Public Perceptions of the Role and Competency of Government to Deal with Water-Related Issues over a 34-Year Period in the Pacific Northwest, USA

Public Perceptions of the Role and Competency of Government to Deal with Water-Related Issues over a 34-Year Period in the Pacific Northwest, USA

Robert L. Mahler

Department of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, USA

Page: 
205-215
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/EI-V5-N3-205-215
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

© 2022 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The purpose of this paper is to examine how the public perceives several levels of government address- ing environmental issues in the Pacific Northwest. In 1987, a set of survey questions was designed to address the following: (1) how different levels of government address the environment, (2) public satis- faction with the government at fulfilling their environmental responsibilities, (3) the level of government that should be most responsible for protecting water quality, (4) the amount of money spent protecting the environment and (5) individual and public participation in environmental activities. These survey questions were inserted into a large mail-based survey that was sent to over 3,000 members of the public in 1987, 1992, 1998, 2002, 2007, 2012, 2017 and 2021. Public response rates exceeding 50% were obtained in each survey year. In 1987, 24.1% of the survey respondents felt that government and elected officials did not place enough emphasis on the environment. However, by 2021, this value more than doubled to 58.8%. In 2021, residents younger than 40 years old and respondents from Washington and Oregon were most likely to say that there was not enough governmental emphasis on the environment. By 2021, a majority of survey respondents felt that state, county, city and town governments were doing a good or a very good job of protecting water resources, while only 36% of residents felt that the federal government was doing a good or very good job protecting water. County and state governments were each viewed by over 35% of residents as should having the most responsibility for protecting water in their communities during the entire 34-year survey period. Conversely, never more than 12% of surveyed residents thought that the federal government should have a primary role. The percentages of the public saying that their state of residence spends less money on the environment than it should in 1987, 1998, 2007, 2017 and 2021 was 28.7%, 33.2%, 36.9%, 41.3% and 45.1%, respectively. The three important observations made about public participation in environmental activities were: (1) about half of the surveyed public never took part in an environmental activity, (2) depending on the survey year, between 20.1% and 30.3% participated more than once in an environmental activity and (3) no evidence in upward or downward participation trends were observed over this 34-year study.

Keywords: 

public opinion, sustainable water resource management, voluntary actions to protect water, water quality, water quantity

  References

[1] Mahler, R. L., Simmons, R., Sorensen, F. & Miner, J.R., Priority water issues in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Extension [On-line], 42(5), Article 5RIB3, 2004, available at http://www.joe.org/joe/2004october/rb3.php 2004.

[2] US Environmental Protection Agency. Summary of the Clean Water Act, available at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-act (accessed 15 February 2022).

[3] US Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Water Act and Federal Facilities, available at https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/clean-water-act-and-federal-facilities (accessed 15 February 2022).

[4] US Environmental Protection Agency. Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), available at https://www.epa.gov/sdwa (accessed 13 November 2021).

[5] US Environmental Protection Agency. Background on Drinking Water Standards in the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) , available at https://www.epa.gov/adwa/backgrounddrinking-water-standards-safe-drinking-water-act-sdwa (accessed 13 November 2021).

[6] US Environmental Protection Agency. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Laws and Regulations, available at https://www.epa.gov/rcra (accessed 18 July 2021).

[7] US Environmental Protection Agency. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Overview, available at https://www.epa.gov/rcra/resource-conservation-andrecovery-act-rcra-overview (accessed 27 July 2021).

[8] Funk, C. & Hefferon, M., U.S. Public Views on Climate and Energy. Pew Research Center, Washington D.C. 2019.

[9] Funk, C., Kennedy, B., Hefferon, M. & Strauss, M., Majorities See Government Efforts to Protect the Environment as Insufficient. Pew Research Center, Washington D.C. 2018.

[10] Johnson, M., Brace, P. & Arceneaux, K., Public opinion and dynamic representation in the American state: the case of environmental attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), pp. 87–108, 2005.

[11] Stoutenborough, J.W. & Vedlitz, A., Public attitudes toward water management and drought in the United States. Water Resources Management, 28, pp. 697–714, 2014.

[12] Burstein, P., Public opinion, public policy, and democracy. Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective, eds. K.T. Leicht & J.C. Jenkins, Springer: New York, 2010.

[13] Clay, D.E., Ren, C., Reese, S., Waskom, R., Bauder, J., Menser, N., Paige, G., Reddy, K., Neibauer, M. & Mahler, R., Linking public attitudes with perceptions of factors impacting water quality and attending learning activities. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 36(1), pp. 36–44, 2007.

[14] Delli, CMX & Keeter, S., What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, 1996.

[15] Hurd, BH, St. Hilaire, R. & White, JM., Residential landscapes, homeowner attitudes, and water-wise choices in New Mexico. HortTechnology, 16(2), pp. 241–246, 2006.

[16] Mahler, R.L. & M.E. Barber., Using adult education to improve the sustainability of water resources in the Pacific Northwest, USA. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 10(6), pp. 828–842, 2015, 2015. DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V10-N6-828-842.

[17] Mahler, R.L., Priority water uses from 1998 to 2017 for urban, suburban and rural residents of the Pacific Northwest, USA. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 14(1), pp. 62–73, 2019. DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V14-N1-62-73.

[18] Mahler, R.L., Barber, M.E. & Simmons, R., Public concerns about water pollution between 2002 and 2017 in the Pacific Northwest, USA. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 2(1), pp. 17–26, 2019. DOI: 10.2495/EI-V2-N1-17-26.

[19] Salent, P. & Dillman, D., How to Conduct Your Own Survey, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York: NY, 1994.

[20] Dillman, D., Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York: NY, 2000.

[21] SAS Institute Inc., SAS Online Document 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, 2004.