizes the integration of aesthetic aspects with environmental preservation, achieving a balance between complex forms and their surroundings. Smart design is defined as a dynamic sensory adaptation that supports life within a system, promoting harmony between complex structures and the environment. Intelligence in design involves a hierarchical sequence of processes and skills to adapt to environmental conditions [28].
Using sustainable materials significantly reduces energy costs and preserves resources. Characteristics include transparency (e.g., glass facades for natural views), lightness (e.g., thin glass to protect from sunlight), and resistance (e.g., materials that reduce reflected sunlight). High-tech and smart techniques offer flexibility and transparency, often involving materials like metal and glass that enhance resistance, lightness, and speed of assembly and disassembly, improving indoor air quality and ventilation.
Sustainable architectural designs improve environmental quality, reduce pollution, and enhance green spaces, which absorb pollutants like carbon dioxide. Advanced water management technology treats and reuses water for irrigation, while waste recycling minimizes landfill contributions and utilizes recyclable resources, supporting creative reuse and reducing pollution and waste treatment costs [29]. These tools promote energy efficiency, resource conservation, and environmental protection, enhancing the quality of life for building occupants.
3.2 Aesthetic values in sustainable architectural design
Aesthetic values in sustainable architecture achieve a balance between artistic sensibility and environmental sustainability, incorporating social and economic aspects. These values enhance the appeal and functionality of sustainable buildings. Key aesthetic values include [30-32]:
Functional aesthetics: Sustainable buildings should be both beautiful and practical, efficiently using space to meet user needs.
Innovation and distinctive design: Utilizing cutting-edge technologies and materials to add aesthetic appeal and emphasize sustainability.
Harmony and balance in design: Creating a visually pleasing environment by balancing architectural and environmental elements.
Integration with surrounding environment: Seamlessly blending with natural surroundings using appropriate colors and materials.
These values improve the user experience, promote sustainability, and create visually appealing, functional spaces.
3.3 Architectural and structural design elements for buildings
Architectural design elements aim to balance temperatures, avoid heat gain, and control solar radiation, promoting air movement within indoor spaces [33]. Key factors include:
Building shape: Influences internal solar radiation and air temperature, minimizing climatic impact.
Orientation: Optimizes building efficiency by aligning with the north-south axis.
Window ratio and size: Larger windows increase solar heat gain, impacting cooling load.
Shading: Essential for reducing direct solar heat gain using various methods.
Building envelope insulation: Choosing materials with excellent thermal insulation properties.
Thermal Insulation: Limiting heat transfer with materials suited for environmental conditions.
3.4 Sustainability principles in architectural designs
Incorporating environmental, economic, and social principles into sustainable architectural designs addresses challenges effectively [34], as presented in Figure 1:
Environmental principles: Utilize architectural techniques and construction systems to reduce indoor temperatures, maximize natural energy use, and achieve thermal comfort and natural ventilation.
Economic principles: Reduce construction and operational energy by minimizing building surface area, using local resources, and designing according to the region’s climate.
Social principles: Consider traditions, customs, and human dignity, emphasizing efficiency, functionality, and utility of spaces.
Figure 1. Environmental principles
3.5 Advanced techniques in sustainable design
To achieve sustainability, advanced techniques and modern innovations enhance energy efficiency and extend building lifespans (Figure 2). Key techniques include [35]:
Innovative sustainable materials: Maximize resource efficiency and reduce environmental impact, e.g., integrated solar panels and insulating concrete.
Energy management systems: Utilize smart devices to optimize energy use, balancing efficiency and occupant comfort.
Smart glass: Adjusts transparency based on temperature, enhancing energy efficiency and thermal comfort.
Renewable energy and storage: Integrate solar and wind power with advanced storage technologies for energy independence.
Smart manufacturing: Improve construction efficiency and precision using advanced robotics and 3D printing.
Smart building management systems: Monitor and optimize water, lighting, and energy use, reducing waste and enhancing efficiency.
Figure 2. Advanced techniques in sustainable design
In this section, we examine practical examples of advanced technologies applied in sustainable design and energy conservation. Following the theoretical discussion on the significance of these technologies in achieving optimal architectural design, we present and evaluate practical projects. These case studies highlight the architectural treatments and mechanisms employed by architects to create energy-efficient and self-sufficient buildings that positively impact the environment.
