Mechanical Characterization of Bone Allografts, Enriched with Mesenchymal Cells

Mechanical Characterization of Bone Allografts, Enriched with Mesenchymal Cells

José Luis Díaz León Raúl Lesso Arroyo Ramón Rodríguez Castro Alfonso López Vázquez 

Departamento de Ingeniería Mécanica y Bió mecanica. Instituto Técnologico de Celaya, Celaya, Guanajuato, México

Investigació n y Desarrollo de Top Health. Zapopan, Jalisco, México

Page: 
722-730
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V11-N4-722-730
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Bone allografts, which are used as bone regeneration material, must satisfy two functions: a biologic function and a mechanical function. The biologic task is satisfied by enrichment of the osseous reconstructive material with mesenchymal cells, radio-sterilized and lyophilized, which helps to a more efficient formation of new bone. Regarding the mechanical function, the allografts must be as rigid and strong as intact bone for immediate load-bearing capability. Consequently, a good mechanical characterization is needed to guarantee the structural integrity of the allografts in the host tissue. Thus, in this work results are presented from compression testing of cancellous and cortical/cancellous allograft tissue chips, as well as results on flexure and pure shear testing of cortical allograft strips. The test specimens were fabricated according to standard procedures. For the cancellous graft chips, different elastic moduli were obtained a long the three perpendicular directions, 32.2, 98.2, and 162.4 MPa, showing orthotropic behavior. For the cortical/cancellous chips, compression loads were only applied along the longitudinal and transversal directions of the cortical phase; the corresponding elastic moduli displayed were 518.6 and 384.8 MPa. On the other hand, for the cortical graft strips, the flexure elastic modulus obtained was 38.9 GPa; reported flexure elastic modulus in the literature for fresh human bone are between 1.525 and 31.5 GPa. Finally the shear strength exhibited by the cortical graft was 43.6 MPa.

Keywords: 

biomechanics, complex material, mechanical bone, tissue engineering

  References

[1] Velasco, M.A., Narváez-Tovar, C.A. & Garzó n-Alvarado, D.A., Design, materials, and mechanobiology of biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. BioMed Research International, 2015, p. 21, 2015, Article ID 729076, Hidawi Publishing Corporation.

[2] Eslaminejad, M.B. & Faghihi, F., Mesenchymal stem cell-based bone engineering for bone regeneration. Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering - Cells and Biomaterials, eds. D. Eberli, InTech, pp. 57–82, 2011.

[3] Grabowski, G. & Robertson, R.N., Bone allograft with mesenchymal stem cells: a critical review of the literature. Hard Tissue, 2(2), p. 20, 2013.

[4] Nordin, M. & Frankel, V., Biomechanics of bone. Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System, Lippincott Williams & wilkins: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA, (pp. 26-–58)., 2001.

[5] Joon, P. & Lakes, R.S., Biomaterials: An Introduction. Composites as Biomaterials, Springer: New York USA, (pp. 208-–222)., 2007.

[6] Arévalo, R., Jenny, A., Páez-Guerrero, D.M. & Rodríguez-Pardo, V.M., Celulas madre mesenquimales: características bioló gicas y aplicaciones clínicas. NOVA, 5, 2007.

[7] Rockwood, N., Gil, E.S., Sang-Hyug, P., Kluge, A., Warren, G., Sarindr, B., Rangam, R., Xungai, W., Kim, J., Vunjak-Novakovic, G. & Kaplan, L., Ingrowth of human mes- enchymal stem cells into porous silk particle reinforced silk composite scaffolds: an in vitro study. Acta Biomaterialia, 7(1), pp. 144–151, 2011.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.020

[8] Athanasiou, K.A., Zhu, C.F., Lanctot, D.R., Agrawal, C.M. & Wang, X., Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone. Tissue Engineering, 6(4), pp. 361–381, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/107632700418083

[9] Turner, C.H. & Burr, D.B., Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone, 14(4), pp. 595–608, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-K

[10] Kalfas, I.H., Principles of bone healing. Neurosurgical Focus, 10(4), pp. 1–4, 2001.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/foc.2001.10.4.2

[11] Meints, A.É., Ozola, B.O. & Moorlat, P.A., Comparative characteristics of the properties of human compact bone tissue under various specimen storage and testing conditions. Mechanical of Composite Materials, 17(3), pp. 355–360, 1981.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00605079

[12] O¨ zkaya, N. & Nordin, M., Fundamentals of Biomechanics, Springer: New York, USA, 1999.

[13] ASTM D1621. Standard test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics.

[14] ISO 178, Determination of flexural properties, 2001.

[15] ASTM D5379, Standard Test Method for Shear Properties of Composite Materials by the VNotched Beam Method.

[16] Keaveny, M., Morgan, F., & Yeh, C., Standard Handbook of Biomedical Engineering and Design, chapter 8: Bone Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, 2004.

[17] Fantnera, G., Birkedalb, H., Kindta, H., Tue, H., Weaverd, C., Cutronia, A., Bosmad, L., Lukmaan, B., Fincha, M., Cidadea, A.G., Morsed, E., Stuckyc, D. & Hansmaa, K., Influence of the degradation of the organic matrix on the microscopic fracture behavior of trabecular bone. 

Bone, 35(5), pp. 1013–1022, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.05.027

[18] Harrigan, T.P., Harris, W.H., Mann, R.W. & Carter, D.R., The anisotropic properties of trabecular bone, M.I.T., Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 1980.

[19] Parkinson, H. & Fazzalari, L., Characterisation of trabecular bone structure, Springer, 2012.

[20] Draper, R.C. & Goodship, E., A novel technique for four-point bending of small bone samples with semi-automatic analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 36(10), pp. 1497–1502, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00129-5

[21] Adams, F., The Iosipescu Shear Test Method as Used for Testing Polymers and Composite Materials, Polymer Composites, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.750110506