From Resilience to Flexibility: Urban Scenario to Reduce Hazard

From Resilience to Flexibility: Urban Scenario to Reduce Hazard

Roberto De Lotto Veronica Gazzola Cecilia Morelli Di Popolo Elisabetta Maria Venco 

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture – UPLab – University of Pavia.

Page: 
789-799
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N4-789-799
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
1 May 2017
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Population estimates and projections demonstrate that, in the next future, human beings, buildings, economy and society will be exposed to multiple effects (direct and indirect) of phenomena capable of producing temporary and permanent damages on natural environment. The city, as complex system, in case of slow changes, is able to modify its main components and relations (physical and social). During and after unexpected disasters (i.e. floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, terrorist attacks, etc.), its ability to absorb external impacts, to transform and to adapt itself in order to find a new equilibrium status, is particularly stressed and involves the concept of resilience.

To be resilient, town should change unceasingly to adapt to the continuous modification of citizens and environment demands and to find a new balance in different dimensions (flexible city).

The paper aims to give some strategically recommendations that will contribute to reduce disaster risk at urban level. Investigating the future of urbanization and of urban theory, the authors try to rethink the city as a dynamic space that better responds to evolving circumstances and contemporary global challenges: concepts of resilient and flexible cities are involved.

Keywords: 

advanced hazard planning, complex system, flexible city, risk reduction, scenario planning, urban resilience

1. Introduction
2. Resilient City
3. Flexible City
4. Resilience and Flexibility in Vulnerable Environment
5. Urban Strategy of Risk Reduction: Relocation
6. Conclusion
  References

[1] UN (United Nations), World Population Prospects. The 2015 Revision Key Findings and Advance Tables, New York, 2015.

[2] IPCC, Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working group II contribution to the IPCC, fourth assessment report, 2007.

[3] Godschalk, D.R., Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4:3, pp. 136–143, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)

[4] Adger, W.N., Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24:3, pp. 347–364, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465

[5] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.

[6] Kasperson, J.X. & Kasperson, R.E., The Social Contours of Risk: Volume II. Risk Analysis, Corporations and the Globalization of Risk, Earthscan: London Sterling, VA, 2005.

[7] UKCIP, Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making (UKCIP Technical report, edited by Willows and Connel), 2003, available at http://www.ukcip.org.uk/

[8] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), Terminology: basic terms of disaster risk reduction. International strategy for disaster reduction secretariat, Ginevra, 2004, available at http://www.unisdr.org/eng/libterminology-eng%20home.html

[9] Tompkins, E.L. & Amundsen, H., Perceptions of the effectiveness of the united nations framework convention on climate change in prompting behavioral change. Tyndall Centre Working Paper, 92, 2005.

[10] UNISDR, Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: revealing risk, redefining development. Geneva, 2011 available at http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/19846

[11] Rockfeller Foundation, available at https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/our-work/ topics/resilience/

[12] Foster, H.D., The Ozymandias Principles, Southdowne Press: Victoria, B.C., 1997.

[13] Colucci, A., Le città resilienti: approcci e strategie, Jean Monnet Interregional Centre of Excellence, University of Pavia, 2012.

[14] Hopkins, R., The Transition Handbook. From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience, Green Books Ldt: Devon, UK, 2008.

[15] Lewis, M. & Conaty, P., The Resilience Imperative: Cooperative Transitions to a Steady-State Economy, Gabriola Island, BC: New Society, 2012.

[16] Thayer, J., Rider, M. & Lerch, D., Resilient what?: how leading U.S. municipalities are understanding and acting on resilience, Post Carbon Institute, 2013, available at http://www.postcarbon.org/publications/resilient-against-what/

[17] Jha, A.K., Miner, T.W. & Stanton-Geddes, Z. (eds), Building Urban Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice, Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5

[18] World Bank, Cities and Flooding. A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century, Washington, DC: World Bank/IBDR, 2012.

[19] Zimmerman, R., Resiliency, vulnerability, and criticality of human systems. Research theme from the New York University Workshop on Learning from Urban Disasters, 2001.

[20] Geddes, P., Two steps in Civics: cities and town planning exhibition and international congress of cities. Town Planning Review, 4:2, pp. 78–94, 1913.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/tpr.4.2.g0x027743vp43033

[21] Choay, F., “Premessa” in Sitte C., L’arte di costruire la città. L’urbanistica secondo isuoi fondamenti artistici, Jaka Book, Milano, pp. 10, 1981.

[22] Welter, V.M., Biopolis. Patrick Geddes and the City of Life, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2002.

[23] De Lotto, R., Flexibility principles for contemporary cities. In eds. Shiling, Z. & Bugatti, A, Changing Shanghai – from Expo’s after Use to New Green Towns, Officina Edizioni: Roma, pp. 73–78, 2011.

[24] Morelli di Popolo, C., La città flessibile. Le dimensioni della flessibilità nella città contemporanea e futura, PhD Thesis Degree in Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Pavia, 2014.

[25] RIBA – Royal Institute of Building Architecture, and ICE – Institute of Civil Engineering, England. Facing Up to Rising Sea Levels - Retreat? Defend? Attack?

[26] Feireiss, L. & Klanten, R., Utopia forever, Visions of Architecture and Urbanism, Gestalten: Berlin, Germany, 2011.

[27] The Why Factory, available at http://thewhyfactory.com/project/

[28] Mileti, D.S. & Passerini, E., A social explanation of urban relocation after earthquakes. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disaster, 14:1, pp. 97–110, 1996.

[29] Perry, R.W. & Lindell, M.K., Principles for Managing Community Relocation as a Hazard Mitigation Measure. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5:1, pp. 49–49, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.00036

[30] Menoni, S. & Pesaro, G., Is relocation a good answer to prevent risk? Criteria to help decision makers choose candidates for relocation in areas exposed to high hydrogeological hazards. Disaster Prevention and Management, 17:1, pp. 33–53, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09653560810855865

[31] De Lotto, R., Morelli di Popolo, C., Morettini, S. & Venco, E.M., La valutazione di scenari flessibili per la riduzione del rischio naturale. Planum the Journal of Urbanism, 27:2, 2013.

[32] Schoemaker, P.J.H., Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36:2, 1995.