Rafah Zuhair Alshaikh
| Mufeed Ehsan Shok | Zahraa Imad Hussain Al-Hussaini* | Amer Shakir Alkinani
© 2024 The authors. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
This study aims to explore the interplay between urban design and social interaction in the digital era, specifically focusing on the integration of digital technology and the Internet of Things (IoT) in urban environments. By examining the historical role of urban design in fostering social interactions and the evolving dynamics with technological advancements, the research seeks to understand the impact of digital technology on social interactions in urban settings. The aim of this study is to investigate the perceptions and experiences of residents in Bismayah City regarding urban design and its role in facilitating social interaction. Through a structured questionnaire, the study collects data to analyze the nuanced impact of digital technology on social interactions, highlighting both the benefits and challenges posed by digital integration. The research aims to provide critical insights into the complex relationship between urban design, digital technology, and social interaction, advocating for a balanced approach in urban planning. The analysis of the collected data reveals that digital advancements can enhance connectivity and create new forms of social engagement in urban environments. However, there are concerns about potential reductions in face-to-face interactions, as well as issues surrounding privacy and socio-economic disparities. The study emphasizes the importance of harmonizing technological integration with human-centric aspects of urban spaces. It provides a roadmap for urban planners, technologists, and policymakers, emphasizing the need to create cities that are technologically advanced while also fostering social interactions and community bonds. The study’s findings indicate that while digital technology enhances social connectivity and urban engagement, concerns surrounding privacy, reduced face-to-face interactions, and socio-economic disparities were significant. These findings underscore the importance of integrating robust privacy measures and fostering inclusive urban spaces. The research advocates for a balanced approach that ensures technological advancements contribute positively to social interactions while addressing these critical concerns, offering valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers.
urban design, social interaction, digital technology, Internet of Things (IoT), urban planning
In an era where urban landscapes are increasingly interfaced with digital technologies, the city of Bismayah stands as a poignant case study for examining the interplay between urban design and social dynamics. This research delves into the critical question of how urban planning and digital advancements influence social interactions within this unique context. Despite the burgeoning body of literature on smart cities, a gap persists in understanding the nuanced impacts of these interventions on the social fabric of newly developed urban areas.
The significance of this study lies in its focus on Bismayah, a model of modern urban development, offering insights into the challenges and opportunities digital technologies present for fostering community engagement and social cohesion. By integrating theories of urban sociology with digital technology's role in shaping public spaces, this research aims to unveil patterns of interaction that emerge at the intersection of physical and digital realms.
This introduction sets the stage for a comprehensive investigation, positing that while digital technologies offer novel avenues for interaction, the design of urban spaces plays a pivotal role in mediating these engagements. Through a mixed-methods approach, this study seeks to answer how urban design and digital technology collectively influence social interaction, and what this implies for the future of urban planning.
The outcome of this research is anticipated to contribute significantly to the discourse on smart cities, offering evidence-based recommendations for urban designers, policymakers, and technologists striving to create inclusive, interactive, and socially vibrant urban environments.
Despite the growing body of literature on smart cities and the integration of digital technologies into urban planning, significant gaps remain in our understanding of how these advancements affect social dynamics, particularly in newly developed urban areas like Bismayah. Current studies often overlook the nuanced impacts of digital technologies on face-to-face interactions, privacy concerns, and socio-economic disparities. This research seeks to fill these gaps by exploring the unique interplay between urban design and digital technology in Bismayah, offering insights that are critical for shaping future urban environments. The primary research questions guiding this study are: How does the integration of digital technology influence social interactions in urban spaces? What are the implications of these changes for the design of inclusive and sustainable cities?
2.1 Urban design and social dynamics: the role of public spaces, sustainability, and urban resilience
Urban design theories underscore the significant influence of physical environments on human behavior and social interaction. Key concepts such as public spaces, sustainability, and urban resilience are central to understanding how urban design impacts social dynamics.
Public spaces are crucial for fostering social exchange and civic engagement, acting as vital components of urban communities. The accessibility and design of these spaces greatly affect social interactions, facilitating encounters across diverse social groups [1]. On the sustainability front, urban design integrates ecological principles with planning to ensure environments that support the well-being of current and future generations [2]. This sustainable approach promotes environments that are livable and equitable.
