Public Participation in Urban Noise Prevention: The Case of a Hungarian Town

Public Participation in Urban Noise Prevention: The Case of a Hungarian Town

Z. Baros L. Dávid 

Institute of Agroinformatics and Rural Development, Károly Róbert College, Gyöngyös, Hungary

Department of Tourism and Regional Development, Károly Róbert College, Gyöngyös, Hungary

Page: 
101-114
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V7-N1-101-114
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
29 February 2012
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The so-called ‘soft factors’ are playing an increasing role in urban planning. Alternative strategies based on these factors can include bottom-up initiatives in which citizens intend to find solutions to noise-related problems in their settlement through their participation and in accordance with their requirements. This paper intends to give a brief introduction to the role of individuals regarding their participation in such programmes, based on the literature available and the results of a questionnaire survey carried out in the Town of Debrecen (East Hungary). The results of the survey indicated that the overall picture of the residents’ opinions on noise pollution is rather contradictory: they basically seem to perceive the impacts and the relevance of this issue, however, in general, the respondents did not recognise their own roles in resolving the problem itself – neither as ‘polluters’ nor as ‘endurers’.

Keywords: 

liveability, mental infrastructure, noise nuisance, noise prevention programmes, public participation, sustainable urban development

  References

[1] Nardo, M., Noise Pollution: An overview of management strategies. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 4(4), pp. 300–322, 2004. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2004.005719

[2] Buna, B., Experiences of noise impact studies in Hungary. Assessment of Environmental Impacts, ed. Gy. Flórián, TEM 13, Közlekedéstudományi Intézet: Budapest, pp. 21–29, 1994 (in Hungarian).

[3] Hatta, L., The Impacts of Noise on Humans, OMIKK Környezetvédelmi füzetek, p. 27, 2000 (in Hungarian).

[4] Baros, Z., Public participation in urban noise prevention. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Urban Environment (Debrecen, 27-28th Nov. 2009), Debreceni Egyetem Tájvédelmi és Környezetföldrajzi Tanszék: Debrecen, pp. 94–99, 2009 (in Hungarian).

[5] Meier, R.L., Ecological Planning, Management, and Design, 2003 – Online manuscript: www.ced.berkeley.edu/pubs/faculty/meier_richard/ecoplanmgmtdes/

[6] Michalkó, G., The Theory and Practice of Urban Tourism, MTA Földrajztudományi Kutató Intézet: Budapest, p. 168, 1999 (in Hungarian).

[7] Juhary-Koroknay, A., The Relationship between the quality of homes and the acoustic comfort. CD-proceedings of the Noise Prevention Seminar – The Actual Issues of Noise Prevention (Debrecen, 8-10th Nov. 2006), OPAKFI, 2006 (in Hungarian).

[8] Penn-Bressel, G., Verkehrslärm und Wohnstandortverhalten. Informationsdienst un Mitteilungsblatt des deutschen Volksheimstättenwerks, 41, pp. 145–148, 1988.

[9] Fodor, I., Environmental Protection and Regionalism in Hungary. Dialóg Campus Kiadó: Budapest-Pécs, pp. 224–235, 2001 (in Hungarian).

[10] Baros, Z. & Gajdátsy, P., Public opinions on road traffi c induced noise nuisance in the Town of Debrecen. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Urban Environment (Debrecen, 8-10th

Nov. 2007), Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó, Debreceni Egyetem: Debrecen, pp. 134–139, 2008 (in Hungarian).

[11] Eke-Zamárdi, I. &-Baros, Z., On urban noise – From a confl ict theory approach. A Honorary Collection of Studies to Dr. Károly Tar, Magyar Szélenergia Társaság, pp. 119–127, 2007 (in Hungarian).

[12] Herzog, T.R., A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, pp. 27–43, 1989. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80024-6

[13] World Bank, Cities in Transition. World Bank Urban and Local Governments Strategy, World Bank: Washington, 2000.

[14] Butters, C., A Holistic Method of Evaluating Sustainability, 2004. Online. www.gaiaoslo.no/artikler.html

[15] Bonacker, M., Participation process according to Directive 2002/49/EC. CD-proceedings of Forum Acusticum (Budapest, 29th Aug-2nd Sept 2005). Budapest, 2005 (in Hungarian).

[16] Nagy, B., Settlement, the Built World, GEO-Könyvek, B+V (medical&technical) Lap- és Könyvkiadó Kft., 486 p, 2005 (in Hungarian).

