Evaluating Suitability of a GIS–AHP Combined Method for Sustainable Urban and Environmental Planning in Beykoz District, Istanbul

Evaluating Suitability of a GIS–AHP Combined Method for Sustainable Urban and Environmental Planning in Beykoz District, Istanbul

A. Akbulut O. Ozcevik L. Carton 

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, City and Regional Planning Department, Nigde, Turkey

Istanbul Technical University, City and Regional Planning Department, Istanbul, Turkey

Radboud University, Geography, Planning and Environment Department, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Page: 
1103-1115
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N8-1103-1115
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
12 December 2018
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Many metropolitan areas in the world currently face challenges of rapid urbanisation. at the urban peripheries, the balance between ‘urban areas’ designated for new settlements for city inhabitants and ‘green areas,’ which provide ecosystem functions, has come under heavy pressure because of this rapid urbanisation. Spatial planning research provides methods for a thorough evaluation of urban development strategies. in this paper, a method is proposed that provides a systematic Suitability assessment for the metropolitan territory, from the perspective of both urban planning basic principles and environmental sustainability. this  approach, which combines analytical  Hierarchy Process (AHP)  and geographic information System (GIS) techniques, is applied to a case study in istanbul, turkey, to evaluate current urbanisation patterns. Beykoz district spans an area of more than 30,000 ha at the anatolian side of Istanbul, along the bosphorus. Currently 79% of the total area is forested, 15% is agricultural land and 6% is urbanised. These characteristics make it a unique and financially precious area. it is thus particularly important to ensure that urban planning and development in this district are sustainable. In the Suitability assessment, six main parameters are included, namely slope, streambed, natural conservation status priority, forested areas, agricultural areas and watershed areas. Twenty-four sub-parameters are weighted by the AHP technique and integrated levels of suitability are determined by weighted overlay using GIS. The final map produced using this combined technique shows how urban constructions are spreading on the urban fridge of the Beykoz district. The resulting suitability map provides for a better comprehension of alternative settlement locations for preserving nature and sustainable development. The systematic and fact-based characteristics of the described methodology add to the legitimacy of its outcomes. The proposed method can serve as a suitability assessment instrument to analyse future urbanisation plans on their wider implications in terms of sustainability. 

Keywords: 

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Beykoz, Environmental Sustainability, Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Istanbul, Suitability

  References

[1] Beckerman, W., Economic Development and the Environment, Conflict or Complementarity?, Background paper for World Development Report 1992, http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/768681468739188525/pdf/multi0page.pdf (accessed on 1 August, 2016).

[2] Moldan, B., Janouskova, S. & Hak, T., How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, (17), pp. 4–13, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033

[3] Baynes, T. & Wiedmann, T., General approaches for assessing urban environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(4), pp. 458–464, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.003

[4] Jankowski, P. & Richard, L., Integration of GIS-based suitability analysis and multicriteria evaluation in a spatial decision support system for route selection. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(3), pp. 323–340, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1068/b210323

[5] James, P., Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability, ­Routledge Press: London, 2015.

[6] Collins, M.G., Steiner, F.R. & Rushman, M.J., Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Management, 28(5), pp. 611–621, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010247

[7] Bagheri, M., Sulaiman, WNA. & Vaghefi, N., Land use suitability analysis using multi criteria decision analysis method for coastal management and planning: a case study of Malaysia, Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5(5), pp. 364–372, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2012.364.372

[8] Thapa, R.B. & Murayama, Y., Image classification techniques in mapping urban landscape: a case study of Tsukuba city using AVNIR-2 sensor data. Tsukuba Geoenvironmental Sciences, (3), pp. 3–10, 2007.

