Enhancing Melon Growth and Nutrient Uptake with Plant-Growth-Promoting Microorganisms from Cucumis melo

Enhancing Melon Growth and Nutrient Uptake with Plant-Growth-Promoting Microorganisms from Cucumis melo

Desti Dian Amalina Sudadi* Ningrum Meliyani Pratama Widyatmani Sih Dewi Hadiwiyono Slamet Minardi Haruhisa Suga

Department of Soil Science, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia

Department of Agrotechnology, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia

Institute for Glyco-Core Research (iGCORE), Gifu University, Gifu 501-1196, Japan

Corresponding Author Email: 
sudadi62@staff.uns.ac.id
Page: 
1475-1484
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.180622
Received: 
14 September 2023
|
Revised: 
21 October 2023
|
Accepted: 
22 November 2023
|
Available online: 
26 December 2023
| Citation

© 2023 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

In an effort to mitigate the environmental impact of chemical fertilizers while promoting soil sustainability, this study investigated the potential of rhizosphere-associated microorganisms to augment nutrient uptake and growth in melon crops. Soil samples were procured from three distinct melon fields and subjected to serial dilution techniques for microbial isolation on Nutrient Agar (NA) and Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) media. Subsequent screening identified select isolates with capabilities for nitrogen fixation, phosphorus and potassium solubilization, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production, and antagonism against pathogens. Two bacterial isolates, designated BS 1A and BK 1, and one fungal isolate, FW 2B, were earmarked for their plant growth-promoting microorganism (PGPM) potential. Sequence analysis revealed homology of BS 1A with Pseudochrobactrum sp., BK 1 with Bacillus cereus, and FW 2B with Trametes polyzona. A greenhouse experiment employing a completely randomized design evaluated the effects of these isolates on melon growth. Control treatments included a positive control (C+), receiving the recommended dosage of NPK fertilizer, and a negative control (C-), devoid of both NPK and microbial treatments. The application of B. cereus, Pseudochrobactrum sp., and T. polyzona was observed to significantly elevate plant biomass and nutrient acquisition, with B. cereus demonstrating the most pronounced effect, rivalling that of chemical fertilization. The results of this study highlight the potential of utilizing select soil microorganisms as biostimulants, which could play a significant role in increasing the productivity of melon crops, thereby supporting the advancement of sustainable agricultural methodologies.

Keywords: 

plant growth-promoting microorganisms, rhizosphere, sustainable farming, Cucumis melo, Bacillus cereus, Pseudochrobactrum sp., Trametes polyzona

1. Introduction

Melon (Cucumis melo) is a horticultural commodity of significant economic value, ranking fourth globally among fruits in market importance [1-3]. Celebrated for its sweet, nutrient-rich flesh, melon consumption has been linked with health benefits [4, 5]. Melon plants are grown in various regions, including tropical, subtropical, temperate, and arid areas under protected agriculture [1, 6]. Melon has a high-water demand and needs nutrient balance for optimal plant growth and development [7]. The species' predilection for high-resource inputs, however, challenges sustainable cultivation [8, 9], with intensive use of chemical inputs leading to soil microflora suppression, and environmental degradation [10-12].

The rhizosphere, a nexus of soil-root interactions, teems with microbial life, modulated by root exudates rich in organic nutrients [13, 14]. Within this intricate ecosystem, microorganisms serve as crucial agents, augmenting nutrient accessibility, endowing resistance to pathogens, and regulating plant growth [11]. Notably, certain bacterial and fungal taxa, collectively termed plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM), have garnered recognition for their contributions to enhancing agricultural productivity and fortifying crop resilience [15, 16]. These microorganisms can modulate nutritional dynamics, mitigate stress, and synthesize growth hormones such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [17, 18]. Notably, genera such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas have been deployed for their phosphate solubilizing and IAA synthesizing properties [19, 20], with Bacillus additionally acting as a biocontrol agent [21], and Serratia spp. enhancing phosphate and nitrogen bioavailability [22, 23].

A persistent challenge in melon cultivation is fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis, a pathogen with devastating impacts on plant health and crop yields [24-26]. Biological control, leveraging antagonistic microorganisms against such pathogens, presents a sustainable alternative to synthetic pesticides, aligning with ecological management practices [27].

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of soil microorganisms in bolstering melon growth and disease resistance. Bioorganic fertilizers incorporating strains of Paenibacillus polymyxa, Bacillus subtilis strain L4, and various fungi have shown reduced wilt incidence and improved yields [28]. Furthermore, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Alcaligenes faecalis have suppressed mycelial growth of FOM [29], while Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens have promoted growth and disease resistance in melons [30]. Additionally, Trichoderma spp. have been identified as plant growth stimulators and protectants against F. oxysporum [31]. The integration of microbial inoculants with tailored fertilizer regimes holds promise for enhancing plant growth, nutrient assimilation, and soil health.

Despite these advances, research gaps remain in the identification and application of PGPM strains endemic to the melon rhizosphere. This study, therefore, is designed to isolate and characterize PGPM from the melon rhizosphere with the potential to improve NPK uptake and stimulate melon growth. It posits that these isolates will enhance nutrient assimilation and plant development, given their roles in nutrient provision, biocontrol, and IAA production. The ultimate goal is to develop a biofertilizer that can reduce reliance on synthetic inputs, thereby fostering sustainable agricultural practices and preserving soil vitality.

2. Material and Method

2.1 Sampling site

Sampling activities were conducted on farmers’ melon plantations in three locations Wonogiri Regency, Sragen Regency, and Karanganyar Regency (Table 1). Isolation and isolate characterization were conducted at the Laboratory of Soil Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University. The selection of sampling locations was based on interviews that had been conducted with farmer groups and local farmers.

Table 1. Location of soil sampling

Location

Coordinates

Altitude (m asl)

Soil Ordo

Ngadirejo Village, Eromoko District, Wonogiri Regency

7°57'9.37'' S

110°52'33.01'' E

168

Vertisol

Dawungan Village, Masaran District, Sragen Regency

7°28'56.12'' S

110°57'45.66'' E

130

Vertisol

Sukosari Village, Jumantono District, Karanganyar Regency

7°37'50.82'' S

110°56'54.52'' E

195

Alfisol

The first location is located in Mojosari, Ngadirejo Village, Eromoko District, Wonogiri Regency with soil ordo Vertisols (Table 1). Sampling was done when the land was being prepared for the next melon-growing season. The cultivation system uses a non-organic farming system with an irrigation system and land is only for melon cultivation.

The second location chosen is located in Dawungan Village, Masaran District, Sragen Regency with soil ordo Vertisols (Table 1). The soil samples were conducted when the melon plant was ready to be harvested, about 2 weeks before harvest. The cultivation system is like the first location with the cropping pattern used is paddy-shallot-melon.

