Climate Change Impacts on Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices

Climate Change Impacts on Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices

Zubayed Rakib Michael Barber Robert Mahler

Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Soil Science Division, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.

Page: 
155-164
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N1-155-164
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
1 February 2017
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Total maximum daily load (TMDL) studies determine the amount of contaminant(s) that can be discharged daily from point (waste load allocation – WLA) and nonpoint (load allocation – LA) sources including a margin of safety (MOS) and then layout the path for achieving these levels by reductions in loadings. This has caused environmental agencies to require best management practices (BMPs) for control of urban stormwater contributions. Design storms for volume-based and peak discharge BMPs are typically determined from historic precipitation and runoff records that do not adequately address the impacts of climate change. We examine a 10-year period of predicted flows in the Spokane River watershed under 2050 climate predictions to determine the amount of additional LA removal required to meet water quality goals. While the current TMDL proposes a 50% reduction of nonpoint loading, our results indicate this will not be adequate. The implication is that urban BMPs are currently inad- equately designed to handle nonpoint pollution in areas projected to experience increased precipitation events. The problem is particularly acute for rain on snow events where BMP performance is already impaired.

Keywords: 

algal blooms, hydrodynamic simulation, nonpoint source pollution, nutrients, total maximum daily loads, waste load allocation, water quality modeling

  References

[1] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Handbook for developing watershed TMDLs. Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC, 2008.

[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National management measures to control nonpoint source pollution from urban areas. EPA-8410B-05-004, Office of Water, Washington, DC, 2005.

[3] Pelletier, G.J., Chapra, S.C. & Hua, T., QUAL2Kw e A framework for modeling water quality in streams and rivers using a genetic algorithm for calibration. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, pp. 419–425, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.002

[4] Turner, D., Pelletier, G. & Kasper, B., Dissolved oxygen and pH modeling of a periphyton dominated, nutrient enriched river. ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(8), pp. 645–652, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:8(645)

[5] Neilson, B.T., Hobson, A.J., Vonstackelberg, N., Shupryt, M. & Ostenmiller, J., Using Qual2K modeling to support nutrient criteria development and wasteload analyses in Utah. Final Project Report. Utah Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Water Quality. Salt Lake City, UT, 2012.

[6] von Stackelberg, N. & Neilson, B., Collaborative approaches to calibration of a riverine water quality model. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(3), pp. 393–405, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000332

[7] Rakib, Z., Barber, M. & Mahler, R., Modeling flow, nutrient and dissolved oxygen concentrations in the Spokane River under multiple year conditions. 8th International conference on Sustainable Water Resources Management, A Coruna, Spain, June 2015.

[8] Cole, T.M. & Wells, S.A., CE-QUAL-W2: a two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, version 3.6. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR, available at: http://www.cee.pdx. edu/w2/ 

[9] Clark, D.L., Kasch, M. & Brattebo, B., Spokane River watershed strategies for point and nonpoint source management to meet the most restrictive TMDL in the nation. Proceeding of the Water Environment Federation, pp. 632–640, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864711802864930

[10] International Stormwater BMP Database, available at: http://www.bmpdatabase.org/ [11] WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual M31-16.04, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, April 2014.

[12] NOAA National Weather Service, Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center, available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/currentpf.htm.

[13] Wong, G., Maraun, D., Vrac, M., Widmann, M., Eden, J. & Kent, T., Stochastic model output statistics for bias correcting and downscaling precipitation including extremes. American Meteorological Society, 27, pp. 6940–6959, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-13-00604.1

[14] Forsee, W.J. & Ahmad, S., Evaluating urban stormwater infrastructure design in response to projected climate change. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16(11), pp. 865–873, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000383

[15] Mohseni, O., Stefan, H.G. & Erickson, T.R., A nonlinear regression model for weekly stream temperatures. Water Resources Research, 34(10), pp. 2685–2692, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98WR01877

[16] Mailhot, A., Duchesne, S., Caya, D. & Talbot, G., Assessment of future change in intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves for Southern Quebec using the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM). Journal of Hydrology, 347(1–2), pp. 197–210, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.019