Environmental Performance Value of Projects: An Environmental Impact Assessment Tool

Environmental Performance Value of Projects: An Environmental Impact Assessment Tool

D. Vagiona

Department of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Page: 
315-330
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V10-N3-315-330
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 June 2015
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The aim of this research is to provide a common methodology for setting environmental performance (EP) values in various projects/activities and involve public in the decision-making process. To hierarchically evaluate the contribution of every environmental component to the environment of the study area, the assessor evaluates the existing as well as the potential situation of the environment by providing different weights to a set of environmental components. Various features of project’s impact on each environmental component are assessed both in the construction and the operational phase. A final environmental evaluation grade for every project evokes for every assessor by the use of a series of simple formulae. To illustrate the use of the proposed tool, the results of its application to 14 cases are presented. The proposed tool uses common criteria and scales to all environmental impact assessment judgments, integrates public participation in the process and concludes, through a uniform methodology, with EP values that should lead either to the acceptance or rejection of a project execution.

Keywords: 

Decision-making, environmental impact assessment, multicriteria analysis, public participation

  References

[1] Morris, P. & Therivel, R., Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment, 4th edn., Spon Press: London, 2004.

[2] Munier, N., Multicriteria Environmental Assessment—A Practical Guide, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.11.027

[3] Hajkowicz, S. & Higgins, A., A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184, pp. 255–265, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.045

[4] Janssen, R., On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10, pp. 101–109, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mcda.293.abs

[5] Kiker, G.A., Bridges, T.S., Varghese, A., Seager, T.P. & Linkov, I., Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2), pp. 95–108, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/ieam_2004a-015.1

[6] Huang, I., Keisler, J. & Linkov, I., Multicriteria decision analysis in environmental science: ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), pp. 3578–3594, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

[7] Hajkowicz, S.A., A comparison of multiple criteria analysis and unaided approaches to environmental decision making. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, pp. 177–184, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.09.003

[8] Momtaz, S. & Gladstone, W., Ban on commercial fishing in the estuarine waters of New South Wales, Australia: community consultation and social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, pp. 319–342, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.001

[9] Sadler, B., Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance, International Association of Impact Assessment and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency: Ottawa, 1996.

[10] Hartley, N. & Wood, C., Public participation in environmental impact assessment – implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, pp. 319–340, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.002

[11] Faircheallaigh, C., Public participation in environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, pp. 19–27, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001

[12] Lawrence, D., The significance of social and economic impacts in environmental assessment. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency: Ottawa, Ontario, available at http://www.ceaaacee.gc.ca/015/001/023/index_e.htm, 2004.

[13] Pastakia, C.M.R. & Jensen, A., The rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) for EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18, pp. 461–482, 1998. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0195-9255(98)00018-3

[14] Kuitunen, M., Jalava, K. & Hirvonen, K., Testing the usability of the rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) method for comparison of EIA and SEA results. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, pp. 312–320, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.06.004

[15] Ijäs, A., Kuitunen, M.T. & Jalava, K., Developing the RIAM method (rapid impact assessment matrix) in the context of impact significance assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, pp. 82–89, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.009

[16] Vagiona, D., Multicriteria decision making tool for environmental impact assessment of projects. Protection and Restoration of the Environment XI, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 1783–1791, 2012.