A Social Sustainability Assessment Model for Manufacturing Company based on S-LCA

A Social Sustainability Assessment Model for Manufacturing Company based on S-LCA

Junli Shi Yajun Wang Qinyi Ma Shuagjiao Fan Haihua Jin Huanyu Liu Huan Liu 

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Dalian Polytechnic University, China

Sinotruk Jinan Fuqiang Power Co., Ltd, China

Page: 
172-182
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V14-N2-172-182
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
15 May 2019
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Generally, sustainability analysis should include the aspects of the environmental, social, and economic assessment. The development of social sustainability assessment for manufacturing company however has been paid little attention currently, and previous studies are not appropriate due to the complex information and the unbefitting indicators. This study presents a new social sustainability assessment model based on social life cycle assessment (S-lcA) methodology to assess the social sustainable performance for manufacturing companies, in this method, four groups of stakeholders and social impact categories are involves and product social risk score (PSrS) is employed to quantitatively expressed the sustainability indicator of the company. Through detailed social inventory investigation, fuqiang Power company as the research case is put to assess the social sustainability and verify the validity of this model.

Keywords: 

manufacturing company, social impact category, social life cycle assessment (S-LCA), social performance, social sustainability assessment

  References

[1] Hossain, M.U., Chi, S.P., Dong, Y.H., Lo, I.M.C. & Cheng, J.C.P., Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7, pp. 1–21, 2017.

[2] Sierra, L.A., Yepes, V. & Pellicer, E., Assessing the social sustainability contribution of an infrastructure project under conditions of uncertainty. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 67, pp. 61–72, 2017.

[3] Sierra, L.A., Pellicer, E. & Yepes, V., Method for estimating the social sustainability of infrastructure projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65, pp. 41–53, 2017.

[4] Cooper, J., Stamford, L. & Azapagic, A., Social sustainability assessment of shale gas in the UK. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 14, pp. 1–20, 2018.

[5] Rafiaani, P., Kuppensa, T. & Dael, M.V., Social sustainability assessments in the biobased economy: Towards a systemic approach. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, pp. 1839–1853, 2018.

[6] Siebert, A. & Bezama, A., Social life cycle assessment indices and indicators to monitor the social implications of wood-based products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, pp. 4074–4084, 2018.

[7] Rajak, S. & Vinodh, S., Application of fuzzy logic for social sustainability performance evaluation: a case study of an Indian automotive component manufacturing organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp. 1184–1192, 2015.

[8] Muthu, S.S. Social Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes, Springer Science+Business, Media Singapore, 2015.

[9] UNEP/SETAC. Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. UNEP/SETAC, Paris, 2011.

[10] Jørgensen, A., Bocq, A.L., Nazarkina, L. & Hauschild, M.Z., Methodologies for Social Life Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), pp. 96–103, 2008.

[11] Jørgensen, A., Hauschild, M.Z., Jørgensen, M.S. & Wangel, A., Relevance and sustainability of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, pp. 204–214, 2009.

[12] Dreyer, L.C., Hauschild. M.Z. & Schierbeck, J., Characterization of social impacts in LCA Part 1: Development of indicators for labor rights. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, pp. 247–259, 2010.

[13] Dreyer, L.C. & Hauschild, M.Z., Characterization of social impacts in LCA. Part 2: implementation in six company case studies. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, pp. 385–402, 2010.

[14] Hosseinijou, S.A. & Mansour, S., Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, pp. 620–645. 2014.

[15] Nemarumane, T.M. & Mbohwa, C., Social Life Cycle Assessment in the South African Sugar Industry: Issues and Views. In Social Life Cycle Assessment, Springer Science+Business. Media, Singapore, 2015.

[16] Chang, Y.J., Sproesser, G. & Neugebauer, S., Environmental and Social Life Cycle Assessment of welding technologies. 12th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 26, pp. 293–298, 2015.

[17] Lehmann, A., Zschieschang, E., Traverso, M., Finkbeiner, M. & Schebek, L., Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies-challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, pp. 1581–1592, 2013.

[18] Hannouf, M. & Getachew, A., Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment: a case study of high-density polyethylene production in Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(1), pp. 116–132, 2018.

[19] Dong, Y.H. & Ng, S.T., A social life cycle assessment model for building construction in Hong Kong. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(8), pp. 1166–1180, 2015.