Classification, Characterization and Abstraction of Vegetable Surfaces for Design

Classification, Characterization and Abstraction of Vegetable Surfaces for Design

Ever Patiño David A. Torreblanca-Díaz Andrés Valencia-Escobar Alejandro Zuleta

Facultad de Diseño Industrial, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Colombia.

Available online: 
| Citation



Biological design tools such as biomimicry and bio-inspiration are increasingly used resources to solve design and engineering problems, owing to their high probability of finding efficient technical solutions and novel morphologies with the potential to positively impact the environment. This article focuses on the development of a methodology for the morphological characterization of plant surfaces, which can be applied in a conventional design or research project based on biological information. The process proposed here is part of the results of the research project ‘Repertory of bio-inspired surfaces and textures, through morphological experiments with Digital Manufacturing Technologies’. For the development of the characterization, the observation and selection of 225 species, which were grouped and categorized based on the predominant geometric characteristics, resulting in six categories: basic geometries, reciprocals, reliefs, ramifications, folds and visual texture. Then, the natural models were evaluated qualitatively and the representative samples of each category to later perform the process of digital abstraction using CAD and parametric tools. In the process of abstraction a description and visual analysis is made from: transition points, contours, symmetries, cross-sections and basic patterns as straight lines, sections of circle, circumferences, ellipses and/or parabolas. It was possible to verify that the three-dimensional interpretation that was made digitally of the textures, preserve the fundamen- tal morphological properties, in addition to, to keep a direct relationship with the category to which they belong, achieving a balance between the faithful copy and the abstract copy; this in order to maintain the formal properties with potential to be applied in future design projects.


abstraction, analogy, biomimicry, bio-inspiration, design, plant surfaces, textures.


[1] Iouguina, A., Dawson, J.W., Hallgrimsson, B. & Smart, G., Biologically informed disciplines: a comparative analysis of bionics, biomimetics, biomimicry, and bio-inspiration among others. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 9(3), pp. 197–205, 2014.

[2] Vincent, J.F., Bogatyreva, O.A., Bogatyrev, N.R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A.K., iomimetics: its practice and theory. Journal of Royal Society Interfase, 3(9), pp. 471–482, 2006.

[3] Jirapong, K., Krawczyk, R.J. & ElnimeirI, M., Natural Forms as Virtual Architectures. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, pp. 1–4, 2002.

[4] Wen, H.I., Zhang, S.J., Hapeshi, K. & Wang, X.F., An innovative methodology of product design from nature. Journal of bionic engineering, 5(1), pp. 75–84, 2008.

[5] Tsipenyuk, A. & Varenberg, M., Use of biomimetic hexagonal surface texture in friction against lubricated skin. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(94), 2014.

[6] Bormashenko, E., Wetting transitions on biomimetic surfaces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1929), pp. 4695–4711, 2010.

[7] Otten, A. & Herminghaus, S., How plants keep dry: a physicist’s point of view. Langmuir, 20(6), pp. 2405–2408, 2004.

[8] Zhang, X., Shi, F., Niu, J., Jiang, Y. & Wang, Z., Superhydrophobic surfaces: from structural control to functional application. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 18(6), pp. 621–633, 2008.

[9] Feng, L., Zhang, Y., Xi, J., Zhu, Y., Wang, N., Xia, F. & Jiang, L., Petal effect: a superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. Langmuir, 24(8), pp. 4114–4119, 2008.

[10] Tuteja, A., Choi, W., McKinley, G.H., Cohen, R.E. & Rubner, M.F., Design parameters for superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity. MRS bulletin, 33(8), pp. 752–758, 2008.

[11] Dai, Z., Tong, J. & Ren, L., Researches and developments of biomimetics in tribology. Chinese Science Bulletin, 51(22), pp. 2681–2689, 2006.

[12] Lee, S.M., Lee, H.S., Kim, D.S. & Kwon, T.H., Fabrication of hydrophobic films replicated from plant leaves in nature. Surface and Coatings Technology, 201(3), pp. 553–559, 2006.

[13] Helms, M., Vattam, S.S. & Goel, A.K., Biologically inspired design: process and products. Design Studies, 30(5), pp. 606–622, 2009.

[14] Moreno, D., Blessing, L., Yang, M. & Wood, K., The potential of design-by-analogy methods to support product, service and product service systems idea generation. DS 80-5 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Design Methods and Tools-Part 1,5, pp. 27–30, 2015.