The third location chosen for soil sampling is located in Sukosari Village, Jumantono District, Karanganyar Regency with soil ordo Alfisols (Table 1). Melons are cultivated by Agrimaga Farmhouse in a screen house the system used is a non-organic farming system with a drip irrigation system. Soil sampling was carried out when the plants reached the initial stage of flower emergence.

2.2 Soil Sampling, isolation and purification of soil microorganisms

Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from three melon fields (Table 1). Isolation was conducted using the dilution method on nutrient agar (NA) for bacterial growth and potato dextrose agar (PDA) for fungal growth. After 7 days of isolation at room temperature, colony forming unit (CFU) or viable cells/gram soil was calculated by the following formula:

$\mathrm{CFU}=\frac{ { Mean \,plate \,count } \times { Dilution \,factor }}{ { Amount \,of \,dilution }}$         (1)

Morphologies of the colony were observed by Bergeys’ Manual Systematic Bacteriology. The selected microorganisms were then purified three times on the media to obtain pure isolates using the streak method.

2.3 Screening of microbial potency to provide soil nutrients, produce IAA and antagonism assay

2.3.1 Screening of N-fixing ability, P and K solubilization

N-fixing ability was identified by inoculating purified microbial cultures on Jensen's N-free medium and incubating for 3 days at room temperature. Microbes that have the potential to fix N are characterized by the growth of clear colonies like water droplets on the surface medium.

P and K solubilization ability was identified by inoculating purified microbial culture on Pikovskaya medium for P and Aleksandrow medium for K and incubating 3 days at room temperature. The microorganisms were characterized by the presence of a halo zone in the media around the growing colonies. The ability of mineral solubilization is then calculated by the formula of the Solubilization Index below:

$\mathrm{SI}=\frac{ { halozone \,diameter }}{ { colony \,diameter }}$           (2)

2.3.2 Quantitively assay for IAA production

The production of IAA by microorganisms was quantitatively measured using the colorimetric method by adding the Salkowski reagent (150 ml of H2SO4 and 7.5 ml of 0.5 M FeCl3.6H2O in 250 ml of distilled water). Bacterial isolates were cultured on 10 ml nutrient broth (NB) and fungal isolates were cultured on 10 ml potato dextrose broth (PDB). One hundred g.ml-1 L-tryptophan was added as a precursor to producing IAA. The culture was then shaken at 100 rpm for 48 h at room temperature. Then the culture was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 30 minutes. Two ml of the supernatant was taken and put into a sterile flask, then mixed with 2 ml of Salkowski's reagent and then incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature. Next, the absorbance of the solution was measured using a spectrophotometer with λ = 530 nm and quantified in an IAA standard curve.

2.3.3 Biocontrol potential against F. oxysporum

The biocontrol potential analysis was conducted by a bi-culture antagonistic test by placing the purified fungi isolates and the F. oxysporum isolates side by side on the petri dish. The F. oxysporum isolates were obtained from the Laboratory of Plant Pests and Disease, Faculty of Agriculture, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia. The media used to place the isolates was PDA and mixed PDA and NA. After the isolates were incubated for 7 days, observations were made by observing the growth direction of the isolate and F. oxysporum, if is there an obstructed growth. The percentage of antagonism potency was calculated using the formula below:

F. oxysporum inhibition $\%=\frac{(a-b)}{b} \times 100$          (3)

where,

a = diameter of F. oxysporum on control

b = diameter of F. oxysporum on bi-culture

2.4 Sequence analysis for selected isolate

The sequence analysis was conducted to investigate the species taxa of each potential isolate based on the molecular assay. The analysis was conducted by PT. Genetika Science Indonesia using PCR and sequencing of 16S rDNA for bacteria and rDNA ITS region for fungi. A similar sequence was obtained by BLAST search at the NCBI Database.

2.5 Pot experimental test for selected isolate

2.5.1 Inoculum formulation

Three selected isolates were then cultured until the cell density reached 108 CFU.ml-1. The liquid media were used in the form of NB for bacterial cell culture and PDB for fungal spore cultures. Each isolate was cultured in each media with a stirring speed of 180-200 rpm for 3×24 hours at room temperature and then we enumerated the cell density. The inoculant was applied before planting with a dosage of 10 ml.pot-1 and twice a week with a dosage of 5 ml.pot-1 using a sprayer.

2.5.2 Experimental design

An experiment was conducted at the Greenhouse of the Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University to examine the impact of specific inoculum on the growth of melon and the nutrient status of the soil. The research design used a CRD with a single-factor, formulation of inoculum. The formulation consists of 7 levels, viz control+ (NPK fertilization, 35 g urea, 50 g TSP, and 40 g KCl per plant), control- (without inoculum and NPK), F1 (BK 1), F2 (BS 1A), F3 (FW 2B), F4 (BK 1 + BS 1A), F5 (BK 1 + FW 2B), F6 (BS 1A + BW 2B), and F7 (BK 1 + BS 1A + FW 2B). Each treatment was repeated 3 times. C+ was chosen to see whether the effect of the inoculated isolates could be as good as the use of NPK fertilizer and C- was selected to be a comparison when there’s no treatment at all. The NPK fertilizer for C+ was applied on the day before planting and the 10th, 20th, and 35th days after planting.

2.5.3 Greenhouse condition

The Greenhouse of the Faculty of Agriculture Sebelas Maret University is located at 7°33’41” S and 110°51’32” E with an average daily temperature of 30-33oC and humidity of 63-78%, monitored every day. We used the soil from Entisols soil ordo. Soil initial test was conducted to analyze the characteristics of the initial soil. The results of the initial soil analysis that the soil used had a neutral pH (7.3), very low organic C content (0.65%), medium total N in the soil (0.46%), very low available P content (0.56 ppm), and moderate exchangeable K levels (25.23 mg/100g).

2.5.4 Melon cultivation and growth observation

We used the “Pertiwi” variety with a germination rate of 85% and a high germination vigor level. Seeding was conducted until the seedlings were ± 14 days old. Then, the seeds are transferred to polybags/planting pots.

The soil to be used is sifted so that it is smooth and there are no lumps. The soil is then sterilized to remove indigenous microbes. The dose of manure used is 20 tons.ha-1. Initial fertilizer analysis was carried out to determine the nutrient content of the manure. The results of the analysis showed a pH value of 7.71, a total N of 0.23%, a P of 0.23%, and a K of 0.59%.

