Home Journals JNMES Comparative Study of Two Types of Iron Doped Carbon Aerogels for Electrochemical Applications

JOURNAL METRICS

Impact Factor (JCR) 2022: 0.9 ℹImpact Factor (JCR):

The JCR provides quantitative tools for ranking, evaluating, categorizing, and comparing journals. The impact factor is one of these; it is a measure of the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular year or period. The annual JCR impact factor is a ratio between citations and recent citable items published. Thus, the impact factor of a journal is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years.

5-Year Impact Factor: 0.7 ℹ5-Year Impact Factor:

A 5-Year Impact Factor shows the long-term citation trend for a journal. This is calculated differently from the Journal Impact Factor, so it is not simply an average of the Impact Factors in the time period. The Impact Factor itself is based only on Web of Science Core Collection citation data from the last three years and thus reflects only recent impact. The Journal Impact Factor is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past two years have been cited in the Journal Citation Reports year.

CiteScore 2022: 1.9 ℹCiteScore:

CiteScore is the number of citations received by a journal in one year to documents published in the three previous years, divided by the number of documents indexed in Scopus published in those same three years.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2022: 0.21 ℹSCImago Journal Rank (SJR):

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2022: 0.296 ℹSource Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):

SNIP measures a source’s contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field. It helps you make a direct comparison of sources in different subject fields. SNIP takes into account characteristics of the source's subject field, which is the set of documents citing that source.

240x200fu_ben_.jpg

123.png

Comparative Study of Two Types of Iron Doped Carbon Aerogels for Electrochemical Applications

Delia Gligor^*| Liviu Cosmin Cotet | Virginia Danciu

Department of Environmental Analysis and Engineering, “Babes-Bolyai” University, 30 Fantanele St., 400294 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Department of Chemical Engineering, “Babes-Bolyai” University, 11 Arany Janos St. 400028 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Corresponding Author Email:

delia.gligor@ubbcluj.ro

Received:

11 February 2013

| |

Accepted:

22 March 2013

| | Citation

v16n02a06_p097-101.pdf

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract:

Iron doped carbon aerogels have been prepared by sol-gel polymerization of potassium salt of 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid with formaldehyde followed by an ion-exchange process between K⁺ doped wet gel and Fe(II) or Fe(III) ion aqueous solutions. The resulted Fe(II) or Fe(III) doped gels have been dried in supercritical conditions with liquid CO₂ and then pyrolyzed in high temperature resulting two types of iron doped carbon aerogels. These aerogels were morpho-structural investigated by using BET method, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and elemental analysis. Also, these iron doped carbon aerogels (CAD-Fe⁽²⁺⁾ and CAD-Fe⁽³⁺⁾) were tested for realization of modified carbon paste electrodes. CAD-Fe⁽²⁺⁾ aerogel showed better electrochemical activity than CAD-Fe⁽³⁺⁾ and also a good electrocatalytic activity towards H₂O₂ reduction (expressed by an electrocatalytic efficiency of 404% measured at – 500 mV vs. SCE).

Keywords:

carbon aerogel, modified electrode, electrocatalytic efficiency, hydrogen peroxide.

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

3. Results and Discussions

4. Conclusions

5. Acknowledgements

References

[1] M. Inagaki, New Carbon Mater., 24, 193 (2009).

[2] C. Moreno-Castilla, M.B. Dawidziuk, F. Carrasco-Marín, E. Morallón, Carbon, 50, 3324 (2012).

[3] L.C. Cotet, V. Danciu, V. Cosoveanu, I.C. Popescu, A. Roig, E. Molins, Rev. Roum. Chim., 52, 1077 (2007).

[4] L.C. Cotet, M. Gich, A. Roig, I.C. Popescu, V. Cosoveanu, E. Molins, V. Danciu, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 352, 2772 (2006).

[5] S. Tang, G. Sun, J. Qi, S. Sun, J. Guo, Q. Xin, G.M. Haarberg, Chinese J. Catal., 31, 12 (2010).

[6] A. Smirnova, T. Wender, D. Goberman, Y.-L. Hu, M. Aindow, W. Rhine, N.M. Sammes, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34, 8992 (2009).

