What Drives Community Flood Risk Management? Policy Diffusion or Free-Riding

What Drives Community Flood Risk Management? Policy Diffusion or Free-Riding

Douglas S. Noonan Lilliard E. Richardson Abdul-Akeem Sadiq Jenna Tyler

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis

Pennsylvania State University

University of Central Florida, United States

01 January 2020
| Citation



This study explores whether participation in the US Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Com- munity Rating System (CRS), a voluntary community flood risk management program, is a function of policy diffusion or an act of free-riding. Policy diffusion would suggest that, all else being equal, once a community has joined the CRS, neighboring communities will be more likely to follow their lead and participate in the CRS. Free-riding would imply that neighboring communities might choose not to participate in the CRS because they perceive that their community benefits from surrounding communities’ participation. Results indicate that a community’s decision to participate in the CRS is not influenced by the characteristics of or the behavior of their neighbors. The results of this study do, however, show that population density, aggregate housing values, rentership rate, and flat topography are significant predictors of CRS participation.


Community Rating System, community flood risk management, free-riding policy diffusion


[1] Guha-Sapir, D., Hoyois, P. & Below, R., Annual disaster statistical review 2012: The numbers and trends. Retrieved from http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ADSR_2012.pdf (accessed 18 December 2018).

[2] Weather fatalities 2017; National Weather Service. Retrieved from http://www.nws. noaa.gov/om/hazstats.shtml (accessed on 18 December 2018).

[3] Sadiq, A.A. & Noonan, D.S., Flood disaster management policy: An analysis of the United States community ratings system. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 7(1), pp. 5–22, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2014.963373

[4] Sadiq, A.A. & Noonan, D.S., Local capacity and resilience to flooding: Community responsiveness to the community ratings system program incentives. Natural Hazards, 78(2), pp. 1413–1428, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1776-9

[5] Dixon, L., Clancy, N., Seabury, S.A. & Overton, A., The national flood insurance program’s market penetration rate, estimates and policy implications. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2006/RAND_TR300. pdf (accessed 18 December 2018).

[6] National Flood Insurance Community Rating Systems Coordinator’s Manual; Federal Emergency Management Agency, FIA-15/2017, OMB No. 1660-0022, Online. Retrieved from www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/8768 (accessed 18 December 2018).

[7] Burby, R.J., Flood insurance and floodplain management: The US experience. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 3(3–4), pp. 111–122, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464-2867(02)00003-7

[8] Landry, C.E. & Li, J., Participation in the community rating system of NFIP: Empirical analysis of North Carolina counties. Natural Hazards Review, 13(3), 205–220, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000073

[9] Posey, J., The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the municipal level: Evidence from floodplain management programs in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), pp. 482–493, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.003

[10] Brody, S.D., Zahran, S., Highfield, W.E., Bernhardt, S.P. & Vedlitz, A., Policy learning for flood mitigation: A longitudinal assessment of the Community Rating System in Florida. Risk Analysis, 29(6), pp. 912–929, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539- 6924.2009.01210.x

[11] Zahran, S., Weiler, S., Brody, S.D., Lindell, M.K. & Highfield, W.E., Modeling national flood insurance policy holding at the county scale in Florida, 1999–2005. Ecological Economics, 68(10), pp. 2627–2636, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.021

[12] Noonan, D.S. & Sadiq, A.A., Community-scale flood risk management: Effects of a voluntary national program on migration and development. Ecological Economics, 157, pp. 92–99, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.005

[13] Noonan, D.S. & Sadiq, A.A., Flood risk management: Exploring the impacts of the community rating system program on poverty and income inequality. Risk Analysis, 38(3), pp. 489–503, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12853

[14] Asche, E.A., The Effect of Flood Risk on Housing Choices and Community Hazard Mitigation, PhD Thesis, University of California at Santa Barbara, 2013.

[15] Fan, Q. & Davlasheridze, M., Flood risk, flood mitigation, and location choice: evaluating the national flood insurance program’s community rating system. Risk Analysis, 36(6), pp. 1125–1147, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12505

[16] Li, J. & Landry, C.E., Flood Risk, local hazard mitigation, and the community rating system of the national flood insurance program. Land Economics, 94(2), pp. 175–198, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.94.2.175

[17] Kahn, M.E., The death toll from natural disasters: The role of income, geography, and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), pp. 271–284, 2005. https://doi. org/10.1162/0034653053970339

[18] Zahran, S., Brody, S.D., Highfield, W.E. & Vedlitz, A., Non-linear incentives, plan design, and flood mitigation: The case of the federal emergency management agency’s community rating system. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(2), pp. 219–239, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560903529410