Going More Private and Sustainable: Ex-Post a Assessment of Armenian Water Utilities

Going More Private and Sustainable: Ex-Post a Assessment of Armenian Water Utilities

N. Harutyunyan

Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Hungary

Page: 
579-589
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V10-N4-579-589
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
31 August 2015
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Recent worldwide changes in water policies emphasize the role of the private sector in the provision of water services with the expectation of market forces to redress public provision failures and introduce innovative approaches for promoting sustainability. Armenia has experienced unprecedented rapid and mass privatiza- tion in the water sector: in a decade from zero reaching 63% of the population, which records the third highest level in Europe. The paper examines the impacts of privatization on sustainability performance of all water utilities. Ex-post benchmarking is employed for assessing relative and absolute sustainability measures and developing scores for utility sustainability ranking. The paper focuses on utility performance in time and scale dimensions and on the international level. The paper shows that transition to the public–private partnerships positively influenced the sustainability performance of all utilities. All utilities have improved their relative to pre-privatization performance. Considerable progress was seen in social followed by environmental performance. Armenian utilities also succeed in performing well internationally. The paper concludes that though water privatization may lead to sustainability of utility performance, the scale of impact may depend on the initial state of the enterprise and the local context. Moreover, after the low-hanging fruits are reached at the first stage, more efforts will be required for enhancing long-term sustainability and effectiveness, consistent with social and environmental needs

Keywords: 

Armenia, benchmarking, ex-post evaluation, infrastructure, privatization, public services, sustain- ability, transition, utility performance, water reforms

  References

[1] Leiberherr, E. & Bernhard, T., The impact of privatization on sustainability transitions: a comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2014 [in press], http://www.eawag.ch/forschung/ess/publikationen/pdf/Lieberherr_truffer.pdf

[2] K’Akumu, O., Sustainability prospects for water utilities privatization in Kenya. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3), pp. 271–280, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.5.3.271/1

[3] Ouyahia, M., Public-Private Partnerships for Funding Municipal Drinking Water Infrastructure: What Are the Challenges? Discussion paper, PRI project, Sustainable Development, 2006, ISBN 0-662-43362-9.

[4] Kirkpatrick, C., Parker, D. & Zhang, Y., State versus private sector provision of water services in Africa: an empirical analysis. The World Bank Economic Review, 20(1), p. 143, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhj001

[5] Hukka, J. & Katko, T., Water Privatization Revisited. Panacea or Pancake? IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre: The Netherlands, 2003.

[6] Ndandiko, C., Public Provision of Private Services in Developing Countries, PhD dissertation, University of Twente: The Netherlands, 2010.

[7] Harutyunyan, N., Alternative partnership models for water governance: a case study in Armenia. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 191, pp. 1609–1620, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/SC141372

[8] Harutyunyan, N., State versus private sector provision of water services in Armenia. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 6, pp. 620–630, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0425-8

[9] Harvey, L., Analytic Quality Glossary, Quality Research International, 2004.

[10] Lin, C., Service quality and prospect for benchmarking: evidence from the Peru water sector. Utility Policy, 13, pp. 230–239, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2005.04.002

[11] Canadian Water and Wastewater Association (CWWA), Water Conservation and Efficiency Performance Measures and Benchmarks within the Municipal Sector, a report to the Ontario Ministry of Environment, 2009.

[12] Storto, C., Benchmarking in the public service industry: the Italian water service management sector. Paper for Conf. on the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2011, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ieem.2011.6118094

[13] Foster, V. et al., Utility reforms (Chapter 3). Analyzing the Distributional Impact of Reforms, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 73–114, 2005.

[14] Berg, C. & Danilenko, A., The IBNET Water Supply and Sanitation Performance Blue Book: The International Benchmarking Network for Water and Sanitation Utilities Databook, World Bank, SKU: 18582, 2010.

[15] Harutyunyan, N., Metering drinking water in Armenia: the process and impacts. Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, 14, pp. 351–358, 2014, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.05.014