[15] Volstad, N.L. & Boks, C., On the use of Biomimicry as a Useful Tool for the Industrial Designer. Sustainable Development, 20(3), pp. 189–199, 2012.

[16] Appio, F.P., Achiche, S., Martini, A. & Beaudry, C., On designers’ use of biomimicry tools during the new product development process: an empirical investigation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(7), pp. 775–789, 2017.

[17] Wagensberg, J., La rebelión de las formas, Editorial Matemas: Barcelona, 2004.

[18] Gorb, S., Functional Surfaces in Biology: Mechanisms and Applications. En: Biomimetics. Biologically Inspired Technologies, ed. Y. Cohen, Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, pp. 381–397, 2006.

[19] Fu, K.D., Moreno, D. Yang, M. & Wood, K.L., Bio-inspired design: an overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(11), pp. 1–18, 2014.

[20] Stevens, P., Patrones y pautas en la naturaleza. Salvat Editores: Barcelona,1987. [21] Otto, F., Form IL22, Institute for Lightweight Structures. University of Stuttgart: Federal Republic of Germany, 1988.

[22] Aranda, B. & Lasch, C., Tooling, Pamphlet Architecture 27. Princeton Architectural Press: New York, 2006.

[23] Arbeláez, E. & Patiño, E., Generación y transformación de la forma. Editorial Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana: Medellín, 2009.

[24] Valencia-Escobar, A.H. Forma, estructura y movimiento: Variables de diseño morfológico para objetos industriales estructurales y dinámicos, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana:Medellín, 2006.

[25] Escobar, A.V., Elementos de la forma, la estructura y el movimiento. Iconofacto, 3(4), pp. 60–85, 2007.

[26] Thompson, D., Sobre el crecimiento y la forma, Cambridge University Press: Madrid, 2000.

[27] Steward, I. & Golubitsky, M., ¿Es Dios un geómetra?: las simetrías de la naturaleza, Crítica., Barcelona, Drakontos Series, 1995.

[28] Villate, M.C. 2008. Estructuras no convencionales en arquitectura, Univerdidad Nacional de Colombia:Bogotá, 2008.

[29] Pugnale, A. & Sassone, M., Structural reciprocity: critical overview and promising research/design issues. Nexus Network Journal, 16(1), pp. 9–35, 2014. [30] Portugali, J., SIRN – Synergetic Inter-Representation Networks BT - Complexity, Cognition and the City, In ed. J. Portugali, Springer Berlin Heidelberg:Berlin, pp. 139–165, 2011.

[31] Schopfer, P., Biomechanics of plant growth. American Journal of Botany, 93(10), pp. 1415–1425, 2006.

[32] Bharat, B., Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367(1893), pp. 1445–1486, 2009.

[33] Fleury, V., Gouyet, J.F. & Léonetti, M. (eds), Branching in Nature: Dynamics and Morphogenesis of Branching Structures, from Cell to River Networks, Springer Science & Business Media:Berlin, 2013.

[34] Hallé, F., Branching in Plants BT - Branching in Nature, In eds. V. Fleury, J.F. Gouyet, M. Léonetti, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 23–40, 2001.

[35] Sierra, D., Sañudo, F. & Vanegas, G., Estructuras ligeras, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana:Medellín, 2006.

[36] Koch, K., Bhushan, B. & Barthlott, W., Multifunctional surface structures of plants: an inspiration for biomimetics. Progress in Materials science, 54(2), pp. 137–178, 2009.

[37] Allen, I.E. & Seaman, C.A., Likert scales and data analyses. Quality progress, 40(7), pp. 64–65, 2007.

[38] Baumeister, D., Tocke, R., Dwyer, J., Ritter, S. & Benyus, J.M., Biomimicry Resource Handbook: A Seed Bank of Best Practices. Biomimicry 3.8: E.E.U.U, 2014.

[39] Comanns, P., Winands, K., Arntz, K., Klocke, F. & Baumgartner, W., Laser-Based Biomimetic Functionalization of Surfaces: From Moisture Harvesting Lizards To Specific Fluid Transport Systems. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 9(3), pp. 206–215, 2014.

[40] Verein Deutscher Ingenieure. Handbuch Bionik, VDI 6220. vdirili/pdf/1751320.pdf. (accessed 12 June 2011).

[41] Hekkert, P. & Helmut, L., Product Aesthetics. Product Experience, Elsevier, pp. 259–285, 2008.

[42] Ramachandran, V.S. & Hirstein, W., The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), pp. 15–51, 1999.

[43] Hekkert, P., Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science 48(2), pp. 157–172, 2006