A Functional Analysis of the Jaw Mechanism in the Sling-Jaw Wrasse

A Functional Analysis of the Jaw Mechanism in the Sling-Jaw Wrasse

S.C. Burgess J. Wang A.C. Etoundi R. Vaidyanathan J.D. Oliver 

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bristol University, UK

Department of Biology, Liberty University, USA

30 November 2011
| Citation



Sling-jaw wrasse can deploy their mouths forward at high speed to catch prey and collect food. The forward swimming of the fi sh and the deployment of the jaw mechanism has been simulated using numerical analysis of the equations of motion. Computed tomography and reverse engineering have been used to obtain accurate geometrical and mass data of an actual sling jaw wrasse including the jaw mechanism. The analysis shows that maximum snout acceleration is up to 10.7 g, whereas the maximum fi sh acceleration is up to 0.25 g, thus showing the advantage of having the deployable snout. The analysis also shows that maximum snout acceleration is highly dependent on the size of the fi sh. Small fi sh of 7.5 cm length have a maximum snout acceleration of up to 10.7 g, whereas large fi sh of 35 cm length have a maximum snout acceleration of up to 5.2 g. The analysis may help to explain why deployable jaws are not seen on fi sh greater than about 35 cm in length. Hypothetical predator–prey c hasing scenarios show that the deployable mouth gives the sling-jaw wrasse a very signifi cant advantage when the prey is in close range. The sling-jaw wrasse demonstrates that linkage mechanisms enable a high degree of optimisation of movement to be achieved in a deployment mechanism. Biomimetic applications of the jaw mechanism are briefl y discussed.


 4-bar mechanisms, deployment mechanisms, reverse engineering, biomimetics


[1] Westneat, M.W., Linkage biomechanics and evolution of the unique feeding mechanism of Epi-bulus insidiator (Labridae: Teleostei). Journal of Experimental Biology, 159, pp. 165–184, 1991.

[2] Muller, M., A novel classifi cation of planar four-bar linkage and its application to the mechani-cal analysis of animal systems. Biological Sciences, 351(1340), pp. 689–720, 1996. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0065

[3] Bertomeu, J.M., Lois, J.M., Guillem, R.B., Pozo, A.P., Lacuesta, J., Mollà, C.G., L,una, P.V. & Pastor, J.P., Development of a hinge compatible with the kinematics of the knee joint.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 31(4), pp. 371–383, 2007. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/03093640601095842

[4] Bellairs, A.A. & Jenkin, C.R., The skeleton of birds. Biology and Comparative Physiology of Birds, Vol. 1, ed. A.J. Marshall, Academic Press: New York, pp. 241–300, 1960.

[5] Conn, A.T., Burgess, S.C. & Ling, C.S., Design of a parallel crank-rocker fl apping mechanism for insect-inspired micro air vehicles, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part c. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science (Special Issue), 221(10), pp. 1211–1222, 2007. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES517

[6] Rieppel, O., The naso-frontal joint in snakes as revealed by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography of intact and complete skulls. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 246(3), pp. 177–191, 2007. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2007.04.001

[7] Westneat, M.W. & Wainwright, P.C. Feeding mechanism of the sling-jaw wrasse, Epibulus  insidiator (Labridae; Teleostei): evolution of a novel functional system. Journal of  Morphology, 202, pp. 129–150, 1989. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052020202

[8] Burgess, S.C., King, A. & Hyde, R., An analysis of optimal structural features in the peacock tail feather. Optics & Laser Technology, 38, pp. 329–334, 2006. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. optlastec.2005.06.021

[9] Burgess, S.C. & Pasini, D., Analysis of the structural effi ciency of trees. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(2), pp. 177–193, 2004. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544820410001658517

[10] Helfman, G.S., Collette, B.B. & Facey, D.E., The Diversity of Fishes, Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden, USA, p. 111, 1997.

[11] Grubich, J.R. & Westneat, M.W., Four-bar linkage modelling in teleost pharyngeal jaws: computer simulations of bite kinetics. Journal of Anatomy, 209, pp. 79–92, 2006. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00551.x

[12] Westneat, M.W., Alfaro, M.E., Wainwright, P.C., Bellwood, D.R., Grubich, J.R., Fessler, J.L., Clements, K.D. & Smith, L.L., Local phylogenetic divergence and global evolutionary convergence of skull function in reef fi shes of the family Labridae. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, pp. 993–1000, 2005. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.3013

[13] Westneat, M.W., Evolution of levers and linkages in the feeding mechanisms of fi shes.  Inegrative and Comparative Biology, 44, pp. 379–389, 2004. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ icb/44.5.378

[14] Blake, R.W., Fish Locomotion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 124, 1983. [15] Webb, P.W., Fast start resistance of trout. J Exp Biol, 96, pp. 93–106, 1982.

[16] Curtin, N.A. & Woledge, R.C., Effi ciency of energy conversion during sinusoidal movement of white muscle fi bres from the dogfi sh scyliorhinus canicula. J Exp Biol, 183, pp. 137–147, 1993.

[17] Wakeling, J.M. & Johnston, I.A., Muscle power output limits fast-start performance in fi sh. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 201, pp. 1505–1526, 1998.

[18] Hill, A.V., The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc Royal Soc B, 126, pp. 136–195, 1938. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1938.0050

[19] Westneat, M.W., A biomechanical model for analysis of muscle force, power output and lower jaw motion in fi shes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223, pp. 269–281, 2003. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00058-4

[20] Vogel, S., Comparative Biomechanics: Life’s Physical World, Princeton University Press: Princeton, p. 401, 2003.

[21] Westneat, M.W., Transmission of force and velocity in the feeding mechanisms of labrid fi shes ( teleostei, perciformes). Zoomorphology, 114(2), pp.103–118, 1994. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/BF00396643

[22] NASA Technical brief GSC-14297, [http://www.techbriefs.com/index.php?option = com_staticxt&staticfi le = /Briefs/Aug01/GSC14297.html].

[23] Alam, H., Apparatus for moving an object in nanometer and method thereof, US, Patent  application number: 20100101361, 2010.

[24] Koseki, Y., Koyachi, K., Arai, T. & Chinzei, K., Remote actuation mechanism for mr-compatible manipulator using leverage and parallelogram – workspace analysis, workspace control, and stiffness evaluation. Proceeding of Robotics and Automation, 1, pp. 652–657, 2003.

[25] Lock, R.J., Vaidyanathan, R., & Burgess, S.C., Mission based optimization of a biologically inspired multi-modal wing model for aerial-aquatic robotic vehicles. Proceedings of the 11th Conference: Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (TAROS), pp. 140–147, 2010.