Biologically-inspired Innovation in Large Companies: a Path for Corporate Participation in Biophysical Systems?

Biologically-inspired Innovation in Large Companies: a Path for Corporate Participation in Biophysical Systems?

T.L. Mead

Centre for Innovation and Service Research, School of Business, University of Exeter, UK

Page: 
216-229
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V9-N3-216-229
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 September 2014
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The use of Biologically-Inspired Design (BID) has become increasingly prominent as an innovation tool for sustainability in large corporations. This research, from the perspective of innovation management and organizational development, explores the use of BID as a tool for corporate sustainability at multiple levels and reflects on the implications for corporate sustainability agendas. The review of the literature analyses the history of BID in a broad sense, both with and without sustainability objectives, and disambiguates several aspects of the field that have been largely overlooked in the popular media. Many corporate managers are utilizing the methods and tools of BID with little understanding of how they may or may not connect to corporate sustainability objectives of the organization. This research aims to bring this to light and create a much-needed critical dialogue around the use of BID for sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI). A four-tiered model is used to frame the use of BID in this setting and existing case studies are used to test the model.  Research outcomes include creating a framework for understanding how BID can be used to inform innovative solutions within the product, process, organizational and systems-levels by embedding sustainability criteria at each level using various biological models. The aim of this research is not to simply deconstruct BID, but rather to create a dialogue amongst sustainability practitioners, corporate professionals and academics that increases the robustness of the tool for use in achieving sustainability goals and objectives.

Keywords: 

biomimicry, Biologically-Inspired Design, Biomimetics, Corporate Sustainability, Sustainability-Oriented Innovation

  References

[1] Romei, F. Leonardo Da Vinci. The Oliver Press, Inc., 2008.

[2] Wiltgen, B., Vattam, S. & Helms, M. Learning functional models of biological systems for biologically inspired design. 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2011.110

[3] De Pauw, I., Kandachar, P., Karana, E. & Peck, D., Nature inspired design: Strategies towards sustainability. Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation ERSCP-EMSU Conference, Delft, Netherlands. pp. 1–21, 2010. 

[4] Nelson, E., How Interface innovates with suppliers to create sustainability solutions. Glob Bus Organ Excell. Sept/Oct, pp. 22–30, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joe.20285

[5] Chen, P. & Nychka, J.A., Inspiration from nature — biomimetic materials workshop at the San Diego Zoo. J Mater., 63(6), pp. 19–21, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11837-0110085-3

[6] Bonser, R.H.C., Patented biologically-inspired technological innovations: A twenty year view. J Bionic Eng., 3(1), pp. 39–41, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1672-6529(06)60005-x

[7] The Fermanian Business and Economic Institute. Global Biomimicry Efforts: An Economic Game Changer, pp. 1–43, 2010.

[8] Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Overy, P. & Denyer, D., Innovating for sustainability: A systematic review of the body of knowledge, pp. 1–106, 2013.

[9] Klewitz, J. & Hansen, E.G., Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. 

J Clean Prod. July 65. pp. 57–75, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017

[10] Tidd, J., & Bessant, J., Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

[11] Adams, R., Bessant, J. & Phelps, R., Innovation management measurement: A review. Int J Manag Rev., 8(1), pp. 21–47, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x

[12] Benyus, J., Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. HarperCollins, 1997. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/4450504

[13] Bar-Cohen, Y., Biomimetics – Using nature to inspire human innovation. Bioinspir Biomim., 1(1), pp. 1–12, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/1/1/p01

[14] Goel, A.K., McAdams, D.A. & Stone, R.B., Biologically Inspired Design: Computational Methods and Tools, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4

[15] Fish, F.E. & Beneski, J.T., Evolution and bio-inspired design: natural limitations. Eds. Goel, A.K., McAdams, D.A. & Stone, R.B. Biologically Inspired Design. London: Springer London. 

pp. 287–312, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_12

[16] Holden, G., Looking to nature to catalyze energy R&D. Res Manag., Jul-Aug, pp. 7–8, 2012.

[17] Tàbara, J.D. & Chabay, I., Coupling human information and knowledge systems with social–ecological systems change: Reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability.  Environ Sci Policy. Apr. 28, pp. 71–81, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.005

[18] Braungart, M. & McDonough, W., Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. 

Random House, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781847203052.00011 [19] Heinberg, R., Peak Everything. Clairview Books, 2007. 

[20] Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.I., Randers, J. & Behrens III, W.W., The Limits to Growth: A  Report to The Club of Rome. pp. 1–9, 1972. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1

[21] Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S. & Lambin, E.F., et al., A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 461(Sept), pp. 472–5, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/461472a

[22] Elkington, J., Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing Ltd, Oxford, 1997. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-3997

[23] Hall, J. & Wagner, M., Integrating sustainability into fi rms’ processes: Performance effects and the moderating role of business models and innovation. Bus Strateg Environ., 21(3), pp. 183–96, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.728

[24] Switzer, J. & Ehrenfeld J.R., Independent environmental auditors: What does ISO 14001 registration really mean? Environ Qual Manag. Autumn. pp. 17–33, 1999.

