Xin Song
© 2023 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
Amid escalating global environmental challenges, sustainability has crystallized as a central tenet in modern society. Understanding the integration of environmental sustainability in the career decisions of the nascent workforce holds substantial implications for businesses, educators, and policymakers. Through a confluence of quantitative survey techniques and qualitative deep-dive interviews, data were gathered from 1,200 recent university alumni across Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Hangzhou, and Shenzhen. Of those interviewed, 72.5% noted that environmental sustainability played a substantial, if not pivotal, role in their career determinations. Notably, those placing a premium on sustainability displayed an increased inclination towards industries and organizations intrinsically associated with environmental and social responsibility. This investigation, by offering both theoretical and empirical insights, pioneers the examination of the influence of environmental sustainability on career preferences from the lens of the emerging workforce. The insights proffered might enable corporations and recruitment firms to finely tune their talent acquisition strategies, aligning with the aspirations and ethos of the contemporary generation. Simultaneously, the results can guide educators and policymakers in refining vocational education and direction, ensuring alignment with societal sustainability goals.
environmental sustainability, career decision-making, university graduates, emerging workforce
The early years of the 21st century witnessed humanity grappling with unparalleled environmental challenges. These challenges were primarily precipitated by the swift strides in industrialization and urbanization. Phenomena such as global climate shifts, increasingly erratic weather events, diminution of biodiversity, and marine pollution grew more acute [1]. The repercussions of these events were not confined to ecological imbalances but were also perceived to strain human continuity and progression. Consequently, a global imperative was identified, underscoring the need to harmonize economic progression with environmental conservation, aiming for a genuinely sustainable trajectory [2].
Addressing these multifaceted challenges necessitates synergized endeavors from a spectrum of sectors. Governments, environmental entities, corporations, and the citizenry at large have been pinpointed as key stakeholders, each endowed with irrevocable responsibilities. Within this milieu, the corporate role has been underscored as especially crucial. A discernible transition was identified, moving from conventionally "profit-centric" paradigms towards frameworks wherein "social responsibility and economic dividends" receive balanced emphasis [3]. This shift towards a more balanced approach to business and sustainability is evident in various sectors, including the manufacturing industry [4].
Those belonging to the emerging workforce, predominantly individuals born during the 1990s and 2000s, matured during this distinctive era. Their maturation was marked by direct exposure to the amplification of environmental crises and the inception of remedial measures. A more profound affinity and heightened environmental expectations were ascribed to this cohort compared to their predecessors. This affinity was manifested in daily practices, such as adopting low-carbon transit and endorsing green consumerism [5], and significantly, in vocational choices. The environmental pedigree and societal commitments of prospective employers have been prioritized more than ever by these individuals.
Additionally, it has been suggested by initial studies that a corporation's environmental stewardship can influence not merely employment decisions of the new generation but also aspects such as job satisfaction, allegiance, and retention propensities [6]. This emphasizes the intertwined nature of environmental sustainability and modern corporate human resource strategies.
In academic spheres, emphasis has been laid on the ramifications of environmental sustainability within corporate management. Historically, discussions predominantly orbited around the strategic benefits corporations could reap by espousing environmental responsibility, suggesting that eco-centric approaches might confer competitive edges [7]. However, as the 21st century unfolded and societal cognizance of environmental issues matured, research has shifted focus, examining the implications of a corporation's environmental credentials on its public standing and consumer inclinations [8].
With the infusion of the new generation into the workforce, a shift in focus towards their perceptions of corporate environmental sustainability and its influence on career decisions has been observed. A notable finding by Jones et al. [9] indicated that individuals from the emerging workforce exhibited a higher propensity to align with corporations demonstrating environmental responsibility [10]. Concurrently, psychological drivers behind such vocational choices were probed by Menaga and Vasantha, suggesting an inclination towards roles that harmonized with environmental conservation and sustainable growth objectives [11].
Additionally, the nexus between a company's environmental posture and facets like employee satisfaction and allegiance has been examined. Findings from a study by Dikaiou et al. [12] revealed that positive perceptions of a company's ecological initiatives correlated with heightened job satisfaction and an amplified intent to sustain employment. This accentuates the premise that environmental sustainability influences not just initial recruitment, but also factors pivotal to long-term retention and operational efficiency [13].
However, while these studies offer valuable insights [14], certain lacunae in the literature have been discerned. A predominant focus on Western contexts [15] has rendered data from Asian and other emergent regions scanty. Additionally, the existing discourse predominantly orbits around large-scale enterprises [16], rendering research concerning small and medium-sized establishments notably sparse [17].
