Comparison Between Electrochemical Noise and Electrochemical Frequency Modulation Measurements during Pitting Corrosion

Comparison Between Electrochemical Noise and Electrochemical Frequency Modulation Measurements during Pitting Corrosion

A. RaufE. MahdiX 

Qatar University, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, P.O. Box 2713, Doha

Corresponding Author Email: 
abdul.rauf@qu.edu.qa
Page: 
107-112
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.14447/jnmes.v15i2.79
Received: 
26 September 2011
| |
Accepted: 
21 October 2011
| | Citation
Abstract: 

The electrochemical noise (EN) and electrochemical frequency modulation (EFM) techniques have been compared for their use to detect pitting corrosion. To do this, experiments on different corroding systems showing passivation and pitting corrosion were carried out. These corroding systems were: (1) Aluminum in borate buffer solution with and without chlorides (pitting corrosion + passivation behavior), (2) AISI 304SS in 0.3 wt.% FeCl3 solution and 6 wt.% FeCl3 solution at room temperature (passivation behavior + pitting and/or crevice corrosion), and (3) AISI 304SS in 6 wt.% FeCl3 at elevated temperature of 57 °C (pitting corrosion). Both EN and EFM were measured on-line meanwhile changing the corrosive environment by adding chlorides or by increasing the temperature. A potential perturbation composed of two sine waves is applied with the help of EFM to get current response at various frequencies. As the corrosion process is nonlinear in nature, the ac-response contains components at harmonic and intermodulation frequencies. Analysis of current components at different frequencies yields the information about the corrosion behavior under investigation. EFM may be considered to detect pitting initiation and its further development due to the results obtained by measuring the so-called "causality factors", which are the ratio of the current components in the ac-response.

Keywords: 

EN and EFM techniques, AISI 304SS, pitting, causality factors

1. Introduction
2. Experimental
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) grant through National Priority Research Program (NPRP) No. 08-159-2-046.

  References

[1] W.P. Iverson, J. Electrochem. Soc., 115, 617 (1968).

[2] V.A. Tyagai, Electrochim. Acta, 16, 1647 (1971).

[3] H.A. Al-Mazeedi, R.A. Cottis and S. Turgoose, “ Electrochemical noise analysis of carbon steel in sodium chloride solution with sodium nitrite as an inhibitor ”, EUROCORR 2000, London, 2000.

[4] U. Bertocci, J.L. Mullen, Y.-X. Ye, “Electrochemical noise measurements for the study of localized corrosion and passivity breakdown” Proc. Passivity of Metals and Semiconductors, May 30 - June 3, Bombannes, France: Elsevier Science Publishers, p.229, 1983.

[5] F.B. Mansfeld, C.H. Hsu and Z. Sun, “Electrochemical noise analysis (ENA) for active and passive systems” CORROSION/2000, paper no. 418, Houston, TX: NACE, 2000.

[6] Á. Kriston and M. Lakatos-Versányi, “Testing and stochastical analysis of metastable pitting corrosion of stainless steels” presented to Electrochemical Methods in Corrosion Research, Budapest, Hungary, 2000.

[7] R.W. Bosch, J. Hubrecht, W.F. Bogaerts and B.C. Syrett, “Electrochemical frequency modulation: a new electrochemical technique for online corrosion monitoring” Corrosion 57, p. 60, 2001.

[8] E. Ku? and F. Mansfeld, Corros. Sci., 48, 965 (2006).

[9] K.F. Khaled, J. Appl. Electrochem., 39, 429 (2008).

[10] S.S. Abdel-Rahim, K.F. Khaled and N.S. Abd-Elshafi, Electrochim. Acta, 51, 3269 (2006).

[11] S. Girija and U. Kamachi Mudali, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 407, 188 (2005).

[12] R.G. Kelly, M.E. Inman and J.L. Hudson, Analysis of electrochemical noise for Type 410 stainless steel in chloride solutions, Electrochemical Noise Measurement for Corrosion Applications, STP 1277, J.R. Kearns, J.R. Scully, P.R. Roberge, D.L. Reichert, and J.L. Dawson, Ed., ASTM, p. 101, 1996.

[13] S.T. Pride, J.R. Scully and J.L. Hudson, Analysis of electrochemical noise from metastable pitting in aluminum, Aged Al- 2%Cu, and AA 2024-T3, Electrochemical Noise Measurement for Corrosion Applications, STP 1277, J.R. Kearns, J.R. Scully, P.R. Roberge, D.L. Reichert, and J.L. Dawson, Ed., ASTM, p. 307, 1996.

[14] R.A. Cottis, Corrosion, 57, 265 (2001).

[15] R.W. Bosch and W.F. Bogaerts, Corrosion, 52, 204 (1996).

[16] A. Rauf and W.F. Bogaerts, Corros. Sci., 52, 2773 (2010).

[17] D.R. Lenard, “Electrochemical Frequency Modulation Measurements on the Corrosion of Copper Nickel alloys in Clean Seawater and Marine Sediments”, CORROSION/07, No. 7246, Nashville TN: NACE International, 2007.

[18] K. Sasaki and G.T. Burstein, Corros. Sci., 49, 92 (2007).

[19] A Conde and D.E. Willams, Materials and Corrosion, 50, 585 (1999).