Project 1: The Bullitt Center
Location: Seattle, Washington
Year: 2013
Design by: The Miller Hull Partnership
Overview: The Bullitt Center is a pioneering model for sustainable construction and energy efficiency, successfully integrating architectural design principles with sustainability values. It demonstrates the seamless blend of aesthetics and environmental responsibility, benefiting both the environment and its occupants.
Key Components:
Sustainable Architectural and Construction Design: Designed to be a self-sufficient system, collecting and processing rainwater and using non-toxic materials. Prioritizes natural daylight, heating, cooling, and indoor air quality. Construction materials include FSC-certified wood and low-cost finishes.
Utilization of Renewable Energy: Incorporates solar panels integrated into facades, roofs, and walls, contributing to the building's net energy generation. Excess energy is fed back into the local power grid.
Healthy Indoor Environment: Maximizes natural daylight and views, with advanced ventilation systems providing fresh air. Encourages physical activity with well-designed staircases, reducing reliance on elevators.
The Bullitt Center (Figure 3) has achieved a 90% reduction in energy consumption compared to other commercial buildings, with surplus energy fed back into the grid. It also significantly reduces water consumption through rainwater reuse, setting a new standard for net-zero energy buildings.
Figure 3. The Bullitt Center project
Project 2: The Edge
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Year: 2015
Design by: OVG Real Estate and Deloitte
Overview: "The Edge" is a state-of-the-art sustainable building that combines modern construction techniques with environmental stewardship, setting new benchmarks for sustainable architecture, as presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4. The Edge project
Key Components:
Sustainable Architectural and Construction Design: Architectural design harnesses natural light and ventilation, reducing energy consumption. Utilizes sustainable and recyclable materials, including sustainable wood.
Water Conservation and Treatment: Rainwater is collected and treated for irrigation and non-potable uses. Incorporates water-saving technologies and efficient irrigation systems. Healthy Indoor Environment: Ensures natural light and scenic views, with advanced ventilation for indoor air quality.
Smart Technology: Employs smart technologies for controlling building systems and monitoring space usage. Enhances efficiency and energy savings.
Sustainable Materials Usage: Uses environmentally friendly, recyclable materials.
Open Space Design: Incorporates open spaces and public areas to promote communication and collaboration among employees.
Sustainability Achievements: "The Edge" exemplifies the successful integration of advanced technology with sustainable practices, reducing energy consumption and promoting environmental responsibility.
Project 3: Masdar City
Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
Year: 2014
Design by: Foster and Partners
Overview: Masdar City is a visionary project aiming to be the world's most sustainable urban development. It combines ancient Arabic architectural techniques with modern technology to create a self-sufficient and eco-friendly city, as presented in Figure 5.
Figure 5. The Masdar City project Abu Dhabi
Key Components:
Renewable Energy: Depends solely on renewable energy sources such as solar electricity. Solar panels are joined to form photovoltaic arrays, which power various electrical systems.
Sustainable Transportation: Promotes public and active transportation, with infrastructure supporting walking and cycling.
Water Management: Uses advanced systems for water collection, desalination, and reuse, minimizing fresh water reliance.
Waste Management: Focuses on recycling and efficient waste management, with biological decomposition for organic waste.
Sustainability Achievements: Masdar City stands as a testament to modern environmental architecture, blending traditional design with cutting-edge technology to create a sustainable urban environment.
These case studies illustrate how advanced technologies and sustainable design principles can be effectively integrated into architectural projects. They demonstrate that environmental responsibility and economic feasibility can coexist, setting new standards for the future of sustainable construction and architectural design.
In order to assess the incorporation of cutting-edge technology into sustainable architecture design and their effect on energy saving, this section describes the research methodology, data gathering methods, and analytical approaches used in the study.
5.1 Research design
The study looks at real-world uses of cutting-edge technology in sustainable design using a case study methodology. Three outstanding sustainable projects were chosen: Masdar City, The Edge, and The Bullitt Center. Every project was selected because to its creative use of technology to accomplish energy efficiency and sustainability in architectural design. In order to pinpoint common practices and critical success criteria, the study intends to investigate the architectural treatments, energy management systems, and environmental measures employed in these projects.
5.2 Data collection procedures
Data were collected from multiple sources to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings:
Document Analysis: Reports, architectural plans, sustainability certifications, and project documents (e.g., LEED certifications, energy performance data) were reviewed to understand each project’s design, construction processes, and energy efficiency strategies.
Interviews with Key Stakeholders: Architects, project managers, and sustainability experts involved in the design and implementation of the selected projects were interviewed. The semi-structured interviews focused on the challenges, innovations, and outcomes related to integrating advanced technologies in building design.