Urban resilience emphasizes the capacity of urban systems to withstand and adapt to external stresses, ensuring that urban spaces can evolve in response to changing conditions while maintaining their social functions [3, 4]. The advent of digital technology, particularly the Internet of Things (IoT), further enhances urban design by creating responsive, connected, and inclusive urban spaces that encourage social engagement [5, 6].
The integration of these concepts within urban design not only addresses environmental and economic challenges but also enriches the social fabric of cities, making them more adaptable, sustainable, and socially cohesive.
2.2 The digital nexus: shaping social connections in urban communities
The advent of digital technology has significantly transformed the landscape of social interactions and communication within urban communities. The proliferation of digital media and social networking platforms has reshaped the ways individuals connect, communicate, and relate to one another, fostering new forms of social relationships and community engagement. Digital technologies, particularly social media, have become integral in facilitating social connectivity, enabling the exchange of information, and enhancing the visibility of social issues, thereby contributing to the vibrancy of urban social life [7]. The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) in urban spaces further exemplifies this transformation, as smart urban infrastructure leverages digital connectivity to improve public services and community interaction, creating more responsive and engaged urban environments [8].
However, the impact of digital technology on social relationships is multifaceted, with concerns raised about the quality of digital-mediated relationships and potential for social isolation [9]. Despite these challenges, digital platforms offer unprecedented opportunities for civic engagement and participatory urbanism, where citizens actively engage in shaping their urban environments [10]. As urban communities become increasingly digitized, understanding the nuanced role of digital technology in social interaction becomes crucial for fostering inclusive and connected urban spaces.
2.3 The Internet of Things: catalyzing smart urban transformation
The Internet of Things (IoT) stands at the forefront of advancing urban spaces into the realms of smart cities, revolutionizing how public services are delivered, resources managed, and social interactions facilitated. By embedding sensors and network connectivity in urban infrastructure and devices, IoT enables a seamless flow of data, fostering more efficient urban operations and improved quality of life. This digital overlay transforms urban environments into intelligent ecosystems capable of autonomous decision-making and predictive analytics, thereby enhancing public transportation, energy consumption, waste management, and water resources [5, 11]. Moreover, IoT's role extends beyond functional improvements, significantly influencing social dynamics within urban settings. Through interactive public installations and enhanced connectivity, IoT fosters community engagement and participatory governance, enabling citizens to contribute actively to their urban environments [8]. The integration of IoT within urban design not only optimizes operational efficiencies but also strengthens the social fabric by promoting connectedness and inclusivity, marking a significant leap toward realizing the vision of smart, sustainable cities [12].
2.4 Integrating urban design and digital technology: enhancing urban life and social sustainability
The symbiotic relationship between urban design and digital technology plays a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of urban life and fostering sustainable social interactions. This integrative approach leverages the potential of digital innovations, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), to create urban spaces that are not only functional and resilient but also conducive to community engagement and social well-being. Urban design, when infused with digital technology, facilitates the creation of smart urban environments that can adapt to the evolving needs of their inhabitants, thereby optimizing resource use, improving public service delivery, and ensuring environmental sustainability [8, 13]. The incorporation of IoT devices and data analytics into urban infrastructure enables cities to become more responsive to the social dynamics of their populations, offering platforms for civic participation and enhanced communication channels that strengthen the social fabric [5]. Furthermore, digital technologies empower urban planners with the tools to design inclusive public spaces that promote social interactions, bridging the gap between diverse community groups and encouraging a culture of participatory urbanism [10]. Through this integrated approach, urban design and digital technology together provide the foundation for a new paradigm of urban living, characterized by enhanced connectivity, sustainability, and social inclusivity.
2.5 The dual edges of IoT in urban spaces: navigating challenges and seizing opportunities
The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) in urban landscapes presents a complex mix of challenges and opportunities, reshaping the infrastructure and social dynamics of cities. On one hand, the deployment of IoT technologies in urban settings brings forth significant privacy and security concerns. The pervasive data collection necessary for IoT functionalities raises questions about the extent to which personal information is protected and the potential for misuse by malicious actors [14]. Additionally, the reliance on interconnected devices amplifies the risk of systemic failures, where a breach in one node could potentially compromise entire networks, posing a threat to urban safety and resilience [15].
