Emerging Tools for Evaluating Safety Management Systems Effectiveness

Emerging Tools for Evaluating Safety Management Systems Effectiveness

T. Brady A. Stolzer 

Daytona Beach Campus, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, FL, USA

Page: 
310-320
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V6-N2-310-320
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Safety Management Systems (SMS) have become prevalent in a host of industries, including aviation, for managing safety, but little research has been performed to-date on measuring the effectiveness of SMS. This research examined the independent application of two related concepts to assess effective- ness: IO/SMS, an Input-Output economics concept applied to SMS, and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Input-Output (IO) is a method for systematically determining the inter-relationships among ele- ments in a system. To determine if IO could be applied to SMS, it was necessary to calculate the relative importance to the system of the four components of SMS. Five SMS experts participated and, through a series of exercises, determined values for the 24 discrete SMS parts. Using IO matrix math, these values were then calculated for a 24×24 matrix. The results produced a matrix that could be used to predict the impact on the system by changing either a total input value such as an aggregate score on a survey, or by changing a single value. DEA is a multi-factor, mathematical programming technique that is used to determine the boundary of an efficient frontier. Using inputs and outputs, a ratio is calculated, which measures the relative efficiency, or effectiveness, of each decision making unit (DMU). In this research, inputs and outputs were determined for each of the four components of SMS via surveys conducted by subject matter experts. DEA models were developed and tested, and efficiency scores were developed for each DMU. DEA modeling also revealed the specific areas that could be addressed to improve efficiency scores. IO/SMS and DEA appear to be powerful tools to measure SMS effectiveness. A next step in the research may be to examine techniques that combine the benefits of both methods.

Keywords: 

data envelopment analysis, emerging tools, input-output analysis, safety management systems

  References

[1] Stolzer, A. & Goglia, J., Safety Management Systems in Aviation, 2nd ed., Ashgate; Burlington, VT, 2008.

[2] Safety management manual (SMM), (Doc 9859 AN/474), International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Montréal, Canada, 2013.

[3] Safety Management Systems for Aviation Service Providers, Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular/AC 120-92A, 2010, available at http://www.faa.gov/docu mentLibrary/media/

[4] Leontief, W., Input-Output Economic, Oxford University Press: New York, 1986.

[5] Correa, H. & Parker, B.R., An application of organizational input-output analysis to hospital management. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 39, pp. 307–333, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2004.09.001

[6] Leurent, F. & Windisch, E., Benefits and costs of electric vehicles for public finances: an integrated valuation model based on input-output analysis, with application to France. Research in Transportation Economics, 50, pp. 51–62, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.06.006

[7] Sorensen, S.W. & Willis, R.E., Input-output analysis in navy manpower planning. Naval Personnel Research and Development Center TR-77, 26, pp. 1–21, 1977.

[8] Correa, H., Scott W. & Skovran, J., Military applications of input-output analysis. Defense Analysis, 13(2), pp. 151–167, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07430179708405726

[9] Cobas, E., Hendrickson, C., Lave, L. & McMichael, F., Economic input/output analysis to aid life cycle assessment of electronics products. IEEE, Symposium on Electronic and the Environment Proceedings, Orlando, FL., pp. 273–278, 1995.

[10] Santos, J.R., May, L. & El Haimar, A., Risk-based input-output analysis of influenza epidemic consequences on interdependent workforce sectors. Risk Analysis, 33(9), pp. 1620–1635, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12002

[11] San Cristobal, J.R. & Biezma, M.V., The mining industry in the European union: analysis of inter-industry linkages using input-output analysis. Resources Policy, 31, pp. 1–6, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2006.03.004

[12] Lee, T. & Mokhtarian, P.L., An Input-Output Analysis of the Relationships Between Communications and Travel for Industry, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis, pp. 4–46, 2004.

[13] Jewczak, M. & Suchecka, J., Application of input analysis in the health care. Comparative Economic Research, 17(4), pp. 87–104, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cer-2014-0034

[14] Brady, T., Stolzer A., Brickhouse, A., Cortes, A., McCune, D., Raghavan, J. & Freiwald, D., Marbles: the application of input-output concepts to safety management systems. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 5(1), pp. 33–43, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/2159-6670.1124

[15] Tiganescu, I.E., Mihail, N. & Sandu, M.T., Input-output analysis and demographic accounting: a tool for educational planning. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 17(7), pp. 37–48, 2010.

[16] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E., Measuring the deficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), pp. 429–444, 1978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

[17] Braunscheidel, M. & Suresh, N., The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), pp. 119–140, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006