Within the corpus of reviewed literature, it is palpable that environmental sustainability within corporate sectors has garnered escalating attention [18]. As a fresh wave of employees integrates into the workforce, their perspectives on corporate ecological accountability and social responsibility have crystallized as salient research themes [19]. While contemporary studies shed light on certain facets [20], vast vistas remain uncharted. The values, aspirations, and sustainability viewpoints of the newer workforce might diverge from earlier generations, thus warranting nuanced exploration.
In this context, the present research seeks to bridge identified gaps with objectives delineated as follows:
(1) Exploration of New Generation Values and Aspirations: Through a judicious blend of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, insights into the emerging workforce's perceptions of corporate ecological commitments and their influence on career trajectories and aspirations are sought to be gleaned.
(2) Scrutiny of Environmental Sustainability's Influence on Employee Satisfaction and Loyalty: The endeavor is to delineate the impacts of corporate environmental stances on employee contentment [21] and discern if heightened satisfaction engenders sustained allegiance and enhanced productivity [22].
(3) Regional and Enterprise Scale Comparative Analysis: Given the paucity of research centered on non-Western geographies and SMEs [23], a comparative assessment across diverse geographies, notably Asia, and varying enterprise magnitudes is proposed.
(4) Formulation of Strategic Recommendations: Predicated upon derived insights, it is anticipated that actionable strategies and guidelines will be proffered to aid organizations in optimally attracting and retaining stellar talent from the contemporary workforce, whilst championing sustainable paradigms [24, 25].
By addressing these research objectives, it is envisaged that a novel vantage point will be proffered to scholars and industry stakeholders, potentially catalyzing further innovations in the realm of environmental sustainability research [26, 27].
2.1 Research design
A mixed-methods approach, encompassing quantitative questionnaire surveys and qualitative in-depth interviews, was adopted to discern the emphasis recent university graduates place on environmental sustainability in their vocational selections. Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Hangzhou, and Shenzhen, five cities in China, were selected as the study locales. The rationale for selecting these cities was grounded in their economic stature, educational prominence, and distinctive traits related to environmental sustainability. From these locales, a total of 1200 valid responses were garnered.
2.2 Instrumentation
For the quantitative aspect, a structured questionnaire was devised. Its design aimed to elicit insights into university students' orientations towards environmental sustainability and its bearing on their employment considerations. The instrument encompassed multiple-choice items, Likert-scale questions, and open-ended prompts. Central themes of inquiry included the demographic profile of respondents, their cognizance of ecological matters, and the weightage they apportion to environmental sustainability in their career determinations.
2.3 Data acquisition
To achieve a diverse respondent pool, questionnaires were disseminated via prominent social networking channels and in partnership with leading universities, ensuring inclusion of students spanning various academic disciplines and cohorts. Subsequent to the quantitative phase, qualitative in-depth interviews were undertaken. A subset of those who participated in the survey was chosen for either face-to-face or virtual interviews to derive deeper insights into their sentiments regarding environmental sustainability.
2.4 Analytical procedures
Following the requisite data sanitization and preprocessing steps, data were analyzed employing SPSS and Excel. The distribution of attitudes across the designated cities concerning environmental sustainability was quantified and subsequently represented graphically.
3.1 Disposition of attitudes across cities
Table 1 delineates the volume of student participants across the five cities and the distribution of their attitudes regarding the significance of environmental considerations. A notable observation is the elevated percentages in Beijing, Shenzhen, and Hangzhou, where environmental sustainability in career selections was deemed "very important" by 49%, 48%, and 45% of the participants, respectively. In a relative context, Shijiazhuang and Tianjin manifested marginally diminished percentages, recorded at 43% and 44%. This observation insinuates a potential correlation between cities possessing robust economic frameworks and consolidated educational assets, and students therein emphasizing environmental considerations.
Table 1. Distribution of student attitudes on environmental importance across five cities
|
City |
Number of Surveyed Students |
Very Important (%) |
Important (%) |
Moderate (%) |
Not Very Important (%) |
Not Important at All (%) |
|
Beijing |
280 |
49% |
30% |
15% |
4% |
2% |
|
Tianjin |
240 |
44% |
32% |
18% |
4% |
2% |
|
Shijiazhuang |
220 |
43% |
30% |
20% |
5% |
2% |
|
Hangzhou |
230 |
45% |
31% |
18% |
4% |
2% |
|
Shenzhen |
230 |
48% |
30% |
17% |
3% |
2% |
3.2 Underpinnings for emphasis on environmental sustainability
Through meticulous qualitative interviews, elucidations for students' prioritization of environmental sustainability were discerned. It was commonly conveyed that tertiary educational experiences and pertinent environmental engagements amplified their apprehensions about ecological dilemmas like climate change and biodiversity decline. Moreover, it was inferred that the proliferation of online platforms and transparency in information dissemination have augmented student exposure to sustainability discourses.
