Risk Management of Mergers and Acquisitions with Borrowed Capital in The Energy Sector

Risk Management of Mergers and Acquisitions with Borrowed Capital in The Energy Sector

Galina Chebotareva Pavel Khomenko Mikhael Khodorovsky 

Academic Department of Banking and Investment Management, Ural Federal University, Russia

Page: 
905-916
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N6-905-916
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 August 2018
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Under the conditions of macroeconomic instability and the difficulty of forecasting trends in the market development, a competitive recovery of the electric power business is possible only by attracting large capital investment. Mergers and acquisitions deals that make it possible to concentrate assets and to amalgamate the industry business are done through the leveraged buy-out (lBo) scheme. However, lBo deals are associated not only with the investor’s risks, but also with the risks of the acquirers and vendors. The article presents the authors’ model of risks formalization of lBo deals. it allows for consolidating the blocks of key project and financial indicators, parameters of a specific risk, and macroeconomic and sectoral factors. The developed model yields an indicative assessment of the degree of risk of lBo deals taking into account the industry specifics. A mechanism for determining the position of the creditor in the framework of lBo is proposed as a practical application of this model. The results of the study can be used by the management of energy companies, investors and analysts in making financial decisions.

Keywords: 

energy, Leveraged Buy-Out (LBO), Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) deals, risk management, risks, risks formalization

  References

[1] Mokhov, V. & Stakhanov, K., Modelling the innovation activity of an enterprise. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series Mathematical Modelling, Programming & Computer Software, 9(2), pp. 130–134, 2016.

[2] Domnikov, A., Chebotareva, G. & Domnikova, L., Economic and technological priorities of competitive development of russian systems of energy cogeneration sources. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, WIT Press, 11(4), pp. 610–619, 2016.

[3] Russia M&A review 2015. Analytical Study; KPMG, 2016, available at https://assets. kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/03/ru-en-russian-ma-review-2015.pdf (accessed 10 November 2016).

[4] Monthly M&A Insider. A Mergermarket Report on Global M&A Activity; Mergermarket, 2009, available at http://www.mergermarket.com/PDF/M&A_Insider_Dec_09.pdf (accessed 10 November 2016).

[5] Chebotareva, G. & Domnikov, A., Assessment of competitiveness of power generating companies through a risk based approach: a case study of developing economies. International Journal of Energy Production and Management: The Quest for Sustainable Energy: WIT Press, 1(4), pp. 322–331, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-1-4-322-331

[6] Domnikov, A., Khomenko, P. & Chebotareva, G., A risk-oriented approach to capital management at a power generation company in Russia. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 186, pp. 13–24, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2495/esus140021

[7] Domnikov, A., Chebotareva, G., Khomenko, P. & Khodorovsky, M., Risk-oriented approach to long-term sustainability management for oil and gas companies in the course of implementation of investment projects. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 192, pp. 275–284, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2495/eco150251

[8] Domnikov, A., Chebotareva, G. & Khodorovsky, M., Development of risk management for power generating companies in developing countries. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 193, pp. 859–870, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2495/sdp150721

[9] Domnikov, A., Chebotareva, G. & Khodorovsky, M., Evaluation of investor attractiveness of power-generating companies: special reference to the development risks of the electric power industry. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 190, pp. 199–210, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2495/eq140211

[10] Sorland, B.F. & Rudel, M.G.N., What drives financial distress risk and default rates of leveraged buyout targets? empirical evidence from European transactions. Norwegian School of Economics, 2015.

[11] Lang, M., Cremers, H. & Hentze, R., Rating model for estimating the probability of default in LBO transactions. Frankfurt School – Working Paper Series, 136, 2010.

[12] Eisenthal, Y., Feldhütter, P. & Vig, V., Leveraged buyouts and credit spreads. Columbia Business School, 16, p. 57, 2016.

[13] Groh, A.P., Baule, R. & Gottschalg, O., Measuring idiosyncratic risks in leveraged buyout transactions. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 47(4), pp. 15–23, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965684

[14] Morgunov, V.A., Simulation of the probability of default of investment projects. Corporate Finance, 10(1), pp. 23–45, 2016.

[15] Global oil and gas transactions review 2015. Analytical Study; EY Research, 2016, available at http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Industries/Oil—Gas/EY-global-oil-and-gastransactions-review-2015 (accessed 10 November 2016).