The cultivation treatment for these plants involves four main steps: watering, pruning, stake installation, and pesticide spraying. Watering is done once a day either before 7 a.m. or after 4 p.m. until the soil is sufficiently moist. To promote stronger growth, pruning is performed to remove excess branches and retain only one main stem. A week after planting, bamboo stakes are installed to support the plants. We use a botanical pesticide made from crushed garlic soaked in water overnight and mixed with cooking oil. This mixture is sprayed twice a week in the morning before 7 a.m. or after 4 p.m. Plant height measurements were taken once a week until the maximum vegetative period.

2.5.5 Plant harvesting and nutrient uptake analysis

Plant harvesting activity was conducted after the melon plants were ± 65 days after planting. Melon plants were taken and weighed to determine the fresh weight of the plants. Melon plants were then stored in an oven at 70°C for 48 hours to determine the dry weight.

Dried whole plant tissue was ground for the analysis of nutrient uptake including, N (H2SO4 wet ashes), P, and K (HNO3 and HClO4 wet ashes) based on the procedure from the Indonesian Soil Research Centre (2005) [32].

2.6 Statistical Analysis

An ANOVA analysis was performed with a confidence level of 95% to evaluate the impact of the treatment on the observed variables. If the treatment showed a significant effect, the DMRT was conducted to compare the different inoculum formulations. The analysis was carried out using the SPSS 26 software.

3. Results

3.1 Abundance and diversity of soil microorganisms isolated from melon rhizosphere

Based on the study, the population of the microorganisms was different for each sampling site. Isolation on NA and PDA showed that the highest bacteria population was enumerated in Wonogiri soil (7.93 x 105 CFU. g-1 soil) and the highest fungi population was enumerated in Karanganyar (5.33 x 103 CFU. g-1 soil) (Table 2). The varying density of microorganisms from the three locations could be attributed to differences in planting patterns, soil types, cultivation techniques, and plant age.

Table 2. Population density of microbes isolated from melon rhizosphere

Location

Soil Type

Population (CFU.g-1 soil)

Bacteria

Fungi

Wonogiri

Vertisols

7.93 × 105

2.83 × 103

Sragen

Vertisols

6.50 × 105

3.50 × 103

Karanganyar

Alfisols

4.15 × 105

5.33 × 103

We selected 10 bacterial and 10 fungal isolates based on the difference in colony morphology, such as color, shape, elevation, and margin, for screening their potency in providing soil nutrients, biocontrol agents, and producing IAA (Table 3).

Table 3. Colony characteristic of the selected isolate

Isolate

Colony Characteristic

Color

Shape

Margin

Elevation

Soil Bacteria

BW 1A

Off white

Irregular

Smooth

Raised

BW 1B

Off white

Irregular

Smooth

Flat

BS 1A

Off white

Irregular

Ciliate

Flat

BS 1B

Off white

Filamented

Branched

Raised

BS 2A

Off white

Round

Smooth

Raised

BS 2B

Off white

Irregular

Smooth

Flat

BK 1

Transparent

Irregular

Smooth

Flat

BK 2A

Off white

Round

Smooth

Raised

BK 2B

Off white

Irregular

Smooth

Flat

BK 3

Off white

Irregular

Smooth

Raised

Soil Fungi

FW 2B

Off White

Round

Smooth

Raised

FS 1A

Off White

Round

Smooth

Raised

FS 1B

Off White

Irregular

Smooth

Raised

FS 1C

Greenish

Irregular

Smooth

Raised

FS 3A

Off White

Round

Smooth

Raised

FS 3B

Black

Round

Smooth

Raised

FK 1A

Greenish

Round

Smooth

Raised

FK 1B

Brownish

Irregular

Smooth

Raised

FK 1C

Black

Round

Smooth

Raised

FK 3A

Brownish

Round

Smooth

Raised

Note: B = Bacteria; F = Fungi; W = isolate from Wonogiri; S = isolate from Sragen; K = isolate from Karanganyar.

3.2 Microbial potency to provide soil nutrients

A total of 10 bacterial isolates and 10 fungal isolates were tested to identify the ability to provide soil nutrients (N, P, and K). The screening of N fixing ability was conducted by inoculating the isolates on Jensen’s medium. Out of 10 bacterial isolates, it is only 1 of them had the potency for N2 fixation, namely BS 1A (Table 4). It is indicated by the growth of a transparent colony on the surface of Jensen's nitrogen-free medium (Figure 1) because the colony fixed N for its metabolisms. The microbial ability to fix N can help to enhance N uptake by plants.

Figure 1. N-fixing isolate on Jensen’s medium

Study results for the P solubilization assay by inoculating the isolates on Pikovskaya medium confirm that 10 bacterial isolates had P solubilization ability (Table 4) and 5 fungal isolates were positive for P solubilization ability (Table 5). The presence of a clear zone on the surface of the Pikovskaya medium indicated the ability to solubilize P. Based on the enumeration of the solubilization index, the highest P solubilization ability was shown by BS 1A with 1.96 (Table 4) and FS 3A with 1.83 (Table 5). The illustration of the halo zone is shown in Figure 2.

Study results on the Aleksandrow medium confirm that out of 5 bacterial isolates were positive for K solubilization ability (Table 4) and 5 fungal isolates were positive for K solubilization ability (Table 5). The appearance of a clear zone on the surface of the Aleksandrow medium indicated the ability of microorganisms to solubilize K. Based on the enumeration of the solubilization index, the highest K solubilization ability was shown by BK 2B with 1.19 (Table 4) and FW 2B with 2.79 (Table 5). The illustration of the halo zone is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2. P solubilization by BS 1A (a) and FS 3A (b)

Figure 3. K solubilization by BK 2B (a) and FW 2B (b)

3.3 Microbial potency to produce IAA

In this study, L-tryptophan was used as a microbial precursor to produce IAA. The study results show the highest IAA produced by bacterial isolate BW 1B (6.15 ppm) (Table 4) and the highest IAA produced by fungal isolate FW 2B (12.99 ppm) (Table 5). The use of microorganisms that produce IAA will lead to increased plant growth.

Table 4. The potency of selected bacterial isolate for N2 fixation, P and K solubilization, IAA production, and pathogen inhibition

 

Isolate

Potency to Provide Nutrients

IAA (ppm)

F. oxysporum Inhibition (%)

N

P

PSI

K

KSI

BW 1A

-

+

1.60

-

0

5.07

24.62%

BW 1B

-

+

1.41

-

0

6.15

61.54%

BS 1A

+

+

1.96

-

0

5.35

80.77%

BS 1B

-

+

1.42

+

0.88

5.38

42.31%

BS 2A

-

+

1.78

+

0.67

4.76

0%

BS 2B

-

+

1.75

-

0

4.53

230.0%

BK 1

-

+

1.24

+

1.17

5.11

73.08%

BK 2A

-

+

1.16

-

0

5.99

0%

BK 2B

-

+

1.35

+

1.20

5.02

76.92%

BK 3

-

+

1.67

-

0

5.93

20.00%

Notes: (+) = has the potency; (-) = doesn’t have the potency; B = Bacteria; F = Fungi; W = isolate from Wonogiri; S = isolate from Sragen; K = isolate from Karanganyar.

