Any phenomenon which can artificially change the rate at which time passes must describe natural statistical variations truly and to the altered time-scale. These necessary criteria are specified here in terms of correlation coefficients. The strange nature of Heraclitean time is examined further. Accepting the limited present scientific knowledge available, it seems reasonable that quantum decoherence can explain the development of Heraclitean time from Parmenidean true reality with regard to present and future time. However, past-time is far more mysterious and alternative possible suggestions are considered. Experimental clarification of these would be expensive and difficult. This depends on our ability to extend the coherence time of the wave function in Schrödinger’s equation in the present instant. It seems that this is the only feature of time available to us for experimental examination. It also seems that the best way to achieve experimental success is to exploit present-day developments in qubit design in quantum computer research which faces the same basic technical problem.
Darwinian evolution, Heraclitean time, Parmenidean time, quantum decoherence, quantum entanglement, qubit design.
 Boothroyd, R.G., Non-relativistic time, existence and adaptation. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 10(3), pp. 193–212, 2015.
 Brooks, M., The secret life of reality. New Scientist, 205(3002), pp. 26–29, 2015.
 Decoherence website, available at: www.decoherence.de/home.html (retrieved 2/12/2015) 2015.
 Idem. ibid. Zeh, H.D., Three essays: a) the essence of the concept of decoherence, b) how decoherence can solve the measurement problem, c) quantum nonlocality and Einstein locality.
 Idem ibid. Joos, E., Essay on; ‘do we need observables?’.
 Moreva, A., Brida, G., Gramegna, M., Giovannetti, V., Maccone, L. & Genovese, M., Time from quantum entanglement: an experimental illustration. Physical Review, A89, 052122, 2014.
 Bub, J., Interpreting the Quantum World, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–290, 1997.
 Anon. Quantum experiment shows how time ‘emerges’ from entanglement, 2015, available at: https.//medium.com/the-phtsics-arxiv-blog/quantum-experiment shows how time-em
R.G. Boothroyd, Int. J. of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. Vol. 12, No. 2 (2017) 153
 Hawks, J., Still evolving after all these years. Scientific American, 31(3), pp. 70–72, 2014.
 Dewel, G., Kondepudi, D. & Prigogine, I., Chemistry far from equilibrium: thermodynamics, order and chaos. In The New Chemistry, ed. N. Hall, Cambridge University Press, pp. 440–464, 2000.
 Rees, M.R., Just Six Numbers, Weidenfeld & Nicholson: London, pp. 1–194, 1999.
 Denton, M.J., Nature’s Destiny, Simon & Schuster: New York, pp. 1–454, 1998.
 Wilczek, F., The Lightness of Being: Big Questions, Real Answers, Penguin: London, pp. 1–270, 2008.
 Slezak, M., Was the Universe made for us. New Scientist, 225 (3019), p. 32, 2015.
 Spinney, L., Once upon a time. New Scientist, 225(3003), pp. 28–31, 2015.
 Jacobs, K., Application of feedback control in quantum systems. ArXiv:quant-ph/0605015 v1, p. 8, 2nd May, 2006.
 Hooper, R., Life in the multiverse. New Scientist, 223(2988), pp. 32–37, 2014.
 Deutsch, D., The Fabric of Reality, Penguin: London, pp. 190–193, 1998.
 Greene, B., The of Fabric of the Cosmos, Penguin: London, pp. 1–569, 2004.
 Lewis, C.S., Time and beyond time. In Mere Christianity, HarperCollins: Glasgow, U.K., pp. 142–146, 1984.
 Popescu, S., Non-locality beyond quantum mechanics. Nature Physics, 10, pp. 264–270, 2014.
 Itano, W.M., Perspectives on the quantum Zeno paradox. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 196, 012018, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/196/1/012018
 Hansen, J., Storms of my Grandchildren, Bloomsbury: New York, pp. 6–58, 70–89, 2009.
 Vanier, J., Life’s Great Questions, Franciscan media: Cincinnati, USA, pp. 1–172, 2015.
 Lemonick, M.D., The hunt for life beyond earth. National Geographic, 226(1), pp. 26–45, 2014.
 Bohm, D., A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables I. Physical Review, 85(2), pp. 166–179, 1952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166