[9] Thapa, R.B. & Murayama,Y., Land evaluation for peri-urban agriculture using analytical hierarchical process and geographic information system techniques: a case study of Hanoi. Land Use Policy, 25(2), pp. 225–239, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.004

[10] Cengiz, T. & Akbulak, C., Application of analytical hierarchy process and geographic information systems in land-use suitability evaluation: a case study of Dumrek village (Canakkale, Turkey). International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16(4), pp. 286–294, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500903106634

[11] Patil V.D., Sankhua R.N. & Jain R.K., Analytic hierarchy process for evaluation of environmental factors for residential land use suitability. International Journal of Computer Engineering Research, 2(7), pp. 182–189, 2012.

[12] Feizizadeh, B. & Blaschke, T., Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(1), pp. 1–23, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.646964

[13] Weerakoon, K., Suitability analysis for urban agriculture using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2(2), pp. 69–76, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14355/ijast.2014.0302.03

[14] Ullah K.M. & Mansourian A., Evaluation of land suitability for urban land-use planning: case study Dhaka City. Transactions in GIS, 20(1), pp. 20–37, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12137

[15] Bozdağ, A., Yavuz, F. & Günay, A.S., AHP and GIS based land suitability analysis for Cihanbeyli (Turkey) County. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(9), p. 813, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5558-9

[16] Environmental Performance Index (EPI), 2014 Indicator, Issue, and Objective Weightings, http://archive.epi.yale.edu/file-type/xls (accessed on 5 August, 2016).

[17] Act. No:3194 of Turkish Law, 2016, http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.3194.pdf (accessed on 5 August, 2016).

[18] Javadian, M., Shamskooshki, H. & Momeni, M., Application of sustainable urban development in environmental suitability analysis of educational land use by using AHP and GIS in Tehran. Procedia Engineering, (21), pp. 72–80, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.1989

[19] TurkStat (Turkey National Statistical Institue), General Population Datas Report 2015, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do (accessed on 2 February, 2015).

[20] Yu, Y. & Wen, Z., Evaluating China’s urban environmental sustainability with data envelopment analysis. Ecological Economics, 69(9), pp. 1748–1755, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.006

[21] Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM), GIS Raw Land Use Datas, 2015.

[22] Aydemir, Ş., Aydemir, S.E., Beyazlı, D.Ş., Okten, N., Oksüz, A.M., Sancar, C., Ozyaba, M. & Türk, Y.A., Designing and Planning Urban Areas, Akademi Press: Trabzon, ­Turkey, 2004.

[23] Beykoz Municipality, 1/5000 Scale Beykoz Revision Master Plan for the Protection (Stage I) and Report, 2005a.

[24] Beykoz Municipality, 1/5000 Scale Beykoz Master Plan For the Protection of the Adjacent Area (Stage II) and Report, 2005b.

[25] Istanbul Provincial Directorate of Food, Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Agricultural Production 2016 Report, http://istanbul.tarim.gov.tr/ (accessed on 1 May, 2016).

[26] ISKI (Istanbul Water And Sewerage Administration), Water Basin Protection and Control Regulations 2016, http://igemportal.org/Resim/ISKI%20 %C4%B0%C3%A7mesuyu%20Havza%20Y%C3%B6netmeligi.pdf (accessed on 5 October, 2016).

[27] Saaty T.L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), pp. 57–68, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

[28] Saat T.L., Decision Making with Dependence And Feedback The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, USA, 1996.

[29] SCOPUS, Analyze search results for AHP and Urban Planning, https://www.scopus. com/ (accessed on 1 March, 2016).

[30] Topçu, İ., Analytical Hiyerarchy and Network Process, http://web.itu.edu.tr/topcuil/ya/ AHAS.pdf (accessed on 5 December, 2014)

[31] Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill International: New York, NY, USA, 1980.

[32] Malczewski, J., GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1999.

[33] Saaty T.L., Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), pp. 83–98, 2008.

[34] Akbulut A. & Ozcevik O., The ideal of sustainability in planning: A study on consumption factor related to the game theory. AESOP 28th Annual Congress, pp. 1377–1386, Prague, 13–16 July, 2015.