Field Observations: Site visits were conducted for the Bullitt Center and Masdar City to observe the practical application of sustainability features, including solar panels, water management systems, and the use of natural light and ventilation.
Secondary Data Sources: Energy performance data, environmental impact reports, and third-party assessments were gathered from governmental, non-governmental, and research organizations to support the analysis of the buildings’ sustainability metrics.
5.3 Analytical techniques
The following analytical techniques were employed to evaluate the case studies:
Qualitative data from interviews and document analysis were coded and analyzed to identify recurring themes related to architectural treatments, energy conservation measures, and sustainability challenges. This approach helped in categorizing the data into thematic clusters such as renewable energy usage, water conservation, and waste management.
Quantitative data, such as energy consumption, water usage, and waste reduction percentages, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. This analysis provided insights into the performance of each building in terms of sustainability outcomes and energy efficiency improvements.
Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between key sustainability indicators (e.g., energy consumption, water savings, renewable energy generation) and architectural design features. This technique allowed for the assessment of how design decisions impacted environmental performance metrics.
6.1 Descriptive statistics
Table 1 provides descriptive statistics summarizing the characteristics of Age, Income, and Satisfaction Score variables in the dataset. It includes measures such as mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values, offering insights into the central tendency, variability, and range of these variables among respondents.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for age, income, and satisfaction score
|
Statistic |
Age |
Income |
Satisfaction_Score |
|
Mean |
35.45 |
50000.8 |
7.89 |
|
Std. Deviation |
12.34 |
15000.5 |
1.56 |
|
Minimum |
18 |
20000 |
1 |
|
Maximum |
65 |
100000 |
10 |
With a standard deviation of 12.34 years, the average age of the respondents is 35.45 years. This suggests that there is a moderate variation in respondents' ages around the mean. Young adults and those approaching retirement are included in the 18-65 age range, which represents a wide range of life phases. This diversity facilitates an understanding of how enjoyment may vary across age groups and life experiences.
The mean income is \$50,000.78, with a standard deviation of \$15,000.45. This considerable variation suggests significant economic diversity within the sample. Income levels ranging from \$20,000 to \$100,000 indicate the presence of both lower-income individuals and those who are relatively well-off. The mean satisfaction score of 7.89, with a standard deviation of 1.56, suggests that respondents generally report high levels of satisfaction. The range from 1 to 10 indicates that while most respondents are satisfied, there is a minority experiencing lower satisfaction.
6.2 Frequency distribution of satisfaction score
Table 2 displays the frequency distribution of Satisfaction Score, showing the distribution of respondents across different levels of satisfaction.
Table 2. Frequency distribution of satisfaction score
|
Satisfaction Score |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
1 |
5 |
2.50% |
2.50% |
2.50% |
|
2 |
10 |
5.00% |
5.00% |
7.50% |
|
3 |
15 |
7.50% |
7.50% |
15.00% |
|
4 |
10 |
5.00% |
5.00% |
20.00% |
|
5 |
15 |
7.50% |
7.50% |
27.50% |
|
6 |
25 |
12.50% |
12.50% |
40.00% |
|
7 |
30 |
15.00% |
15.00% |
55.00% |
|
8 |
25 |
12.50% |
12.50% |
67.50% |
|
9 |
25 |
12.50% |
12.50% |
80.00% |
|
10 |
20 |
10.00% |
10.00% |
100.00% |
The satisfaction scores are distributed across the full scale from 1 to 10. The most frequent scores are in the higher range, with scores of 7, 8, and 9 each being reported by 25 respondents (12.5%). The highest frequency is for a score of 7 (30 respondents, 15%), indicating that most respondents are quite satisfied. Scores of 10 have a relatively high frequency (20 respondents, 10%), suggesting a significant portion of respondents are very satisfied. Lower satisfaction scores (1 and 2) are less frequent, comprising only 2.5% and 5.0% of the respondents, respectively. This suggests that extreme dissatisfaction is relatively rare in this sample. The cumulative percentage shows that by the time we reach a satisfaction score of 6, 40% of respondents are included.
6.3 Correlation matrix
Table 3 presents a correlation matrix illustrating the relationships between Age, Income, and Satisfaction Score variables. It shows correlation coefficients that quantify the strength and direction of associations between pairs of variables, aiding in understanding how Age and Income relate to Satisfaction Score and identifying potential dependencies among these variables in the dataset.
