Land Dedication for Ecodynamic Design and Ecological Conservation, A Case Study

Land Dedication for Ecodynamic Design and Ecological Conservation, A Case Study

M. Reyahi Khoram V. Norisharikabad M. Safikhani 

Department of Environment, Faculty of the Basic Knowledge, Islamic Azad University-Hamadan Branch in Hamadan, Iran.

Graduate School of the Environment and Energy, Islamic Azad University-science and Research Branch in Tehran, Iran.

Page: 
88-102
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V8-N1-88-102
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
31 March 2013
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Protected area and reserve system provide the core areas for biodiversity conservation. Establishment of protected areas is necessary for promoting sustainable management and biodiversity conservation. Protected area effectiveness, however, depends on management, monitoring, and improving protected area system design, as well as increasing local and national support. This research was conducted in the Hamadan province from 2006 to 2009. The aim of this research is to study and identify the sites in the province with appropriate capabilities for conservation under environmental management. Makhdoum’s model was used for evaluation and identifi cation of the land’s potential for ecological conservation. This model was presented for the ecological conditions of Iran by Majid F. Makhdoum, an Iranian Environmentalist, in 2002. In this model, 12 parameters related to different factors are used, and each informational layer consists of several classes. The model defi nes the capabilities of ecological conservations of the studied area. Based on the literature review and fi eld patrolling, only eight GIS data layers were obtained related to the studied area. The title of these layers are Habitat Trends (Ha), Biodiversity of Mammal Species (Ba), The Value of the Mammal Species (Bs), Protected Areas (Pr), Sensitive Habitats (Si), Overall Slope (So), The Value of the Protective Plant Species (Cvt), and Hydrologic Soil Groups (Phg). The software Arc View (version 3.2a) was used with the UTM projection to analyze the data. Based on our evaluation of the results, areas that may be suitable for ecological conservation were included on a map of the studied area. The total area that was suitable for ecological conservation based on these data was 189,000 hectares, which is 9.7 percent of the province area. According to these evaluations, the Hamadan province has a moderate potential for environmental conservation.

Keywords: 

biodiversity, conservation, ecology, environmental evaluation and planning, GIS, methodology

  References

[1] Mirkarimi, H., Landscape ecological planning for protected areas using spatial and temporal metrics, [PhD dissertation]. School of mathematical and geospatial sciences discipline of geospatial sciences, Australia: University of RMIT: Melborne, pp. 39–54, 2007.

[2] Makhdoum, M.F., Darvishsefat, A.A., Jafarzadeh, H. & Makhdoum, A.F., Environmental evaluation and planning by geographic information system, Tehran university publication: Tehran, pp. 185–242, 2002.

[3] Rezaian, S., Jozi, A. & Alesheikh, A., Design and Implementation of a GIS Model for Evaluat-ing Iran Ecological Capabilities, Proc. of Map Middle East Conf.: Dubai, 2006.

[4] Makhdoum, M.F., Management of protected areas and conservation of biodiversity in Iran, International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65(4), pp. 563–585, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/00207230802245898

[5] Department of Environment (DoE), Biodiversity Conservation Planning in Iran from Rio to Jo’burk (Riport to the World Summit on Sustainable Development), DoE publication: Tehran, pp. 22–24, 2002.

[6] Reyahi Khoram, M., Shariat, M., Moharamnejad, N., Azar, A. & Mahjub, H., Ecological C apability Evaluation for Aquaculture Activities by GIS, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2(3), pp. 183–188, 2005.

[7] Reyahi Khoram, M., Norisharikabad, V. & Jahangiri. H., Review of Biotic Capabilities and limiting factors in Lashgardar Protected Area (LPA) in Hamadan Province, Proc. of World Biodiversity Cong, Chiang Mai, pp. 31–32, 2009.

[8] Makhdoum, M.F., Fundamental of Land use planning, Tehran university publication: Tehran, pp. 197–205, 2001.

[9] Ziaie, H.A., Field guide to the Mammals of Iran, Iran wildlife center: Tehran, pp. 127–279, 2008.

[10] Burrough, P.A., Principles of geographic information systems for land resources assessment, 2nd edn., Oxford science publication: New York, pp. 10–15, 1996.

[11] Michael, N.D., Fundamental of geographic information systems, 4th edn., John Wily & Sons, INC.:U.S.A., pp. 313–333, 2009.

[12] McHarg, I.L., Design with nature, Natural history press: New York, pp. 53–76, 1971.

[13] Buckley, R., Jessica, R., Joanne, C. & Narelle K., Monitoring for management of conservation and recreation in Australian protected areas, Biodiversity Conserve, 17(1), pp. 3589–3606, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9448-7

[14] Soil Conservation Service (SCS), Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release, 55 (TR-55), pp. 6/8–6/12, 1986.

[15] Randolph, j., Environmental Land Use Planning and Management, Island Press: Washington, DC, pp. 36–106, 2003.

[16] Geneletti, D. & Iris, V.D. , Protected area zoning for conservation and use: A combination of spatial multicriteria and multiobjective evaluation, Landscape Urban Planning, 85(2), pp. 97–110, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.10.004

[17] Natalie, C. & Ban, Minimum data requirements for designing a set of marine protected  areas using commonly available abiotic and biotic datasets, Biodiversity Conserv, 18(7), pp. 1829–1845, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9560-8

[18] Dilek, E.F., Sahin, S. & Yilmazer, I., Afforestation areas defi ned by GIS in Goelbai specially protected area Ankara/Turkey, Environ Monit Assess, 44, pp. 251–259, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9985-7