Comparative Ecosystem Analysis of Urban Ponds: Implications for Synergistic Benefits and Potential Trade-Offs Resulting from Retrofitting of Green Roofs in Their Catchments

Comparative Ecosystem Analysis of Urban Ponds: Implications for Synergistic Benefits and Potential Trade-Offs Resulting from Retrofitting of Green Roofs in Their Catchments

Vladimir Krivtsov Steve Birkinshaw Rebecca Yahr Valerie Olive

Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Newcastle University, England, UK

SUERC, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK

University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Page: 
323-339
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/EI-V4-N4-323-339
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

This paper provides a summary of ecological functioning, biodiversity and water chemistry of two sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) ponds, and compares the level of ecosystem services with those attainable by retrofitting green roofs (GRs) in the ponds’ catchments. These study sites are characterised by relatively high diversity of habitats, including aquatic, mesic and terrestrial; the importance of the latter is highlighted using the analysis of vascular plants and calcicolous lichens. Both SuDS sites provide valuable multiple benefits related to the enhancement of local biodiversity, water quality improvement and alleviation of flood risk, and the retrofitting of GRs would further enhance flood resilience and biodiversity of the area. However, there might be potentially negative effects on the runoff water quality and hydrobiological community composition of the receiving ponds. Changes in the runoff chemistry combined with the decreases in flush rate of high-flow events would increase the risk of cyanobacterial dominance during late summer and autumn. Such trade-offs should be carefully considered in planning any practical actions. This study elucidates indirect effects by following the methodological framework of comparative ecosystem analysis, which will be of use for any research and applications considering implementation of complex nature-based solutions (NBS), including those within the context of sustainable development of blue-green cities (BGC).

Keywords: 

blue-green infrastructure, community structure, CTEA, hydrological modelling, indirect effects, mesofauna, newts, plankton, runoff chemistry, terrestrial flora, fungi, urban pollution

  References

[1] D’Arcy BJ, Kim L-H, Maniquiz-Redillas M., Wealth creation without pollution. Designing for industry, ecobusiness parks and industrial estates. London: IWAP; 2018.

[2] O’Donnell E, Thorne C, Ahilan S, Arthur S, Birkinshaw S, Butler D, et al. The blue-green path to urban flood resilience. Blue-Green Systems. 2020;2(1):28–45.

[3] Fenner R. Spatial evaluation of multiple benefits to encourage multi-functional design of sustainable drainage in blue-green cities. Water. 2017;9(12):953.

[4] Fenner R, O’Donnell E, Ahilan S, Dawson D, Kapetas L, Krivtsov V, et al. Achieving urban flood resilience in an uncertain future. Water. 2019;11(5).

[5] Morgan M, Fenner R. Spatial evaluation of the multiple benefits of sustainable drainage systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Water Management 2019 2019;172(1):39–52.

[6] CIRIA. Blue-green infrastructure – perspectives on planning, evaluation and collabora-tion. London: CIRIA C780a; 2019.

[7] Oberndorfer E, Lundholm J, Bass B, Coffman RR, Doshi H, Dunnett N, et al. Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. BioScience. 2007;57(10):823–33.

[8] Köhler M, Ksiazek-Mikenas K. Chapter 3.14 – Green Roofs as Habitats for Biodiver-sity. In: Pérez G, Perini K, editors. Nature Based Strategies for Urban and Building Sustainability: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. p. 239–49.

[9] Shafique M, Xue X, Luo X. An overview of carbon sequestration of green roofs in urban areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2020;47:126515.

[10] Ahilan S, Guan MF, Wright N, Sleigh A, Allen D, Arthur S, et al. Modelling the long-term suspended sedimentological effects on stormwater pond performance in an urban catchment. Journal of Hydrology. 2019;571:805–18.

[11] Jarvie J, Arthur S, Beevers L. Valuing multiple benefits, and the public perception of SUDS ponds. Water 2017;9(2):128.

[12] O’Brien CD. Sustainable drainage system (SuDS) ponds in Inverness, UK and the favourable conservation status of amphibians. Urban ecosystems. 2015;18(1):321–31.

