OPEN ACCESS
The levels of air pollution in the cities of Greater Bay Area in Southern China, including Macao, are extremely high and often exceeded the levels recommended by World Health Organization Air Quality Guidelines. In order for the population to take precautionary measures and avoid further health risks un- der high pollutant exposure, it is important to develop a reliable air quality forecast. Statistical models based on multiple regression analysis were developed successfully for Macao to predict the next-day concentrations of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) for Taipa Ambient, a background representative station located within the area of Macao (32.9 km2), at Taipa Grande, the headquarter of Macao Meteorological and Geophysical Bureau. The two developed models were statistically significantly valid, with a 95% confidence level with high coefficients of determination. A wide range of meteorological and air quality variables were identified, and only some were selected as significant dependent variables. The meteorological variables such as geopotential height and relative humidity at different vertical levels were selected from an extensive list of variables. The air quality variables that translate the resilience of the recent past concentrations of each pollutant were the ones selected. The models were based in meteorological and air quality variables with five years of historical data, from 2013 to 2017. The data from 2013 to 2016 were used to develop the statistical models and data from 2017 were used for validation purposes, with high coefficients of determination between predicted and observed daily average concentrations (0.92 and 0.89 for PM10 and PM2.5 , respectively). The results are expected to be the basis for an operational air quality forecast for the region.
air pollutants, air quality forecast, management, modelling, monitoring
[1] Sheng, N. & Tang, U.W., Risk assessment of traffic-related air pollution in a world heritage city. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10(1), pp. 11–18, 2013.
[2] Statistics and Census Service (DSEC), Macao in Figures. Available at http://www.dsec.gov.mo/Statistic.aspx?NodeGuid=ba1a4eab-213a-48a3-8fbb-962d15dc6f87, 2018 (accessed 1 March 2019).
[3] United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Particle Pollution and Your Health. Available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P1001EX6.txt, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[4] World Health Organization (WHO), Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/112199/E79097.pdf, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[5] Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE), Ambient Air Quality Standards. Available at http://210.72.1.216:8080/gzaqi/Document/gjzlbz.pdf, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[6] Krzyzanowski, M. & Cohen, A., Update of WHO air quality guidelines. pp. 7–13, 2008.
[7] World Health Organization (WHO), Air Quality Guidelines. Available at http://202.171.253.71/www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78638/E90038.pdf, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[8] World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide. Available at http://202.171.253.72/apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69477/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[9] World Health Organization (WHO), Evolution of WHO Air Quality Guidelines: Past, Present and Future. Available at http://202.171.253.69/www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/331660/Evolution-air-quality.pdf, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[10] World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Expert Consultation : Available Evidence for the Future Update of the WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines (AQG). Available at http://202.171.253.66/www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/301720/Evidencefuture-update-AQGs-mtg-report-Bonn-sept-oct-15.pdf, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[11] Macao Meteorological and Geophysical Bureau (SMG), Resumo anual sobre qualidade do ar em Macau – 2017. Available at http://www.smg.gov.mo/smg/airQuality/pdf/IQA_2017_PT.pdf, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[12] Lopes, D., Ferreira, J., Hoi, K.I., Miranda, A.I., Yuen, K.V. & Mok, K.M., Weather research and forecasting model simulations over the Pearl River Delta Region. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, pp. 115–125, 2018.
[13] Lopes, D., Hoi, K.I., Mok, K.M., Miranda, A.I., Yuen, K.V. & Borrego, C., Air quality in the main cities of the Pearl River Delta Region. Global Nest Journal, 18(4), pp. 794–802, 2016.
[14] He, D., Zhou, Z., He, K., Hao, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Z. & Deng, Y., Assessment of traffic related air pollution in urban areas of Macao. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 12(1), pp. 39–46, 2000.
[15] Ferreira, F.C., Torres, P.M., Tente, H.S. & Neto, J.B., Ozone levels in Portugal: the Lisbon region assessment, 2004.
[16] Clapp, L.J. & Jenkin, M.E., Analysis of the relationship between ambient levels of O3, NO2 and NO as a function of NOx in the UK. Atmospheric Environment, 35(36), pp. 6391–6405, 2001.
[17] Ferreira, F., Tente, H., Torres, P., Cardoso, S. & Palma-Oliveira, J., Air quality monitoring and management in Lisbon. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 65, pp. 443–450, 2000.
[18] Neto, J., Ferreira, F., Torres, P.M. & Boavida, F., Lisbon air quality forecast using statistical methods. International Jounral of Environment Pollution, 39(3), pp. 333–340, 2009.
[19] Wang, W., Lu, W., Wang, X. & Leung A.Y.T., Prediction of maximum daily ozone level using combined neural network and statistical characteristics. Environment International, 29(5), pp. 555–562, 2003.
[20] European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), User Guide to ECMWF Forecast Products, Version 4.0. Available at https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/geofag/nedlagte-emner/GEF4220/v09/undervisningsmateriale/Persson_user_guide.pdf, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[21] Choi, W., Paulson, S.E., Casmassi, J. & Winer, A.M., Evaluating meteorological comparability in air quality studies: classification and regression trees for primary pollutants in California’s South Coast Air Basin. Atmospheric Environment, 64, pp. 150–159, 2013.
[22] United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Guidelines for Developing an Air Quality (Ozone and PM2.5) Forecasting Program. Available at http://infohawk.uiowa.edu/F/19FJHSI1VLLSQ1YJQLQ7SK1BIG4QCC5N92I2J7Y3LIFRT6CDFN-03298?func=full-set-set&set_number=002362&set_entry=000004&format=999, (accessed 1 March 2019).
[23] Cassmassi, J.C., Objective ozone forecasting in south coast air basin: updating the objective prediction models for the late 1990’s and Southern California ozone study (SCOS97-NARSTO) applications, 1997.
[24] Oduro, S.D, Ha, Q.P. & Duc, H., Vehicular emissions prediction with CART-BMARS hybrid models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49, pp. 188–202, 2016.
[25] Durão, R.M., Mendes, M.T. & Pereira, M.J., Forecasting O3 levels in industrial area surroundings up to 24 h in advance, combining classification trees and MLP models. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 7, pp. 961–970, 2016.