Priority Water Uses from 1998 to 2017 for Urban, Suburban and Rural Residents of the Pacific Northwest, USA

Priority Water Uses from 1998 to 2017 for Urban, Suburban and Rural Residents of the Pacific Northwest, USA

Robert L. Mahler

Department of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, USA

31 March 2019
| Citation



Water is the most important and most debated natural resource in the Pacific Northwest. Researchers, educators and policy makers give a lot of attention to water resources in the region; however, the knowledge of actual water resource priorities of the public is lacking. Consequently, the purpose of this research study was to document how urban, suburban and rural residents living in the Pacific Northwest prioritize water resource issues over the last 20 years. A survey instrument was developed to ask the public about 10 common water uses in the region. This survey was statistically designed using the Dillman methodology and delivered to the public using a mail-based survey process in 1998, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015 and 2017. Water uses in this study were the importance of water for: irrigated agriculture, aquatic habitat, commerce, drinking water, household landscapes, industry, power generation, recreation, snowpack and wetlands. Each water use could be categorized by survey respondents as very important, important, somewhat important, not important or no opinion. In 2017, drinking water, snowpack, wetlands, recreation, aquatic habitat, industry, commerce, power generation, household landscapes and irrigated agriculture were considered an important or very important use of water by over 95, 80, 79, 77, 76, 74, 64, 63, 52 and 47% of the public, respectively. Over time snowpack, recreation, wetlands and aquatic habitat protection have become more important to the public. Conversely, the importance of water for irrigated agriculture, power generation and commerce have become less important to the public. However, at least 45% of all respondents considered all ten questioned water uses important. Survey respondents were placed into three groups (urban, suburban or rural) based on the population of their home county. Rural residents considered the use of water for agriculture more important than both suburban (84 vs. 46%) and urban (84 vs. 35%) residents. Conversely, urban residents were more likely to consider the preservation of wetlands as very important, compared to suburban and rural residents. The demographic factors of gender, education and age also impacted how the public viewed the importance of different water-related issues. Females were more likely than males to consider most water uses important. Respondents with more formal education were more likely to consider snowpack and aquatic habitat important than those with less formal education. Younger respondents were more likely than older residents to consider wetlands and aquatic habitat important. The information from this study will be used to assist policy makers in their decision-making processes about water resource issues.


Public concerns, public opinion, water quality, water quantity, water issues


[1] Mahler, R.L., Simmons, R., Sorensen, F. & Miner, J.R., Priority water issues in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Extension [Online], 42(5), 2004. Article 5RIB3. available at

[2] Mahler, R.L., Gamroth, M., Pearson, P., Sorenson, F., Barber, M.E. & Simmons, R., Information sources, learning opportunities and priority water issues in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Extension [Online], 48(2), 2010. Article 2RIB2. available at

[3] Mahler, R.L., Simmons, R. & Sorensen, F., Drinking water issues in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Extension, 43(6), 2005: 6RIB6, online at joe/2005december/rb6.php

[4] Mahler, R.L. & Barber, M.E., Rivers and river basin management issues and concerns in the Pacific Northwest, USA. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 197, ISSN 1743–3541 [Online], 2015.

[5] Mahler, R.L., Barber, M.E. & Shafii, B., Urban public satisfaction with drinking water since 2002 in the Pacific Northwest, USA. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 10(5), pp. 620–634, 2015.

[6] Mahler, R.L., Preferred water resource information sources and learning opportunities in the Pacific Northwest. Natural Sciences Education, 47(1), p. 180014, 2018. https://

[7] Mahler, R.L. & Barber, M.E., Using adult education to improve sustainability of water resources in the Pacific Northwest, USA. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 10(6), pp. 828–842, 2015.

[8] Chaffin, B.C., Mahler, R.L., Wulfhurst, J.D. & Shafii, B., The role of agency partnerships in collaborative watershed groups: Lessons from the Pacific Northwest experience. Environmental Management, 55(1), 2014.

[9] Mahler, R.L., Smolen, M.D., Borisova, T., Boellstorff, D.E., Adams, D.C. & Sochacka, N.W., The national water survey needs assessment program. Natural Sciences Education, 42(1), pp. 98–103, 2013.

[10] Salent, P. & Dillman, D., How to Conduct Your own Survey, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 1994.

[11] Dillman, D., Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 2000.

[12] SAS Institute Inc., SAS Online Document 9.1.3. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc., 2004.