3.3 Vocation preferences and ecological priorities
Upon interrogation regarding the juxtaposition of environmental sustainability and vocation preferences, a predominant inclination towards firms championing sustainable growth and manifesting eco-conscious values was reported by the respondents. This discernment reflects an evolving ethos within contemporary university graduates, spotlighting a surge in considerations about corporate social responsibility and environmental contributions over traditional metrics like salary scales and advancement opportunities.
Figure 1. Distribution of students preferring environmentally aligned firms across cities
As illustrated in Figure 1, Shenzhen and Beijing emerged with the most pronounced predilections for environmentally-conscientious firms, documented at 72% and 70% respectively, while Shijiazhuang and Tianjin registered somewhat subdued proclivities, at 65% and 66%.
3.4 Comprehension depth of environmental imperatives
Though a substantial faction of respondents professed a pronounced valuation of environmental sustainability, a closer scrutiny revealed a segment possessing circumscribed insights into intricate environmental quandaries and viable remedial measures. Such revelations suggest an extant chasm between ecological affinities and tangible environmental literacy, emphasizing a pivotal need to enrich educational and outreach endeavors, transitioning students from abstract understanding to pragmatic application.
4.1 Interpretation of principal findings
An upward trajectory in the proclivity of recent university graduates towards environmental sustainability in vocational decision-making has been observed through empirical analysis. Enhanced emphasis on this pattern is discernible in premier urban centers such as Beijing and Shenzhen. Such inclinations illuminate the burgeoning environmental cognizance of younger cohorts and their intertwined aspirations of amalgamating personal and societal ideals in occupational endeavors. However, a nuanced observation from regions like Shijiazhuang and Tianjin depicts an analogous inclination, albeit with marginally diminished fervor. Such variances could conceivably be attributed to regional economic matrices, industrial blueprints, pedagogical frameworks, and prevalent cultural ethos.
4.2 Corporate consequences
The gleaned insights hold pivotal implications for corporate entities, particularly those aiming to onboard this emergent generation. To entice and uphold the commitment of this demographic, an integration of environmental sustainability within overarching business tactics and organizational ethos is imperative. Furthermore, establishments demonstrably progressing in environmental stewardship and eco-innovations are poised to capture the allegiance of this discerning cohort.
4.3 Repercussions for academic entities
It is advised that pedagogical institutions accentuate curricula centered on environmental literacy and sustainable progression. Instilling an early reverence and cognizance for environmental guardianship is paramount. Furthermore, forging symbiotic affiliations with corporate sectors can equip students with pragmatic exposures pertinent to environmental sustainability, bridging the chasm between theoretical knowledge and its tangible applications.
4.4 Inferences for policymakers
It must be duly noted by policymakers that burgeoning professionals evince an elevated valuation of environmental sustainability within their career paradigms. Such predilections are not solely emblematic of personal preferences but are indicative of broader societal trajectories. Consequentially, legislative architectures should be calibrated to incorporate heightened focus on environmental conservation and sustainable progression, whilst concurrently fostering corporate initiatives in this domain.
In summation, environmental sustainability has transcended its conventional realm, interfacing intricately with economic, societal, and cultural dimensions. It is anticipated that these findings will illuminate deliberative processes across pertinent sectors.
This investigation endeavored to elucidate the dynamics governing how burgeoning university graduates incorporate environmental sustainability considerations into their vocational deliberations. Employing a multifaceted approach comprising quantitative questionnaires and qualitative in-depth dialogues with 1200 nascent graduates spanning five urban locales, several pertinent inferences were discerned:
(1) Ascendance of Environmental Awareness: Analysis of the collated data intimates that an overwhelming 72.5% of the recent graduates across the quintet of cities deem environmental sustainability as pivotal, if not indispensable, in their career trajectories. Such figures are emblematic of the profound resonance environmental stewardship bears with this demographic.
(2) Geographic Discrepancies: Whilst a consensus on the import of environmental sustainability was palpable among the respondents, disparities contingent on the city of survey were noted. In Shijiazhuang, for example, the emphasis on this metric being "of paramount importance" was registered by 43% of the participants. In juxtaposition, Beijing and Shenzhen recorded slightly elevated metrics at 49% and 48% respectively.
(3) Synergy of Vocational Aspirations and Eco-Advocacy: A conspicuous trend observed was the concurrent weighting of personal vocational aspirations with eco-responsible corporate behaviors. Recent graduates appear to be evaluating potential employers not merely on conventional criteria but also on their ecological praxis and ethos.