Table 5. The potency of selected fungal isolate for P and K solubilization, IAA production, and pathogen inhibition

Isolate

Potency to Provide Nutrients

IAA (ppm)

F. oxysporum Inhibition (%)

P

PSI

K

KSI

FW 2B

-

0

+

2.79

12.99

34.62%

FS 1A

+

1.19

+

1.24

6.62

26.92%

FS 1B

-

0

-

0

7.08

59.23%

FS 1C

-

0

+

1.96

9.05

30.77%

FS 3A

+

1.83

-

0

7.68

14.00%

FS 3B

-

0

-

0

9.35

42.31%

FK 1A

-

0

+

0.83

10.86

30.77%

FK 1B

-

0

-

0

12.83

0%

FK 1C

-

0

-

0

8.44

71.54%

FK 3A

+

0.84

+

0.75

9.50

0%

Notes: (+) = has the potency; (-) = doesn’t have the potency; B = Bacteria; F = Fungi; W = isolate from Wonogiri; S = isolate from Sragen; K = isolate from Karanganyar.

3.4 Microbial potency to inhibit F. oxysporum

The results of the antagonist test using the bi-culture antagonist test showed that the inhibition percentage of F. oxysporum varied from both bacteria and fungi. The highest ability of bacterial isolates to inhibit the growth of F. oxysporum was shown by BS 1A (80.77%) (Table 4), and the highest ability of fungal isolate was shown by FK 1C (71.54%) (Table 5). The inhibition activity is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. F. oxysporum inhibition by BS 1A (a) and FK 1C (b)

3.5 Species identification of selected potential microorganisms for inoculum formulation

The potential microorganisms for melon growth were selected based on several characteristics based on the research. BS 1A was selected because it is the only isolate that shows the N-fixing ability, has the highest P solubilization ability, and has the highest antagonistic potential among all the bacterial isolates. BK 1 was selected because it can solubilize P, K, and antagonistic potential. FW 2B was selected because it has the highest ability to solubilize K and the highest IAA production among all the fungi isolates (Tables 4 and 5).

Based on the sequence analysis, it is identified that BS 1A was similar to Pseudochrobactrum sp. with similarity (99.92%) (Table 6). BK 1 was similar to B. cereus with similarity (99.86%) (Table 6) and FW 2B was similar to Trametes polyzona with similarity (99.84%) compared to NCBI Database (Table 6).

Table 6. PCR results primer 16S RNA (bacteria) and ITS (fungi)

Isolate

Species

Similarity (%)

GenBank Accession Number

BK 1

Bacillus cereus

99.86

MN543837

BS 1A

Pseudochrobactrum sp.

99.92

KU986671

FW 2B

Trametes Polyzona

99.84

LC732073

Note: Molecular analysis of three selected isolates was carried out using 16S rDNA (bacteria) and ITS1-ITS4 (fungi) sequences, and the results were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database. The closest species and corresponding similarity percentages for each isolate were documented using the BLAST tool in NCBI.

3.6 The effect of PGPM formulation on plant height and biomass

The inoculation was significant due to the result of ANOVA for plant height and plant biomass, this means the application of microbe inoculum has an effect on plant height and plant biomass compared to the control (Table 7).

Table 7. ANOVA results for plant height and biomass

Dependent Variable

df

F

P-value

Plant height

8

10.007

0.000**

Fresh weight

8

17.278

0.000**

Dry weight

8

7.300

0.000**

Note: *Significant at α=0.05; ** Highly significant at α=0.01.

Treatment F6 (a combination of BS 1A and FW 2B) gives the highest result on plant height. The combination of BS 1A and FW 2B inoculum was able to increase plant height by up to 48.2% compared to the C- (Table 8). The highest plant biomass for both fresh and dry weight was F1 (single inoculant BK 1) with an increase in plant fresh weight of up to 77.2% compared to the C- (Table 8).

Table 8. Results of plant height and plant biomass in greenhouse experiment

Formulation

Plant Height (cm)

Plant Biomass (gram)

Fresh Weight

Dry Weight

C-

195.50a

219.00a

47.36ab

C+

236.83b

380.33d

62.92d

F1

277.33bc

388.00d

63.50d

F2

272.83bc

255.33ab

43.03a

F3

274.83bc

281.67bc

47.96ab

F4

267.00bc

303.00c

50.12b

F5

262.33bcd

275.00bc

59.38cd

F6

290.33d

275.33bc

56.42c

F7

250.50bc

226.67a

45.21ab

Note: The numbers followed by the same letter in the same column were not significantly different based on the DMRT test at the 5% level.

3.7 The effect of PGPM formulation on NPK uptake

The inoculation of microorganisms was significant due to the result of ANOVA for N, P, and K uptake, this means the microbe affects nutrient uptake (P<0.05) (Table 9). The highest N uptake was shown by the C+ (recommended NPK treatment) of 3.15% (Table 10). The recommended NPK treatment was able to increase plant N uptake by up to 65.6%. Meanwhile, the best inoculum formulation for increasing N uptake was shown by the F1 (single inoculum BK 1) of 2.63% (Table 10), an increase of 38% compared to the C-. This means that the application of single inoculum BK 1 can reduce the reliance on inorganic N fertilizer.

Table 9. ANOVA results for nutrient uptake

Dependent Variable

df

F

P-value

N uptake

8

6.110

0.001**

P uptake

8

4.950

0.002**

K uptake

8

7.792

0.000**

Note: *Significant at α=0.05; ** Highly significant at α=0.01.

Table 10. Results of nutrient uptake greenhouse experiment

Formulation

Nutrient Uptake (%)

N

P

K

C-

1,61a

0,06a

0,09a

C+

2,83bc

0,18bc

0,26e

F1

2,84bc

0,17bc

0,17bcd

F2

3,37c

0,13ab

0,14ab

F3

1,64a

0,13ab

0,19bcd

F4

1,82a

0,08a

0,15bc

F5

2,28ab

0,18bc

0,22de

F6

3,48c

0,17bc

0,19cd

F7

1,98a

0,22c

0,16bcd

Note: The numbers followed by the same letter in the same column were not significantly different based on the DMRT test at the 5% level.

