Situated artificial institution to support the regulation of crisis management

Situated artificial institution to support the regulation of crisis management

Maiquel de Brito
Lauren Thévin
Catherine Garbay
Olivier Boissier
Jomi Fred Hübner

PPGEAS/Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil

LIG/Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France

Laboratoire Hubert Curien UMR CNRS 5516, Institut Henri Fayol,MINES Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France

Corresponding Author Email: 
maiquel.b@posgrad.ufsc.br,jomi.hubner@ufsc.br
Page: 
185-209
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.3166/RIA.30.185-209
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 April 2016
| Citation
Abstract: 

This paper highlights the use of Situated Artificial Institution within an hybrid, interactive, normative multi-agent system to regulate human collaboration in crisis management. Norms regulate the actions of human actors based on the dynamics of the environment in which they are situated. In order to provide a flexible crisis regulation, situated in the context, we insert a constitutive level between environmental and normative states. Norms are thus no more referring to environmental facts but to institutional interpretation of environmental facts through constitutive rules. We present how this declarative and distinct modelling succeeds in managing the interpretation of the events while taking into account organizational context.

Keywords: 

institution, norm, tangible interaction, crisis management.

1. Introduction
2. Besoins et démarche suivie
3. Institution artificielle située
4. Institution artificielle située pour la gestion de crises
5. Institution artificielle située appliquée aux problématiques complexes de la gestion de crises
6. Travaux liés et discussions
7. Conclusion et perspectives
Remerciements

Les auteurs remercient les membres de l’IRMa (Institut des Risques Majeurs de Grenoble) pour leur collaboration et également les soutiens accordés par CAPES (PDSE 4926145), CNPq (contrats 448462/2014-1 et 306301/2012-1) et l’ARC 6 Région Rhône-Alpes (ARC-13-009716-01, ARC- 13-01015201).

  References

Aldewereld H., Napagao S. Álvarez, Dignum F., Vázquez-Salceda J. (2010). Making norms concrete. In W. van der Hoek, G. A. Kaminka, Y. Lespérance, M. Luck, S. Sen (Eds.), 9th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (aamas 2010), toronto, canada, may 10-14, 2010, volume 1-3. ifaamas, p. 807–814.

Boella G., Torre L. van der, Verhagen H. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on normative multiagent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 17, no 1, p. 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10458-008-9047-8

Campos J., López-Sánchez M., Rodríguez-Aguilar J. A., Esteva M. (2009). Coordination, organizations, institutions and norms in agent systems iv : Coin 2008 international workshops, coin@aamas 2008, estoril, portugal, may 12, 2008. coin@aaai 2008, chicago, usa, july 14, 2008. revised selected papers. In J. F. Hübner, E. Matson, O. Boissier, V. Dignum (Eds.),, p. 126–139. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_9

Dastani M., Torre L., Yorke-Smith N. (2013). Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems viii: 14th international workshop, coin 2012, held co-located with aamas 2012, valencia, spain, june 5, 2012, revised selected papers. In H. Aldewereld, J. S. Sichman (Eds.),, p. 17–34. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37756-3_2

De Brito M., Hübner J. F., Boissier O. (2014). Computational logic in multi-agent systems: 15th international workshop, clima xv, prague, czech republic, august 18-19, 2014. proceedings. In N. Bulling, L. Torre, S. Villata, W. Jamroga, W. Vasconcelos (Eds.),, p. 35–51. Cham, Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09764-0_3

De Brito M., Hübner J. F., Boissier O. (2015). Progress in artificial intelligence: 17th portuguese conference on artificial intelligence, epia 2015, coimbra, portugal, september 8-11, 2015. proceedings. In F. Pereira, P. Machado, E. Costa, A. Cardoso (Eds.),, p. 624–637. Cham, Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23485-4_63

De Brito M., Hübner J. F., Bordini R. H. (2013). Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems viii: 14th international workshop, coin 2012, held co-located with aamas 2012, valencia, spain, june 5, 2012, revised selected papers. In H. Aldewereld, J. S. Sichman (Eds.),, p. 158–173. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37756-3_10

Dugdale J., Bellamine-Ben Saoud N., Pavard B., Pallamin N. (2010). Simulation and Emergency Management. In B. Van de Walle, M. Turoff, S. R. Hiltz (Eds.), Information Systems for Emergency Management, vol. 16. M.E. Sharpe. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00952168 (Part IV. Systems Design and Technology (Chap. 10))

Franke J., Charoy F. (2010). Design of a collaborative disaster response process management system. In 9th international conference on the design of cooperative systems (coop’2010).

Garbay C., Badeig F., Caelen J. (2012). Normative multi-agent approach to support collaborative work in distributed tangible environments. In S. E. Poltrock, C. Simone,

J. Grudin, G. Mark, J. Riedl (Eds.), CSCW 12, p. 83–86. ACM. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2141512.2141548

Grossi D., Aldewereld H., Vázquez-Salceda J., Dignum F. (2006). Ontological aspects of the implementation of norms in agent-based electronic institutions. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, vol. 12, no 2-3, p. 251–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9546-6

Kubicki S., Lebrun Y., Lepreux S., Adam E., Kolski C., Mandiau R. (2013). Simulation in contexts involving an interactive table and tangible objects. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 31, p. 116 - 131.

Kubicki S., Lepreux S., Kolski C. (2012). Rfid-driven situation awareness on tangisense, a table interacting with tangible objects. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 16, no 8,p. 1079-1094.

Laurillau Y., Nigay L. (2002). Le modèle d’architecture clover pour les collecticiels. In IHM, p. 113–120.

Lebrun Y., Adam E., Kubicki S., Mandiau R. (2010). Advances in practical applications of agents and multiagent systems: 8th international conference on practical applications of agents and multiagent systems (paams 2010). In Y. Demazeau, F. Dignum, J. M. Corchado, J. B. Pérez (Eds.),, p. 125–134. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Oomes A. H. J. (2004). Oragnization awareness in crisis management. In ISCRAM.

Pipek V., Liu S., Kerne A. (2014). Crisis informatics and collaboration: A brief introduction. CSCW, vol. 23, no 4-6, p. 339-345.

Piunti M., Boissier O., Hübner J. F., Ricci A. (2010). Embodied organizations: a unifying perspective in programming agents, organizations and environments. In O. Boissier, A. E. Fallah-Seghrouchni, S. Hassas, N. Maudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the multi-agent logics, languages, and organisations federated workshops (MALLOW 2010), lyon, france, august 30 - september 2, 2010, vol. 627. CEUR-WS.org.

Robert J. M. (2012). Cognition située, cognition distribuée et cognition socialement partagée. Cours.

Searle J. (2009). Making the Social World:The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press.

Shaer O., Hornecker E. (2009). Tangible user interfaces: Past, present and future directions. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, no 1-2, p. 1–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000026

Thévin L., Badeig F., Dugdale J., Boissier O., Garbay C. (2014). Un système multi-agent normatif pour la collaboration et l’interaction mixte (présentation courte). In R. Courdier, J. Jamont (Eds.), Principe de parcimonie - JFSMA 14 - vingt-deuxièmes journées francophones sur les systèmes multi-agents, loriol-sur-drôme, france, octobre 8-10, 2014, p. 203–212. Cepadues Editions.