OPEN ACCESS
This paper attempts to disclose the law of critical gas velocity in the swirling flow field induced by the vortex tools. For this purpose, a critical gas velocity calculation model for vortex drainage gas wells was established based on the axial force balance between the liquid film and the gas core in swirling flow, and modified with the experimental data in previous studies. Then, the effects of helix angle and hub diameter of vortex tool on the reduction amplitude of critical gas velocity were analyzed by comparing the modified model with Turner model. Through experimental verification, it is learned that our new model can predict the critical gas velocity under different production conditions with different vortex tools. The reduction amplitude of critical gas velocity increased with the helix angle and decreased with the growth in hub diameter. The reduction amplitude ranged from 55.03% to 59.35% as the helix angle varied from 15 ° to 75 ° and the hub diameter varied from 34mm to 50 mm. The helix angle has a greater impact than the hub diameter on the reduction amplitude. The research findings shed new light on the design and application of the vortex tools.
gas well, vortex tool, drainage gas recovery, critical gas velocity, swirling flow, friction factor, prediction model, reduction amplitude
[1] Simpson DA. (2003). Vortex flow technology finding new applications. The Rocky Mountain Oil Journal 83(45): 40-45. http://www.vortextools.com/VtxTechnicalReports/David_Simpson_Vortex-RMOJ_11-03.pdf
[2] Ali A, Scott S, Fehn B. (2005). Investigation of new tool to unload liquids from stripper-gas wells. SPE Production & Facilities 20(04): 306-316. http://doi.org/10.2523/84136-ms
[3] Yang T, Yu SM, Yang H. (2012). A new technology of vortex dewatering gas recovery in gas wells and its application. Natural Gas Industry 32(8): 63-66. http://doi.org/10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.08.013
[4] Zhu Q, Zhang JJ, Xie F. (2013). Application of eddy drainage gas recovery to gas fields in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Technology and Economy 7(1): 37-39.
[5] Wu XD, Zhou C, An YS. (2016). Dynamic analysis of liquid droplet and optimization of helical angle for vortex drainage gas recovery. Natural Gas Industry 36(5): 45-50. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ngib.2016.12.010
[6] Turner RG, Hubbard MG, Dukler AE. (1969). Analysis and prediction of minimum flow rate for the continuous removal of liquids from gas wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology 21(11): 1475-1482. https://doi.org/10.2118/2198-PA
[7] Li M, Li SL, Sun LT. (2002). New view on continuous-removal liquids from gas wells. Spe Production & Facilities 17(1): 42-46. https://doi.org/10.2118/70016-MS
[8] Wang YZ, Liu QW. (2008). A new method to calculate the minimum critical liquids carrying flow rate for gas wells. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing 26(6): 82-85.
[9] Belfroid S, Schiferli W, Alberts G. (2008). Predicting onset and dynamic behavior of liquid loading gas wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers 21-24. http://doi.org/10.2118/115567-MS
[10] Wang Z, Bai H, Zhu S. (2015). An entrained-droplet model for prediction of minimum flow rate for the continuous removal of liquids from gas wells. SPE Journal 20(5): 1,135-1,144. https://doi.org/10.2118/174077-PA
[11] Pan J, Wang WJ, Wei YQ. (2018). A calculation model of critical liquid-carrying velocity of gas wells considering the influence of droplet shapes. Natural Gas Industry 38(1): 67-73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2018.01.007
[12] Richter HJ. (1981). Flooding in tubes and annuli. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 7(6): 647-658. http://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(81)90036-7
[13] Chen D, Yao Y, Fu G. (2016). A new model for predicting liquid loading in deviated gas wells. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 34: 178-184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.063
[14] Liu Y, Luo C, Zhang L. (2018). Experimental and modeling studies on the prediction of liquid loading onset in gas wells. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 57: 349-358.
[15] Chen DC, Han H, Yao Y. (2015). An experimental study on the effect of the vortex tool and its influence on critical velocity. Natural Gas Geoscience 26(11): 2137-2141. http://doi.org/10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.11.2137
[16] Zhou C, Wu XD, Tang JF. (2016). Calculation of the critical liquid carrying-over in the wellbore for downhole vortex dewatering gas recovery. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing 35(6): 99-103.
[17] Wallis GB. (1969). One-dimensional two-phase flow. New York: McGraw-Hill 11(3): 445-458. http://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(68)90089-6
[18] Gambill WR, Bundy RD, Wansbrough RW. (1960). Heat transfer, burnout, and pressure drop for water in swirl flow through tubes with internal twisted tapes. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4145353
[19] Lopina RF, Bergles AE. Heat transfer and pressure drop in tape-generated swirl flow of single-phase water. Journal of Heat Transfer 91(3): 434-441. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.3580212
[20] Chen DC, Yao Y, Han H. (2016). Optimizing experiment on the liquid discharge effects and its structural parameters for gas-well vortex tool. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing 35(4): 109-112. http://doi.org/10.6056/dkyqt201604028
[21] Yang XD, Li L, Zhang J. (2015). Mechanism study of downhole vortex tool for water drainage during gas production. China Petroleum Machinery 43(5): 81-86.