(4) Catalytic Role of Policy and Organizational Ethos: Discourses revealed that governmental environmental edicts, coupled with an organizational commitment to sustainable growth, exert tangible influences on this cohort's vocational alignments. Establishments manifesting an unwavering dedication to sustainable paradigms are perceived as more appealing to these potential entrants.
Grounded on these insights, a clarion call is made to both the corporate realm and governmental echelons to bolster their commitment to environmental sustainability in forthcoming strategic formulations and recalibrations. Concurrently, pedagogical entities are exhorted to amplify their focus on environmental tutelage, infusing curricula with both theoretical profundities and tangible experiences pertinent to ecological sustainability. Such refocused efforts will, it is envisaged, fortify the alignment between emerging professionals and the broader objectives of global sustainability.
[1] Arora, R., Kaur, J. (2023). Scientists’ warning on loss of insect biodiversity and implications for sustainable agriculture. Insect Environment, 26(2): 161-167. https://doi.org/10.55278/TELS2532
[2] Ayuk, E.T., Njomgang, C. (2022). Editorial: Health in the green economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 975615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.975615
[3] Chazireni, B. (2017). An investigation into corporate social responsibility on sustainable growth of wholesale and retail SMEs: A case study of Ethekwini Municipal Region. Doctoral dissertation, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa. https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2583
[4] Saidu, S.A., Gidado, S. (2018). Managerial ownership and financial performance of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9): 1227-1243. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4693
[5] Lam, A.Y., Lau, M.M., Cheung, R. (2016). Modelling the relationship among green perceived value, green trust, satisfaction, and repurchase intention of green products. Contemporary Management Research, 12(1): 47-60. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.13842
[6] Stanisavljevic, N., Brunner, P.H. (2020). The user–beneficiary or victim of modern waste management systems. Waste Management & Research, 38(6): 597-598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20924283
[7] Soonsiripanichkul, B., Ngamcharoenmongkol, P. (2019). The influence of sustainable development goals (SDGs) on customer-based store equity (CBSE). Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 13: 48-62. https://doi.org/10.24052/JBRMR/V13ISSP/ART-5
[8] Lekkas, D.F., Panagiotakis, I., Dermatas, D. (2021). A digital circular bioeconomy–Opportunities and challenges for waste management in this new era. Waste Management & Research, 39(3): 407-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X21992299
[9] Jones, D.A., Willness, C.R., Madey, S. (2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2): 383-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0848
[10] Healy, K., Poole, J. (2022). Corporate morality: Analysis of corporate social responsibility and generation Z’s purchasing habits. Journal of Student Research, 11(2): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i2.2503
[11] Alekseev, P.N., Balanin, A.L., Nevinitsa, V.A. (2021). Analysis of the competitiveness of a new generation BN power unit project, taking into account system requirements. Voprosy Atomnoj Nauki i Tekhniki. Seriya: Yaderno-Reaktornye Konstanty, 53(2): 34-51.
[12] Dikaiou, A., Wehrmeyer, W., Vecchi, M., Druckman, A. (2021). Perceptions of job quality and performance in b corporations: Evidence from the best performers in the US. Corporate Governance: A Search for Emerging Trends in the Pandemic Times, pp. 133-186. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsetpt23
[13] Kekutia, T. (2019). Voluntary turnover factors in Georgia. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(2): 28-60. https://doi.org/10.5296/IJHRS.V9I2.14395
[14] George, G., Osinga, E.C., Lavie, D., Scott, B.A. (2016). Big data and data science methods for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5): 1493-1507. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4005
[15] Rugman, A.M., Verbeke, A. (2017). Global Corporate Strategy and Trade Policy. Routledge.
[16] Meyer, K.E., Li, C., Schotter, A.P. (2020). Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 51: 538-576. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00318-w
[17] Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.010
[18] Wright, C., Nyberg, D. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5): 1633-1661. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0718
[19] Crane, A., Matten, D., Spence, L. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context. Routledge.
[20] Whiteman, G., Walker, B., Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2): 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01073.x
[21] De Roeck, K., Farooq, O. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Investigating their interactive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151: 923-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3656-6
[22] Raineri, N., Paillé, P. (2016). Linking corporate policy and supervisory support with environmental citizenship behaviors: The role of employee environmental beliefs and commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 137: 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2548-x
[23] Sheth, J.N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4): 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.166
[24] Eisenbeiss, S.A., Van Knippenberg, D., Fahrbach, C.M. (2015). Doing well by doing good? Analyzing the relationship between CEO ethical leadership and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 128: 635-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2124-9
[25] Bansal, P., Song, H.C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1): 105-149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095
[26] Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127: 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5
[27] Shen, J., Benson, J. (2016). When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42(6): 1723-1746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314522300
