Human Factor Analysis Inside a Peculiar Job Environment at the Gran Sasso Mountain Underground Laboratory of Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics

Human Factor Analysis Inside a Peculiar Job Environment at the Gran Sasso Mountain Underground Laboratory of Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics

F. Borghini F. Garzia M. Lombardi M. Mete R. Perruzza R. Tartaglia 

SSEG – Safety and Security Engineering Group – DICMA, SAPIENZA – University of Rome, Italy

Wessex Institute of Technology, UK

European Academy of Sciences and Arts, Austria

PPS Department, Gran Sasso National Laboratory, National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Italy

Page: 
390-405
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V8-N3-390-405
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Due to the high social, economic and image costs associated with every single incident, the first in-depth studies on the importance of the Human Factor (HF) have been carried out since the 70s in the field of aviation, both military and civilian, and in the nuclear field. To date there are several methodologies by which it is possible to estimate the human error probability. However, all these techniques have the disadvantage of not being able to analyse the unconscious component involved. Therefore, the aim of this research is to integrate into the analysis of the human factor some psychodynamic investigation techniques, capable, indeed, to stress the unconscious component of potential sub-threshold disorders and further assess what does it mean to work in a particular working environment such as the Gran Sasso mountain underground laboratories (LNGS or Gran Sasso National Laboratory) of Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN).

Keywords: 

dream activity, emergency management, human factor, occupational safety and security engineering, psychodynamic, underground laboratory, work related stress

  References

[1] Chandler, F.T., Chang, Y.J., Mosleh, A., Marble, J.L., Boring R.L. & Gertman, D.I., Human Reliability Analysis Method - Selection Guidance for NASA, NASA/OSMA, Washington DC (USA), 2006.

[2] Kirwan, B., Kennedy, R., Taylor-Adams S. & Lambert, B., The validation of three Human Reliability Quantification techniques - THERP, HEART and JHEDI: part II -Results of validation exercise. Applied Ergonomics, 28(1), pp. 17–25, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-6870(96)00045-2

[3] Spurgin, A.J., Human Reliability Assessment: Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009.

[4] Swain, A. & Guttman, H., Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque (NM, USA), 1983.

[5] Mackieh, A. & Cilingir, C., Effects of performance shaping factors on human error. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 22(4–5), pp. 285–292, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-8141(97)00079-6

[6] Reason, J., Human Error, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1990.

[7] Reer, B. & Dang, V.N., The Commission Errors Search and Assessment (CESA) Method, Paul Scherrer Institut - Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis (LEA), 7(3), 2007.

[8] Senders, J.W. & Moray, N.P., Human Error: Cause, Prediction and Reduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991.

[9] Williams, J.C., HEART - A Proposed Method for Assessing and Reducing Human Error. 9th Advances in Reliability Technology Symposium, Bradford (UK), 1986.

[10] Sanders, M. & McCormick, E., Human Factors in Engineering, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, Columbus, OH, 1993.

[11] Hollnagel, E., Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), 1st ed., Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp. 234–261, 1998.

[12] Karwowski, W. and Marras, W.S. Occupational Ergonomics: Principles of Work Design, I ed., Boca Raton (FL, USA): CRC Press, 2003.

[13] Stellman, J.M., Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, IV ed., International Labour Office, Geneva, 1998.

[14] Guarascio, M., Lombardi, M., Rossi, G. & Sciarra, G., Risk analysis and acceptability criteria, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 94, 2007.

[15] Lombardi, M., Guarascio, M. & Rossi, G. The management of uncertainty: model for evaluation of human error probability in railway system. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(3), pp. 381–390, 2014.

https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2014.381.390

[16] Lombardi, M. & Rossi, G., Cluster analysis of fatal accidents series in the INFOR.MO database: analysis, evidence and research perspectives. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 3(4), pp. 317–331, 2013.

https://doi.org/10.2495/safe-v3-n4-317-331

[17] Rucci, P., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Kupfer, D.J., Shear, K., Dell’Osso, L., Banti, S., Mauri, M., Grochocinski, V.J., Maser, J.D., Endicott, J. & Cassano, G.B., Development and preliminary testing of the General 5-Spectrum Measure (GSM-V). Depression and Anxiety, 18(3), pp. 109–117, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10123

[18] Borghini, F., Garzia, F., Borghini, G. & Borghini, A., The Psychology of Security, Emergency and Risk, WIT Press (UK and USA), 2016.

[19] Accettura, A., Aufiero, M., Anghileri, A., Briccola, A., Canevaro, G., Catelli, N., Cavalleri, M., Cusani, R., De Lucia, E., Borghini, F., Garzia, F., Lombardi, M., Luraschi, P., Paddeu, M. & Rossi, G., Oneiric Stress and Safety and Security at Work: The Discovery of a New Universal Symbol, Safety and Security Engineering VI, WIT Press (UK and USA), pp. 299–308, 2015.

[20] Holi, M., Assessment of psychiatric symptoms using the SCL-90, Helsinki University Printing House, Helsinki (FIN), 2003.

[21] Kim, H.-Y., Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), pp. 52–54, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52

[22] Kendall, M. & Gibbons, J.D., Rank Correlation Methods, V ed., Oxford University Press, Cary, NC, 1990.

[23] Xu, W., Hou, Y., Hung, Y.S. & Zou, Y., A comparative analysis of Spearman’s rho and Kendall’s tau in normal and contaminated normal models. Signal Processing, 93(1), pp. 261–276, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.08.005

[24] Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, II ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.

[25] Siegel, S. & Castellan, J.N.J., Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, II ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1998.

[26] Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, pp. 98–101, 1992.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783

[27] Draper, N.R. & Smith, H., Applied Regression Analysis, III ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1998.

[28] Dunst, C.J., Dunst, H.D.W. & Dunst, T.C.M., Guidelines for calculatin effect sizes for practice-based research syntheses. Centerscope, 3(1), pp. 1–10, 2004.

[29] American Psychiatric Association - APA, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - TR, VI ed., 2000.

[30] Hartsough, D.M. & Myers, D.G., Disaster work and mental health: Prevention and control of stress among workers. National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD, 1985.

[31] Case, C. & Dalley, T., The Handbook of Art Therapy, III ed., Routledge, New York, NY, 2014.

[32] Shapiro, F. & Maxfield, L., Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): information processing in the treatment of trauma. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(8), pp. 933–946, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10068