A Quasi-Static Interface Damage Model with Frictional Contact – Applications to Steel Reinforced Concrete Structures

A Quasi-Static Interface Damage Model with Frictional Contact – Applications to Steel Reinforced Concrete Structures

Roman Vodička* Filip Kšiňan

Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovakia

Page: 
1043-1056
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N6-1043-1056
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

A model for numerical analysis of compound structures made of various materials is presented. The mathematical concept of solution is based on quasi-static evolution of debonding processes occurring along the interface. It is formulated in terms of energies considering the stored energy represented by the elastic energy of the structures and dissipation due to damage processes, plastic slip at the inter- face or friction. The numerical solution includes a semi-implicit time stepping procedure, relying on splitting of the whole problem at a current time step into two problems of variational nature solved recursively. The space discretisation includes Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method used to obtain the stored energies, and, in combination with the variational character of the recursive problems, also to calculate its gradients to be utilized in non-linear programming algorithms for finding the time- evolving solution. Numerical results are demonstrated for a steel-concrete interface frequently met in civil engineering applications to assess the model applicability in engineering practice.

Keywords: 

cohesive interface, contact with friction, interface damage, interface plastic slip, quadratic programming, quasi-static delamination, SGBEM

  References

[1] Ortiz, M. & Pandolfi, A., Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three dimensional crack propagation analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 44, pp. 1267–1283, 1999.https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::aid-nme486>3.3.co;2-z

[2] Park, K. & Paulino, G., Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 64(6), 2011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023110

[3] Távara, L., Mantič, V., Salvadori, A., Gray, L. & París, F., Cohesive-zone-model formu-lation and implementation using the symmetric Galerkin boundary element method for homogeneous solids. Computational Mechanics, 51, pp. 535–551, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0808-5

[4] Leguillon, D., Strength or toughness? a criterion for crack onset at a notch. European Journal of Mechanics and Solids, 21(1), pp. 61–72, 2002.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0997-7538(01)01184-6

[5] Cornetti, P., Mantič, V. & Carpinteri, A., Finite fracture mechanics at elastic interfaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 49, pp. 1022–1032, 2012.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.01.002

[6] García, I., Mantič, V., Blázquez, A. & París, F., Transverse crack onset and growth in cross-ply [0=90]s laminates under tension: application of a coupled stress and energy criterion. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51, pp. 3844–3856, 2014.

[7] Kočvara, M., Mielke, A. & Roubíček, T., A rate-independent approach to the delami-nation problem. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 11, pp. 423–447, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286505046482

[8] Roubíček, T., Kružík, M. & Zeman, J., Delamination and adhesive contact models and their mathematical analysis and numerical treatment. Mathematical Methods and Models in Composites, ed. V. Mantič, Imperial College Press, pp. 349–400, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848167858_0009

[9] Raous, M., Cangemi, L. & Cocu, M., A consistent model coupling adhesion, friction and unilateral contact. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 177(6), pp. 383–399, 1999.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(98)00389-2

[10] Frémond, M., Dissipation dans l’adhérence des solides. CR Acad Sci, Paris, SérII, 300, pp. 709–714, 1985.

[11] Vodička, R., A quasi-static interface damage model with cohesive cracks: SQP–SGBEM implementation. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 62, pp. 123–140, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2015.09.010

[12] Vodička, R. & Mantič, V., A multilinear cohesive law within a quasi-static interface damage model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017. (accepted).

[13] Banks-Sills, L. & Askenazi, D., A note on fracture criteria for interface fracture. International Journal of Fracture, 103, pp. 177–188, 2000.https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007612613338

[14] Mantič, V., Discussion on the reference length and mode mixity for a bimaterial inter-face. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 130, pp. 045501–1–2, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2975232

[15] Panagiotopoulos, C., Mantič, V. & Roubíček, T., BEM implementation of energetic solutions for quasistatic delamination problems. Computational Mechanics, 51, pp. 505–521, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0826-3

[16] Vodička, R., Mantič, V. & Roubíček, T., Energetic versus maximally-dissipative local solutions of a quasi-static rate-independent mixed-mode delamination model. Meccanica, 49(12), pp. 2933–296, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-0045-4

[17] Mantič, V. & París, F., Relation between SIF and ERR based measures of fracture mode mixity in interface cracks. International Journal of Fracture, 130, pp. 557–569, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:frac.0000049496.77533.d5

[18] Roubíček, T., Panagiotopoulos, C. & Mantič, V., Local-solution approach to quasistatic rate-independent mixed-mode delamination. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 25(7), pp. 1337–1364, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218202515500347

[19] Wriggers, P., Computational Contact Mechanics. Springer: Berlin, 2006.

[20] Vodička, R., Mantič, V. & Roubíček, T., Quasistatic normal-compliance contact prob-lem of visco-elastic bodies with Coulomb friction implemented by QP and SGBEM. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 315, pp. 249–272, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2016.10.010

[21] Roubíček, T., Panagiotopoulos, C. & Mantič, V., Quasistatic adhesive contact of visco-elastic bodies and its numerical treatment for very small viscosity. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 93, pp. 823–840, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201200239

[22] Panagiotopoulos, C., Mantič, V. & Roubíček, T., A simple and efficient BEM imple-mentation of quasistatic linear visco-elasticity. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51, pp. 2261–2271, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.02.028

[23] Roubíček, T., Adhesive contact of visco-elastic bodies and defect measures arising by vanishing viscosity. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 45(1), pp. 101–126, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1137/12088286x

[24] Dostál, Z., Optimal Quadratic Programming Algorithms, volume 23 of Springer Optimization and Its Applications. Springer: Berlin, 2009.

[25] Vodička, R., Roubíček, T. & Mantič, V., General-purpose model for various adhesive frictional contacts at small strains. Interf Free Bound, 2017. (submitted).

[26] Benzeggagh, M. & Kenane, M., Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending appara-tus. Composites Science and Technology, 56, pp. 439–449, 1996.https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-x

[27] Hutchinson, J. & Wu, T., Mixed mode cracking in layered materials. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 29, pp. 63–191, 1992.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2156(08)70164-9

[28] Vodička, R., Mantič, V. & París, F., Symmetric variational formulation of BIE for domain decomposition problems in elasticity – an SGBEM approach for nonconform-ing discretizations of curved interfaces. CMES – Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 17(3), pp. 173–203, 2007.

[29] Vodička, R., Mantič, V. & París, F., Two variational formulations for elastic domain decomposition problems solved by SGBEM enforcing coupling conditions in a weak form. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 35, pp. 148–155, 2011.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2010.05.002