Management of Water and Wastewater Under the Framework of the IMM: The Case of the Favela Rocinha

Management of Water and Wastewater Under the Framework of the IMM: The Case of the Favela Rocinha

Gianfranco Becciu Stefano Mambretti Gabriele Masera Umberto Sanfilippo Massimo Tadi

DICA Politecnico di Milano

Wessex Institute of Technology

Dept. ABC Politecnico di Milano

01 January 2020
| Citation



The paper presents the so-called Integrated Modification Methodology (IMM), which is aimed to make cities and human settlements more inclusive, resilient and sustainable. In particular, the paper resumes how it has been implemented to the case study of favela rocinha in rio de Janeiro. IMM is the result of a research project financed by Politecnico di Milano university using Italian national funds allocated by law to social purposes. This kind of projects have to be multidisciplinary and in favour of human and social development. Many are the aspects considered in the project case study: energy, work, mobility, ecosystem, service, food and waste water). for all of these aspects, which are crucial in Rio de Janeiro slums, the engineering issues have to be matched not only with the requests of the other practitioners working on the same area, in a holistic view of the problems, but also with cultural and social constraints. The aim of this approach is to produce integrated solutions which can be understood by the population, made its own and so managed in the best possible way; so, the cultural improvement may also produce a relevant economic activity. In the paper, the methodology for approaching a difficult case like Favela Rocinha is presented, together with the main outcomes of the work of the different specialists who dealt with the different parts of the work. In details, the paper deals specifically with water and wastewater management, to show more deeply the applied methodology. The paper shows that this approach has requested, in some cases, to propose solutions that textbooks would not consider theoretically the ‘best’ ones, but that are more suitable for the actual situation of a slum like favela rocinha, definitively to make the development of those systems more inclusive, resilient and sustainable. 


community involvement in urban modifications, urban management, water and wastewater management.


[1] Ribeiro, D., O Povo Brasileiro Companhia das Letras, São Paulo (in Portouguese), 1995.

[2] IPP—Institute Pereira Pasos, Armazém de Dados, Prefeitura de Rio de Janeiro (in Portouguese), 2017.

[3] IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, (in Portouguese) https://www., 2017

[4] SNIS – Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento, Ministério das Cidades (in Portouguese),, 2017.

[5] EMOP – Empresa de Obras Públicas. Relatório de Diagnóstico Urbano, Ambiental e Social, Estado do Rio do Janeiro (in Portouguese), 2012.

[6] Tadi, M. & Manesh, S.V., Transformation of an urban complex system into a more sustainable form via Integrated Modification Methodology (IMM). International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 9(4), pp. 514–537, 2014. https://

[7] UN DESA, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, NY, 1e-en, 2017.

[8] Arcidiacono, A., Causone, F., Grosso, M., Masera, G., Tadi, M. & Zadeh, H.M., ­Environmental performance and social inclusion: A project for the rocinha favela in 94 Rio de Janeiro. Energy Procedia, 134, pp. 356–365, 2017. egypro.2017.09.546

[9] World Energy Council, Measures for low-income households. London: World Energy Council. households.pdf, 2010.

[10] Carvalho, M.I. & Bastos, V.P., A favela da Rocinha e a destinação inadequada de lixo: entendendo os meandros da questão, Master Thesis in Social Service, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2016

[11] de Groot, R., Wilson, M. & Boumans, R.M.J., A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, pp. 393–408, 2002.

[12] TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. ed. P. ten Brink. Earthscan, London and Washington, 2011.

[13] Bignami D.F., Rosso, R. & Sanfilippo, U., Flood Proofing in Urban Areas, Springer Nature, Switzerland, 2019. ISBN 978-3-030-05933-0, 030-05934-7

[14] van Duivendijk, J., Manual on Planning of Structural Approaches to Flood Management. ICID Guideline, New Delhi, India, 2005.

[15] Einstein, H.H., Special lecture: Landslide risk assessment procedure. In International Symposium on Landslides. Landslide, ed. C. Bonnard. Vol. 2, Lausanne, pp. 1075–1090, 1988.

[16] De Wrachien, D., Mambretti, S. & Schultz, B., Flood management and risk assessment in flood-prone areas: Measures and solutions. Irrigation and Drainage, 60(2), pp. 229–240, 2011.

[17] Chirenje, L.I., Giliba, R.A. & Musamba, E.B., .Local communities’ participation in decision-making processes through planning and budgeting in African countries. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 11(1), pp. 10–16, 2013.

[18] Abbott, J., Community participation and its relationship to community development. Community Development Journal, 30(2), pp. 158–168, 1995. cdj/30.2.158

[19] Eden, S., Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counterscientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), pp. 183–204, 1996.