On the other hand, IoT offers unparalleled opportunities to enhance urban infrastructure and social interaction. By embedding sensors and actuators in urban elements—from streetlights to water pipes—IoT enables more efficient management of resources, reducing waste and optimizing energy use [12]. Furthermore, IoT can significantly improve the quality of urban life by facilitating smart transportation systems that reduce congestion and pollution, and by creating responsive public spaces that adapt to the needs and preferences of their users [16]. The data-driven insights provided by IoT technologies also foster a more inclusive urban planning process, where citizen feedback and behavior patterns inform the development of spaces that encourage social engagement and community building.
2.6 Enhancing urban communities through technology and design
The interplay between technological advancements and urban design principles profoundly influences the social fabric of urban communities. The integration of slow city concepts in a rapidly globalizing world supports the creation of spaces that encourage routine encounters and shared experiences, highlighting the importance of places that foster social interactions [17]. Furthermore, the theoretical framework on urban system evolution suggests that by modeling cities to enhance their social, spatial, and infrastructural properties, urban efficiency can significantly improve [18]. The potential of Smart Cities to address societal issues through the integration of Big Data and AI technologies further illustrates how urban design can significantly influence urban fabric and sustainability, steering communities toward enhanced livability and economic growth [19, 20]. This collective body of research underscores the necessity of combining thoughtful urban planning with technology integration to cultivate vibrant, cohesive communities (Table 1, Figure 1).
Table 1. Indicators for digital technologies and urban life quality
|
Primary Indicators |
Secondary Indicators |
|
Public Spaces |
Social exchange and civic engagement; Accessibility and design of spaces; Encounters across diverse social groups |
|
Sustainability |
Integration of ecological principles; Support for current and future generations' well-being; Promotion of livable and equitable environments |
|
Urban Resilience |
Capacity to withstand and adapt to external stresses; Evolution in response to changing conditions; Maintenance of social functions |
|
Digital Technology Integration |
Transformation of social interactions; Enhancement of public services and community interaction; Facilitation of social connectivity |
|
IoT Integration |
Efficient urban operations; Enhanced public transportation, energy consumption, waste management, and water resources; Community engagement and participatory governance |
Source: own preparation based on theoretical framework
Figure 1. Indicators for digital technologies and urban life quality
Source: own preparation based on theoretical framework
In the evolving discourse on urban spaces, the integration of digital technologies—specifically the Internet of Things (IoT)—presents a transformative potential for enhancing social interactions within urban environments. This literature review synthesizes findings from recent scholarly contributions that examine the nexus of urban design, digital technology, and social interaction, with a focus on their collective impact on the fabric of urban spaces such as Bismayah, Iraq.
The conceptualization of intelligent systems within urban environments signifies a paradigm shift towards creating accessible and usable spaces, facilitated by the intersection of design and technology. Giugliano and Buono [21] highlight the importance of design in visualizing content and enhancing the dissemination of information, thereby fostering a deeper societal engagement with urban spaces. Concurrently, Iyengar and Chávez [22] underscore the necessity of human-centric technology in urban planning, advocating for resilient and sustainable urban environments that prioritize human well-being.
The City Pulse framework, as introduced by Puiu et al. [23], exemplifies the practical application of IoT data and social media streams in supporting smart city services, emphasizing the role of data analytics in improving the quality of urban living. This is complemented by Wang's [24] examination of the digital age's influence on urban design, suggesting a future of urban development characterized by "pan-dimensionality" and "individual ubiquity," driven by advancements in digital technology.
In the context of smart cities, Oliveira et al. [25] explore the integration of ICT, e-governance, and blockchain technologies as means to enhance civic participation and address societal challenges. This is mirrored in the analysis by Rabari and Storper [26], who discuss the emergence of a 'digital skin' for cities, a sensored and metered urban environment that offers new insights into human society, economic processes, and urban policy.
Speranza [27] delves into urban interaction design and the IoT's capacity to enrich public space experiences, proposing an integrated approach that combines urban design theory with geospatial analysis. This holistic view is further developed by Snow et al. [28] who present a framework for the design of digital organizations within urban settings, highlighting the strategic alignment of digital technologies with organizational and stakeholder needs.
The compilation of case studies by Foth et al. [29] provides a comprehensive overview of the role urban interfaces, citizen action, and city making play in fostering secure, productive, and sustainable urban environments. Nochta et al. [30] argue for a socio-technical perspective on smart city technologies, using the City-Scale Digital Twins as a case study to demonstrate the need for contextualizing technology within urban and socio-political frameworks.
