An Assessment of Using Anaerobic Baffled Reactor to Upgrade Wastewater Stabilization Ponds: A Pilot Study

An Assessment of Using Anaerobic Baffled Reactor to Upgrade Wastewater Stabilization Ponds: A Pilot Study

SH. JAMSHIDI G. BADALIANS GHOLIKANDI 

Water and Wastewater Research Center (WWRC), Water Research Institute (WRI), Tehran, Iran

Department of Water and Wastewater, Power and Water University of Technology (PWUT), Iran

Page: 
597–607
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V9-N4-597–607
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Operating wastewater treatment facilities is a challenge in developing countries. A research to find more sustainable alternatives is required with emphasize on modification, upgrade and optimization of these systems. Accordingly, a case study over a wastewater stabilization pond (WSP) of Hoveizeh, Iran, is carried out. It is real-ized that the facultative ponds have been encountered high purple sulfur bacteria (PSBs) bloom as a consequence of high organic loads. In fact, the overall efficiency of 70% in soluble COD removal is barely achieved in the system. This is recognized that volatile fatty acids (VFAs) have been motivated to be accumulated to more than 190 mg/L within the anaerobic ponds by high organic load. Hence, the ratio of VFAs to alkalinity is exceeded 0.6 and H2S concentration is increased in the facultative pond. It is observed that the influent COD is correlated logarithmically to the H2S concentration (R2 = 0.9) and the latter itself is correlated in third order to the chloro-phyll A (R2 = 0.92) representing PSBs growth. Since this phenomenon is attributed to the accumulation of VFAs, it is recommended to use anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) as a modification to control the process.

For this purpose, a bench-scale ABR with 48 l volume and six compartments were fed with domestic wastewater and operated for 7 months in three hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 36, 24 and 18 hours. It is observed that the efficiency of soluble COD removal in the anaerobic part can be promoted from 45% to 70% by ABR with 24-h retention time while the effluent of COD and VFAs are limited to 170 and 70 mg/L, respectively. Besides, the overall efficiency of ABR has not been changed significantly in a range of 36–18 h HRT. Consequently, it is found that ABR as an efficient, economical and environmentally sound option can be considered as a sustainable alternative to upgrade WSPs operationally.

Keywords: 

Anaerobic baffl ed reactor (ABR), purple sulfur bacteria, stabilization pond, upgrade, wastewater treatment

  References

[1] Hamdy, A., Rabia, N. & Hamdy, S., Study of waste stabilization pond geometry for waste-water treatment efficiency. Ecological Engineering, 28, pp. 25–34, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.03.008

[2] Jamshidi, Sh., Badalians Gholikandi, G. & Orumieh, H.R., High organic loading rate and waste stabilization pond’s operation efficiency: a case study, Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. of Natural Resources, Sustainable Development and Ecological Hazards, Ravage of the Planet III, eds. C.A. Brebbia, S.S. Zubir, Shah Alam, Malaysia, WIT Press, pp. 415–424, 2011.

[3] Kaya, D., Dilek, F. & Gokcay C.F., Reuse of lagoon effluents in agriculture by post-treatment in a step feed dual treatment process. Desalination, 215, pp. 29–36, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.11.013

[4] Mara, D.D., Domestic Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries, Earthscan Publications: London, 2004.

[5] Nelson, K.L., Cisneros, B.J., Tchobanoglous, G. & Darby, J., Sludge accumulation, characteristics, and pathogen inactivation in four primary waste stabilization ponds in central Mexico. Water Research, 38, pp. 111–127, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.013

[6] Ashworth, J. & Skinner, M., Waste stabilisation pond, design manual. Power and Water Corporation, Document No: D2011/578598, pp. 40–55, December 2011.

[7] Lloyd, B.J., Leitner, A.R., Vorkas, C.A. & Guganesharajah, R.K., Under performance evaluation and rehabilitation strategy for waste stabilization ponds in Mexico. Water Science and Technology, 48(2), pp. 35–43, 2003.

[8] Park, J.B.K. & Craggs, R.G., Biogas production from anaerobic waste stabilization ponds treating dairy and piggery in New Zealand. Water Science and Technology, 55(11), pp. 257–264, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.357

[9] Picot, B., Paing, J., Sambuco, J.P., Costa, R.H.R. & Rambaud, A., Biogas production, sludge accumulation and mass balance of carbon in anaerobic ponds. Water Science and Technology, 48(2), pp. 243–250, 2003.

[10] Kayombo, S., Mbwette, T.S.A., Mayo, A.W., Katima, J.H.Y. & Jorgrnsen, S.E., Diurnal cycles of variation of physical–chemical parameters in waste stabilization ponds. Ecological Engi-neering, 18, pp. 287–291, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(01)00086-6

[11] Murakani, K., Inomari, Y., Sudo, R. & Kurihara, Y., Effect of temperature on prosperity and decay of genetically engineered micro-organisms in a microcosm system. Water Science and Technology, 26 (9–11), pp. 2165–2165, 1992.

[12] Alabaster, G.P., Combined treatment of domestic and industrial wastewater stabilization pond systems in Kenya. Water Science and Technology, 24, pp. 43–52, 1991.

[13] Freedman, D., Koopman, B. & Lincoln, E.P., Chemical and biological flocculation of purple sulphur bacteria in anaerobic lagoon effluent. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 28, pp. 115–125, 1983. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(83)90081-1

[14] Houghton, S.R. & Mara, D.D., The effects of sulfide generation in waste stabilization ponds on photosynthetic populations and effluent quality. Water Science and Technology, 26, pp. 1759–1768, 1992.