[13] Krivtsov V, Birkinshaw S, Forbes H, Olive V, Chamberlain D, Lomax J, et al. Hydrology, ecology and water chemistry of two suds ponds: detailed analysis of ecosystem services provided by blue-green infrastructure. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment. 2020;194:167–78.

[14] Krivtsov V. Investigations of indirect relationships in ecology and environmental sciences: a review and the implications for comparative theoretical ecosystem analysis. Ecological Modelling. 2004;174(1–2):37–54.

[15] Krivtsov V. Indirect Effects in Ecology. In: Jorgensen SE, Fath BD, editors. Encyclope-dia of ecology: Newnes; 2008. p. 1948–58.

[16] Ewen J, Parkin G, O’Connell PE. SHETRAN: distributed river basin flow and transport modeling system. Journal of hydrologic engineering. 2000;5(3):250–8.

[17] Lewis E, Birkinshaw S, Kilsby C, Fowler HJ. Development of a system for automated setup of a physically-based, spatially-distributed hydrological model for catchments in Great Britain. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2018;108:102–10. 

[18] Glenis V, Kutija V, Kilsby CG. A fully hydrodynamic urban flood modelling system representing buildings, green space and interventions. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2018;109:272–92.

[19] Birkinshaw SJ, O’Donnell G, Glenis V, Kilsby C. Improved hydrological modelling of urban catchments using runoff coefficients. Journal of Hydrology. 2021;594:125884.

[20] Van Seters T, Rocha L, Smith D, MacMillan G. Evaluation of green roofs for runoff retention, runoff quality, and leachability. Water Quality Research Journal. 2009;44(1):33–47.

[21] Gedge D, Grant G, Kadas G, Dinham C. Creating green roofs for invertebrates – a best practice guide. Peterborough: Buglife; 2012.

[22] Ibrahim MW, Hamzah AF, Jamaluddin N, Ramadhansyah P, Fadzil A. Split tensile strength on self-compacting concrete containing coal bottom ash. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;195:2280–9.

[23] Ahmed N. Runoff water quality from a green roof and in an open storm water system. TVVR 10/5020. 2011.

[24] Zhang Q, Wang X, Hou P, Wan W, Li R, Ren Y, et al. Quality and seasonal variation of rainwater harvested from concrete, asphalt, ceramic tile and green roofs in Chongqing, China. Journal of Environmental Management. 2014;132:178–87.

[25] Vijayaraghavan K, Joshi UM, Balasubramanian R. A field study to evaluate runoff quality from green roofs. Water Research. 2012;46(4):1337–45.

[26] Krivtsov V, Bellinger E, Sigee D. Water and nutrient budgeting of Rostherne Mere, Cheshire, UK. Nordic Hydrology. 2002;33(5):391–414.

[27] CIRIA. Blue-green infrastructure – perspectives on water quality benefits. London: CIRIA C780b; 2019.

[28] Ahilan S, Guan M, Wright N, Sleigh A, Allen D, Arthur S, et al. Modelling the longterm suspended sedimentological effects on stormwater pond performance in an urban catchment. Journal of hydrology. 2019;571:805–18.

[29] Krivtsov V, Howarth M, Jones S. Characterising observed patterns of suspended particulate matter and relationships with oceanographic and meteorological variables: studies in Liverpool Bay. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2009;24(6):677–85.

[30] Krivtsov V, Howarth M, Jones S, Souza A, Jago C. Monitoring and modelling of the Irish Sea and Liverpool Bay: an overview and an SPM case study. Ecological Modelling. 2008;212(1–2):37–52.

[31] Krivtsov V, Arthur S, Buckman J, Kraiphet A, Needham T, Gu W, et al. Characterisation of suspended and sedimented particulate matter in blue-green infrastructure ponds. Blue-Green Systems. 2020;2(1):214–36.

[32] Krivtsov V, Arthur S, Buckman J, Bischoff J, Christie D, Birkinshaw S, et al. Monitoring and Modelling SUDS Retention Ponds: Case Studies from Scotland ICONHIC; Chania, Greece. http://www.urbanfloodresilience.ac.uk/documents/krivtsov-et-al.-iconhic-2019b.pdf 2019.