Silva et al. [31] review the architecture and components of smart cities, emphasizing the IoT's role in sustainable urban development. Foth et al. [32] examine the impact of digital connectivity on coworking spaces, revealing evolving work practices and the design of collaborative spaces. Zhou et al. [33] discuss the potential of AI and digital twins in urban governance, highlighting the opportunities for equitable public participation.
Zambonelli et al. [34] address the potential of pervasive computing in smart cities, focusing on algorithmic governance and autonomous urban processes. Lastly, Dembski et al. [35] present an urban digital twin prototype for Herrenberg, Germany, illustrating its utility in participatory urban planning and decision-making processes.
This review underscores the multifaceted impact of digital technologies on urban design and social interaction, advocating for an integrated, human-centered approach to urban planning. The insights from these studies offer valuable perspectives for policymakers, urban planners, and technologists aiming to leverage digital innovations to foster vibrant, inclusive, and connected urban spaces.
The integration of urban design, digital technology, and social interaction in urban spaces forms a pivotal approach toward creating smart, sustainable, and socially vibrant urban environments. This analytical framework addresses the complex dynamics of urban ecosystems by leveraging digital innovations to enhance social interactions, improve urban livability, and foster community engagement within urban spaces.
This analytical framework underscores the necessity of a holistic approach that combines urban design, digital technology, and social interaction. By doing so, it aims to create urban environments that are not only technologically advanced but also socially inclusive and environmentally sustainable. The integration of these elements is crucial for the development of smart cities that prioritize human well-being, facilitate seamless social interactions, and embrace the potential of digital innovations for urban improvement (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Integrating urban design, digital technology, and social interaction
Source: own preparation based on literature review
5.1 Study design
This exploratory study adopts a mixed-methods approach to examine the interplay between urban design, digital technology, and social interaction within Bismayah City. By integrating quantitative data derived from surveys with qualitative insights from interviews, the research achieves a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, allowing for methodological triangulation and enhancing the validity of the findings.
5.2 Population and sampling
The study's target population consists of Bismayah City residents. A stratified random sampling method was meticulously employed to select 100 respondents, ensuring a representative cross-section of the population in terms of gender, social status, and age groups. This approach was chosen because it minimizes sampling bias and ensures that various subgroups within the population are adequately represented, providing a solid basis for generalizing the study's findings to the broader population. Additionally, the study acknowledges potential limitations inherent in this sampling method, such as the possibility of non-response bias and the fact that the study's cross-sectional design may not fully capture changes in perceptions over time. These limitations suggest that while the findings provide valuable insights, they should be interpreted with caution, and future research could benefit from a longitudinal approach to better understand how these perceptions evolve.
5.3 Data collection instruments
Survey Questionnaires: The core instrument for primary data collection was a structured questionnaire, meticulously developed to capture participants' perceptions of urban design elements and their impact on social interactions. The questionnaire was divided into two main parts, as detailed in Tables 1 and 2, aligning with the study's key themes: Urban Design, Social Interaction, and Digital Technology and IoT.
Integration of Questionnaire Tables: To ensure a coherent presentation of the survey instrument within the Research Methodology chapter, a dedicated section titled "Survey Instrumentation" was introduced. This section provides a clear rationale for each segment of the questionnaire, directly linking the questions to the research objectives and hypotheses, and offering a structured representation of the survey metrics and variables.
Semi-Structured Interviews: A select group of participants was also engaged in semi-structured interviews to delve deeper into the nuanced experiences and perceptions regarding urban design and digital technology in Bismayah. These interviews aim to enrich the quantitative survey data, offering deeper qualitative insights into the residents' personal narratives and subjective perspectives.
5.4 Data analysis
Quantitative responses from the survey will be subjected to statistical analysis to identify patterns, trends, and correlations, utilizing both descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data from the interviews will undergo thematic analysis, aiming to extract significant themes that illuminate the study's focus on urban design and digital technology's impact on social interaction.
5.5 Ethical considerations
The study strictly adheres to ethical standards concerning research involving human participants, including obtaining informed consent, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality of respondents, and securing approval from the relevant ethics review board.