[25] Perego, P. & Kolk, A., Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of thirdparty assurance of sustainability reports. J Bus Ethics., 110(2). pp. 173–190, 2012. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5

[26] Böhringer, C. & Jochem, P.E.P., Measuring the immeasurable – A survey of sustainability indices. Ecol Econ., 63(1). pp. 1–8, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.008 [27] Kemp, R., Measuring eco-innovation. United Nations Univ Res Br., (1), pp. 1–8, 2008.

[28] Van Zeijl-Rozema, A., Ferraguto, L., & Caratti, P., Comparing region-specifi c sustainability assessments through indicator systems: Feasible or not? Ecol Econ., 70(3), pp. 475–486, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.025

[29] Wolff, F. & Schönherr, N., The impact evaluation of sustainable consumption policy instruments. J Consum Policy., 34(1), pp. 43–66, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10603-0109152-3

[30] Pogutz, S. & Winn, M., Organizational ecosystem embeddedness and its implications for sustainable fi t strategies. Research Seminar at Universita Bocconi, 2011. 

[31] Whiteman, G., Walker, B. & Perego, P., Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. J Manag Stud., 50(2), pp. 307–36, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-6486.2012.01073.x

[32] Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C.K. & Rangaswami, M.R., Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harv Bus Rev., Sep. pp. 1–10, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ emr.2013.6601104

[33] Kallio, T.J. & Nordberg, P., The evolution of organizations and natural environment discourse: Some critical remarks. Organ Environ., 19(4), pp. 439–457, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1086026606294955

[34] Bejan, A. & Lorente, S., Constructal law of design and evolution: Physics, biology, technology, and society. J Appl Phys., 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4798429

[35] Wahl, D.C., Bionics vs. biomimicry: From control of nature to sustainable participation in nature. Design in Nature III: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering. WIT Press: Southampton, UK. pp. 289–98, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/dn060281

[36] Marshall, A. & Lozeva, S., Questioning the theory and practice of biomimicry. Int J Des Nat Ecodynamics, 4(1), pp. 1–10, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/dne-v4-n1-1-10

[37] Iouguina, A., Dawson, J.W., Hallgrimsson, B. & Smart, G., biologically informed disciplines : 

a comparative analysis of terminology within the fi elds of bionics, biomimetics, biomimicry and bio-inspiration, among others. Pending Publication in Des Nat VII, 2014. 

[38] Knippers, J. & Speck, T., Design and construction principles in nature and architecture. 

 Bioinspir Biomim., 7(1), pp. 1–10, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/015002 [39] McHarg, IL., Design With Nature. Natural History Press., 1969. 

[40] Lange-Merrill, C.,  Biomimicry of the Dooxygen Active Site in the Cooper Proteins Hemocyanin and Cytocrhrome Oxidase. Doctoral Thesis, pp. 1–204, 1982.

[41] Marshall, A., The theory and practice of ecomimicry. Sustain Gondwana. Aug(3), pp. 1-32, 2007.

[42] Vincent, J.F., Bogatyreva, O.V., Bogatyrev, N.R., Bowyer, A. & Pahl, A.K., Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. J R Soc Interface, 3(9), pp. 471–82, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/ rsif.2006.0127

[43] Harkness, J.M., In appreciation: A lifetime of connections: Otto Herbert Schmitt, 1913–1998. Phys Perspect., 4(4), pp. 456–490, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s000160200005

[44] Biomimicry 3.8. Online: http://biomimicry.net/. 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-012-415995-2.00019-2

[45] Johnson, E.R., Reanimating bios: Biomimetic science and the empire. Doctoral Thesis. pp. 1–222, 2011.

[46] Mathews, F., Towards a deeper philosophy of biomimicry. Organ Environ., 24(4), pp. 364–87, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086026611425689

[47] Lepora, N.F., Verschure, P. & Prescott T.J., The state of the art in biomimetics. Bioinspir Biomim. 8(1), pp. 1–11, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/8/1/013001

[48] Kaye, H.L., The Social Meaning of Modern Biology. Transaction Publishers, 1997.

[49] Mueller, T., Biomimetics. National Geographic Magazine. Online: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/04/biomimetics/tom-mueller-text, 2013.

[50] Hutchins, G., Biomimicry: Looking to nature to solve human problems. Guardian Sustainable Business Blog. 2013. Online: http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/biomimcry-nature-human-problems-sustainability.

[51] Hennighausen, A. & Roston, E., 14 smart inventions inspired by nature. Bloomberg: Sustainability. Online: http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2013-08-18/14-smart-inventions-inspired-by-nature-biomimicry.html, 2013.

[52] Ungereleider, N. Mims, C., Clendaniel, M. & Parr, S., Biomimicry. Fast Company. Online: http://www.fastcompany.com/section/biomimicry, 2013.

