Driving Functions for Urban Sustainability: The Double-Edged Nature of Urban Tourism

Driving Functions for Urban Sustainability: The Double-Edged Nature of Urban Tourism

R. Fistola R.A. La Rocca 

Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, Italy

Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Page: 
425-434
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-425-434
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Our concept of urban sustainability is changing along with our evolving modern society. It is related to a number of factors that have an impact on our current understanding of the concept of an urban system. Referring to a systemic approach to understanding the urban system, we can consider urban sustainability as the opposite of urban entropy, which represents both the “dark side of the urban system” and the negative component of each urban subsystem. Within these subsystems, we can identify some driving functions that play an important role in urban sustainability. Nevertheless, when these functions exceed the threshold of urban load, urban entropy increases exponentially. Starting with the very recent changes in urban entropy (as well as urban sustainability) and by assuming that the negative components of the urban system are connected to urban risks, two types of urban entropies can be defined: endogenous and exogenous. The first relates to internal conditions of urban subsystems which unplanned urban management can generate. The second one relates to external causes: natural and anthropic. Within this framework, tourism can be considered as one of the urban functions affecting the organizational process of an urban system. Tourism depends on internal factors and grows by generating exogenous flows. In many cases, tourism plays a fundamental role in an urban economy and it acts as a strategic factor for urban competitiveness. When tourism exceeds urban capacity, it causes urban malfunctions. In this sense, tourism is one of the most sensitive urban functions regarding the process of entropy. Using the systemic approach as a theoretical reference, this paper states that tourism can act as a driving function able to shift the urban system towards sustainable condition if it is integrated into the process of town planning.

Keywords: 

systemic approach, tourist city, urban entropy, urban tourism

  References

[1] Prigogine, I., Le leggi del caos, Laterza, Bari, 2008.

[2] Chaisson, E.J., Using complexity science to search for unity in natural sciences. In Complexity and the Arrow of Time, eds. C.H. Lineweaver, P.C.W. Davies & M. Ruse, Cambidge University Press, p. 68, 2013.

[3] von Bertalanffy, L., General System Theory, Penguin Books: Harmondsworth, 1972.

[4] Fistola, R., La città come sistema, (Volume II, Chapter 2). Per il XXI secolo una enciclopedia. Città cablata e nuova architettura, eds. C. Beguinot & U. Cardarelli, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” (Di.Pi.S.T.), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (I.Pi.Ge.T.), Napoli, 1992.

[5] Fistola, R., Urban entropy vs sustainability: a new town planning perspective. In The Sustainable City VII., M. Pacetti, G. Passerini, C.A. Brebbia & G. Latini, WIT press, WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, 155, pp. 185–204, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/sc120171

[6] Pearce, D.G., An integrative framework for urban tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(4), pp. 926–946, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00082-7

[7] Ashworth, G.J., Urban tourism: still an imbalance in attention? In Classic Reviews in Tourism, ed. C. Cooper, Clevedon: Channel View, 2003.

[8] Ashworth, G. & Page, S.J., Urban tourism research: recent progress and current paradoxes. Progress in Tourism Management, 2010.

[9] Evans, G., Planning for urban tourism: a critic of borough development plans and tpurism policy in London. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2, pp. 307–326, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-1970200009/10)2:5<307::AID-JTR227>3.0.CO;2-5

[10] Pearce, D.G., Tourism development in Paris: public intervention. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(2), pp. 457–476, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00096-0

[11] van den Berg, L., van der Borg, J.L.J. & van der Meer, J. (eds), Urban Tourism: Performance and Strategies in Eight European Cities, Avebury, Aldershot, 1995.

[12] Law, C.M., Urban tourism and its contribution to economic regeneration. Urban Studies, 29, pp. 599–618, 1992.

[13] Pearce, D.G., Urban management, destination management and urban destination management: a comprarative review with issues and examples from New Zeland. International Journal of Tourism Cities, Emerald, 1(1), pp. 1–17, 2015.

[14] Buhalis, D., Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21, pp. 97–116, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00095-3

[15] La Rocca, R.A., The Role of tourism in planning the smart city. TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 7(3), pp. 269–283, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2814

[16] Hall, M.C., A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19, pp. 437–457, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570346

[17] La Rocca RA From Sustainable City to Smart City. In Papa R. ed (2014) Towards Smart City a Scientific Approach, Aracne Editrice, Roma, ISBN 978-88-548-7024-6.