Use of Social Media for Assessing Sustainable Urban Mobility Indicators

Use of Social Media for Assessing Sustainable Urban Mobility Indicators

ALEXANDROS SDOUKOPOULOS ANASTASIA NIKOLAIDOU MAGDA PITSIAVA-LATINOPOULOU PANAGIOTIS PAPAIOANNOU 

Transport Engineering Laboratory, Civil Engineering Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Page: 
338-348
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-338-348
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
1 February 2018
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Achieving sustainable urban mobility is a complex and multivariate issue that requires constant moni- toring and evaluation of the existing situation and possible reconsideration and adjustment of objectives and strategy. The use of indicators is perhaps the most common methodological assessment tool for the sustainable urban mobility level achieved. Key performance indicators can provide in a simple way useful information for complex phenomena in an urban area (i.e. identification of the specific problems and their development over time). Thus, they contribute at a great degree to the decisions made concerning the prioritization of measures and policies toward achieving a goal. However, the use of indicators often constitutes a highly time consuming and costly process due to the large volumes of raw data required for their calculation. In recent years, a solution toward this problem is attempted to be given through the adoption of new technologies and approaches, such as the collection and export of ‘big data’ from social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. Social networks provide to their users a continuous and enhanced ability for communication, interface and interaction. Such networks are therefore an important potential tool for the promotion of research in the transport sector, as the amount of data generated in their context gives the possibility to analyse and investigate with greater precision critical issues (e.g. trips characteristics) of urban mobility. The present study is an attempt to link the indicators related to sustainable mobility with social networks. The main advantage resulting from the above link, beyond the possibility of a more precise evaluation of the indicators, is to highlight the society’s position toward the prioritization of the various transport-related aspects and measures.

Keywords: 

big data, sentiment analysis, social media, sustainable urban mobility indicators, Twitter

  References

[1] United Nations, Report of the Conference on the Human Environment. United Nations Publication, 1972.

[2] United Nations, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations Publication, 1987.

[3] United Nations, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development - Rio Declaration. United Nations Publication, 1992.

[4] United Nations-Habitat, The state of the world’s cities report 2006/2007: 30 Years of Shaping the Habitat Agenda, Earthscan: London, 2006.

[5] Muneer, T., Celik, A.N. & Caliskan, N., Sustainable transport solution for a medium- sized town in Turkey - A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 1(1), pp. 29–37, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.004

[6] Mori, K. & Christodoulou, A., Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), pp. 94–106, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001

[7] Litman, T.A., Sustainable Transportation Indicators - A Recommended Research Program for Developing Sustainable Transportation Indicators and Data. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2009.

[8] Tafidis, P., Sdoukopoulos, A. & Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M., Sustainable urban mobility indicators: policy versus practice in the case of Greek cities. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility, pp. 340–347, 2016.

[9] Gilbert, R., Irwin, N., Hollingworth, B. & Blais, P., Sustainable Transportation Performance Indicators. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2003.

[10] European Union, Minutes of the 2340th meeting of the Council of Ministers, Luxembourg, 2001.

[11] Zheng, J., Garrick, N.W., Atkinson-Palombo, C., McCahill, C. & Marshall, W., Guide- lines on developing performance metrics for evaluating transportation sustainability. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 7, pp. 4–13, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.02.001

[12] Böhringer, C. & Jochem, P.E.P., Measuring the immeasurable - A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63(1), pp. 1–8, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.008

[13] Litman, T.A., Well Measured - Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2015.

[14] Henderson, H., Building A Win-Win-World, Berrett-Koehler: San Francisco, 1996.

[15] Dobranskyte-Niskota, A., Perujo, A. & Pregl, M., Indicators to assess sustainability of transport activities Part 1: Review of the Existing Transport Sustainability Indicators Initia- tives and Development of an Indicator Set to Assess Transport Sustainability Performance. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2007.

[16] Costa, M.S., Silva, A.N.R. & Ramos, R.A.R., Sustainable urban mobility: a comparative study and the basis for a management system in Brazil and Portugal. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, vol. 77, WIT Press: Southampton and Boston, pp. 323–332, 2005.

[17] European Environment Agency, EEA core set of indicators: Guide. EEA Technical Re- port, Copenhagen, 2005.

[18] Eckersley, R., Perspectives on progress: Is life getting better? Resource Futures Program, Working Paper Series 97/27. Resource Futures Program, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, 1997.

[19] Organization of Economic Coordination and Development, Environmental Indicators. OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews. Environment Monographs no 83, OECD: Paris, 1993.

[20] Joumard, R., Gudmundsson, H. & Folkeson, L., Framework for assessing indicators of environmental impacts in the transport sector. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2242, pp. 55–63, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2242-07

[21] Tanguay, G.A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J.F. & Lanoie, P., Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), pp. 407–418, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013

[22] Litman, T.A., Sustainable transportation indicator data quality and availability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2009.

[23] Joumard, R. & Gudmundsson, H., (eds), Indicators of environmental sustainability in transport: An interdisciplinary approach to methods, INRETS Report: Bron France, 2010.

[24] Santos, A.S. & Ribeiro, S.K., The use of sustainability indicators in urban passenger transport during the decision-making process: the case of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(2), pp. 251–260, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.010

[25] Miller, H.J., Witlox, F. & Tribby, C.P., Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: a measurement framework. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, pp. 51–64, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.007

[26] Burggraf, K., Why is Monitoring and Evaluation a Challenge in Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning?. Report of CH4LLENGE programme, 2014.

[27] Kaplan, A.M. & Haenlein, M., Users of the World, Unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), pp. 59–68, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

[28] Sterne, J., Social Media Metrics: How to Measure and Optimize Your Marketing Investment, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester UK, 2010.

[29] Zafarani, R., Abbasi, M.A. & Liu, H., Social Media Mining: An introduction, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK, 2014.

[30] Kenyon, S. & Lyons, G., The value of integrated multimodal traveller information and its potential contribution to modal change. Transport Research Part F: Traffic Psychology Behavior, 6(1), pp. 1–21, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8478(02)00035-9

[31] Eboli, L. & Mazzulla, G., A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transport Policy, 18(1), pp. 172–181, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007

[32] Mazzulla, G. & Forciniti, C., Spatial association techniques for analysing trip distribution in an urban area. European Transport Research Review, 4(4), pp. 217–233, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-012-0082-9

[33] Alexa Internet Inc., The top 500 sites on the web. www.alexa.com/topsites, last access February 20, 2017.

[34] Hansen, D.L., Shneiderman, B. & Smith, M.A., Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World, Morgan Kaufmann: Burlington USA, 2011.

[35] Pang, B. & Lee, L., Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), pp. 1–135, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1500000011

[36] Park, A. & Paroubek, P., Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Proceedings of International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 17–23, 2010.

[37] Sood, S., Owsley, S., Hammond, K. & Birnbaum, L. Reasoning through search: a novel approach to sentiment classification. Technical Report, 2007.

[38] Hu, M. & Liu, B., Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 168–177, 2004.

[39] Liu, B., Hu, M. & Cheng, J., Opinion Observer: Analyzing and Comparing Opinions on the Web. Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2), 2005.