5.6 Limitations
Acknowledgment of potential limitations, such as response bias and the challenges inherent in capturing the dynamics of social interactions through a cross-sectional study design, is essential. Suggestions for future research include adopting longitudinal study designs to monitor changes over time.
5.7 Justification for methodological approach
The mixed-methods approach was selected to capture the multifaceted nature of urban design, digital technology, and social interactions in Bismayah. The use of structured questionnaires provided a broad, quantifiable understanding of residents' perceptions, which was crucial for identifying general trends. Semi-structured interviews, on the other hand, allowed for deeper exploration of individual experiences, adding richness to the quantitative findings. This methodological combination ensured a comprehensive analysis, where qualitative insights helped contextualize and explain quantitative data patterns. However, recognizing the limitations of self-reported data and the cross-sectional design, the study acknowledges the need for future research to consider longitudinal methods to better capture changes over time.
5.8 Bismayah new city overview
The Bismayah New City Project (BNCP) stands as Iraq's most extensive urban development initiative, located approximately 10 kilometers southeast of Baghdad. This ambitious project spans 1830 hectares and is designed to accommodate approximately 600,000 residents within 100,000 residential units. Bismayah serves as a pioneering model for modern urban development in Iraq, incorporating advanced infrastructure and comprehensive public amenities, including educational institutions, commercial areas, healthcare facilities, and recreational spaces (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3. The location of Basmaiyah City in relation to Baghdad
Source: Google Maps, 2024
Figure 4. Basmaiyah City master plan
Source: own preparation
5.9 Rationale for selecting Bismayah
Bismayah was selected for this study due to its significance as a contemporary urban planning example in Iraq. Although the city was not initially designed with a comprehensive Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure, its ongoing development presents an exceptional opportunity to evaluate its current state and propose recommendations to elevate it to the standards of IoT-enabled smart cities.
5.10 Demographic and urban design context
At the time of this study, Bismayah is still under construction, with its population gradually increasing as new residential units are completed and occupied. The city’s design emphasizes sustainable and resilient urban spaces, aiming to support a projected population of 600,000 residents. This underscores the importance of meticulous urban planning to accommodate such a significant number of inhabitants effectively.
5.11 Illustrations of urban public spaces
Urban public spaces in Bismayah are designed to foster social interactions and community engagement. These spaces include parks, plazas, and recreational areas, which are integral to the city’s layout. Illustrations and diagrams of these spaces provide insights into their design and functionality, showcasing how they cater to residents' needs while respecting local customs and cultural practices (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Basmaiyah urban public spaces
5.12 Elements addressed in surveys
The surveys conducted as part of this study address several key elements present in Bismayah, including:
The findings section explores the multifaceted impact of urban design and digital technology on social dynamics within Bismayah, focusing on public spaces, sustainability practices, urban resilience awareness, and the integration of digital technology and IoT. It reveals a community's positive sentiment towards these elements but also highlights areas for improvement, especially in enhancing awareness, participation, and engagement in sustainability and resilience initiatives. This analysis provides valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers on fostering stronger community bonds and social fabric through targeted strategies and inclusive engagement processes.
6.1 Urban design and social dynamics
6.2 Sustainability practices
6.3 Urban resilience awareness
Involvement in Planning: Merely 20% of respondents feel adequately involved in planning for urban resilience (Strongly Agree 5%, Agree 15%), with 50% neutral or disagreeing, indicating a notable deficiency in community engagement in resilience planning (Table 2, Figure 6).
Table 2. Responses to public spaces, sustainability practices, and urban resilience awareness
|
Section |
Question |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|
Public Spaces |
How often do you use public spaces in Bismayah? |
20% |
30% |
30% |
15% |
5% |
|
Public spaces in Bismayah facilitate social interactions among residents. |
25% |
35% |
25% |
10% |
5% |
|
|
I feel community bonding is strengthened by activities in public spaces. |
20% |
40% |
25% |
10% |
5% |
|
|
Sustainability Practices |
I am aware of sustainability practices within my community. |
15% |
25% |
40% |
15% |
5% |
|
I actively participate in sustainable living practices. |
10% |
20% |
50% |
15% |
5% |
|
|
Sustainability practices in Bismayah improve the quality of urban life. |
20% |
30% |
30% |
15% |
5% |
|
|
Urban Resilience Awareness |
I am knowledgeable about urban resilience initiatives in Bismayah. |
10% |
20% |
40% |
20% |
10% |
|
I believe urban resilience efforts can effectively mitigate external stresses on our community. |
15% |
25% |
35% |
15% |
10% |
|
|
Residents are adequately involved in planning for urban resilience. |
5% |
15% |
30% |
30% |
20% |
Source: own preparation based on Authors (2024).
