In circular economy (Ce), the value of products and materials is maintained for as long as possible. What has previously been considered waste is now a resource that can be reused and reintroduced to the production cycle. Therefore, waste management of both technical and bio-based waste streams plays a central role in the transition towards Ce. In bioeconomy, the materials are to a certain extent circular by nature. however, biomaterials may also be used in a rather linear way. according to the european Commission, the transition towards Ce needs to be supported on local, regional and national levels. Thus, to enhance sustainability and get the full potential out of bioeconomy, the Ce principles should be applied to reach bio-based Ce. This paper presents the results of a qualitative assessment that was carried out in Finland, Spain, Slovakia, greece, romania and France. Selected national and regional strategies were identified, compared and analyzed from the perspective of Ce and bio-based Ce. at the time of the study, the added value of Ce was recognized in most of the national and regional level strategies studied, through objectives concerning e.g. waste management or bioenergy. Bio-based Ce was hardly ever included as a term but circularity aspects were referred to for example through bio- waste management. Waste management appears to be the main driver in the transition towards Ce. This is evident also in the case presented from Slovakia. yet, in order for Ce to become an integral part of national and regional policies, a more comprehensive understanding of the Ce mechanisms should be achieved. Supported actions on both small and large-scale are needed. The research is partly an outcome of the ongoing Interreg europe project BIOregIO, where the bio-based circular economy is boosted through a transfer of expertise about best practices, aiming at changing regional policies to support bio-based Ce.
bio-based materials, circular economy, national strategies, regional strategies
 Kahle, L.R. & Gurel-Atay, E., Communicating Sustainability for the Green Economy, Routledge: UK, 2013.
 Bakari, M.E.K., The Dilemma of Sustainability in the Age of Globalization: A Quest for a Paradigm of Development, Lexington Books: New York, 2017.
 United Nations, General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome. Resolution A/60/1, Online http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/do cs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf (accessed 8 June 2018).
 Severo, E.A., Ferrode Guimarães, J.C. & Henri Dorion E.C., Cleaner production, social responsibility and eco-innovation: Generations’ perception for a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, pp. 91–103, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.03.129
 Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C. & Ulgiati, S., A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, pp. 11–32, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
 Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. & Hultink, E.J., The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, pp. 757–768, 2017.
 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition, 2012.
 Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. & Hekkert, M., Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, pp. 221–232, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
 The Euroepean Commission, Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, COM/2015/0614, Online, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0614 (accessed 23 May. 2018).
 Bugge, M., Hansen, T. & Klitkou, A., What is bioeconomy? Sustainability, 8(7), pp. 1–22, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
 McCormick, K. & Kautto, N., The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability, 5(6), pp. 2589–2608, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
 The European Commission, Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. COM/2012/060, Online https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? uri=OJ:C:2012:060:TOC (accessed 20 May. 2018).
 Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkänen, K., Leskinen, P., Kuikman, P. & Thomsen, M., Green Economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, pp. 361–271, 2016. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024
 Allen, B., A Step Further. The Bioeconomy, pp. 197–199, 2016.
 Bezama, A., Let us discuss how cascading can help implement the circular economy and the bio-economy strategies. Waste Management Res, 34, pp. 593–594, 2016. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16657973
 D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., Leskinen, P., Matthies, B.D. & Toppinen, A., Green, circular, bio economy: a comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, pp. 716–734, 2017. doi: org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
 Aguilar, A., Wohlgemuth, R. & Twardowski, T., Perspectives on bioeconomy. New Biotechnology, 40, pp. 181–184, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.012
 BIOREGIO, Interreg Europe, https://www.interregeurope.eu/bioregio
 The European Commission, The role of waste-to-energy in the circular economy, COM/2017/034 final, Online https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= CELEX%3A52017DC0034 (accessed 20 May. 2018).
 Carus, M. & Dammer, L., The “circular bioeconomy” – concepts, opportunities and limitations. Industrial Biotechnology, 14(2), Online https://www.coebbe.nl/en/content/what-biobased-economy-0 (accessed 6 February 2018). doi: 10.1089/ind.2018. 29121.mca
 Chertow, M.R., Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, pp. 313–337. 2000. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313
 Costa, I., Massard, G. & Agarwal, A., Waste management policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), pp. 815–822, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.019
 Interreg Europe. https://www.interregeurope.eu/ (accessed 20 May 2018).
 The European Commission, Review of the 2012 European Bioeconomy Strategy, Online https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/review_of_2012_eu_bes.pdf#view= fit&pagemode=none (accessed 20 May 2018).
 The European Commission, A resource-efficient Europe – Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy, COM/2011/0021 final, Online https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0021&from=EN (accessed 20 May 2018).
