Pedestrian Level of Service: the Impact of Social Groups on Pedestrian Flow Characteristics

Pedestrian Level of Service: the Impact of Social Groups on Pedestrian Flow Characteristics

Elvezia M. Cepolina Federico Menichini Paloma Gonzalez Rojas

University of Pisa, Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture

Page: 
839-848
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N4-839-848
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
1 May 2017
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

A comprehensive measure of the level of pedestrian comfort can lead to an improved design of public spaces, to the appropriate dimensioning of urban infrastructure (such as airports, stations and com- mercial centers), and, most importantly, to a design that is more responsive to people and to that very fundamental human activity: walking.

The planning and design of the pedestrian environment is based on pedestrian Levels of Service (LOS). These levels currently classify the level of comfort based on space available for movement and speed (and delay, in case of crosswalks). Guidance is provided for different area types and times of day. Although many methods of assessing pedestrian LOS have been developed, all these do not consider spontaneous pedestrian groups. However, social groups, such as friends, couples, colleagues and families, represent an important component of urban crowds.

The paper presents first, an overview of the current methods for assessing pedestrian environment LOS. Then the paper presents the application of the HCM method for the evaluation of a selected site LOS. The calculation is based on collected measurements of pedestrian flow. Some critical issues and inconsistencies result. These have been reviewed and read taking into account the presence of groups in pedestrian flows.

Keywords: 

pedestrian groups, pedestrian level of service

1. Introduction
2. Overview of Pedestrianslos Methods
3. Pedestrians Groups
4. The Case of Study - Data Collection and Analysis
5. Results
6. Conclusions
  References

[1] Sisiopiku, V.P., Zhang, X. & Virkler, M.R., Pedestrian level of service and quality of operations assessment methods. In Proceedings of the 81st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2002.

[2] Transport of London, Pedestrian comfort guidance for London, 2010, available at www.tfl.gov.uk/walking

[3] Sisiopiku, V., Byrd, J. & Chittoor, A., Application of level of service methods for the evaluation of operations at pedestrian facilities. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002(1), pp. 117–124, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2002-15

[4] Sing, K. & Jain, P.K., Methods of assessing pedestrian level of service. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, 2(1), pp. 116–124, 2011.

[5] Highway Capacity Manual, National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.

[6] Landis, B.W., Vattikuti, V.R., Ottenberg, R.M., McLeod, D.S., Guttenplan, M., Modelling the roadside walking environment: a pedestrian level of service. Transportation Research Record 1773, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 82–88, 2001.

[7] Nicole Gallin, Quantifying Pedestrian Friendliness – Guidelines for Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service. Walking the 21st Century 20th to 22nd February 2001. Perth, Western Australia.

[8] Dixon, Linda, B., Bicycle and pedestrian level-of-service performance measures and standards for congestion management systems. Transportation research record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 1–9, 1996.

[9] Jaskiewicz, F., Pedestrian level of service based on trip quality. transportation research circular, national research council, transportation research board, Washington, D.C., 2000.

[10] Bloomberg, M.R. & Burden, A.M.. New York city pedestrian level of service study phase i, nyc dcp transportation division April 2006, available at http://www.nyc.gov

[11] Canetti, E. & Stewart, C., Crowds and power. 1984 Ferrar, Straus and Giroux.

[12] Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D. & Theraulaz, G., The walking behavior of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics. PLoS ONE, 5(4), p. e10047, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010047

[13] Cepolina, E.M., Cervia, S. & Gonzalez Rojas, P., Pedestrian modelling: autonomy and communication needs. Proceedings of the International. Conference on Harbor Maritime and Multimodal Logistics M&S, ISBN 978-88-97999-58-4; Bruzzone, Del Rio Vilas, Longo, Merkuryev, Piera Eds, 2015.

[14] Cepolina, E.M., Caroti, G., Piemonte, A. & Gonzalez Rojas, P., Pedestrian modelling: discomfort assessement. Proceedings of the International Conference on Harbor Maritime and Multimodal Logistics M&S, eds A.G. Bruzzone, D. Del Rio Vilas, F. Longo, Y. Merkuryev & M.A. Piera, 2015.

[15] Navin, F.P.D. & Wheeler, R.J., Pedestrian flow characteristics. Traffic Engineering, 19(7), pp. 30–36, 1969.