The highest P uptake value was shown by the F7 (combination of 3 isolates) of 0.22% (Table 10), this figure showed an increase of 244.14% compared to the control. The highest K uptake was shown by the C+ (recommended NPK treatment) of 0.26% (Table 10). The recommended NPK treatment was able to increase K uptake by up to 185.9%. Meanwhile, the best inoculum formulation in increasing K uptake was shown by treatment F5 (combination of BK 1 and FW 2B inoculums) of 0.22% (Table 10), an increase of 138.6% compared to the C-. The results mean that the use of PGPM in melon cultivation will reduce the reliance on chemical fertilizers.

4. Discussions

4.1 Exploration of soil microorganisms from melon rhizosphere

The isolation of microorganisms from three melon fields showed that there are various densities of microorganisms (Table 2). The melon field from Wonogiri had the highest bacterial density, while Karanganyar had the highest fungal density (Table 2). The amount of organic matter in the soil can impact the diversity and activity of microorganisms in the soil [33, 34]. These may explain the variation in colony density and morphological diversity (Table 3).

The results of the screening to provide soil nutrients, only one of the isolates found in the rhizosphere of melon plants was able to fix nitrogen, and it was identified as BS 1A (Table 3). Applying this isolate to melon growth is expected to help reduce the use of inorganic N fertilizer. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria have benefits such as increasing root surface, seed production, and fruit ripening [35]. Using a consortium of nitrogen-fixing bacteria was shown to reduce the use of inorganic fertilizers in plants by up to 25% [36].

The high P solubilization activity is expected to enhance the P availability. A higher value of PSI indicates a higher activity of phosphatase enzymes and the production of organic acids [37]. For the greenhouse experiment, PSMs BS 1A and BK 1 were selected (Table 5). The results showed that the inoculation of PSM increased the uptake of P by plants (Table 8). PSM is an alternative way to maintain soil health and minimize its degradation [38]. The use of PSM as a biological fertilizer is expected to increase the yield of fruits on melon plants, help these plants resist pathogen attacks, and reduce the excessive use of chemical fertilizers [39-41].

The K solubilization index (KSI) was used to quantify the ability to solubilize K. The results showed that BK 1 and FW 2B were suitable for inoculant application in the greenhouse experiment (Table 5). KSM produces organic acids that can solubilize K directly or chelate silicate ions first to absorb K and become available to plants [42, 43]. Utilizing KSM increased K uptake in plants (Table 8), indicating its potential as a biofertilizer. The use of KSM in agriculture as a biofertilizer can reduce the need for K fertilizer by up to 50% [44].

Plant growth is largely influenced by microbes, which produce phytohormones such as IAA that stimulate growth. IAA is a natural auxin and its production and concentration are affected by various factors such as species/strain, pH, carbon source, nitrogen source, and tryptophan availability. Microorganisms can produce varying amounts of IAA, as observed in studies using L-tryptophan as a precursor (Tables 4 and 5) [45, 46]. The use of microorganisms that can produce IAA will improve plant tolerance to pathogens by regulating growth [47]. Plants use IAA for various growth and physiological processes, including embryogenesis, organogenesis, root and shoot development, growth, and fruit development [48].

Several selected microorganisms showed the potency of F. oxysporum inhibition with the highest inhibition activity shown by BS 1A (Table 4) and FK 1C (Table 5). The inhibition occurs because of the mechanization of antibiotics or anti-microbials from isolates to fight pathogens [49, 50]. Several compounds synthesized by plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) such as HCN, chitinase, and gluconate make PGPM have antagonistic abilities [51]. This is expected to reduce the use of chemical products in fighting F. oxysporum in melon cultivation. Biocontrol agents can prevent pathogen infection, improve plant growth, and increase resistance to pathogens [21, 47].

We selected 3 potential isolates for greenhouse experiments, namely BS 1A, BK 1, and FW 2B based on the results of the screening that had been conducted. The selection was based on the outstanding characteristics of each isolate to complement each other when formulated into a biofertilizer in the future. Utilizing the PGPM with a beneficial effect for providing nutrients and plant growth offers environmentally friendly and sustainable alternatives to chemical fertilizer and disease control methods in melon cultivation.

4.2 The effect of inoculation soil microorganisms on plant growth and nutrient uptake

The use of a microorganism formula on melon plants had a positive impact on their growth, as indicated in Table 7. This can be attributed to the presence of inoculum, which provides necessary nutrients for the plants [52]. The addition of inoculum leads to an increase in nutrition and subsequently, plant height [53]. Furthermore, the application of microorganism inoculum resulted in an increase in plant biomass - both fresh and dry weight (Table 8). Results from the Pearson’s correlation test indicate that factors affecting plant fresh weight were N uptake (r=0.849**), K uptake (r=0.590**), and exchangeable K value in the soil (r=0.547**). On the other hand, plant dry weight was influenced by fresh weight (r=0.839**), N uptake (r=0.919*), P uptake (r=0.419*), and K uptake (r=0.740**). This demonstrates the significant impact of nutrition on plant biomass. When plants receive adequate nutrients, they can grow optimally and produce good biomass [54].

The inoculation of microorganisms that provide nutrients can effectively improve plant growth and nutrition. In this study, a single inoculation of B. cereus resulted in the highest increase in both fresh and dry plant biomass compared to other formulas (Table 8). B. cereus has been proven to promote plant growth in various studies involving sunflowers, Phaseolus vulgaris, and tomatoes. The ability of B. cereus to enhance plant growth is directly related to its production of the growth hormone IAA (Table 4). IAA is a known promoter of plant growth, and plants utilize IAA produced by microorganisms to encourage root elongation, increased root coverage, and mineral uptake, as well as root exudation [55, 56]. Furthermore, IAA contributes to plant tolerance against stress and pathogen attacks. Microbe-produced IAA enhances the number of root hair and plant lateral roots, which in turn improves plant mineral uptake and root exudation. Overall, IAA improves plant tolerance, growth, dry mass, and photosynthetic pigments [57].

The application of microorganisms in melon cultivation in greenhouses can increase NPK uptake by plants (Table 10), this is related to the ability of the applied microorganisms to fix N and dissolve P and K (Tables 4 and 5). Single inoculant B. cereus gave the highest N uptake results. Farmers commonly use inorganic nitrogen fertilizers to meet plant needs, but up to 65% of applied minerals are lost through gas emissions, runoff, erosion, and leaching [58]. Utilization of N-fixing bacteria (NFB) has been widely used to reduce the use of N fertilizers in plants. NFB can convert N2 in nature into NH3 because it produces the enzyme nitrogenase. The addition of microorganisms can increase nitrogen through several mechanisms such as N fixation, enzyme activity such as N-acetylglucosaminidase and urease in soil N mineralization, ammonification, and nitrification [59, 60].