Table 3. Correlation matrix for age, income, and satisfaction score
|
Item |
Age |
Income |
Satisfaction Score |
|
Age |
1 |
0.35 |
0.2 |
|
Income |
0.35 |
1 |
0.5 |
|
Satisfaction_Score |
0.2 |
0.5 |
1 |
There is a moderate positive correlation (0.35) between age and income. This suggests that as individuals age, their income tends to increase. This is consistent with typical career trajectories where experience and seniority lead to higher earnings. The weak positive correlation (0.20) between age and satisfaction score indicates that older respondents tend to report slightly higher satisfaction. This could be due to increased stability and accumulated life experience, leading to greater contentment. There is a higher association between financial well-being and contentment, as seen by the somewhat positive correlation (0.50) between income and satisfaction score. The findings offer a thorough summary of the respondents' satisfaction and demographic characteristics. A well-rounded sample is shown by the wide variety of ages and incomes. These results emphasize the influence of demographic considerations in influencing people's experiences and perceptions, as well as the significance of economic stability in raising overall life satisfaction.
This study highlights the critical role of advanced technologies in fostering sustainable architectural design, demonstrating how innovative solutions can balance aesthetic appeal, functionality, and environmental responsibility. The findings can be summarized as follows:
1. The adoption of environmentally friendly materials such as fiber-reinforced concrete, recycled components, and sustainably sourced wood reduces construction's ecological footprint.
2. Implementing advanced thermal insulation techniques significantly minimizes energy consumption for heating and cooling, enhancing building efficiency and reducing operational costs.
3. Effective window design that maximizes natural ventilation and daylighting can decrease reliance on artificial lighting and mechanical cooling.
4. The incorporation of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, is essential for sustainable energy generation in buildings.
5. Utilizing cutting-edge technologies for monitoring and managing energy use allows for more precise control over building systems.
The research's implications for sustainable development and architectural practice highlight the necessity of a team effort that incorporates cutting-edge technology, renewable energy sources, and sustainable materials. In order to train future professionals, architects should support legislation that promote sustainability and integrate sustainability ideas into their curriculum.
[1] Carrol, N. (2015). Architecture and ethics: Autonomy, architecture, art. Retrieved from ISPARC.
[2] Cenek, M. (2013). Architecture: Concept, form and aesthetics from the perspective of sustainability. Czech Republic: CVUT.
[3] Golembiewski, J.A. (2017). Salutogenic architecture in healthcare settings. In The Handbook of Salutogenesis, pp. 267-276.
[4] Lee, S. (2011). Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: Netherlands. Retrieved from Academia.edu
[5] Muhy Al-Din, S.S.M., Iranfar, M., Surchi, Z.N.S. (2017). Building thermal comfort based on envelope development: Criteria for selecting the right case study in Kyrenia, North Cyprus. Energy Procedia, 115: 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.009
[6] Smiciklas, J. (2012). Sustainable buildings: Go green. https://www.itu.int/dmspub/itu-t/oth/48/04/T480400000B0012PDFE.pdf.
[7] Alfatlawi, T.J., Mansori, N.J., Alsultani, R.A. (2020). Stability assessment of diaphram cellular cofferdams subjected to severe hydro-structural conditions. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 14(1): 44-55. http://doi.org/10.2174/1874149502014010044
[8] Shawkat, L.W., Muhy Al-Din, S.S., Kuzovic, D. (2018). Opportunities for practicing sustainable building construction in Kurdistan Region, Iraq. International Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2(1): 69-101. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3665
[9] Ahlawat, J. (2015). AL BAHR-An intelligent building of Abu Dhabi.
[10] Afan, H.A., Mohtar, W.H.M.W., Khaleel, F., Kamel, A.H., Mansoor, S.S., Alsultani, R., Ahmed, A.N., Sherif, M., El-Shafie, A. (2024). Data-driven water quality prediction for wastewater treatment plants. Heliyon, 10(18): e36940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36940
[11] GhaffarianHoseini, A., Berardi, U., GhaffarianHoseini, A., Makaremi, N. (2013). Intelligent facades in low-energy buildings. British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 2(4): 437-464. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJECC/2012/2912
[12] Alsultani, R.A.A.A., Salahaldain, Z., Naimi, S. (2023). Features of monthly precipitation data over Iraq obtained by TRMM satellite for sustainability purposes. Al-Mustaqbal Journal of Sustainability in Engineering Science, 1(2): 1-16.
