OPEN ACCESS
This paper introduces the concept of an innovative truss system (truss-Z) that allows the creation of complex and re-confi gurable structural networks with certain organic aesthetics. The system is composed of two modular units used for constructing the main structure of the truss and a single module for the supporting structure. An example is given of the use of the system to provide pedestrian walkways, which allows the connection of any given number of points in space (terminals). It also permits the creation of loops and multiple branches of the structure. The geometry of the truss-Z is based on a universal module which, subject to geometrical transformations, allows the construction of structural links along virtually any 3D paths. Scale models of the modules are created from resin cast using two types of mold and timber using an aluminum template. Various algorithms for local and global discrete optimization of the modular structure are proposed. A number of cases of creating a truss network in a constrained environment are discussed. The elements of the environment model real obstacles such as roads, buildings, and watercourses that may constrain both the run of the truss and the placement of the supports. An example of a truss-Z network connecting six terminals in an environment with three obstacles is shown. The issues of fabrication of the modules of the truss, full-size manufacturing, and joinery are also discussed.
3D, emergence, modular, organic, overpass, reusable mold, template, truss system
[1] Spuybroek, L., NOX: Machining Architecture, Thames & Hudson: London, England, pp. 142–157, 2004.
[2] Spuybroek, L., The Architecture of Variation, Thames & Hudson: London, England, pp. 127–129, 2009.
[3] “Allround Modular Truss System” by Wilhelm Layher GmbH & Co. KG, available at www.
layher.co.nz/scaffold-project-allround-modular-truss-system.html.
[4] Modular truss systems: (US Pyatents 5964068, 5826384, 7347030, 5390463).
[5] Daily, C., Lees, D. & McKitterick, D., Truss Structure Design, United States Patent and Trademark Offi ce, Alexandria, VA, USA, 6076324, 1997.
[6] Staib, G., Dörrhöfer, A. & Rosenthal, M., Components and Systems: Modular Construction Design, Structure, New Technologies, Edition Detail: Munich, Germany, 2008.
[7] Bowman, R., An Introductory Guide to the Slip Resistance of Pedestrian Surface Materials, Strathfi eld, NSW: Standards Australia; Wellington: Standards New Zealand, 1999.
[8] Billington, M.J., Bright, K.T. & Waters, J.R., The Building Regulations: Explained and Illustrated, Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, England, 2007.
[9] Terzidis, K., Algorithmic Architecture, Architectural Press: Oxford, England, p. 44, 2006.
[10] Fox, B., Rapid Manufacture in the Aeronautical Industry. Rapid Manufacturing: An Industrial Revolution for the Digital Age, eds. N. H opkinson, R.J.M. Hague & P.M. Dickens, John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, England, 2006.
[11] Corke, G., Rapid Prototyping for Architecture. Prototype, EDA Publications: London, England, 2006.
[12] Kudless, A., Oxman, N. & Swackhamer, M., Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Manufacturing at Foster + Partners. Acadia 2008 Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of ACADIA, 2008.
[13] Zawidzki, M., An algorithm for constructing a truss network with the modular truss-Z system for pedestrian traffi c in a 3D environment. Design & Nature V, Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, eds. C.A. Brebbia & A. Carpi, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment: Ashurst, England, 138, 2010.
[14] Jeronimidis, G., Bioinspiration for Engineering and Architecture: Materials – Structures – Function, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the ACADIA, Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture: Minneapolis, 2008.
[15] Bar-Cohen, Y., Biomimetics Biologically Inspired Technologies, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, p. 230, 2006.
[16] Zawidzki, M. & Nishikawa, I., Discrete optimization of modular truss network in constrained environment, Proceedings for CJK-OSM6: 6th China-Japan-Korea Joint Symposium on Optimization of Structural and Mechanical Systems, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers: Kyoto, Japan, 2010.
[17] Kicinger, R., Arciszewski, T. & De Jong, K.A., Evolutionary computation and structural d esign: a survey of the state of the art. Computers & Structures, 83(23–24), pp. 1943–1978, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.002
[18] Saridakis, K.M. & Dentsoras, A.J., Soft computing in engineering design - A review, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22, pp. 202–221, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.aei.2007.10.001
[19] Richardson, J.T., Palmer, M.R., Liepins, G. & Hilliard, M., Some Guidelines for Genetic A lgorithms with Penalty Functions, Proceedings of the Third ICGA, Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 191–197, 1989.
[20] Michalewicz, Z., Dasgupta, D., Le Riche, R.G. & Schoenauer, M., Evolutionary Algorithms for Constrained Engineering Problems, Computers & Industrial Engineering Journal, 30(2), pp. 851–870, 1996. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(96)00037-X
[21] Talbi E., Roux O., Fonlupt C. & Robillard D., Parallel Ant Colonies for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, IPPS/SPDP Workshops: pp. 239–247, 1999.
[22] Dueck, G., New optimization heuristics: the great deluge algorithm and the record-to-record travel, Journal of Computational Physics, 104, pp. 86–92, 1993. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ jcph.1993.1010
[23] Park, H.S. & Sung, C.W., Optimization of steel structures using distributed simulated annealingalgorithm on a cluster of personal computers, Computers and Structures 80, pp. 1305–1316, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00073-1