Safeguarding Marine Protected Areas in the Growing Mediterranean Blue Economy— Recommendations for the Maritime Transport Sector

Safeguarding Marine Protected Areas in the Growing Mediterranean Blue Economy— Recommendations for the Maritime Transport Sector

M. Randone M. Bocci C. Castellani C. Laurent C. Piante

WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative, Thetis Spa

30 November 2019
| Citation



Maritime transport is the backbone of the global economy. The sector is particularly important in the Mediterranean Sea which, despite covering less than 1% of the world’s oceans, carries about 15% of global shipping. Worldwide, ocean-related economic activity – the so-called Blue Economy – is growing; and the maritime transport sector is expected to continue increasing at a rate of 4% per annum for the next decade. In line with the global expansion of seaborne trade, shipping activity in the Mediterranean is growing in terms of the number of routes, traffic intensity and size of ships. And with this growth come increasing environmental impacts, such as chemical pollution, noise pollution and collisions with marine mammals. These environmental impacts are an issue for the whole of the Mediterranean, but it’s particularly critical that they’re prevented – or at least minimized – in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), which by definition are areas of great importance for marine biodiversity and ecosystems. In certain sensitive MPAs, maritime transport of any kind is forbidden. In many, though, shipping activity is legally possible, so there’s an urgent need for all relevant stakeholders to work together to ensure sustainable transport practices and tools are identified and adopted to minimize its impact. Considering the growth of the sector, it’s inevitable that major commercial traffic routes will increasingly interact with MPAs and other area-based conservation measures in some Mediterranean locations, especially where vessels are approaching ports or passing through straits. This paper provides key recommendations for the main actors in the maritime transport sector to help move towards a sustainable Mediterranean Blue Economy. The three stakeholder groups we focus on are MPA managers, public authorities and maritime transport companies. Each group has its own priorities, perspectives and powers, but all can make important contributions to a sustainable future for the region.


biodiversity, blue economy, conservation, ecosystems, environmental impacts, marine protected areas, maritime transport, shipping.


[1] MedPAN, The 2016 Status of Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean, Main findings, 2016.

[2] Tejedor Arceredillo, A., Sagarminaga, R., de Stephanis, R., Cañadas, A. & Lago, A., Management of MPAs: options and challenges for the maritime transport sector. Spanish case studies. Proceedings of the ECS/ASCOBANS/ACCOBAMS Workshop on Selection Criteria for Marine Protected Areas for Cetaceans. 2009.

[3] Eurostat. Maritime ports freight and passenger statistics, Statistics Explained –16/10/2018

[4] Med-Iamer Project. Maritime Transport Factsheet for the Adriatic-Ionian Ecoregion Transport_factsheet.pdf, 2014.

[5] Thana, E. & Patuzi, D., Toward a protected maritime environment of Adriatic Region. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(9), pp. 223–229, 2013.

[6] Fossi, M.C., Panti, C., Marsili, L., Maltese, S., Spinsanti, G., Casini, S., Caliani, I., Gaspari, S., Muñoz-Arnanz, J., Jimenez, B. & Finoia, M.G., The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean marine mammals: Marine Protected Area (MPA) or marine polluted area? The case study of the striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba). Mar Pollut Bull, 70(1–2), pp. 64–72, 2013.

[7] Coomber, F.G., D’Incà, M., Osso, M., Tepsich, P., Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. & Moulins, A., Description of the vessel traffic within the north Pelagos Sanctuary: Inputs for Marine Spatial Planning and management implications within an existing interna- tional Marine protected area. Marine Policy, 69, pp. 102–113, 2016.

[8] Abdulla, A. & Linden, O., Maritime effects on biodiversity and potential mitigation measures. Chapter 5. In Maritime Traffic Effects on Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea, eds. A. Abdulla. & O. Linden. Malaga, Spain: IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, p. 184, 2008.

[9] Panigada, S., Pesante, G., zanardelli, M., Capoulade, F., Gannier,A. & MasonWeinrich, T., Mediterranean fin whales at risk from fatal ship strikes. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 52, pp. 1287–1298, 2006.

[10] Pelagos, Resoconto di decisioni della V conferenza delle parti contraenti all’Accordo Pelagos. PELAGOS_COP5_Doc20, 2013.

[11] Jacob, T. & Ody, D., Characteristics of Maritime Traffic in the Pelagos Sanctuary and Analysis of Collisions Risk with Large Cetaceans, From the report of Quiet Oceans and Institut EcoOcéans, 2016.


[13] Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Panigada, S., Lanfredi, C. & Hoyt, E., Towards a Trans- boundary Managed Area in the Strait of Sicily: Challenges and Opportunities. Report to MAVA, Fondation pour l’Environnement, p. 85, 2017.

[14] EC, On criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of Marine Waters, s.l.: Office Journal of the European Union, L232, pp. 14–24, 2010.