[7] G. Rasines, P. Lavela, C. Macías, M. Haro, C.O. Ania, J.L. Tirado, J. Electroanal. Chem., 671, 92 (2012).

[8] B. Liu, S. Creager. J. Power Sources, 195, 1812 (2010).

[9] Y.J. Lee, J.C. Jung, J. Yi, S.-H. Baeck, J.R. Yoon, I.K. Song, Curr. Appl. Phys., 10, 682 (2010).

[10] P.J.M. Carrott, L.M. Marques, M. Carrott, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 131, 75 (2010).

[11] R.A. Catalão, F.J. Maldonado-Hódar, A. Fernandes, C. Henriques, M.F. Ribeiro, Appl. Catal., B, 88, 135 (2009).

[12] O. Czakkel, E. Geissler, I.M. Szilágyi, E. Székely, K. László, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 337, 513 (2009).

[13] M.B. Dawidziuk, F. Carrasco-Marín, C. Moreno-Castilla, Carbon, 47, 2679 (2009).

[14] S. Cacchi, C.L. Cotet, G. Fabrizi, G. Forte, A. Goggiamani, L. Martín, S. Martínez, E. Molins, M. Moreno-Mañas, F. Petrucci, A. Roig, A. Vallribera, Tetrahedron, 63, 2519 (2007).

[15] L. Lin, M. Juanjuan, J. Liuyan, W. Yunyang, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 291, 1 (2008).

[16] H. Zhu, Z. Guo, X. Zhang, K. Han, Y. Guo, F. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Wei, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37, 873 (2012).

[17] H.W. Park, U.G. Hong, Y.J. Lee, I.K. Song, Catal. Commun., 20, 89 (2012).

[18] A. Maicaneanu, L.C. Cotet, V. Danciu, M. Stanca, Studia Univ Babes-Bolyai Chem., 54, 117 (2009).

[19] F.J. Maldonado-Hódar, C. Moreno-Castilla, F. Carrasco-Marín, A.F. Pérez-Cadenas, J. Hazard. Mater., 148, 548 (2007).

[20] W. Yang, D. Wu, R. Fu, Colloids Surf., A, 312, 118 (2008).

[21] Y.J. Lee, J.C. Jung, S. Park, J.G. Seo, S.–H. Baeck, J.R. Yoon, J. Yi, I.K. Song, Curr. Appl. Phys., 10, 947 (2010).

[22] M. Haro, G. Rasines, C. Maclas, C.O. Ania, Carbon, 49, 3723 (2011).

[23] C. Moreno-Castilla, M.B. Dawidziuk, F. Carrasco-Marín, E. Morallón, Carbon, 50, 3324 (2012).

[24] X. Lu, J. Shen, H. Ma, B. Yan, Z. Li, M. Shi, M. Ye, J. Power Sources, 201, 340 (2012).

[25] Y.J. Lee, H.W. Park, S. Park, I. Song, Curr. Appl. Phys., 12, 233 (2012).

[26] X. Li, B. Wei, Nano Energy, 1, 479 (2012).

[27] S.L. Candelaria, Y. Shao, W. Zhou, X. Li, J. Xiao, J.G. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Liu, J. Li, G. Cao, Nano Energy, 1, 195 (2012).

[28] R.W. Murray, A.J. Bard, in “Electroanalytical Chemistry”, Ed., Dekker, New York, 1984, 13, p. 191.

[29] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, “Electrochemical Methods. Funda- mental and Applications”, J. Wiley, New York, 1980.

[30] M. Baia, L.C. Cotet, L. Baia L. Barbu-Tudoran, V. Cosoveanu,V. Danciu, J. Popp, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mat. - Symposia, 2, 9 (2010).

[31] D. Gligor, A. Maicaneanu, A. Walcarius, Electrochim. Acta, 55, 4050 (2010).

IJHT
MMEP
ACSM
EJEE
ISI
I2M
JESA
RCMA
RIA
TS
IJSDP
IJSSE
IJDNE
JNMES
IJES
EESRJ
RCES
AMA_A
AMA_B
AMA_C
AMA_D
MMC_A
MMC_B
MMC_C
MMC_D

Username
Password
Remember me

Search form

Comparative Study of Two Types of Iron Doped Carbon Aerogels for Electrochemical Applications