‘In’ or ‘As’ Space?: A Model of Complexity, with Philosophical, Simulatory, and Empirical Ramifications

‘In’ or ‘As’ Space?: A Model of Complexity, with Philosophical, Simulatory, and Empirical Ramifications

C.H. Smith

University Libraries, Western Kentucky University, USA

Page: 
233-241
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V10-N3-233-241
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

A General Systems model based on ideas originating with the writings of Benedict de Spinoza is described, starting with its philosophical underpinnings and proceeding on to its relation to modern systems concepts, including attempts to simulate the relationships posed and measure real-world structures. Central to the idea is the notion that spatial extension may not have a prior existence but emerges only through an entropy maximization process in which information and energy exchange is balanced among some limited number of subsystems that in sum comprise any given functioning complex system. Related published empiricism concerning geographical/geological systems – the hypsometry of stream basins and overall internal zonation properties of earth structure – is briefly described; the former, especially, reveals a hierarchical pattern of potential energy relations that seems to fit well the organizational hypothesis. Possible applications of the model to genomic codon and medical imaging modeling are alluded to. A brief treatment of the relation of the model to basic properties of complex systems (connectivity, autonomy, emergence, etc.) is provided.

Keywords: 

complex systems, entropy maximization, General Systems Theory, simulation, space, spatial exten- sion, spatial structure, Spinoza, stream basins

  References

[1] Wilson, A.G., Ecological and urban systems models: some explorations of similarities in the context of complexity theory. Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 633–646. 2006.

[2] Wilson, A.G., Boltzmann, Lotka and Volterra and spatial structural evolution: an integrated methodology for some dynamical systems. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5, pp. 865–871.

[3] Smith, C.H., A system of world mammal faunal regions. II. The distance decay effect upon inter-regional affinities. Journal of Biogeography, 10(5), pp. 467–482.

[4] Carnap, R., Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. Weltkreis-Verlag: Berlin-Schlachtensee, 1928.

[5] Quine, W.V., Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60, pp. 20–43, 1951.

[6] Smith, C.H., A general approach to the study of spatial systems. I. The relational representation of measurable attributes. International Journal of General Systems, 12(4), pp. 359–384, 1986. [7] Wilson, A.G., Entropy in Urban Planning. Pion: London.

[8] Smith, C.H. & Derr, M., ‘In space’ or ‘as space’?: a new model. Life, 2(3), pp. 243–254, 2012.

[9] Smith, C.H., ‘In space’ or ‘as space’?: spatial autocorrelation properties of the earth’s interior. 

International Journal of Geosciences, 5(4), pp. 375–382, 2014.

[10] The Once and Future Wallace: A Theory of Spatial Systems, Online. http://people.wku.edu/ charles.smith/once/writings.htm#2