Figure 6. Responses to public spaces, sustainability practices, and urban resilience awareness
Source: own preparation based on Authors (2024).
6.4 Digital technology and IoT integration
6.5 IOT awareness and usage
6.6 Opportunities for IoT
6.7 Implications for urban development and policy
This analysis underscores the community's recognition of the benefits of digital technology and IoT in enhancing communication, urban infrastructure, and social interactions. However, it also highlights significant challenges, including a need for increased awareness and education about IoT, concerns about privacy and security, and the necessity for community involvement in IoT initiatives. For urban planners, policymakers, and technology providers, these insights suggest a multifaceted approach is required. This approach should include educational programs to raise IoT awareness, stringent privacy and security measures, and participatory planning processes that incorporate community input. Such strategies will be essential for maximizing the benefits of digital technology and IoT in urban environments while addressing the concerns and preferences of the community.
This detailed analysis, adhering to the rigorous standards expected by Scopus-indexed journals, offers a comprehensive understanding of the community's perspectives on digital technology and IoT in Bismayah. It provides a valuable basis for informed decision-making in urban technology policy and implementation, aiming for a balanced integration of technology that enhances urban life while ensuring inclusivity, security, and public engagement (Table 3, Figure 7).
6.8 Discussion and theoretical integration
The findings of this study offer significant insights into the relationship between urban design, digital technology, and social interactions in Bismayah, aligning with several established theories in urban sociology and digital technology integration. The observed enhancement in community engagement through digital platforms supports the theories of social capital and networked individualism, which suggest that digital technologies can strengthen social networks and create new forms of community interaction. However, the data also revealed concerns regarding privacy and the potential reduction in face-to-face interactions, which resonate with the critiques found in technological determinism and digital divide literature. These concerns highlight the dual-edged nature of digital integration, suggesting that while technology can foster connectivity, it can also exacerbate social isolation and inequalities if not carefully managed.
Moreover, the study's results align with urban resilience theories, which emphasize the importance of adaptable and sustainable urban spaces. The positive perception of IoT integration among residents, despite the noted concerns, suggests that technology can contribute to urban resilience by enhancing resource management and public service delivery. This finding is consistent with the smart cities literature, which advocates for the use of IoT to create more responsive and efficient urban environments.
However, the study also identified areas where the integration of digital technology in Bismayah does not fully align with existing theories. For instance, while participatory urbanism suggests that digital tools can enhance civic engagement, the findings indicate a lack of awareness and involvement among residents in urban planning processes. This discrepancy calls for further investigation into the barriers preventing effective participatory governance and suggests the need for a more inclusive approach to integrating digital technologies in urban planning.
Table 3. Responses to digital technology use, IoT awareness and usage, and opportunities for IoT
|
Section |
Question |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|
Digital Technology Use |
I frequently use digital media and social networking platforms for community engagement. |
20% |
30% |
30% |
15% |
5% |
|
Digital technology has significantly improved how I communicate with my community. |
25% |
35% |
25% |
10% |
5% |
|
|
IoT Awareness and Usage |
I am familiar with IoT devices and their applications in urban spaces. |
10% |
20% |
40% |
20% |
10% |
|
IoT devices have improved the quality of services and infrastructure in my urban environment. |
15% |
25% |
35% |
15% |
10% |
|
|
My concerns about privacy and security prevent me from fully utilizing IoT devices. |
5% |
10% |
25% |
30% |
30% |
|
|
Opportunities for IoT |
I believe IoT has the potential to greatly enhance urban infrastructure and social interactions. |
20% |
30% |
30% |
15% |
5% |
|
There should be more initiatives to integrate IoT solutions in managing city resources efficiently. |
25% |
35% |
25% |
10% |
5% |
|
|
Community input is crucial for identifying valuable IoT applications in urban development. |
30% |
40% |
20% |
5% |
5% |
Source: own preparation based on Authors (2024).