[33] Krivtsov V, Birkinshaw S, Arthur S, Knott D, Monfries R, Wilson K, et al. Flood resilience, amenity and biodiversity benefits of an historic urban pond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 2020;378(2168):20190389.

[34] Codd G. Toxins of freshwater cyanobacteria. Microbiological Sciences. 1984;1(2):48–52.

[35] Krivtsov V, Tien C, Sigee D, Bellinger E. X-ray microanalytical study of the protozoan Ceratium hirundinella from Rostherne Mere (Cheshire, UK): dynamics of intracellular elemental concentrations, correlations and implications for overall ecosystem functioning. Netherlands Journal of Zoology. 1999;49(4):263–74.Vladimir Krivtsov et al., Int. J. Environ. Impacts, Vol. 4, No. 4 (2021) 339

[36] Bloor MC, Banks CJ, Krivtsov V. Acute and sublethal toxicity tests to monitor the impact of leachate on an aquatic environment. Environment International. 2005;31(2):269–73.

[37] Bloor MC, Banks CJ, Krivtsov V. Population dynamics in Asellus aquaticus as modified by chronic leachate stress. Engineering Geology. 2006;85(1–2):9–13.

[38] Krivtsov V, Illian J, Liddell K, Garside A, Bezginova T, Salmond R, et al. Some aspects of complex interactions involving soil mesofauna: analysis of the results from a Scottish woodland. Ecological Modelling. 2003;170(2–3):441–52.

[39] Krivtsov V. Study of cause-and-effect relationships in the formation of biocenoses: their use for the control of eutrophication. Russian Journal of Ecology. 2001;32(4):230–4.

[40] Krivtsov V, Bezginova T, Salmond R, Liddell K, Garside A, Thompson J, et al. Ecological interactions between fungi, other biota and forest litter composition in a unique Scottish woodland. Forestry. 2006;79(2):201–16.

[41] Tien CJ, Krivtsov V, Levado E, Sigee DC, White KN. Occurrence of cell-associated mucilage and soluble extracellular polysaccharides in Rostherne Mere and their possible significance. Hydrobiologia. 2002;485(1–3):245–52.

[42] Krivtsov V, Sigee DC. Importance of biological and abiotic factors for geochemical cycling in a freshwater eutrophic lake. Biogeochemistry. 2005;74(2):205–30.

[43] Puchol-Salort P, Van Reeuwijk M, Mijic A. Natural Capital Impact Assessment.

[44] Hölzinger O, Sadler J, Scott A, Grayson N. NCPT-managing environmental gains and losses. Town & Country Planning. 2019:167.

[45] Ncube S, Arthur S, Kapetas L, Fenner R, Birkinshaw S. Impact of blue/green and grey infrastructure interventions on natural capital in urban development.

[46] Collective Architecture. Meadowbank development green roof options appraisal. Collective architecture; 2020.

[47] Grant G. Ecosystem services come to town: greening cities by working with nature: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.

[48] Brears RC. Blue and Green Cities: the role of blue-green infrastructure in managing urban water resources: Springer; 2018.

[49] Lashford C, Rubinato M, Cai Y, Hou J, Abolfathi S, Coupe S, et al. SuDS & sponge cities: a comparative analysis of the implementation of pluvial flood management in the UK and China. Sustainability. 2019;11(1):213.

[50] Krivtsov V, D’Arcy BJ, Sevilla AE, Arthur S, Semple C. Mitigating Polluted Runoff from Industrial Estates by SUDS Retrofits: Case Studies of Problems and Solutions Co-Designed with a Participatory Approach, Sustainability (In Press). 2021.

[51] Krivtsov V, Ahilan S, Arthur S, Birkinshaw S, Dawson D, Everett G, et al. Blue-Green Cities: Achieving Urban Flood Resilience, Water Security and Biodiversity. The Pal-grave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures (in Press), ed. R.C. Brears, 2021.