[15] Sirianuntapiboon, S. & Srikul, M., Reducing red color intensity of seafood wastewater in facultative pond. Bioresource Technology, 97, pp. 1612–1617, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.07.022

[16] Veenstra, S., Al-Nozaily, F.A. & Alaerts, G.J., Purple non-sulfur bacteria and their influence on waste stabilisation pond performance in the Yemen Republic. Water Science and Technology, 31, pp. 141–149, 1995. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(95)00501-D

[17] Villanueva, J., Grimalt, J.O., Wit, R.D., Brendan, J.K. & Maxwell, J.R., Sources and transformations of chlorophylls and carotenoids in a monomictic sulphate-rich karstic lake en-vironment. Organic Geochemistry, 22, pp. 739–757, 1994. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90136-8

[18] Angelica, P.S., Tommy, H. & Overmann, J., Physiology of purple sulfur bacteria forming macroscopic aggregates in great sippewissett salt marsh, Massachusetts. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 12, pp. 225–235, 1993. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1993.tb00035.x

[19] Imhoff, J.F., Order I. Chromatiales ord. nov. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Springer: New York, 2005.

[20] Guyoneaud, R., Wit, R.D., Matheron, R. & Caumette, P., Impact of macroalgal dredging on dystrophic crises and phototrophic bacterial blooms (red waters) in a brackish coastal lagoon. Oceanologica Acta, 21, pp. 551–561, 1998. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(98)80038-8

[21] Tank, M., Thiel, V. & Imhoff, J.F., Phylogenetic relationship of phototrophic purple sulfur bacteria according to pufL and pufM gens. International Microbiology, 12, pp. 175–185, 2009.

[22] Pearson, H.W., Mara, D.D. & Bartone, C.R., Guidelines for the minimum evaluation of the performance of full-scale waste stabilization ponds. Water Research, 21(9), pp. 1067−1075, 1987. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(87)90028-5

[23] Peña, M.R., Advanced Primary Treatment of Domestic Wastewater in Tropical Countries: De-velopment of High-rate Anaerobic Ponds, PhD Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, 2002.

[24] Barber, W.P. & Stuckey D.C., The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for waste-water treatment: a review. Water Research, 33(7), pp. 1559–1578, 1999. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00371-6

[25] Feng, H., Hu, L., Shan, D., Fang, C., He, Y. & Shen, D., Effects of operational factors on soluble microbial products in a carrier anaerobic baffled reactor treating dilute wastewater. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20, pp. 690–695, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1001-0742(08)62114-2

[26] Krishna, G.V.T.G., Kumar, P. & Kumar, P., Treatment of low strength soluble wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 166–176, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.017

[27] Nasr, F.A., Doma, H.S. & Nassar, H.F., Treatment of domestic wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor followed by a duckweed pond for agricultural purposes. Journal of Environ-mentalist, 29, pp. 270–279, 2009.

[28] Singh, S., Haberl, R., Moog, O., Raj Shrestha, R., Shrestha, P. & Shrestha, R., Performance of anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland treating high-strength wastewa-ter in Nepal-A model for DEWATS. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 35, pp. 654–660, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.10.019

[29] Badalians Gholikandi, G., Jamshidi, Sh. & Ebrahimzade, V., The response of anaerobic baffled reactor in various operational conditions. International Journal of Wastewater Treatment and Green Chemistry, 2(1), pp. 1–10, 2011.

[30] Badalians Gholikandi, G., Jamshidi, Sh. & Hazrati, H., Optimization of anaerobic baffled reac-tor (ABR) wastewater treatment system using artificial neural network. Environmental Engi-neering and Management Journal, 2012, in press.

[31] Nachaiyasit, S. & Stuckey, D.C., Microbial response to environmental changes in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 65, pp. 111–123, 1995. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/BF00872199

[32] Dama, P., Bell, J., Brouckaert, C.J., Buckley, C.A. & Stuckey, D.C., Computational fluid dy-namics: application to the design of the anaerobic baffled reactor, Proceedings of WISA Bien-nial Conference, Sun City, South Africa, 2000.

[33] APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 24th edn. American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, 2005.

[34] Matsuyama, M., Phylogenic status of a purple sulfur bacterium and its bloom in Lake Kaiike. The Japanese Society of Limnology, 5, pp. 95–101, 2004.

[35] Tchobanoglous, G. & Burton, F.L., Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, McGraw Hill: New York, 2003.

[36] USEPA, Design Manual for Municipal Wastewater Stabilization Ponds, NSCEP, 1983.

[37] Langenhoff, A., Intrachandra, N. & Stuckey, D.C., Treatment of dilute soluble and colloidal wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: influence of hydraulic retention time. Water Research, 34(4), pp. 1307–1317, 2000. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00236-5

[38] Voolapalli, R.K. & Stuckey, D.C., Hydrogen production in anaerobic reactors during shock loads-influence of formate production and H2 kinetics. Water Research, 35(7), pp. 1831–1841, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00441-3

[39] Gerardi, M.H., The Microbiology of Anaerobic Digesters, John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471468967

[40] Gerardi, M.H., Wastewater Bacteria, John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471979910

[41] Fu, F. & Wang, Q., Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. Environmental Management, 92(3), pp. 407–418, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011

[42] Badalians Gholikandi, G., Jamshidi, Sh. & Valipour, A., Application of electrolysis upgrading the operation of anaerobic reactors, (in Persian). Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(4), pp. 9–16, 2013.