[17] Holden, E., Ecological footprints and sustainable urban form. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(1), pp. 91–109, 2004. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHO.0000017708.98013.cb

[18] Kang, J., Urban Acoustics. Applied Acoustics, 66, pp. 121–122, 2005. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.07.006

[19] Wilkins, H., The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, pp. 401–414, 2003. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1

[20] Steinemann, A., Rethinking human health impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, pp. 627–645, 2000. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00068-8

[21] Kneip R. Transport and the quality of life – controversy or harmony? Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Urban Environment (Debrecen, 27-28th Nov. 2009), Debreceni Egyetem Tájvédelmi és Környezetföldrajzi Tanszék: Debrecen, pp. 128–133, 2009 (in Hungarian).

[22] Locsmándi, G., Urban Planning and Environmental Protection, Supplemental Study. Háttértanulmány, Nemzeti Kutatási és Technológiai Hivatal, A természeti és épített környezet védelme és fejlesztése munkacsoport, p. 12, Online www.nkth.gov.hu/innovaciopolitika/technologiai/termeszeti-epitett (in Hungarian)

[23] Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities (2007) - adopted by the informal meeting of the Council of Ministers in Leipzig on 24 May 2007. http://www.eu2007.de/en/News/download_docs/Mai/0524-AN/075DokumentLeipzigCharta.pdf

[24] Bulla, M., Environmental key problems. The Urban Environment of Hungary, ed. Gy. Enyedi, Magyar Tudományos Akadémia: Budapest, pp. 187–236, 2000 (in Hungarian).

[25] Baros, Z., Public opinions on road traffi c induced noise in residential areas with various builtup types in the Town of Debrecen. CD-Rom Proc of the 3rd International Conference on the application of sciences, technology and economics (Szombathely, 30th October 2004), Berzsenyi Dániel F iskola: Szombathely, p. 8, 2005 (in Hungarian).

[26] Szász, G. & T kei, L. (eds). Meteorology for Agronomists, Horticulturists and Foresters, Mez gazda Kiadó, pp. 697–703, 1997 (in Hungarian).

[27] Andersson, K.-Lindvall, T. (eds), Health Effects of Community Noise, Nordic Noise Group, Nordic Council of Ministers, p. 45, 1988.

[28] European Commission, Inventory of Noise Mitigation Methods – The European Commission Directorate-General: Environment Policy Area: Noise, Working Group 5: Abatement, p. 46 Online. www.a21italy.it/enviplans/guidelines/reading/noise/mitigations_02_en.pdf

[29] Bite, P. & Póta Gy., EU Guidelines and their enforcement in the traffi c induced noise prevention in Hungary. Közlekedéstudományi Szemle, 51(7), pp. 241–256, 2001 (in Hungarian).

[30] Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Section of Engineering Sciences, Complex Committee of Acoustics, Environmental Noise Prevention in Hungary and its Development Strategy with Special Focus on the EU Requirements, Budapest, p. 45, 2003 (in Hungarian).

[31] Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Lex-UriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002: 189:0012:0025:EN:PDF

[32] Dávid, L. et al. (ed), The Environmental Programme of the North Great Plain Region in Hungary, Észak-alföldi Regionális Fejlesztési Ügynökség: Debrecen, p. 150, 2003 (in Hungarian).

[33] Berndt M., Detailed background information to the implementation of the Governmental Decree No. 280/2004 on the assessment and management of environmental noise. Budapest, p. 12, 2007 (in Hungarian).

[34] Vizeli, S., The Role of Municipalities in Noise Prevention. CD-proceedings of the Noise Prevention Seminar – The Actual Issues of Noise Prevention (Debrecen, 8-10th Nov. 2006), OPAKFI, 2006 (in Hungarian).

[35] Bucher, E., Civil Organisations for the Development of the Urban Environment – with examples from the County of Baranya. CD-proceedings of the 3rd Hungarian Conference of Geography (Budapest, 6-7th Sept. 2006), 2006 (in Hungarian).

[36] Bujdosó, Z., The urbanization in Hungary during the last decade- is it an economic interest or a question of prestige to be graded a town in our country nowadays? Cross-Border Co-operations –Schengen Challenges, ed. I. Süli-Zakar, Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó: Debrecen, pp. 232–237, 2004.

[37] Kiss, A., Conscious Urban Development. Landscape, Environment and Society – Honorary Studies for Prof. Ilona Kevei-Bárány: Szeged, pp. 363–372, 2006 (in Hungarian).

[38] Soneryd, L. & Weldon, S., Noise and newts: Public Engagement in the UK and Sweden. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, pp. 17–37, 2003. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00057-4

[39] Swedish Council for Sustainable Development (SCSD). Make Your Municipality Sustainable (An Introduction to Local Tools and Working Methods for Sustainable Development). Online. www.hallbarhetsradet.se/upload/publikationer/Make_your_muni_webb.pdf

[40] Puczkó, L. & Rátz, T., The Impacts of Tourism – An Introduction. Häme Polytechnic: Finland, p. 406, 2002.