 Yuan, Z.W., Bi, J. & Moriguichi, Y., The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1–2), pp. 4–8, 2006. doi: doi. rg/10.1162/108819806775545321
 Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J. & Xue, B., Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: an evaluation and critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23(1), pp. 216–224, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005
 Su, B., Heshmati, A. & Geng, Y., A Review of the Circular Economy in China: Moving from Rhetoric to Implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, pp. 215–227, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020
 Geng, Y. & Doberstein, B., Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving ‘leapfrog development’. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(3), pp. 231–239, 2008. doi:/10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6
 Manskinen, K., Foreword. Lahti Cleantech Annual Review 2016, Online http:// www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/121322/LAMK_2016_24.pdf?sequence= 2&isAllowed=y (accessed 20 April 2018).
 BIOREGIO, BIOREGIO policy overview.xls, 22.5.2018, Lahti University of Applied Sciences, Finland.
 Greek National Plan for Waste Management 2015–2020. In Greek, Online http://www. ypeka.gr/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=8rKEKVFO8G0%3d&tabid=238&language=elGR (accessed 20 May).
 The Finnish Roadmap to a Circular Economy 2016–2025, Online https://media.sitra. fi/2017/02/24032659/Selvityksia121.pdf (accessed 20 April 2018).
 Waste Management State Plan PEMAR 2016–2020. In Spanish, Online https://www. boe.es/boe/dias/2015/12/12/pdfs/BOE-A-2015-13490.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
 The Waste Management Program of the Slovak Republic 2016–2020. In Slovak, Online http://www.minzp.sk/files/sekcia-enviromentalneho-hodnotenia-riadenia/odpadya-obaly/registre-a-zoznamy/poh-sr-2016-2020_vestnik.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
 Energy Transition for Green Growth Act 2015–2030. In French, Online https://www. legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000031044385&categorieLie n=id (accessed 18 April 2018).
 Romanian National Waste Management Strategy 2014–2020. In Romanian, Online https:// legestart.ro/hg-nr-8702013-privind-aprobarea-strategiei-nationale-de-gestionare -a-deseurilor-2014-2020/ (accessed 19 April 2018).
 Finnish Ministry of Environment, Government’s Goal: Finland is a Forerunner in the Circular Economy by 2025, Online http://www.ym.fi/enUS/The_environment/Circular_economy (accessed 6 Febraury 2018).
 The European Parliament, Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives, Online https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008L0098 (accessed 20 May 2018).
 Päijät-Häme Regional Strategy and program 2018–2021, Regional Council of Päijät-Häme. 2017. In Finnish, Online http://www.paijat-hame.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ Maakuntastrategia_ja_ohjelma_2018-2021_nettiin.pdf (accessed 15 May 2018).
 Päijät-Häme Road Map: Towards Circular Economy in Finland, Online http://www. kohtikiertotaloutta.fi/english/ (accessed 15 May 2018).
 Interreg Europe. Good Practice: Utilisation of biowaste streams – bio-based industrial symbiosis, Online https://www.interregeurope.eu/policylearning/good-practices/ item/169/utilisation-of-biowaste-streams-bio-based-industrial-symbiosis/ (accessed 16 May 2018).
 Integrated waste management plan of Castilla-La Mancha 2016. In Spanish, Online http:// www.castillalamancha.es/sites/default/files/documentos/pdf/20170103/20161220pigr. pdf (accessed 16 May 2018).
 Smart Specialization Strategy of South Muntelia Region 2015. South Muntenia Regional Development Agency, Online http://www.onlines3.eu/wp-content/uploads/ RIS3_strategy_repository/RO_Sud_Muntenia_RIS3_eng.pdf (accessed 16 April 2018).
 Performance Agreement for a Regional Dynamic about Waste and Circular Economy (CODREC) 2016–2018. Pays de la Loire Region. In French, Online. http://docplayer. fr/52721161-Annexe-1-contrat-d-objectifs-pour-une-dynamique-regionale-dechets-eteconomie-circulaire-codrec.html (accessed 11 June 2018).
 Program of Economic and Social Development of Nitra Region in Slovakia 2016. Nitra Self-governing Region. In Slovak, Online https://www.unsk.sk/zobraz/sekciu/dokumenty-regionalneho-rozvoja (accessed 18 April 2018).
 Waste Management Plan of Central Macedonia 2016. Regional Council of Central Macedonia. In Greek, Online. https://fodsakm.gr/site/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ PESDA_KM-1.pdf (accessed 18 May 2018).
 Subsidies from the budget of the Nitra Self-governing Region, from the “Programme to Support Integrated Rural Development LEADER NSK – Instrument 2, Activity 1.2 – Environmental Activities”, based on Decree 3/2017 of Nitra Self-governing Regionfrom 10.07.2017. In Slovak, Online http://original.unsk.sk/showdoc.do?docid=13220 (accessed 5 December 2018).
 Contract on irretrievable granting a financial contribution by ministry of Environment of Slovakia. In Slovak, Online https://www.crz.gov.sk/index.php?ID=186256&l=sk (accessed 5 December 2018).
 Interreg Europe. Good Practice: Separate Collection and Recovery of Biodegradable Waste, Online https://www.interregeurope.eu/policylearning/good-practices/item/1557/ separate-collection-and-recovery-of-biodegradable-waste/ (accessed 5 December 2018).