Quantification of the Aerodynamic Gain on Two Virtually Coupled Modular Trains

Quantification of the Aerodynamic Gain on Two Virtually Coupled Modular Trains

Siwar Fadhel Samuel Fromont Capgemini

Capgemini Engineering, Meudon, France

Page: 
372-384
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V10-N4-372-384
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

© 2022 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

To make railway systems more autonomous and energy efficient, the suction phenomenon induced by virtual coupling (VC) can be considered as a beneficial source of energy saving since trains are very closely spaced. A minimum safe distance between railway systems must be defined and maintained to ensure the safety of the whole convoy. The purpose of this paper is to study and quantify the aerody- namic gain in case of VC of two modular and autonomous trains ‘Smart Cabins’ as designated in our project. Computational fluid dynamics simulations are investigated to analyze the aerodynamic effect under several scenarios by varying the inter-cabins distance. Some design simplifications have been made for each Smart Cabin to prepare simulations and reduce computation time. Simulation results confirm the interest of VC in the sense of reducing coefficient drag of the full convoy up to 27%, which reflects a power gain of about 4% of the total traction power required for a single Smart Cabin (~200 kW).

Keywords: 

Aerodynamic, CFD, design, inter-cabin distance, virtual coupling

  References

[1] Di Meo, C., Di Vaio, M., Flammini, F., Nardone, R., Santini, S. & Vittorini, V., ERTMS/ETCS virtual coupling: Proof of concept and numerical analysis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(6), pp. 2545–2556, 2019. https://doi. org/10.1109/tits.2019.2920290

[2] Unterhuber, P., et al., A survey of channel measurements and models for current and future railway communication systems. Mobile Information Systems, 2016, 2016.

[3] Pan, J., Peng, Q., Zhan, S. & Bai, J., Multiscenario-based train headway analysis under virtual coupling system. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2021.

[4] Aoun, J., Quaglietta, E., Rob, M. & Goverde, P., Investigating market potentials and operational scenarios of virtual coupling railway signaling. Transportation Research Board, 2674(8), pp. 799–812, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120925074

[5] MOving block and VIrtual coupling New Generations of RAIL signalling https://projects.shift2rail.org/s2r_ip2_n.aspx?p=MOVINGRAIL. Accessed on: 21 Dec. 2020.

[6] X2RAIL-3: https://projects.shift2rail.org/s2r_ip2_n.aspx?p=X2RAIL-3 Accessed on: 23 Nov. 2020.

[7] D’Acierno, L., Gallo, M., Montella, B. & Placido, A., Analysis of the interaction between travel demand and rail capacity constraints. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 128, pp. 197–207, 2012.

[8] D’Acierno, L. & Botte, M., Optimising frequency-based railway services with a limited fleet endowment: An energy-efficient perspective. Energies, 13(10), Art. No. 2403, pp. 1–26, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102403

[9] D’Acierno, L. & Botte, M., Railway system design by adopting the Merry-Go-Round (MGR) paradigm. Sustainability, 13(4), Art. No. 2033, pp. 1–21, 2021.

[10] Unterhuber, P., Pfletschinger, S., Sand, S., Soliman, M., Jost, T., Arriola, A., Val, I., Cruces, C., Moreno, J., García-Nieto, J. P., Rodríguez, C., Berbineau, M., Echeverría, E. & Baz, I., A survey of channel measurements and models for current and future railway communication systems. Mobile Information Systems, pp. 1–14, 2016.

[11] Stickel, S., Schenker, M., Dittus, H., et al., Technical feasibility analysis and introduction strategy of the virtually coupled train set concept. Scientific Reports, 12, p. 4248, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08215-y

[12] Cao, Y., Wen, J. & Ma, L., Tracking and collision avoidance of virtual coupling train control system. Future Generation Computer Systems, 120, pp. 76–90, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.02.014

[13] Felez, J., Kim, Y. & Borrelli, F., A model predictive control approach for virtual coupling in railways. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 29(7), pp. 2728–2739, 2019.

[14] Wilhelmi, H., Thieme, T., Henning, A. & Wagner, C., Aerodynamic investigations of the effects of virtual coupling on two next generation trains. New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XI, Contributions to the 20th STAB/DGLR Symposium. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Springer, Cham, pp. 695–704, 2018.

[15] Thieme, T., Wilhelmi, H., Henning, A. & Wagner, C., Force and flow measurements on two trains in Platoon Configuration. 3rd International Symposium on RAIL AERODYNAMICS, Germany, 2018.

[16] Lammert, M. P., Duran, A., Diez, J., Burton, K. & Nicholson, A., Effect of platooning on fuel consumption of Class 8 vehicles over a range of speeds, following distances, and mass. SAE Int. J. Commercial Vehicles, 7(2), pp. 626–639, 2014. https://doi. org/10.4271/2014-01-2438

[17] Alam, A., Mårtensson, J. & Johansson, K. H., Experimental evaluation of decentralized cooperative cruise control for heavy duty vehicle platooning. Control Engineering Practice, 38, pp. 11–25, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2014.12.009

[18] Torabi, S. & Wahde, M., Fuel-efficient driving strategies for heavy-duty vehicles: A platooning approach based on speed profile optimization. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, pp. 1–12, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4290763

[19] Norrby, D., A CFD study of the aerodynamic effects of platooning. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2014.

[20] Turri, V., Besselink, B. & Johansson, K. H., Cooperative look-ahead control for fuel-efficient and safe heavy-duty vehicle platooning. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 25(1), pp. 12–28, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2016.2542044

[21] Turri, V., Look-ahead control for fuel-efficient and safe heavy-duty vehicle platooning, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.

[22] Teja Kaluva, S., Pathak, A. & Ongel, A., Aerodynamic drag analysis of autonomous electric vehicle platoons. Energies, pp. 1–18, 2020.

[23] Cerutti José, J., Sardu, C., Cafiero, G. & Iuso, G., Active flow control on a square-back road vehicle. Fluids, pp. 1–27, 2020.

[24] Hucho, W.-H., Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles. Oxford, UK: Butterworth–Heinemann, 1987.

[25] Zabat, M., Stabile, N., Farascaroli, S. & Browand, F., The aerodynamic performance of Platoons: A Final Report. California Partners of Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1995.