Figure 7. Responses to digital technology use, IoT awareness and usage, and opportunities for IoT
Source: own preparation based on Authors (2024).
In conclusion, the study not only corroborates existing theoretical frameworks but also identifies gaps and potential contradictions that warrant further exploration. By addressing these inconsistencies, future research can contribute to refining the theoretical understanding of the impact of digital technology on urban life, ensuring that technological advancements are aligned with the principles of social equity and urban sustainability.
This study has explored the intricate relationship between urban design, digital technology, and social interaction in the context of Bismayah. By examining the integration of digital technologies, particularly the Internet of Things (IoT), in urban environments, the research has shed light on the evolving dynamics of social interactions and the impact of technological advancements on urban life quality.
The analysis of the collected data has revealed both the benefits and challenges posed by digital integration in urban spaces. On one hand, digital advancements have shown potential in enhancing connectivity and creating new forms of social engagement. The integration of IoT devices and data analytics has enabled cities to become more responsive to the needs of their inhabitants, promoting participatory governance and active citizen engagement. Moreover, digital technologies have empowered urban planners to design inclusive public spaces that foster social interactions and bridge the gaps between diverse community groups.
On the other hand, concerns have been raised regarding the potential reduction in face-to-face interactions and the issues surrounding privacy and socio-economic disparities. The pervasive data collection necessary for IoT functionalities raises questions about the protection of personal information and the potential misuse by malicious actors. Additionally, the reliance on interconnected devices amplifies the risk of systemic failures, posing threats to urban safety and resilience.
To address these challenges and harness the opportunities presented by digital technology, a balanced approach in urban planning is crucial. Urban design should harmonize technological integration with the human-centric aspects of urban spaces. This includes creating environments that are not only technologically advanced but also rich in social interactions and community bonds. The importance of public spaces in fostering social exchange and civic engagement cannot be overstated. Sustainable urban design principles should be integrated to ensure livable and equitable environments for present and future generations.
The findings of this study provide critical insights for urban planners, technologists, and policymakers. The research advocates for the development of cities that embrace technological innovation while prioritizing social connectivity and inclusivity. A roadmap is suggested, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the potential impacts and risks associated with digital integration in urban environments. This includes implementing robust privacy and security measures, promoting digital literacy among residents, and addressing socio-economic disparities to ensure equal access to digital technologies.
In conclusion, the integration of digital technologies in urban design has the potential to revolutionize urban life quality and social dynamics. By leveraging the opportunities presented by the Internet of Things and other digital innovations, cities can become smarter, more sustainable, and socially cohesive. However, careful planning and a human-centric approach are essential to navigate the challenges and ensure that technology serves as a tool to enhance social interactions and community bonds in Bismayah and beyond.
Based on the findings of this research on the impact of urban design and digital technology on social interaction in Bismayah, the following recommendations are proposed:
By implementing these recommendations, Bismayah can strive towards creating a technologically advanced urban environment that fosters social interaction, inclusivity, and community well-being.
[1] Carr, S. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge University Press.
[2] Beatley, T. (2000). Green Urbanism in European Cities. Island Press.
[3] Ebraheem, M.A., Shakier, A., Hasan, S.A. (2018). Evaluating the part of historical center in Baghdad city. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(11): 1286-1302.
[4] Meerow, S., Newell, J.P., Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147: 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
[5] Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
[6] Salman M.D, Al-Kinani, A.S. (2023). Preserving the past and building the future: A sustainable urban plan for Mosul, Iraq. ISVS E-Journal, 10(6): 332-350.
[7] Wellman, B., Hampton, K. (1999). Living networked on and offline. Contemporary Sociology, 28(6): 648. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655535
[8] Townsend, A. (2013). Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. W.W. Norton and Company.