[15] Lüber, S., Frey, S. Prideaux, M. & Prideaux, G., Creating ‘quiet zones’: Protecting Cuvier’s beaked whale and Mediterranean monk seal critical habitat from anthropo- genic noise in the Mediterranean Sea. Oceancare, Switzerland, 2015.

[16] Bracciali, C., Campobello, D., Giacoma, C. & Sara`, G., Effects of nautical traffic and noise on foraging patterns of Mediterranean Damselfish (Chromis chromis). PLoS ONE, 7(7), p. e40582, 2012.

[17] Abdulla, A. & Linden, O., Maritime effects on biodiversity and potential mitigation measures. Chapter 5. In Maritime Traffic Effects on Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea Malaga, eds. Abdulla, A. & Linden, O., Spain: IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, p. 184, 2008.

[18] Azzellino, A., Lanfredi, C., D’Amico, A., Pavan, G., Podestà, M. & Haun, J., Risk mapping for sensitive species to underwater anthropogenic sound emissions: Model development and validation in two Mediterranean areas. U.S. Navy Research, 2011.

[19] Maglio, A., Soares, C., Bouzidi, M., zabel, F., Souami, Y. & Pavan, G., Mapping shipping noise in the Pelagos Sanctuary (French part) through acoustic modelling to assess potential impacts on marine mammals. Sci. Rep. Port-Cros National Park, 29, pp. 167–185, 2015.

[20] Maglio, A., Pavan, G., Castellote, M. & Frey, S., Overview of the noise hotspots in the Accobams area. Part I—Mediterranean Sea. Final report. https://oceancare. org/ wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ Report_L%c3%a4rm_Maglio-et-al_ Noise-Hot-Spots_ EN_2016.pdf, 2016

[21] IWC, Cates, k., Demaster, R.L., Silber, G., Gende, S., Leaper, R., Ritetr, F, & Panigada, S. (eds.), Strategic Plan to mitigate the impacts of ship strikes on cetacean population:

2017–2020, 2017.

[22] David, L. & Alleaume, G.C., Evaluation of the potential of collision between fin whales and maritime traffic in the north-western Mediterranean Sea in summer, and mitigation solutions. Journal of Marine Animals and Their Ecology, 4(1), pp. 17–28, 2011.

[23] Lewis, T., Boisseau, O., Danbolt, M., Gillespie, D., Lacey, C., Leaper, R., Matthews, J.N., McLanaghan, R. & Moscrop, A., Abundance estimates for sperm whales in the Medi-terranean Sea from acoustic line-transect surveys. Journal of Cetacean Research and

Management, 2017.

[24] Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. Sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus, in the Mediterranean Sea: A summary of status, threats, and conservation recommendations. Aquatic Con- serv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst, 24(Suppl. 1), pp. 4–10, 2014.

[25] Frantzis, A., Leaper, R., Paraskevi, A. & Lekkas, D., Distribution patterns of sperm whales in relation to shipping density in the Hellenic Trench, Greece. Paper presented to IWC Scientific Committee, Bled, Slovenia, 12–24 May 2014. SC/65b/HIM 07.

[26] Galdis, C., Ship-generated oil discharges and exhaust emissions in the Mediterranean basin: their distribution and impact Chapter 4. In Maritime Traffic Effects on Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea, eds, A. Malaga Abdulla. & O. Linden. Spain: IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, p. 184, 2008.

[27] Girin, M. & Carpenter, A., Shipping and PIL transportation in the Mediterranean Sea. In Oil pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: Part I – The International Context, Hdb Env Chem, eds. Carpenter & kostianoy, 2017.

[28] REMPEC, Regional information system; Part c2, statistical analysis -alerts and acci- dents database. Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Medi- terranean Sea, 2011.

[29] Griffiths, C.A., Langmead, O.A., Readman, J.A.J. & Tillin, H.M., Anchoring and Mooring Impacts in English and Welsh Marine Protected Areas: Reviewing sensitivity, activity, risk and management. A Report to Defra Impacts Evidence Group, 2017.

[30] Boudouresque, C.F., Bernard, G., Bonhomme, P., Charbonnel, E., Diviacco, G., Meinesz, A., Pergent G., Pergent- Martini C., Ruitton S. & Tunesi L., Protection and Conservation of Posidonia Oceanica Meadows, RAMOGE and RAC/SPA publisher, Tunis, pp. 1–202, 2012.

[31] Roy D., Divetain, N., Bernard, G., Coquillard, Y., Bonhomme, P. & Gravez, V., Prospection de trois systèmes de mouillage en rade d’Hyères—Analyse et recomman- dations pour une éventuelle installation en baie de Port-Cros. Parc national de Port- Cros & GIS Posidonie, GIS Posidonie publ., Fr.: pp. 1–32, 1999.

[32] Zenetos, Α., Gofas, S., Morri, C., Rosso, A., Violanti, D., Raso, J. G., ... & Ballesteros, E. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2012. A contribution to the application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part 2. Introduc- tion trends and pathways. Mediterranean Marine Science, [S.l.], 13(2), pp. 328–352, December 2012. ISSN 1791-6763.

[33] EEA,