OPEN ACCESS
The boundary element method (BEM) is a widely used engineering tool in acoustics. The major disadvantage of the three-dimensional boundary element method (3D-BEM) is its computational cost, which increases with the size of the simulated obstacle and the simulated wave number. Thus, the geometrical details of the obstacle and the simulated frequency range are limited by computer speed and memory.
The computational cost for simulating large obstacles like noise barriers is often reduced by applying the two-dimensional boundary element method (2D-BEM) on three-dimensional obstacles. However, the 2D-BEM limits the geometry of the boundary to obstacles with a one-dimensionally constant profile. An interesting compromise solution between the 2D-BEM and the 3D-BEM is the quasi-periodic boundary element method (QP-BEM). The QP-BEM allows the simulation of periodically repetitive complex three-dimensional structures and periodic sound fields while keeping the computational cost at a reasonable level.
In this study, first, the QP-BEM was implemented and coupled with the fast multipole method. Second, the QP-BEM was used to simulate the sound field radiated by a simple geometric object, i.e., a uniformly vibrating cylinder. Results were compared to an analytic solution, for the evaluation of the numerical accuracy of our QP-BEM implementation. For the demonstration of some use cases, third, the QP-BEM was used to simulate the sound field scattered by a sonic crystal noise barrier and a noise- barrier top element.
acoustics, boundary element method, diffraction, fast multipole method, helmholtz equation, noise barriers, periodicity, scattering
[1] Brebbia, C. & Dominguez, J., Boundary element methods for potential problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 1(7), pp. 372–378, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(77)90046-4
[2] Kurze, U.J., Noise reduction by barriers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Amer-ica, 55(3), pp. 504–518, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1914528
[3] Kasess, C.H., Kreuzer, W. & Waubke, H., Deriving correction functions to model the efficiency of noise barriers with complex shapes using boundary element simulations. Applied Acoustics, 102, pp. 88–99, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.09.009
[4] Oldham, D.J. & Egan, C.A., A parametric investigation of the performance of multiple edge highway noise barriers and proposals for design guidance. Applied Acoustics, 96, pp. 139–152, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.03.012
[5] Marburg, S., Six boundary elements per wavelength: Is that enough? Journal of Com-putational Acoustics, 10(1), pp. 25–51, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218396X02001401
[6] Duhamel, D., Efficient calculation of the 3D sound pressure field around a noise barrier. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 197(5), pp. 547–571, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0548
[7] Fard, S., Peters, H., Kessissoglou, N. & Marburg, S., Three-dimensional analysis of a noise barrier using a quasi-periodic boundary element method. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(6), pp. 3107–3114, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4921266
[8] Hunter, P. & Pullan, A., 2002. FEM/BEM Notes.
[9] Chen, Z.S., Waubke, H. & Kreuzer, W., A formulation of the fast multi-pole boundary element method for acoustic radiation and scattering from 3D structures. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 16(02), pp. 303–320, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218396X08003725
[10] Ziegelwanger, H., Majdak, P. & Kreuzer, W., Mesh2hrtf: Open-source software pack-age for the numerical calculation of head-related transfer functions. Proceedings of the 22nd ICSV, Florence, IT, 2015.
[11] Ziegelwanger, H., Majdak, P. & Kreuzer, W., Numerical calculation of listener-specific head-related transfer functions and sound localization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(1), pp. 208–222, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4922518
[12] Burton, A.J. & Miller, G.F., The application of integral equation methods to the nu-merical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London a Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 323(1553), pp. 201–210, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1971.0097
[13] Beranek, L.L. & Mellow, T.J., Acoustics: Sound Fields and Transducers, Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2012.