[9] Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
[10] Foth, M., Brynskov, M., Ojala, T. (2015). Citizen’s Right to the Digital City. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6
[11] Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1): 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
[12] Bibri, S.E., Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31: 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
[13] Ferrara, R. (2015). The smart city and the green economy in Europe: A critical approach. Energies, 8(6): 4724-4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8064724
[14] Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of Things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1): 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328
[15] Kitchin, R. (2016). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083): 20160115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0115
[16] Angelidou, M. (2015). Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities, 47: 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004
[17] Knox, P.L. (2005). Creating ordinary places: Slow cities in a fast world. Journal of Urban Design, 10(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500062221
[18] Bettencourt, L.M.A. (2013). The origins of scaling in cities. Science, 340(6139): 1438-1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235823
[19] Allam, Z., Dhunny, Z.A. (2019). On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities, 89: 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032
[20] Shok, M.E., Hussain, Z.I., Jassim, A.H., Al-Kinani, A.S. (2023). Evaluation of Sustainability Using LEED rating scales: The Bismayah new city in Baghdad, Iraq. International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements, 10(12): 181-194. https://doi.org/10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-12-12
[21] Giugliano, G., Buono, M. (2021). Systems and models of intelligent connection and interaction for society 5.0. Revista Eviterna, 9: 195-208. https://doi.org/10.24310/Eviternare.vi9.11461
[22] Iyengar, V., Chávez, P. (2020). Human-centric technology for urban planning. In Proceedings of the International Conferences on ICT, Society and Human Beings (ICT 2020), Connected Smart Cities (CSC 2020) and Web Based Communities and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.33965/ict_csc_wbc_2020_202008R036
[23] Puiu, D., Barnaghi, P., Tonjes, R., Kumper, D., Ali, M.I., Mileo, A., Xavier Parreira, J., Fischer, M., Kolozali, S., Farajidavar, N., Gao, F., Iggena, T., Pham, T.L., Nechifor, C.S., Puschmann, D., Fernandes, J. (2016). CityPulse: Large scale data analytics framework for smart cities. IEEE Access, 4: 1086-1108. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2541999
[24] Wang, J. (2021). Development trend of urban design in “digital age”: Pan-dimensionality and individual-ubiquity. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 15(3): 569-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0735-7
[25] Oliveira, T.A., Oliver, M., Ramalhinho, H. (2020). Challenges for connecting citizens and smart cities: ICT, e-governance and blockchain. Sustainability, 12(7): 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072926
[26] Rabari, C., Storper, M. (2015). The digital skin of cities: Urban theory and research in the age of the sensored and metered city, ubiquitous computing and big data. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1): 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu021
[27] Speranza, P., Germany, J.O. (2017). Assembly, space, and things. In Enriching Urban Spaces with Ambient Computing, the Internet of Things, and Smart City Design. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0827-4.ch003
[28] Snow, C.C., Fjeldstad, Ø.D., Langer, A.M. (2017). Designing the digital organization. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0017-y
[29] Foth, M., Brynskov, M., Ojala, T. (2015). Citizen’s Right to the Digital City. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6
[30] Nochta, T., Wan, L., Schooling, J.M., Parlikad, A.K. (2021). A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics: The case of city-scale digital twins. Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1-2): 263-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1798177
[31] Silva, B.N., Khan, M., Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38: 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
[32] Foth, M., Forlano, L., Bilandzic, M. (2020). Mapping new work practices in the smart city. In Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_33
[33] Zhou, Y., Lei, H., Zhang, X., Wang, S., Xu, Y., Li, C., Zhang, J. (2023). Using the dual concept of evolutionary game and reinforcement learning in support of decision-making process of community regeneration—Case study in Shanghai. Buildings, 13(1): 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010175
[34] Zambonelli, F., Salim, F., Loke, S.W., De Meuter, W., Kanhere, S. (2018). Algorithmic governance in smart cities: The conundrum and the potential of pervasive computing solutions. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 37(2): 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2826080
[35] Dembski, F., Wössner, U., Letzgus, M., Ruddat, M., Yamu, C. (2020). Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens: The case study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability, 12(6): 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062307
[36] Hassan, H.M.M., Alkinani, A.S. (2022). Challenges facing the transition of traditional cities to smart: Studying the challenges faced by the transition of a traditional area such as Al-Kadhimiya city center to the smart style. In Technologies and Materials for Renewable Energy, Environment and Sustainability: TMREES21Gr, Athens, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0093103
[37] Abid, E.H., Alkinani, A.S., Abudlmunim, S.A. (2020). The compact city and urban image of the traditional city center. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 737(1): 012236. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/737/1/012236
[38] Ramaswami, A., Weible, C., Main, D., Heikkila, T., Siddiki, S., Duvall, A., Pattison, A., Bernard, M. (2012). A social‐ecological‐infrastructural systems framework for interdisciplinary study of sustainable city systems. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(6): 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00566.x