[53] Mason, S., Ingredient innovation: Inspired by nature. Ingredients: Eco Trends., Mar. pp. 44–47, 2012.

[54] Jacobsen, N.B., Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark. J Ind Ecol., 1, pp. 239–55, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545411

[55] Volstad, N.L. & Boks, C., On the use of biomimicry as a useful tool for the industrial designer. Sustain Dev., 20(3), pp. 189–199, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1535

[56] Anderson, R., Confessions of a Radical Industrialist: How Interface Proved That You Can Build a Successful Business Without Destroying the Planet. Random House, 2010. 

[57] Linnenluecke, M.K. & Griffi ths, A., Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability fi eld. Glob Environ Chang., 23(1), pp. 382–391, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.007

[58] Hart, S.L., Milstein, M.B. & Caggiano, J., Creating sustainable value. Acad Manag Exec., 17(2), pp. 56–69, 2013.

[59] Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.I., Krause, T. & Hugo, V., Shifting paradigms for sustainable  development: Implications for management theory and research. Acad Manag Rev., 20(4), pp. 874–907, 1995. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024

[60] Marcus, J., Kurucz, E.C. & Colbert B.A., Conceptions of the Business-Society-Nature interface: Implications for management scholarship. Bus Soc., 49(3), pp. 402–438, 2010. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650310368827

[61] Winn, M.I. & Pogutz, S., Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: New horizons for management research. Organ Environ., 26(2), pp. 203–229, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1086026613490173

[62] Biermann, F., Planetary boundaries and earth system governance: Exploring the links. Ecol Econ. 81, pp. 4–9. 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.016

[63] Leach, M., Raworth, K. & Rockström, J. Between social and planetary boundaries: Navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity. World Social Science Report, pp. 84–89, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264203419-10-en

[64] Muys, B., Sustainable development within planetary boundaries : A functional revision of the defi nition based on the thermodynamics of complex social-ecological systems. Chal Sust., 1(1) pp. 41–52, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12924/cis2013.01010041

[65] Engelbrecht, A.P., Fundamentals of Computational Swarm Intelligence, 2005. doi: http://dx .doi.org/10.1109/sis.2005.1501612

[66] Singh, J.V. & Lumsden, C.J., Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annu Rev Sociol. 16, pp. 161–95, 1990. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001113

[67] Hahlweg, K. & Hoooker, C.A., Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology: Contemporary Engagements Between Analytic and Continental Thought. SUNY Press, 1989. 

[68] Bessant, J. & Tidd, J., Innovation and Entrepreneurship. John Wiley & Sons, 2007. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740910946778

[69] Altenburg, T. & Pegels, A., Sustainability-oriented innovation systems – managing the green transformation. Innov Dev., 2(1) pp. 5–22, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/215793 0x.2012.664037

[70] Ehrenfeld, J. & Gertler, N., Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. J Ind Ecol., 1(1), pp. 67–79, 1997. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.1.67

[71] Ellen MacArthur Foundation.  Case Studies: Splosh. Online: http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/case_studies/splosh.

[72] Ellen Macarthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy, 1, p. 96, 2013.

[73] Walker A., Biomimicry Challenge: IDEO Taps Octopi and Flamingos to Reorganize the USGBC. Fast Company: Business + Innovation. Online: http://www.fastcompany.com/1643489/ biomimicry-challenge-ideo-taps-octopi-and-fl amingos-reorganize-usgbc, 2013.

[74] Harman, J., The Shark’s Paintbrush: Biomimicry and How Nature is Inspiring Innovation. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2013. 

[75] Nameroff, T.J., Garant, R.J. & Albert, M.B., Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents. Res Policy, 33(6-7), pp. 959–74, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.001

[76] Bonabeau, E. & Meyer, C., Swarm Intelligence: A Whole New Way to Think About Business. Harv Bus Rev. May, pp. 106–14, 2001.

[77] HOK & Biomimicry 3.8. Genius of the Biome Report. p. 178. Online: http://biomimicry.net/ consulting/genius-of-biome-report/, 2013.

[78] Kim, S-J & Lee, J-H., How biomimetic approach enlarges morphological solution space in a streamlined high-speed train design? Proceedings of the 16th SIGRADI Conference. pp. 538–42, 2012.

[79] Kumar, R., Smith, S., McNeilan, J., Keeton, M., Sanders, J., Talamo, A., et al., Butterfl y wing-inspired nanotechnology. The Nanobiotechnology Handbook, CRC Press, p. 692, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b12935-11

[80] Bixler, G.D., Theiss, A., Bhushan, B. & Lee, S.C., Anti-fouling properties of microstructured surfaces bio-inspired by rice leaves and butterfl y wings. J Colloid Interface Sci., 419. pp. 114–33, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.019

[81] Okey, T.A., Strategy as ecology: Critique of the Keystone Advantage. Harv Bus Rev. Sep. p. 132, 2004.