Learning to Quantify Positive Futures

Learning to Quantify Positive Futures

Delwyn Jones Mathilde Vlieg Shloka Ashar Lesley Friend Ceclia Costa Gomez

The Evah Institute, a Division of Ecquate Pty Ltd, Australia

VliegLCA, Spain

Available online: 
| Citation

© 2022 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



This paper highlights the urgent need to increase the understanding and uptake of positive messaging, metrics and analysis to facilitate learning across all areas of community and professional environmental education. It examines the failures of current environmental sustainability reporting, communication and learning frameworks to inspire and engage people. It then shows the quantification of ‘unsustainability’ inherent in the development of world-first automated whole-building Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) software. by focussing on a negative range that stops at zero, LCIA excludes positive gains in security of supply, climate, habitat and wellness. Through case studies, the authors show how practitioners sought to improve sustainability education. They also sought to measure positive gains by developing Life Cycle Benefit Analysis (LCBA) compiled to quantify positive development gains within planetary boundaries’ safe operating space. LCBA was tested in third-party-certified environmental Product Declarations and building projects. Case studies compare benefit and damage metrics for supply, climate, habitat and wellness outcomes, carbon drawdown ratings and circularity scores. The authors report what consultants, teachers, interns and clients learnt about gaps in environmental education frameworks in other institutions. They reflect on how to expand positive sustainability messaging and learning across industry, community and education from primary to post-graduate and professional accreditation. Of vital significance is the need to address youth and student anger and apathy in response to the locked-in devastating climate change and wildlife extinctions they have inherited. The authors assert the critical need to engage people of all generations in counting benefits and gains and offer positive sustainability development strategies to this end. Among the recommendations is the need for positive climate and habitat security narratives to activate interest, empower responses and motivate teaching and learning.


benefit, climate brake, education, positive development, security


[1] U nited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, COP 25, available at http://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/un-climate-change-conference-december-2019/speeches-and-statements-at-cop-25 (accessed 9 January 2020).

[2] U nited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Global Environment Outlook 6: “Healthy Planet Healthy People”, available at www.unenvironment.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6, 2019 (accessed 5 May 2019).

[3] HRH Charles, Prince of Wales, Keynote to WEF, Davos, Switzerland, 21 January 2020, available at www.princeofwales.gov.uk/prince-wales-delivers-keynote-address-worldeconomic-forum-davos-switzerland (accessed 4 February 2020).

[4] Dunlap, R.E. & McCright A.M., Challenging climate change the denial countermovement. Climate Change & Society: Sociological Perspectives, eds. R.E. Dunlap & R.E. Brulle, Oxford University Press: Oxford & New York, pp. 300–322, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199356102.003.0010.

[5] Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Take mura, T. & Zhang H., Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. pp. 659–740 IPCC AR5.

[6] S ierra Club, BC Canada et al., Letter to the ISO-TC-207 Secretariat, 10 September 2015.

[7] G ilbert, D. & Jones, D. Healthy sustainable buildings. Towards Sustainability in The Built Environment, eds. A. Shanableh & W.P. Chang, Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, pp. 140–149, 2001, ISBN 1864354895.

[8] Jones D. G., Ashar S., Vlieg M. A. M. & Baggs D. M., Counting gains to beyond zero impact futures. WIT Transactions on Ecology & the Environment, 245, pp. 97–108, 2020. DOI: 10.2495/EID200101.

[9] W orkman, D., World’s Top Exports: Coal Exports by Country, available at http://www.worldstopexports.com/coal-exports/, 2019 (accessed 16 January 2020).

[10] Climate Council, What the Frack? Australia Overtakes Qatar as World’s Largest Gas Exporter, available at www.climatecouncil.org.au/australia-worlds-largest-gas-exporter/, 18 January 2019 (accessed 16 January 2020).

[11] Commonwealth Science & Industrial Research Organisation, What Science Tells us About Fugitive Methane Emissions From Unconventional Gas, available at gisera.csiro. au/factsheet/fugitive-methane-emissions/ (accessed 2 January 2020).

[12] U nited Nations (UN), European Commission, Food & Agriculture Organisation of the UN, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development & the World Bank, System of Environmental Economic Accounting 2012 – Central Framework, p. 13, United Nations: New York, 2014.

[13] I nternational Standards Organisation (ISO), ISO 14044:2006 EMS: LCA: Requirements & Guideline for Data Review: LCI; LCIA, Interpretation Results, ISO, Geneva, 2006.

[14] Downton, P., The SHED FrogStick Scoresheets, Ecopolis Part two, Chapter 11 Synthesis IV, available at https://www.google.com.au/books/edition/Ecopolis/, 2002 (accessed November 2020).

[15] Cashman, R. & Hughes, A., Staging the Olympics: The Event & its Impact Sydney, UNSW Press, ISBN 0868407291 book from, available at https://nla.gov.au/nla.cat-vn1388420, 1999 (accessed 26 April 2022).

[16] W oods G. & Jones D.G., LCA: How it Works & Practical Applications, BPN Solutions: Sydney, 1996.

[17] E nvironmental Planning, About BASI X, available at https://www.basix.nsw.gov.au/iframe/81-about-basix.html (accessed April 2022).

[18] S tate Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASI X), New South Wales Planning & Environment, available at https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/epi-2004-0396, 2004 (accessed April 2022).

[19] E ldridge, (2002) LCAid™ Software Measuring Environmental Performance of Buildings, Department of Public Works & Services: Sydney, NSW, Australia, available at https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB9355.pdf (accessed 5 November 2020).

[20] Jones, D., Watson, P., Scuderi, P. & Mitchel, P. Clients building product ecoprofiling needs, Ch 10. Clients Driving Construction Innovation, eds. K. Brown, K. Hampson & P. Brandon, Icon.net: Australia, pp. 80–89, 2006. ISBN 1-7410712-8-3.