Formulation F5 which is a combination of B. cereus and Trametes polyzona gives the highest K uptake value compared to the others (Table 10). The inoculum of the two species used is known to have the ability to solubilize K (Table 10). KSM can increase the availability of K in soil solution thereby increasing the absorption of K for plant growth and development [40]. KSM can dissolve K in the soil through the mechanisms of acidolysis, chelation, exchange reactions, and complexation of the organic acids produced [14, 61, 62]. Likewise, the presence of PSM can make more P available for plant absorption [63]. PSM has been widely accepted as an environmentally friendly and easy-to-obtain P fertilizer for increasing soil orthophosphate concentrations and the geochemical P cycle since the early 20th century [41]. PSM produces organic acids and enzymes such as phosphatase and pyrophosphatase which can dissolve P to become available [64, 65]. PSM has many roles for plants, including growth boosters [39], biocontrol and bioremediation activities [40], and increasing plant growth and fruit yields [41]. The F7 formulation consisting of a combination of the three isolates, in which the three isolates could produce organic acids in dissolving K and P, was able to give the highest P absorption results.

The use of PGPM in this research plays a vital role in enhancing nutrient uptake and plant growth. This ensures the long-term health, and productivity of melon, and offers a promising path forward for more eco-friendly and efficient agricultural practices. Beyond the promotion of plant growth, PGPM also supports biocontrol and bioremediation activities, reducing the reliance on chemical products in agriculture.

5. Conclusions

The application of PGPM significantly enhanced the growth of melon and NPK uptake. Inoculated plants exhibited increased plant height, fresh and dry biomass, and nutrient uptake. This underscores the importance of adequate nutrition for optimal plant development.

Among the different strains tested, only one strain, BS 1A, which was found in the melon rhizosphere, was capable of nitrogen fixation. The use of NFBs proved to be particularly effective in reducing the need for inorganic nitrogen fertilizers. Two strains, BS 1A and BK 1, were identified as effective PSMs. Moreover, BK 1 and FW 2B showed potential in solubilizing (K). The use of KSM and PSM as biofertilizers provides an eco-friendly alternative to chemical fertilizers. Among the various formulations tested, the single inoculation of B. cereus was the most effective in promoting plant growth and biomass production. This microorganism is known to produce the growth hormone IAA, which plays a vital role in enhancing root growth, mineral uptake, and plant tolerance to stress and pathogens.

PGPM formulations can improve melon cultivation sustainably and with minimal environmental impact. Using beneficial soil microorganisms enhances crop resilience, improves production, and promotes resource-efficient and eco-friendly farming. To determine the effectiveness of PGPM inoculum in substituting inorganic fertilizer, further research should be conducted using different inoculum doses combined with inorganic fertilizer. This will help to reduce the use of inorganic fertilizers. Additionally, it is important to conduct resistance testing of the inoculum for field use.

Acknowledgment

This publication was the result of the “Development of Biofilm Biofertilizer with Biocontrol Agents for High Economic Value Horticulture” Mandatory Research project of Sebelas Maret University. We would like to thank Sebelas Maret University, which funded part of this research through the Mandatory Research scheme for non-APBN funds for the fiscal year 2022 with Contract Number: 254/UN27.22/PT.01.03/2022.

  References

[1] Abraham-Juárez, R., Espitia-Vázquez, I., Guzmán-Mendoza, R., Olalde-Portugal, V., De La, G.M., Ruiz-Aguilar, L., García-Hernández, J.L., Herrera-Isidrón, L., Núñez-Palenius, H.G. (2018). Development, yield, and quality of melon fruit (Cucumis melo L.) inoculated with Mexican native strains of Bacillus subtilis (EHRENBERG). Agrociencia, 52(1): 91-102.

[2] Kesh, H., Kaushik, P. (2021). Advances in melon (Cucumis melo L.) breeding: An update. Scientia Horticulturae, 282: 110045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110045

[3] De Campos, G.S., Ayub, R.A., Etto, R.M., Galvão, C.W., Stroka, M.A., Inaba, J. (2017). High-quality total RNA isolation from melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruits rich in polysaccharides. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias, 38(4): 2201-2207. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2201

[4] Ali, A.F., Alsaady, M.H., Salim, H.A. (2019). Impact of biofertilizer and magnetic irrigation water on growth and yield of melon (Cucumis melo L). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 388(1): 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012070

[5] Vishwakarma, V.K., Gupta, J.K., Upadhyay, P.K. (2017). Pharmacological importance of Cucumis melo L.: An overview. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 10: 8-12. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i3.13849

[6] Silva, M.A., Albuquerque, T.G., Alves, R.C., Oliveira, M.B.P.P., Costa, H.S. (2020). Melon (Cucumis melo L.) by-products: Potential food ingredients for novel functional foods? Trends Food Science and Technology, 98: 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIFS.2018.07.005

[7] Lopez-Zaplana, A., Martinez-Garcia, N., Carvajal, M., Bárzana, G. (2022). Relationships between aquaporins gene expression and nutrient concentrations in melon plants (Cucumis melo L.) during typical abiotic stresses. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 195: 104759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104759

[8] Amiroh, A., Rohmad, M. (2017). Kajian varietas dan dosis urine kelinci terhadap pertumbuhan dan produksi tanaman melon (Cucumis Melo L.). Folium: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian, 1(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.33474/folium.v1i1.1012

[9] Castellanos, M.T., Cabello, M.J., del Carmen Cartagena, M., Tarquis, A.M., Arce, A., Ribas, F. (2011). Dinâmica do crescimento e da produtividade do melão em resposta ao fertilizante nitrogenado. Scientia Agricola, 68(2): 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162011000200009

[10] Cuartero, J., Pascual, J.A., Vivo, J.M., Özbolat, O., Sánchez-Navarro, V., Egea-Cortines, M., Zornoza, R., Mena, M.M., Garcia, E., Ros, M. (2022). A first-year melon/cowpea intercropping system improves soil nutrients and changes the soil microbial community. Agriculture, Ecosystem, and Environment, 328: 107856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.107856

[11] Dewi, W.S., Amalina, D.D., Romadhon, M.R. (2023). Microbial biofilm for soil health, plant growth, and productivity under multi stress: A review. Earth and Environmental Science, 1162(1): 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1162/1/012008

[12] Firmansyah, M.A., Nugroho, W.A., Suparman. (2018). The effect of varieties and fertilization packages in the productive phase on the quality of melon (Cucumis melo L.) in Quartzipsamments. Jurnal Hortikultura Indonesia, 9(2): 93-102. https://doi.org/10.29244/jhi.9.2.93-102

[13] Vacheron, J., Desbrosses, G., Bouffaud, M.L., Touraine, B., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., Muller, D., Legendre, L., Wisniewski-Dyé, F., Prigent-Combaret, C. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4: 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356