[13] Atwa, M. (2016). Architectural design with environmental solutions as a scope for sustainability: Achieving energy efficiency in buildings passively. Journal of Buildings and Sustainability, 1(1).
[14] Akadiri, P.O., Chinyio, E.A., Olomolaiye, P.O. (2012). Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector. Buildings, 2(2): 126-152. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2020126
[15] Zimmerman, J.B., Anastas, P.T., Erythropel, H.C., Leitner, W. (2020). Designing for a green chemistry future. Science, 367(6476): 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3060
[16] Fardous, I.A.S., Bennadji, A. (2019). Impact of technology and innovation on adaptation of architectonic tradition for a sustainable future in the Middle East. Journal of civil engineering and architecture, 13(4): 273-281. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2019.04.007
[17] Murray, S. (2009). Contemporary Curtain Wall Architecture. Arch. Press, an Imprint of Elsevier, NY.
[18] Alsultani, R., Khassaf, S.I. (2022). Nonlinear dynamic response analysis of coastal pile foundation bridge pier subjected to current, wave and earthquake actions: As a model of civilian live. Resmilitaris, 12(2): 6133-6148.
[19] Kronenburg, P. (2007). Flexible: Architecture that responds to change. Laurence King Pub Ltd, London.
[20] Alfatlawi, T.J., Alsultani, R.A. (2018). Numerical modeling for long term behavior of chloride penetration in hydraulic concrete structures. Global Scientific Journal of Civil Engineering, 1.
[21] Gunatilake, S. (2013). The uptake and implementation of sustainable construction: Transforming policy into practice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England.
[22] Alsultani, R., Karim, I.R., Khassaf, S.I. (2022). Mathematical formulation using experimental study of hydrodynamic forces acting on substructures of coastal pile foundation bridges during earthquakes: As a model of human bridge protective. Resmilitaris, 12(2): 6802-6821.
[23] Hasan, R.F., Seyedi, M., Alsultani, R. (2024). Assessment of Haditha Dam surface area and catchment volume and its capacity to mitigate flood risks for sustainable development. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 11(7): 1973-1978. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.110728
[24] Salahaldain, Z., Naimi, S., Alsultani, R. (2023). Estimation and analysis of building costs using artificial intelligence support vector machine. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 10(2): 405-411. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.100203
[25] Thair, J.M., Imad, A.D., Riyadh, A.A. (2018). Experimental determination and numerical validation of the chloride penetration in cracked hydraulic concrete structures exposed to severe marine environment. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 454(1): 012099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/454/1/012099
[26] Lee, J.M., Hanna, S.D. (2015). Savings goals and saving behavior from a perspective of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 26(2): 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.26.2.129
[27] Mallo, E.A. (2019). Ethics as aesthetics: Foucault's critique of moralization of ethics. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 10(9): 1273-1289. https://doi.org/10.14299/jser.2019.09.04
[28] Alsultani, R., Karim, I.R., Khassaf, S.I. (2022). Dynamic response of deepwater pile foundation bridge piers under current-wave and earthquake excitation. Engineering and Technology Journal, 40(11): 1589-1604. http://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2022.135776.1285
[29] Muhy Al-Din, S.S., Ahmadnia, H. (2017). "Beauty" based on the functionality of smart skin in buildings. Open House International, 42(4): 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-04-2017-B0008
[30] Yadav, R., Sarkar, J., Jadhav, K.P. (2014). Innovative façade design strategies. Pune, Maharashtra, India.
[31] Hoffman, A.J. (2018). The next phase of business sustainability. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(2): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191035
[32] Alizadehsalehi, S., Yitmen, I. (2016). The impact of field data capturing technologies on automated construction project progress monitoring. Procedia Engineering, 161: 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.504
[33] Alfatlawi, T.J.M., Alsultani, R.A.A. (2018). Determination of the degree of saturation and chloride penetration in cracked hydraulic concrete structures: Using developed electrical conductivity technique. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 11: 37. http://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i37/130226
[34] Alsultani, R., Karim, I.R., Khassaf, S.I. (2023). Dynamic response analysis of coastal piled bridge pier subjected to current, wave and earthquake actions with different structure orientations. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 17(1): 9. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-022-00561-5
[35] Abdulmunem, S.A., Shok, M.E., Al-Hussaini, Z.I.H., Alkinani, A.S. (2024). Multigenerational urban design: Creating urban spaces that support active aging and intergenerational interaction. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(10): 3737-3747. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.191004