[21] T ucker, S.N., Ambrose, M.D., Johnston, D.R., Newton, P.W., Seo, S. & Jones, D.G., LCADesign: An integrated approach to eco-efficiency assessment of commercial building. Proceedings CIB W078 Conference, Auckland New Zealand, 2003.

[22] T he Evah Institute, OzLCI2019, available at https://nexus.openlca.org/databases (accessed 06 November 2020).

[23] T obias, J. & Haymaker, J., A model based LCA process, Proceedings of the InLCA/LCM Conference 2007, Portland, OR, USA.

[24] Jones, D., Can LCA Account for Positive Development, Post Graduate Lecture, Department of Architecture, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2009.

[25] Jones, D.G., Sustainable School Fitout, presentation to Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, Swinburne University Centre for Design, 2009. Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre: Melbourne, Australia.

[26] Jones, D.G., Vlieg, A.M.M., Ashar, S. & Baggs, D.M., Positive LCA factoring planetary boundaries. Proceedings of the 27th Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) Conference, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 23–32, 2017.

[27] B irkeland, J., Positive development & assessment. Smart & Sustainable Built Environment, 3(1), pp. 4–22, 2014. DOI: 10.1108/SASBE-07-2013-0039.

[28] B aggs, D.M., Jones, D.G., Vlieg, A.M. & Ashar, S., Driving ‘beyond LCA’ metrics for net positive cities, Proceedings of SETAC Conference, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 167–168, 2017.

[29] R enger, B.C., Birkeland, J.L. & Midmore, D.J., Net-positive building carbon sequestration, Building Research & Information, 43(1), pp. 11–24, 2015.

[30] Cole, R.J., Net-zero & net-positive design. Building Research & Information, 43(1), pp. 1–6, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2015.961046.

[31] V lieg, A., M., Jones D. & Ashar S., Forest product LCA: Carbon form, fire, fuel & fate rules. Proceedings of the 27th SETAC Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, p. 52, 2017.

[32] Jones, D.G., Vlieg, A.M., Baggs, D.M., Biaz, O. & Bortsie N. Novel wood LCA & EPDs. Proceedings 29th SETAC Conference, Helsinki, pp. 255–256, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339815300_Novel_Wood_LCA_and_EPDs, 2019 (accessed 26 April 2022).

[33] V lieg, M. & Jones, D., eDiverter EPD, Global GreenTag Brisbane, pp. 1–14, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359841019_Recyclables_Waste_Diverter_EPD, 2017 (accessed 26 April 2022).

[34] V lieg, M., Jones, D.G., Baggs, D.M. & Luo, H.Y., LCBA of recyclables, oil & carbon recovery. Proceedings of the SETAC Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 2017.

[35] E vah Institute, Toilet tissue EPD, Global GreenTag, Brisbane, pp. 1–14, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359841430_Toilet_Tissue_EPD, 2018 (accessed 26 April 2022).

[36] V lieg, M., Jones, D. & Reiter S., Building product fossil, recycled & renewable polymers, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting SETAC, Helsinki, pp. 69, 2019.

[37] V lieg, M. & Jones, D., BluCore Sand EPD, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359839634_Blu-Core_Building_Sand_EPD (accessed 26 April 2022).

[38] R ockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, III, F.S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J., Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), p. 32, 2009. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/

[39] V lieg, M. & Jones, D., Benefit assessment in LCA. Proceedings FSLCI LCIC 2020 Conference, Berlin, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359865895_Benefit_Assessment_in_LCA, 2020 (accessed 26 April 2022).

[40] A ustralian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, Foundation to year 10 Curriculum: Cross-curriculum priorities, Sustainability, available at https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/, 2017 (accessed 26 April 2022).

[41] B osevska, J. & Kriewaldt, J., Fostering a whole-school approach to sustainability: Learning from one school’s journey towards sustainable education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(1), 55–73, 2020.

[42] W allace, H.D., Transdisciplinary learning in a kitchen garden: Connecting to nature and constructing a path to ecoliteracy. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(4), 309–323, 2019.

[43] da Silva-Branco, K. & Woods-McConney, A., Teachers’ experiences of implementing sustainability as a cross-curriculum priority in western Australian schools. Teaching Science, Deakin West, A.C.T. 67(3), 39–50, 2021.

[44] E vans, N., Stevenson, R., B., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J. & Davis, J., Approaches to embedding sustainability in teacher education: a synthesis of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 405–417, 2017.

[45] S quella Padilla, M.P., Environmental education to environmental sustainability, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(2), 217–230, 2001. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812. 2001.tb00264.x.

[46] Muñoz-Pedreros, A., Environmental education in Chile, a task pending, Ambiente & Sociedade, 17(3), 177–198, 2014.

[47] Condeza-Marmentini, A. & Flores-González, L., Teachers’ transgressive pedagogical practices in context: ecology, politics, and social change, Sustainability, 11, 6145, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216145

[48] A cuna, V., Environmental citizenship in Chilean school textbooks: A case study on environmental citizenship education in Chilean basic-education textbooks of 2012, Thesis. University of British Columbia, https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0166418, 2015 (accessed 26 April 2022).

[49] B erríos-Villarroel, A., Orellana-Fernández, R. & Bastías-Bastías, L.S., Sustainable development and secondary school Chilean curriculum: What do school programs propose?, Revista Electrónica Educare, 25(1), pp. 333–355, 2021.

[50] A ndrews, D., Lishman, B. & Newton, E., Being Bad to do Good: Etc in design and engineering curricular. FSLCI LCIC 2020 Conference, Berlin Germany, London, United Kingdom, https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8q6v8, 2020 (accessed 26 April 2022).