[14] Meena, V.S., Bahadur, I., Maurya, B.R., Kumar, A., Meena, R.K., Meena, S.K., Verma, J.P. (2016). Potassium-solubilizing microorganism in evergreen agriculture: An overview. In Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, India, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_1

[15] Khan, N. (2021). Application of plant growth promoting microorganism and plant growth regulators in agricultural production and research. Agronomy, 11(2): 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY11030524

[16] Muñoz-Carvajal, E., Araya-Angel, J.P., Garrido-Sáez, N., González, M., Stoll, A. (2023). Challenges for plant growth promoting microorganism transfer from science to industry: A case study from Chile. Microorganisms, 11(4): 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS11041061/S1

[17] Meraklı, N., Memon, A. (2020). Role of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) in plant growth and development: Soil-plant relationship. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(12): 2590-2602. https://doi.org/10.24925/TURJAF.V8I12.2590-2602.3785

[18] Chauhan, H., Bagyaraj, D.J., Selvakumar, G., Sundaram, S.P. (2015). Novel plant growth promoting rhizobacteria—Prospects and potential. Applied Soil Ecology, 95: 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSOIL.2015.05.011

[19] Lanna-Filho, R., Pozzebon, B.C., de Oliveira, A.M.R. (2022). Endophytic bacteria Bacillus safensis and Pseudomonas hibiscicola and their ability to increase rice seedling growth. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 89: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000162021

[20] Putrie, R.F.W., Aryantha, I.N.P., Iriawati, Antonius, S. (2021). The structure characteristic of IAA n-acetyl-transferase enzyme produced by two species of bacteria (Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens). Earth and Environmental Science, 762: 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/762/1/012054

[21] Widyantoro, A., Hadiwiyono, Subagiya. (2020). Short communication: Biological control of Fusarium wilt on banana plants using biofertilizers. Biodiversitas, 21: 2119-2123. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210540

[22] Hanif, M.K., Malik, K.A., Hameed, S., Saddique, M.J., Ayesha, Fatima, K., Naqqash, T., Majeed, A., Iqbal, M.J., Imran, A. (2020). Growth stimulatory effect of AHL producing Serratia spp. from potato on homologous and non-homologous host plants. Microbiological Research, 238: 126506. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICRES.2020.126506

[23] Nascente, A.S., Lanna, A.C., de Sousa, T.P., Chaibub, A.A., de Souza, A.C.A., de Filippi, M.C.C. (2019). N fertilizer dose-dependent efficiency of Serratia spp. for improving growth and yield of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Plant Production, 13(3): 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42106-019-00049-5/TABLES/13

[24] Dhaouadi, S., Rouissi, W., Mougou-Hamdane, A., Nasraoui, B. (2019). Evaluation of biocontrol potential of Achromobacter xylosoxidans against Fusarium wilt of melon. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 154(2): 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-01646-2

[25] Suwarno, S.J., Masnilah, R. (2020). Potential Bacillus spp. as a biocontrol agent to suppress Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum) in melon plants (Cucumis melo L.). Jurnal Pengendalian Hayati, 3(1): 22-28. https://doi.org/10.19184/jph.v3i1.17148

[26] Oumouloud, A., El-Otmani, M., Chikh-Rouhou, H., Claver, A.G., Torres, R.G., Perl-Treves, R., Álvarez, J.M. (2013). Breeding melon for resistance to Fusarium wilt: Recent developments. Euphytica, 192(2): 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0904-4

[27] De Cal, A., Sztejnberg, A., Sabuquillo, P., Melgarejo, P. (2009). Management Fusarium wilt on melon and watermelon by Penicillium oxalicum. Biological Control, 51(3): 480-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.08.011

[28] Zhao, Q., Dong, C., Yang, X., Mei, X., Ran, W., Shen, Q., Xu, Y. (2011). Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt disease for Cucumis melo using bio-organic fertilizer. Applied Soil Ecology, 47(1): 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.09.010

[29] Kadir, J., Tengku, M., Mohamed, M., Vadamalai, G., Elmahdi, S., Akter, S. (2015). Isolation, screening and characterization of effective microbes with potential for biological control of Fusarium wilt of rock melon. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(1): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-3-1-3

[30] García-Gutiérrez, L., Romero, D., Zeriouh, H., Cazorla, F.M., Torés, J.A., de Vicente, A., Pérez-García, A. (2012). Isolation and selection of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as inducers of systemic resistance in melon. Plant and Soil, 358(1-2): 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1173-z

[31] Martínez-Medina, A., Del Mar, A.M., Pascual, J.A., Van Wees, S.C.M. (2014). Phytohormone profiles induced by Trichoderma isolates correspond with their biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activity on melon plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 40(7): 804-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0478-1

[32] Sulaeman, Suparto, Eviati. (2005). Technical instructions for chemical analysis of soil, plants, water and fertilizer. Indonesian Soil Research Center, Bogor.

[33] Abdila, A., Japarang, N., Agustin, N., Hafni, W., Annisi, A.D., Karim, H., Azis, A.A., Junda, M., Jumadi, O. (2022). Population of soil microorganisms in corn fields after application of polyacrylate fertilizer. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 27(1): 8-21. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.27.1.18

[34] Saragih, A.M., Dermiyati, Buchari, H., Arif, M.A.S. (2015). The effect of the tillage system on total soil bacteria in soybean planting in the second planting season after corn planting on former grassland (Imperata cylindrica L). Jurnal Agrotek Tropika, 3(1): 174-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jat.v3i1.2011

[35] Reis, V.M., Teixeira, K.R. dos S. (2015). Nitrogen fixing bacteria in the family Acetobacteraceae and their role in agriculture. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 55(8): 931-949. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201400898

[36] Widiyawati, I., Sugiyanta, Junaedi, A., Widyastuti, R. (2014). The role of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in reducing the dose of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer in lowland rice. Indonesian Journal of Agronomy, 42(2): 96-102. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v42i2.8424

[37] Paul, D., Sinha, S.N. (2017). Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa KUPSB12 with antibacterial potential from river Ganga, India. Annals of Agrarian Science, 15(1): 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2016.10.001

[38] Amalina, D.D., Sudadi, Pratama, N.M., Dewi, W.S. (2023). The potency of soil bacteria on soil phosphorus solubilization and IAA production for innovation on sustainable Melon (Cucumis melo) production through biofilm biofertilizer. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1200: 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1200/1/012001

[39] Kalayu, G. (2019). Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: Promising approach as biofertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy, 2019: 4917256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4917256

[40] Rawat, P., Das, S., Shankhdhar, D., Shankhdhar, S.C. (2021). Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms: Mechanism and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21(1): 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00342-7

[41] Tian, J., Ge, F., Zhang, D., Deng, S., Liu, X. (2021). Roles of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from managing soil phosphorus deficiency to mediating biogeochemical P cycle. Biology, 10(2): 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10020158

[42] Jaya, D.K., Hasibuan, S.Y.K., Bria, D. (2021). Isolation and characterization of potassium-solubilizing bacteria from two different rhizospheres and a cow manure in IPB University. Jurnal Biologi Tropis, 21(2): 336-342. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v21i2.2559

[43] Herdiyantoro, D., Simarmata, T., Setiawati, M.R., Nurlaeny, N., Joy, B., Hamdani, J.S., Handayani, I. (2018). Exploration and identification of colony morphology of potassium-solubilizing rhizobacteria isolates from the rhizosphere of corn plants which have potential as potassium-solubilizing biofertilizers. Proceedings of the National Seminar on the Indonesian Biodiversity Society, 4(2): 178-183. https://doi.org/10.13057/psnmbi/m040214

[44] Bahadur, I., Maurya, B.R., Kumar, A., Meena, V.S., Raghuwanshi, R. (2016). Towards the soil sustainability and potassium-solubilizing microorganisms in potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. In Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, India, pp. 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_18

[45] Raut, V., Shaikh, I., Naphade, B., Prashar, K., Adhapure, N. (2017). Plant growth promotion using microbial IAA producers in conjunction with azolla: A novel approach. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 4(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0083-3

[46] Myo, E.M., Ge, B., Ma, J., Cui, H., Liu, B., Shi, L., Jiang, M., Zhang, K. (2019). Indole-3-acetic acid production by Streptomyces fradiae NKZ-259 and its formulation to enhance plant growth. BMC Microbiology, 19(1): 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1528-1

[47] Hadiwiyono, Widono, S. (2017). Effectiveness and mechanism of endophytic Bacillus in suppressing wilt intensity of banana seedling inoculated by blood disease bacterium. Plant Pathology Journal (Faisalabad), 16(2): 89-95. https://doi.org/10.3923/ppj.2017.89.95

[48] Mohite, B. (2013). Isolation and characterization of indole acetic acid (IAA) producing bacteria from rhizospheric soil and its effect on plant growth. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 13(3): 638-649. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162013005000051

[49] Jayanti, R.M., Joko, T. (2020). Plant growth promoting and antagonistic potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from melon in Indonesia. Plant Pathology Journal, 19(3): 200-210. https://doi.org/10.3923/ppj.2020.200.210

[50] Sudadi, S., Hadiwiyono, H., Sumarno, S., Ciptasari, D.D. (2019). Capability of sulphur oxidizing bacteria to inhibit basal plate rot and increase shallot growth on Andisols. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science, 41(1): 107-116. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v41i1.829

[51] Wahyudi, A.T., Astuti, R.P., Widyawati, A., Meryandini, A., Nawangsih, A.A. (2011). Characterization of Bacillus sp. strains isolated from rhizosphere of soybean plants for their use as potential plant growth for promoting rhizobacteria. Journal of Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 3(2): 34-40.

[52] Singh, D., Prasanna, R., Sharma, V., Rajawat, M.V.S., Nishanth, S., Saxena, A.K. (2020). Prospecting plant-microbe interactions for enhancing nutrient availability and grain biofortification. In Wheat and Barley Grain Biofortification, UK, pp. 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818444-8.00008-0

[53] Maheshwari, D.K., Kumar, S., Maheshwari, N.K., Patel, D., Saraf, M. (2012). Nutrient availability and management in the rhizosphere by microorganisms. In Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management, Berlin, pp. 309-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23465-1_15

[54] Mir, M.R., Mobin, M., Khan, N., Bhat, M.A., Lone, N., Bhat, K., Razvi, S.M., Wani, S., Wani, N., Akhter, S., Rashid, S., Masoodi, N., Payne, W. (2010). Crop responses to interaction between plant growth regulators and nutrients. The Journal of Phytology, 2(10): 9-19.

[55] Gunasinghe, Y.H.K.I.S., Edirisinghe, E.A.A.D. (2020). Industrially important enzyme and plant growth promoter potential of soil actinomycetes. International Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 7(6): 54-62. https://doi.org/10.31033/IJRASB.7.6.9

[56] Abid, A., Ahmed, A. (2018). Microbial IAA: Spectral analysis and application to modulate growth of Triticum aestivum. RADS Journal of Biological Research & Applied Sciences, 9(2): 53-63. https://doi.org/10.37962/JBAS.V9I2.128

[57] Husen, A., Iqbal, M., Aref, I.M. (2017). The plant growth and foliar characteristics of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) are affected by indole-acetic acid under water-sufficient and water-deficient conditions. Journal of Environmental Biology, 38: 179-186. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/38/2/MS-247

[58] Bhattacharjee, R.B., Singh, A., Mukhopadhyay, S.N. (2008). Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertilizer for non-legumes: Prospects and challenges. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 80(2): 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1567-2

[59] Zhou, Z., Zheng, M., Xia, J., Wang, C. (2022). Nitrogen addition promotes soil microbial beta diversity and the stochastic assembly. Science of The Total Environment, 806: 150569. https://doi.org10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.150569

[60] Munkager, V., Altenburger, A., Priemé, A., Bang-Andreasen, T., Rønn, R., Vestergård, M., Ekelund, F. (2021). Soil microorganisms decrease barley biomass uniformly across contrasting nitrogen availability. European Journal of Soil Biology, 104: 103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJSOBI.2021.103311

[61] Etesami, H., Emami, S., Alikhani, H.A. (2017). Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): Mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects-a review. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17(4): 897-911. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017000400005

[62] Sharma, A., Shankhdhar, D., Shankhdhar, S.C. (2016). Potassium-solubilizing microorganisms: Mechanism and their role in potassium solubilization and uptake. In Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, India, pp. 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_15

[63] Lanna, A.C., Silva, M.A., Moreira, A.S., Nascente, A.S., de Fillipi, M.C.C. (2021). Improved nutrient uptake in three Crotalaria species inoculated with multifunctional microorganisms. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 25(7): 460-465. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/AGRIAMBI.V25N7P460-465

[64] Alfiah, L.N., Zul, D., Nelvia. (2016). Effect of inoculation of a mixture of Riau indigenous phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates on the growth and production of soybean plants (Glycine max L. Merr). Jurnal Agroteknologi, 7(1): 7-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ja.v7i1.2243

[65] Setiawati, M.R., Pranoto, D.E. (2015). Comparison of several exogenous phosphate solubilizing bacteria in Andisol soil as the dominant tea planting area in Indonesia. Journal of Tea and Quinine Research, 18(2): 159-164.